DesideriScuri -> RE: Damn Those Overpaid, Unionized, Public School Teachers!!! (12/28/2012 6:31:10 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: graceadieu quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri spanxalot15, you are barking up the wrong tree with me. In the Toledo area, brand-spanking new teachers are paid around $30k, unless they have a Master's Degree, which gets them a bump of $5k/yr. more. $30k for 9 months isn't really all that bad, and it spares you the expense of summer child care, if you so choose. So, assuming the teacher works 60 hours a week for 40 weeks, which seems pretty much in line with what I've seen, that's.... $12.50/hour, the same as what I used to make in retail as an hourly supervisor, a job which required a high school diploma and a drug test. I suppose at least there's more room for growth? I have an awful lot of appreciation for the service teachers are supposed to provide. And, if we'd actually allow them to concentrate on provision of that service, I wholeheartedly believe that we would see improvements in the system, the education of the children, and our global ranking (which I think isn't as important as many seem to). And, I do think that the teaching profession does offer gain in areas that can't be financially compensated (how many teachers do not enjoy simply teaching?). Talk to a teacher about what they love about teaching and they'll tell you about the look on a child's face as a lesson sinks in and the child finally "gets it." They'll talk about touching a child's life, making some small gesture towards a student that turns a kid's life around. That shit happens, and it's all due to those who choose to teach (remember, none of them didn't get forced into a classroom, nor did they go in no knowing it wasn't going to be easy, nor did they go in without knowing the ballpark pay scale). Were your benefits similar to that of a teacher? My point, which you are failing to grasp, apparently, is that the demands and responsibilities foisted on teachers is too high. Because schools will take care of kids, some parents are shirking their own responsibilities. Toledo Public Schools decided to offer free breakfast for all students, and participation jumped from 25% to 75%. In May of 2012, the board decided to put a levy on the ballot to prevent $40M annual deficits by 2016. That was before the "free for all" breakfast was offered. The levy didn't pass. Now, you have a program that is feeding breakfast to 75% of the student population for free. I guaran-damn-tee not all those students live in homes where the parents can't provide breakfast. But, if the schools are going to do it without increasing my costs, why wouldn't you let them? But, this is just another example of how the schools are doing a great thing, but that thing isn't something they should bear the responsibility to provide. Teachers should be teachers and instructors to the kids. Teachers should not also be required to be the kids' parents. I would support some sort of "punishment" be required to be "paid" (don't like that word since I'm thinking of non-financial consequences) by the parent(s) of children who misbehave, underperform, etc. The first couple times the parent(s) go through the consequences, there may be more of an incentive to be a responsible parent. For those of you that wish to bring up the increase in child abuse, it's a sad reality, but the parent(s) will face far more consequences from those actions, including removal of the child from the home. If a parent is so base that they would stoop to abuse rather than stepping up to the responsibility to actually be the parent, well, the child is going to be in a much better environment for learning after being removed.
|
|
|
|