Hillwilliam
Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl I see a safety risk. No one will attack a home owner they know has a weapon. The same cannot be said about the journalist. Maybe not when he is home but I can definitely see it as greatly increasing the burglary risk when he is away. The excuse of "We're just publishing public records" works both ways. Unfortunately, the journalists were short sighted. It seems that the anti-gun crowd sees gun owners as a bunch of non bathing, knuckle dragging bubbas who have to be periodically reminded to breathe. The reality is that some of us have 150+ IQ scores, advanced degrees and own companies. Piss those people off and it can bite you on the ass. they were short sighted.. and put themselves into the position they find themselves in currently. I dont think either side really thought out their actions. Someone could seriously get hurt as a result of their tit for tat games. If you dont want to see people get hurt, dont start fights. It's really simple. I put a majority of the responsibility on whomever decided to post the map of gun owners. (note, I said a majority) That person's actions led directly to everything that follows. If they don't publish the gun owners map, nothing else happens that has been described here. Irresponsible actions have consequenses. If someone walks up to me and punches me in the face out of the blue, they really have noone to blame but themselves if they end up on the floor with a dislocated kneecap.
_____________________________
Kinkier than a cheap garden hose. Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio. Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.
|