Aylee -> RE: Turnabout is fair play (12/28/2012 8:38:48 PM)
|
I am going to pull a "Tazzy" here. http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?sh=printbill&bn=A09388&term quote:
A. 9388 2 1 (II) A REQUEST FOR THE ENTIRE LIST OF LICENSEES, OR FOR ALL LICENSEES 2 IN A GEOGRAPHIC AREA, SHALL BE DENIED, EXCEPT TO ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT 3 AGENCY OR ANY ENTITY ACTING ON BEHALF OF OR PROVIDING SERVICES TO ANY 4 LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY. 5 FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION, THE TERM "LAW ENFORCEMENT AGEN- 6 CY" SHALL MEAN THE DIVISION OF STATE POLICE, ANY NEW YORK STATE COUNTY 7 SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ANY POLICE DEPARTMENT OF ANY CITY, VILLAGE OR TOWN 8 WITHIN NEW YORK STATE, THE POLICE FORCE OF ANY NEW YORK STATE AUTHORITY 9 OR AGENCY, THE STATE POLICE FORCE OF ANY OTHER STATE, ANY FEDERAL LAW 10 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY AND ANY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE IN NEW YORK STATE. 11 S 2. This act shall take effect immediately. It seems that I may be wrong and they DID break the law. (Well, we know they violated the ruling of Roe v Wade, I meant other than that.) Also: http://www.talkleft.com/story/2012/12/27/0245/1525 I wonder if any of those whose addresses were published are immediate family members of federal officials or employees, and covered by 18 USC Section 119, which prohibits publishing home addresses for intimidation. Or if the internet publication of home addresses of gun owners can be considered cyber stalking, cyber-bullying, harassment or invasion of privacy under state laws?
|
|
|
|