freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Lets make a deal (12/16/2012 3:15:11 AM)
|
Nice notion jlf. But why abortions? What has that got to do with it? I believe prayers are already allowed in schools. But the notion of forced prayers is just unthinkable for those that are not christians or non-believers. As for "an acknowledgement that the United States is a Christian nation under God" Which god would you foister on everyone?? That is almost as bad as a dictatorship! Personally, if you don't like tazzy's proposal about locking up semi and auto guns, why not just ban then completely like it is in many other countries, including here?? Guns will never ever be eradicated but if Joe Public doesn't have them as a matter of course, gun related crimes will plummet. You want a statistic for that premise? From the BBC news last night - A decade ago, 60% of US citizens legally owned a gun. Today, just under 33% still own a gun. Gun related crimes in the US have, in general, fallen by 40%. The figures speak for themselves. And, if I can remember the quote correctly that was cited on the BBC news last night from a US gun law specialist - "Those that advocate the ownership or carry guns, when faced with a situation that we had on Friday, the chances of having your gun out, loaded, ready and aimed at the shooter at the point they make their entry into the room is even less than the chances of winning the National Lottery. In that event, gun ownership, even if kept loaded and handy, is just as ineffective as not not having a gun and would not have stopped the killer". I think those comments just about wipe out any notion that owning a gun is a necessity. Given that the 2nd was made in the days of the wild west, just over 200 years ago (December 15, 1791), the circumstances for having weapons was vastly different to the living standards of today. The UK was no different is that regard until 1920 when we changed our gun ownership laws. * In 1920, Britain passed a law requiring civilians to obtain a certificate from their district police chief in order to purchase or possess any firearm except a shotgun. To obtain this certificate, the applicant had to pay a fee, and the chief of police had to be "satisfied" that the applicant had "good reason for requiring such a certificate" and did not pose a "danger to the public safety or to the peace." The certificate had to specify the types and quantities of firearms and ammunition that the applicant could purchase and keep. * In 1968, Britain made the 1920 law stricter by requiring civilians to obtain a certificate from their district police chief in order to purchase or possess a shotgun. This law also required that firearm certificates specify the identification numbers ("if known") of all firearms and shotguns owned by the applicant. * In 1997, Britain passed a law requiring civilians to surrender almost all privately owned handguns to the police. More than 162,000 handguns and 1.5 million pounds of ammunition were "compulsorily surrendered" by February 1998. Using "records of firearms held on firearms certificates," police accounted for all but fewer than eight of all legally owned handguns in England, Scotland, and Wales. It is also interesting that when you go to various websites to get statistical data, those showing statistics for gun related crimes are often shown per 100,000 for the US but per million for the UK, and our figures are half that of the US. We did it, despite the general objections - just like in the US. And given the number of horrific incidents we have seen in recent years, I see no reason why the US couldn't follow suit. You talk about freedoms and rights. You want the freedom and right to own guns. I would like my US friends to have the right to walk down the street and not be in fear of being shot at and getting killed. Gangs could be rounded up at regular intervals and all guns and narcotics confiscated. Sure, there will always be illegal guns, in much the same way as there are illegal drugs. But if you weren't allowed to have them in the first place, being caught with a gun would mean instant jail whether you'd used it or not. Just like here, being caught with even the smallest amount of drugs gets you a minimum of 6 months inside.
|
|
|
|