|
DarkSteven -> RE: "It's the Jews are behind the 'War on Christmas'" (12/19/2012 4:15:39 PM)
|
I just read that idiot's (Prelutsky's) article. Some salient points:
How is it, one well might ask, that in a Christian nation this is happening?
Gee, separation of church and state says this ain't a Christian nation. Maybe the Founding Fathers didn't consider us to be a Christian nation, despite them being Christians themselves.
But when the overwhelming majority of a country’s population believe Jesus to be their savior, only a darn fool would deny the obvious.
Translation - majority rules, and the hell with minority opinions. We ain't no melting pot. (An odd opinion from a Jew.)
Assimilation wasn’t a threat to anyone; it was what the Statue of Liberty represented.
Nope, freedom and openness to others was what she represented.
What makes them even more obnoxious is that, by and large, the Jews who are leading the crusade against what is, we should never forget, a national holiday, are secular.
This sentence shows that WND doesn't require writing ability from people who support their theology. Content over form. The author here says it's the Jews' fault and then says they really aren't Jews. They're secular Jews. which is some kind of liberal. Right about here, I'd like to see some backup for his statements - does he have any data to back him up?
They’re the pinheads who pretend that “separation of church and state” appears in the Constitution.
No pretense at all. Per Wikipedia, "The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
Anti-Semitism is no longer a problem in society; it’s been replaced by a rampant anti-Christianity.
Well, damn. I missed the lynchings, and the burnings of Stars of David in Christians' lawns.
For example, much of the hatred spewed towards George W. Bush had far less to do with his policies than it did with his religion.
No, it really DID have to do with him instituting torture, getting us into two hopeless wars, destroying the US economy, and shredding the Bill of Rights. Please note how he was criticized for this, and the hundreds of millions of other Christians living in the US were not. Even though they're Christians too.
As you may have noticed, they haven’t called Barack Obama any bad names even though he’s kept Gitmo open, extended the Patriot Act and even used drones to kill American citizens.
That's okay. The names that the good Christians have called Obama made up for it.
Seriously, he does have a point here, even if it has nothing to do with his main premise of Christian-hating. Good policy is good whether it comes from a friend or foe. Bad policy too.
These Jewish bigots voiced no concern when Bill Clinton or John Kerry made a big production out of showing up at black Baptist churches or posing with Rev. Jesse Jackson because, again, they understand that’s just politics. They only object to politicians attending church for religious reasons.
First off, don't call me a bigot, you SOB. Second, who objects to a politician attending church, or anyone for that matter? You're entitled to your opinions, but not to your own facts.
My fellow Jews, who often have the survival of Israel heading the list of their concerns when it comes to electing a president, only gave 26 percent of their vote to Bush and roughly 30 percent to Mitt Romney, even though they were clearly far friendlier toward Israel than John Kerry or Barack Obama.
WTF does supporting one Christian over another have to do with the alleged anti-Christian bias of Jews? Since by my definition, Romney is not a Christian, wouldn't this show a pro-Christian bias among Jews?
What’s more, unlike Clinton, who had Yasser Arafat sleeping in the Lincoln Bedroom so often even Monica Lewinsky got jealous, Bush saw to it that the Palestinian butcher was persona non grata at the White House. But if you mention George Bush to most secular Jews, their reaction is to spit first and ask questions later.
Logic is lost. Here the author claims that supporting Israel is somehow being a Christian, and supporting it more is more Christian. Therefore, because Bush was more Christian than Clinton because he supported Israel more, supporting Bush less than Clinton must mean that Jews hate Christians. The author needs to accept that Bush was hated by all liberals for good reason, his Christianity didn't matter, and Jews are permitted to dislike people whose policies they dislike, Christian or no.
I'm quitting here. This clown cannot reason, has nothing to support his statements, and is a whacko.
|
|
|
|
