TheHeretic
Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007 From: California, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aswad quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic Fair enough, but I'm wondering what the sticking point is. "Little". And the connotative implications of "only", but not its denotative function, of course. IWYW, — Aswad. Ok. Universal healthcare is such a vast issue, though, that I'd categorize kidney dialysis centers, and research on new treatments for any particular disease including cancer, as "only little pieces," too. I saw an article in the last few days (I can't guarantee the accuracy, but it sounds about right) that placed annual US healthcare spending as being a bigger amount than the entire annual GDP of France. These "little," issues, no matter how life and death they might be for the affected and their loved ones, will only matter to some. The "big," issues in the discussion, as I look at at, are those that will impact every individual, regardless of specific conditions. Speed and quality of access. Containment of bureaucracy and institutional bloat. The determination of the end of life protocols that everyone will be subject to. Mental health is a big deal, but placed on that table, it gets dwarfed.
_____________________________
If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced. That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.
|