Hillwilliam
Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote:
My point is that she was behind 2 locked doors and he still got to her. Wouldn't it be safe to assume that a locked BR door means someone is behind it and a locked bathroom door means the same? Is it likely that she was on the phone with her husband and he couldn't hear her while he was getting thru those locks? How likely is it that he broke into the house after loot but changed his mind and decided he was after HER? Not likely at all. If he wanted her, he wouldnt have gone back to his car to get the crow bar he needed to break into the house, he would have had it with him. Burglars ring or knock.. if someone is home, they try to determine the risk, or make an excuse and leave. In this day and age, no one knows what weapons someone has. Burglars was loot... not people. Sorry taz, this is one of the few times your logic fails. 1. Burglar knocks, no answer. Assumes noone is home. 2. Burglar goes back to car to get a tool. Still assumes noone home. 3. Burglar breaks in. Still assumes noone is home. When he went back to his car, it was under the assumption that noone was home. He encountered the locked bedroom and bathroom doors AFTER he went to the car to get a prying tool. He was either: A: So stupid he didn't know a locked BR door means a person is in there especially when backed up by a locked bathroom door. He was also deaf and didn't hear her voice as she talked to her husband on the phone. But, due to the fact that he opened the door to the crawl space where she was hiding, he must have been looking for her. "Melinda Herman told police she started shooting the man when he opened the door to the crawl space." or B: Realized after he broke in that someone was home and heard a female voice and.........................
_____________________________
Kinkier than a cheap garden hose. Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio. Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.
|