Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate the other.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate the other. Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 11:37:39 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
Well, at least you seem to agree that so many guns contribute to the escalation of violence.

Comparing Mexico and Jamaica to the USA may be a bit of apples-to-oranges as those countries lack the rule of law and regulatory powers of the US, and those countries are also more subject to lawlessness and corruption.

quote:

The problem with so many guns in the USA is that these massacres are becoming a norm. We can expect these rampages to happen with regularity.

Gun control affects crimes of passion and accidents, not premeditation.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


YES

quote:

Pro gun wacko's always spout the same bullshit after one of these horrible things happen. Yet, they are always without any ideas on how to change the status quo and keep things like this from happening.

Nice try. Complete bullshit about Mexico though.

DomYngBlk


And YES.

< Message edited by cloudboy -- 12/15/2012 11:44:06 AM >

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 161
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 11:40:12 AM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

If the killer had not had two semi automatic weapons in that school, would he have killed as many as he did? The answer is no.



Excuse me Tazzy, but... how do you KNOW that?


_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 162
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 11:45:32 AM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline
FR:

Spree Killers in our culture (which is how the killing in CT yesterday would be classified), like to use firearms. It appears to be an important component of how they act out their rage. Although some use melee weapons as well (and Asian spree killers appear to prefer melee weapons), the numbers are overwhelming in both the US and the UK.

Interestingly, some used arson as a secondary weapon, and one used a vehicle.

These stats are based on a list of spree killers I found on wiki.

Spree Killers

I wish I could have found a better list that included type of victim, since these killers often kill a family member or the whole family before going off to take their rage out on complete strangers.

I think a discussion as to why that is, and why firearms are so often used, would be interesting.

_____________________________



(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 163
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 11:49:37 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Personally, I think the rights of innocents trump ANY person's enjoyment of shooting dick extension toys.


Yanno, not all of us are into dick extension. Some of us happen to be into deep concentration, extreme engineering, taming the forces of nature, and all manner of intellectual and emotional things that have precisely squat to do with dick extension. Indeed, calling it that may be seen as licence to make the similarly offensive (and in the same way) statement that what you said amounts to womb extension, to cover everyone in a protective environment where they can't do anything, but also can't be harmed. I hope you realize I'm not actually stating it, just illustrating in what manner your statement offends by analogy.

In my experience, storage is the main issue.

Can we agree availability is a factor?

Storage defines availability.

IWYW,
— Aswad.



I agree, storage is the key.

As for my comment about dick extension. I do agree it is, by itself, as a generalization offensive. But, in comparison to the prevalent gun culture in my little part of the world it is a very good descriptive. Around here, bigger is better. It is a very machismo thing. Even the physical posturing I've seen guys use when showing off their biggest best toy mirrors the physical stance I've seen guys use when showing off their dick.

Around here, many guys don't care about home ownership, paying their bills, hell, many get angry they have to pay child support, but to spend hundreds or thousands even on an assault rifle is 'cool' and brag worthy.

Then, they think because they lock it in a glass fronted, Walmart purchased, gun storage case (glass fronted so they can display it), it is safe.

In addition, most of the houses around here, if the doors are even locked, can still be easily accessed within minutes, literally.

My description is not that of ALL gun owners, or that of all male gun owners, only those I've the most experience with personally.


< Message edited by LaTigresse -- 12/15/2012 11:51:38 AM >


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 164
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 11:56:04 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

We are discussing whether the government is going to restrict the freedom of people who wish to own guns. I need a solid argument in favor of that. The default would be "no".


Amen.

Give me the right argument, and I'll be in favor, but I haven't heard the right argument yet, the one that is solid. I've heard a lot of very interesting conjecture, and I've made some interesting conjectures myself, but that won't suffice to limit freedom, even for a goal that is laudable in itself. The means and the ends both need to be justified.

My organs can save a lot of people. Yet, you can't have them, no matter how many kids they may save, because I'm using them. This comes down to the incommensurability of human lives. Those lives cannot be weighed against my life on a utilitarian basis in any tolerable morality. Swapping mine for those of others is a choice I alone get to make. And here comes the really neat trick:

Freedom is also incommensurable.

Hence, the default "no" you mention.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 165
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 11:58:28 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheGorenSociety

Prohibition banning proved the solution does not work.


Don't be silly.

Prohibition showed that it's not that easy.

Doesn't mean it can't be a tool in the toolbox, just that- like most tools- you have to know how to use it.

No reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater; that's the same simplistic thinking that caused the problems with the prohibition era approach in the first place.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to TheGorenSociety)
Profile   Post #: 166
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 12:01:21 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
You bungled your quotes, cloudboy.

The first line in the quote that appears to be from me, wasn't from me, and certainly not from the post you quoted.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 167
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 12:02:03 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

I don't own a gun. I never have. I have no intention of buying one any time soon.


well,... you do happen to live in a country with gun control.. it would be almost impossible to legally get a handgun there, a rifle, yes, possible if you pass the govt & RCMP checks, training, etc in place & required...

In yesterdays case, he came in with 2 handguns, being able to conceal those gave him much easier access to the building & his victims..

My feeling on guns is to severely restrict ownership of the most dangerous and easily concealed guns..and the less guns out there (imo) means less deaths (both deliberate & accidental).. No, you cant eliminate guns or death by guns entirely since people that are determined to get one (& do someone harm) will try to get one & possibly succeed.. but no reason to make that so dam easy for them (as it is in the US)..

and yes, even if you could snap your fingers and all the guns disappear, if someone is indeed determined to do someone else harm, they will find other ways (knives, drugs, their hands) to do that, but again, those ways likely will not be as easy and/or as potentially final (meaning deadly) or a danger to as many people..

There is the cultural difference also.. which has (imo) a lot to do with the desire to own guns.. there is a lot of paranoia in the US, which is why there are so many gated (& guarded) communities (which are not common in Canada).. I find the whole gun thing in the US scary (cuz anyone here can have one), I never even thought about that when I lived in Canada... I felt safe & not burdened with such thoughts..

JMO

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 168
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 12:03:32 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

I think a discussion as to why that is, and why firearms are so often used, would be interesting.


We had one. Me and Peon got into that a bit.

As I recall, it was pulled.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to ChatteParfaitt)
Profile   Post #: 169
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 12:11:27 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

The first part of my solution to stop mass killings, get rid of the high cap mags. Not the weapon.


Yet they can be modified as you pointed out earlier. And hey are available on the secondary market, as well as through private sales.



True, I did make that point, however, you cannot increase the capacity by much, in some cases it is enough.

And I have been thinking about the currently available ones, and I think I have a solution, a government sponsored buy back program, worked for illegal guns in a few cities, why not high cap mags?

It is not perfect but it is a start.

I repeatedly stated something about the number of dead, and pointed out something many people who have never used one doesn't seem to know or realize.

The shooter had about 8 minutes to kill his victims.

Cho at Virginia tech killed most of his victims in 10 to 15 minutes.

I like to go to shooting competitions. I also watch the Discovery series "Sons of Guns" and have seen the technique demonstrated in person and on tv.

I am going to paint a picture for you to think about.

John Doe has a modern double action large bore revolver, say a 44 magnum.

Now John goes shooting say three times a week, which is about average from what I have read, could be wrong on that, but for the sake of argument, lets say three times a week.

When John first bought his pistol, he thumbed the rounds into the cylinder, a slow and cumbersome process, forget what hollywood does with the process.

John goes to the sporting goods shop and complains about the time it takes to reload. The helpful clerk demonstrates a speed loader.

Over the years John gets faster reloading with the little gimmick, and he buys more speed loaders. He starts to time himself to see how fast and how many rounds he can put on target in a given amount of time. (in the era of police revolvers, this was a common past time among leo's, it was also a life saving ability)

One day John snaps, maybe his wife left him, who knows, the reason is not important.

He loads every speed loader he has, and he has a lot of them, puts on something with a number of baggy pockets, say BDU's like in this case, drives to a local mall and goes on a shooting spree.

now the world record for shooting a revolver is held by Jerry Miculek, 12 shots in 2.99 seconds. That is fire six, reload and fire six.

Our boy is not that fast, say he can fire 12 shots in 10 seconds. In eight minutes he can fire 576 rounds accurately. That is 96b speed loaders worth of ammo. Between 8 large BDU pockets and a fanny pack, it is theoretically possible.

But lets make it a bit harder, he has the bulk of his speed loader in a book bag. That extra encumbrance going for a speed loader adds a few seconds to his reload time. It is not going to be as fast as an automatic, but it is by no means slow either. So now we are looking at a time frame similar to Cho at Virginia Tech.

Average police response time to a crime scene is 12 minutes if there is no unit close, and it can be as high as twenty minutes.

Now John does not kill himself before he runs out of ammo. He has 8 to 12 minutes before the closest police unit arrives, during that time he is doing what he went there to do. First unit arrives and it is a single officer, procedure is to enter the mall and assess the situation. This means he has to find John.

Now he is going to continue killing until the police find him, if the officer enters the section of the mall where he is, no problem, if he enters the point furthermost from John it could take a few minutes as he runs to the gunfire.

Lets just say a total of fifteen minutes, during that time John has fired 360 rounds. If it is crowded when he starts, the death toll could easily be 30 to forty people.

Now put him in a school and figure 12 rounds every 15 seconds, and give him 8 minutes. The death toll may not be as high as with the automatic, but it is going to be high.

I am proficient with the smith and wesson 44 I own, and I pride myself on accurately placing 12 shots in the bullseye in 20 seconds. Of the group of friends I shot with, the slowest is 12 rounds in 28 seconds, the fastest is 12 rounds in 8 seconds. At competitions I have seen men and women faster, but not record breaking speeds, and I have seen some of these shooters get angry at some of the littlest things, and have commented that with that temper they do not need to have firearms.

And these competitions are combat style, meaning they work through an obstacle course selecting targets, disregarding target portraying innocent bystanders.

Combat shooting ranges and courses are common in this country, and all this type of scenario needs is one wannabe super shooter to lose it.

The body count will not be as high as with an automatic but it is going to be significant.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 170
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 12:23:49 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
Then we seem to be in agreement, LaTigresse.

And I wouldn't even have objected to the dick extension comment, if it weren't for you saying it was the only reason to permit such guns, when I personally would like to shoot one because they're masterpieces of engineering and pretty challenging to handle properly. I would also submit that I know a fair number of ladies that enjoy the purring of a Firebird or a Harley, and that this is closely related to the thing that ends up being seen as a dick extension. In many cases, it is dick extension. It's the "always" and "only reason" that I object to, because that tars me with the same brush and dismisses the legitimacy of an interest of mine on grounds that are stereotyping, not factual.

Course, never underestimate the value, utility and legitimacy of having "because we can" as a reason, either.

We put a couple of guys on the moon because we can.

One day, that'll save our whole species.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 171
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 12:49:39 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

Then we seem to be in agreement, LaTigresse.

And I wouldn't even have objected to the dick extension comment, if it weren't for you saying it was the only reason to permit such guns, when I personally would like to shoot one because they're masterpieces of engineering and pretty challenging to handle properly. I would also submit that I know a fair number of ladies that enjoy the purring of a Firebird or a Harley, and that this is closely related to the thing that ends up being seen as a dick extension. In many cases, it is dick extension. It's the "always" and "only reason" that I object to, because that tars me with the same brush and dismisses the legitimacy of an interest of mine on grounds that are stereotyping, not factual.

Course, never underestimate the value, utility and legitimacy of having "because we can" as a reason, either.

We put a couple of guys on the moon because we can.

One day, that'll save our whole species.

IWYW,
— Aswad.



It may be a case of, lost in translation, because to me, it's not a reason to permit them. Rather the opposite in my mind. If a person needs an item, to define their personal identity, it may need to be given more introspection as to why.

And yes, I agree that it's not just a guy thing, and not just a gun thing. In fact, I laughed at a photo that was posted in the 'Train Wreck' thread the other day by Kana, I believe. A picture of a truck with a humorous caption about the size of the dick of the person that owned it. That fit many around here as well.

I do want to add......I've owned handguns in the past. There are two old shotguns in this house. I got rid of the handguns because I had children and didn't want the temptation available and didn't NEEEEEEEEEEEEED the handguns. I very much enjoyed target shooting. It was something I was very good at. For ME, the danger of possessing them was much greater a reality than the danger of needing them, and being able to access them when I needed them. The two old shotguns probably won't even fire, and there is no ammunition in the house if they would. No one in this house, would have any problem, if those old shotguns had to be gone.

As I've said repeatedly....I am not against responsible gun ownership. I simply believe that 'responsible gun ownership' needs to be determined, re-defined, and controlled better.


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 172
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 1:01:49 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

If the killer had not had two semi automatic weapons in that school, would he have killed as many as he did? The answer is no.



Excuse me Tazzy, but... how do you KNOW that?



I broke it down. From the moment he walked in until the police came in - everyone keeps saying 8 minutes, so lets go with that. Wouldnt the ability to shoot multiple rounds be much higher with a semi than with a pistol? Take into consideration reload time as well. One parent who was there said he popped off hundreds of rounds. The exact count wont be known for a while.. and even then it qill be a rough guestimate. But, I can say, it wouldnt have been near as many as with a pistol.

Mathematically, the odds of him killing as many as he did would have been decreased significantly.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 173
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 1:13:23 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

If the killer had not had two semi automatic weapons in that school, would he have killed as many as he did? The answer is no.



Excuse me Tazzy, but... how do you KNOW that?



I broke it down. From the moment he walked in until the police came in - everyone keeps saying 8 minutes, so lets go with that. Wouldnt the ability to shoot multiple rounds be much higher with a semi than with a pistol? Take into consideration reload time as well. One parent who was there said he popped off hundreds of rounds. The exact count wont be known for a while.. and even then it qill be a rough guestimate. But, I can say, it wouldnt have been near as many as with a pistol.

Mathematically, the odds of him killing as many as he did would have been decreased significantly.



I respectfully disagree.

I explained how it could be done with a revolver. I have seen professional shooters demonstrate the technique. And in the era of police revolvers, leo's put out a significant number of rounds from an obsolete gun.

Lets face reality here folks, it can be done, people have the skills to do it, and do it often enough. All it takes is practice.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 174
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 1:25:04 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

True, I did make that point, however, you cannot increase the capacity by much, in some cases it is enough.

And I have been thinking about the currently available ones, and I think I have a solution, a government sponsored buy back program, worked for illegal guns in a few cities, why not high cap mags?


Because those that own them arent in need of the money like those who live in inner cities.

quote:

Cho at Virginia tech killed most of his victims in 10 to 15 minutes.


Seung-Hui Cho shot and killed 32 people and wounded 17 others[1] in two separate attacks, approximately two hours apart, before committing suicide (another 6 people were injured escaping from classroom windows)

Cho used two firearms during the attacks: a .22-caliber Walther P22 semi-automatic handgun and a 9 mm semi-automatic Glock 19 handgun.

he carried several chains, locks, a hammer, a knife, two handguns with nineteen 10 and 15 round magazines, and nearly 400 rounds of ammunition.[



Approximately 10–12 minutes after the second attack began, Cho shot himself in the head

State Police Superintendent William Flaherty told a state panel that police found 203 live rounds in Norris Hall


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Tech_massacre

he took in 400 rounds... and used half... in 15 minutes. How fast can you load a pistol, shoot, then reload to shoot again, that many rounds? What would be the chances of someone being able to rush him in those minutes of him reloading?

See my point?

Just how accurate of shots are these guys that it takes that many rounds to kill? Many of the victims in Virginia had 3 shots each.

Now, this 20 year old would not have had any speed to load and reload. And you spoke of multiple reloaders. Are you saying the mother would have had those? For what purpose?

Lanza wasnt a proficient shooter. He shot one teacher in the foot. His intention, again, was to take out as many as he could with the fastest gun he could get his hands on. What would be the chances of him attempting to do that with a revolver? or Cho?

quote:

Now put him in a school and figure 12 rounds every 15 seconds, and give him 8 minutes. The death toll may not be as high as with the automatic, but it is going to be high.


You are assuming I said it would be low. I did not. I said even one child saved would have been better than none at all.

quote:

I am proficient with the smith and wesson 44 I own, and I pride myself on accurately placing 12 shots in the bullseye in 20 seconds. Of the group of friends I shot with, the slowest is 12 rounds in 28 seconds, the fastest is 12 rounds in 8 seconds. At competitions I have seen men and women faster, but not record breaking speeds, and I have seen some of these shooters get angry at some of the littlest things, and have commented that with that temper they do not need to have firearms.


This school, and Columbine, were not shooters with any level of proficiency.

quote:

I explained how it could be done with a revolver. I have seen professional shooters demonstrate the technique. And in the era of police revolvers, leo's put out a significant number of rounds from an obsolete gun.


Which of these schools were with shooters of a professional level?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 175
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 1:48:31 PM   
TheGorenSociety


Posts: 116
Joined: 2/13/2005
Status: offline
This is just semantics 

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 176
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 2:08:45 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Obviously not if so many are arguing against it because they want to be able to play with their toys at a moments notice.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to TheGorenSociety)
Profile   Post #: 177
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 2:18:26 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
None of those shooter in any of those instances were professional shooters, and they managed a high body count, I agree.

Lanza had to have had some practice at least in reloading. For someone that is not real familiar with a weapon, any weapon, reloading is awkward.

Until we know what size mags he was in possession of, we cant say for certain how many times he reloaded. Agreed?

As for your point about the fact he shot one woman in the foot. That does not prove or disprove his ability. I have missed the target after a fast reload or hit the target in a less than fair area.

It happens. It can happen in combat with even a seasoned trooper, not every shot is a kill. I have seen experts place a round in a bad area of the target, even miss completely on occasion.

Perfect performance does not happen in a biological unit, human or otherwise.

I was a sniper, I took my time to make my shots, and when I qualified, I made expert. I have, in perfect conditions, missed a man sized target at less than 200 yards with a scope. My instructor in sniper school missed a very easy shot during a demonstration.

Charles Whitman, the UT sniper was in a perfect position, was out of range of the local police, so he was not under fire, except by a few civilians that got into the act. He was a former marine who always scored high in his qauls.

For the first 20 minutes he was firing with no return fire, he killed 16 and wounded 31 after being on the tower for 96 minutes.

He had time to aim accurately, coolly squeeze off a round and then acquire a new target. By Marine corp standards, at least by their claim, he failed the standard.

For an expert with little or no distractions, he actually did a poor job for what his goal was.

Lee Harvey Oswald performed better in Dealey Plaza in the JFK assassination, with a low quality bold action rifle and firing at a moving target, one critical hit and one fatal hit.

I am using examples that are not quite the same as Friday, but the point is that even under the best of conditions, you dont always hit what or where you are aiming.

I therefore suggest we reserve judgement on Lanza's ability until all the facts are in.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 178
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 2:22:07 PM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

I think a discussion as to why that is, and why firearms are so often used, would be interesting.


We had one. Me and Peon got into that a bit.

As I recall, it was pulled.

IWYW,
— Aswad.



Well dang. Obviously I missed it. I wish they would put pulled discussions in there own special sub section so a person could read them.

I thought the breakdown of location and choice of weapon in the list I posted was fascinating.





_____________________________



(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 179
RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate... - 12/15/2012 2:22:56 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Obviously not if so many are arguing against it because they want to be able to play with their toys at a moments notice.


And in the history of mass shootings in the US, the majority of shooters were at least nominally proficient in the use of their chosen gun.

I told you what my solution is to the problem, and you pointed out some flaws, but as proven by modern history in the United States, a gun ban on a specific type or types of weapons did not work when it was implemented the first time, so what makes you think it would work now?

Harvard made a study on the Assault weapon ban's effectiveness as did the Justice Department, both came to the same conclusion, the ban had no effect on reducing crime, reducing gun violence, or any thing it was supposed to accomplish.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Gun Control and mass murder, one does not eliminate the other. Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109