LafayetteLady
Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007 From: Northern New Jersey Status: offline
|
Now of course, there is no such thing as "real" slavery in western culture, so your points are quite moot. Reasonably, when someone is a parent, the child's needs usurp everyone else's. This seems to be the biggest problem you have, as you have openly stated that you do "not have the time" to follow a kid around all day. That is what a parent's job is. I can likely guarantee that every "real" parent (and unlike slavery, that does exist) would tell you that: a) Their child comes first in all things. By the way, if you aren't willing to put your child's needs first, you shouldn't have a child. b) Those same parents who also identify as "slaves" (and since it isn't legal and it only as "real" as the parties involved allow) will tell you that just like they haven't chose someone who would permanently cause harm, they chose a partner who understands how the needs of a child are paramount. Realistically, based on your "traditional" definition, you have also just insulted every person who identifies as "slave" on this site, because none of them meet that definition. Sure, there may be a few who think that their "master" could kill them, sell them or bequeath them without consent, but the reality is that they can't. Further, the "slaves" on these sites chose their masters, which certainly doesn't meet your definition of a "real" slave either. quote:
Slaves aren't parents, because they don't actually have any say whatsoever about issues concerning parenting, beyond what their owner has granted them. They are, in effect, a hired help to whom the owner has contracted out the care of the kids. However, any authority over the kids the owner outsourced to the slave is an illusion, because at any time the owner can revoke the slave's authority privileges and make the slave have no say at all about anything that is to happen to the kids. If the owner cannot revoke the slave's privileges to act as if they have authority over the kids, the owner doesn't actually own the slave, and the slave isn't an actual slave, aside from in name only. So I don't believe that simple by choosing to call yourself a slave (or your partner choosing to call you such) you can't be a parent. And I have no problem whatsoever with people calling themselves whatever the hell they'd like, so long as everybody understands that calling yourself something isn't the same as being something. See? Now based on the above opinion, I think you should consider the same when believing you could be a positive influence in any young person's life. You have no understanding of what being a "real" parent is. And yes, many, many "step" parents do grasp that concept.
|