Missokyst
Posts: 6041
Joined: 9/9/2006 Status: offline
|
I have no idea if your stated premise is in regards to forums, or ds so I will choose to apply it to everything. Rules are what keeps things in general order. I mean.. I could drive on the left side of the street but that might interfere with someone who chooses to go with the flow of traffic. We have rules for a reason. The rules of the forum attempt to maintain order so that the reset of us may ride down the path we want to travel. For instance I would never visit gor, and am rarely popping in to read the mistress forum. Rules within a DS relationship are what ever the involved parties agree upon. If I as a submissive expected to live within a set of guidelines and my mate one day said "from now on you are to agree to become poly", well, I would have to leave because those rules that we originally agreed upon were invalid. Yu are correct in stating it is wise to move on. BUT, I disagree with the implication you make to do it without discussion. If such a thing happened you better believe I would be speaking up before making my exit. As for your last point, can you clarify? I fail to see what submission has to do with the forum, and I cannot for the life of me understand why breaking an understood framework in a ds relationship would negate submission. I am submissive. That does not change. What does change is WHO I am submissive to at any given time. If my mate for instance decided we were going to become poly, he could not longer count on my being submissive to him. And for the record even though I am submissive I have never colored within the lines. I draw my own life. I follow my own rules of the rules given by the man with whom I share my time. I CHOOSE to abide by the rules of the land within my own framework and sensibility. quote:
ORIGINAL: ChrisKNJ One of my observations, after spending some time on this board and others, is that there seems to be a reliance and adherence to a framework of rules and etiquette. It is my own belief (not shared I assure you) that leaders are more effective at what they do. This includes those aspects of being a Dominant. Soooo, where am I going with this? I don’t know why I am bothered by the concept of “rules” within what is arguably a departure from the “norm”. In this case, norm meaning a vanilla lifestyle. I accept that some of the rules are designed for safety. Some are designed to protect and maintain a modicum of order or structure. My own thought is that if you don’t like somebody’s interpretation or adherence to rules, move along. Does relying on and strictly enforcing a set of rules negate true submission? Especially when that “enforcement” is coming from the submissive side.
< Message edited by Missokyst -- 12/13/2012 12:07:19 PM >
_____________________________
pain is the breaking of the shell that encloses your understanding ~Gibran, Kahlil “The truth is, everyone is going to hurt you. You just got to find the ones worth suffering for.” ― Bob Marley
|