DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Moonhead It's all just talk then and these stories about Chick-a-Fil donating large sums to obnoxious antigay organisations are just hearsay and nonsense? Chic-Fil-A, or the owner? There is a difference, yanno? And, regardless, who are we to decide what a person can and can not do, donate to, or support? Unless there becomes a Government mandate that everyone has to eat there x/week or something, you have the freedom to choose to eat there or not. Just understand who or what it is you are actually hurting. Who or what is it you're attempting to change, and who or what the brunt of your choice is going to effect. Enough people stop buying at Whole Foods because the owner equated Obamacare to Fascism and the result is going to do what? Could close down Whole Foods. How is that going to change the owner's mind about Obamacare? Or, is this just about shutting him up? Now, if enough people stopped buying Caribbean Sea slugs because the majority of companies there use hormone injections to speed up the slug growth (good Lord, it is sometimes difficult to make up hypothetical BS) in favor of Pacific Ocean sea slugs from the Baja California area (where they don't use hormone injections and have "free-range" sea slug practices), then the consumer would be impacting something definite, and impacting those who are perpetrating the evil.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|