quote:

Sorry, but femdommes do get the worst of the pickings around here. I hate to put down malesubs but ya know....have you seen what's around? It's not too optimistic

quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81

With things said like this...

quote:

Sorry, but femdommes do get the worst of the pickings around here. I hate to put down malesubs but ya know....have you seen what's around? It's not too optimistic

And in another thread on the ask a mistress forum a while ago, a domme claimed 95 percent or so of male subs are bad. Then plenty of others backed her up when I clashed with her. It's amazing how no one ever says it's the woman's fault, she is the one that needs to change when she thinks most males are [insert something bad here]. But when a male claims most women are bad one way or the other, nearly everyone is so quick to say that it is him that needs to change, it is all his fault.

Gotta larf!

No wonder why some males such as myself are bitter.

quote:

Something Nick might want to think about.

quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81

quote:

Something Nick might want to think about.

It's something that only men should worry about lolz

quote:

Sorry, but femdommes do get the worst of the pickings around here. I hate to put down malesubs but ya know....have you seen what's around? It's not too optimistic.

quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81
A point I want to make is that hardly anyone calls these women whiners or cry babies.

quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81

Thanks for making this thread.

A point I want to make is that hardly anyone calls these women whiners or cry babies. Pretty much when a woman complains, there are no ramifications, their social status will never be tarnished. On the other hand when a male complains, he gets told to man up and stop complaining or do something about it. It's all his fault, end of story. His social status in this site will most definitely be tarnished.

quote:

I just looked at the 87,000th Dominant woman's profile I've seen in which the journal, and often the "about me" section, rages on and on about the "fakes and flakes"

Just an hour or so ago in another thread I was going to mention something very similar like this in regards of this argument I was having.

It's amazing how nearly everywhere you look, women left, right, and center in their profiles and journals have these kinds of rants and this is all given a social pass. If men appear negative and ranty in their profiles, they are social outcast.

quote:

ORIGINAL: HarryVanWinkle

I've long believed that one of the most important characteristics of a dominant is self control. If she can't control herself, ride herd at least on her emotions, she's probably dangerous. I just looked at the 87,000th Dominant woman's profile I've seen in which the journal, and often the "about me" section, rages on and on about the "fakes and flakes" who don't bother to read their profiles completely before writing to them and rail on and on about all the other shortcomings of of the vast majority of men who write them. They are especially incensed by wankers.

I realize that dozens of emails a day from Wankers can get pretty frustrating. But, isn't frustration one of those destructive emotions which a Dominant person should be able to keep under control?

As Jesus said, "Wankers you will have with you always." What good does it do to rail on in your profile and journal against men who don't read your profiles and journals before writing their little, jack off notes. You're preaching, or should I say, screeching to the Choir; throwing tantrums at those who won't read your tantrums, thus giving the impression that you are an angry, out of control woman. Meanwhile, the wankers pay no attention to your rants, because they don't read that far.

Ladies, any of you who have been on this site for any length of time knows how many wankers there are here, and know that as you list yourselves as Women, that you're going to draw them like moths to a flame. What use are the angry outbursts which accomplish nothing? Wouldn't it be far better to put something near the end of your profile, saying something like, "For the first word of your email to me, write, 'Rumplestiltskin.'" Or something equally unlikely. Such a system would make it easy for you to separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak, quickly.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

Hi Harry. Good to see you again. I had noticed you post on another thread and had wanted to say it was nice to see you posting, but I didn't want to be off topic when the thread itself didn't interest Me much.

I get what you are driving at about anger and the 'Master yourself before you can Master another' thought process. However, that theory doesn't mean that people never have an emotion or need an outlet for emotions. Mastering oneself doesn't mean that a person never gets angry, frustrated, or sad. Being Dominant doesn't equate to being devoid of emotions or never expressing them. The latter is actually rather unhealthy.

Of course, if all a person demonstrates is anger, that might be an excellent way to know who you would like to avoid.

quote:

ORIGINAL: HarryVanWinkle
Lady Pact. It's nice to see you too. I wasn't talking about the occasional outburst, but of those profiles and journals which are nothing but outburst. Good point about those demonstrations of nothing but anger being an excellent way to know whom to avoid. But can none of those women understand that their constant rants about being contacted by "fakes and flakes" become self fulfilling prophecy? Anybody serious who does try to read through their profiles reacts with "another one of these," and clicks out of it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

If negative is all a person writes about, who could blame anyone for running to the hills? What a terrible first impression!

I have to wonder though, does everything being positive have a similar effect? Does it substantiate the myth that Dominant women don't have the full range of emotions?

quote:

ORIGINAL: HarryVanWinkle
I've long believed that one of the most important characteristics of a dominant is self control. If she can't control herself, ride herd at least on her emotions, she's probably dangerous.... What use are the angry outbursts which accomplish nothing?

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

I have to wonder though, does everything being positive have a similar effect? Does it substantiate the myth that Dominant women don't have the full range of emotions?