Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 7:53:46 AM   
RacerJim


Posts: 1583
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

LOL

How? You mean you need 21 guns out and ready to shoot at any second? Do tell me how that policy "infringes" on anything? Show me the unconstitutionality of insisting a gun owner properly secures his weapons.




someone breaks through your door and you have to excuse yourself while you find the key to your trigger lock.

You nor anyone singing that tune have ever experienced any thing like this. It oft times happens in fractions of a second.

I supose we could impose a number law that when someone wants to break in or otherwise do you harm that they are required to take a number and wait till you unlock your arms to shoot back and service them.


and what someone needs is not up to you or anyone else to decide is it?

more over the top democracy?





Liberals/progressives don't care about logic, reality and/or the U.S. Constitution.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 8:08:04 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Pennsylvania girl, 5, suspended for threatening to shoot girl with pink toy gun that blows soapy bubbles
A 5-year-old Pennsylvania girl who told another girl she was going to shoot her with a pink Hello Kitty toy gun that blows soapy bubbles has been suspended from kindergarten....
Ficker [the family's lawyer] says Mount Carmel Area School District officials said the girl made the threat on Jan. 10 as she waited for a school bus with friends. A school official overheard the remark and searched the girl's backpack and did not find the Hello Kitty gun, he said.
The next day, the girls involved were 'interrogated' by school officials, Ficker said. By the time the girl was done speaking to administrators about the incident, she was crying, he said. A teacher called out the girl in front of her class and told her police may get involved, he said.

And they say gun owners are nuts.
K.





Ever had soap in your eyes? That shit hurts! Absolutely a terrifying threat!!!


It reminds me of what happen many years ago at a TV station, a guy held the news cast hostage, with a toy gun....and it looked so real. Also remember John Dillinger escaped from jail..

< Message edited by Nosathro -- 1/20/2013 8:09:52 AM >

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 8:11:28 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

someone breaks through your door and you have to excuse yourself while you find the key to your trigger lock.


Who said it had to be trigger locks?

You are assuming many things.

Tell me, what else are you assuming while you dodge my question about constitutionality?



well what would you intend to impose that would fit all conditions and peoples access needs such that it wil not violate their right?


Oh you are a Marshal fan?

Many people lack legal interpretive understanding and frankly read most things regarding constitutional matters incorrectly or even backwards.


quote:

Expressio unius est exclusio alterius ("the express mention of one thing excludes all others")

Items not on the list are assumed not to be covered by the statute. However, sometimes a list in a statute is illustrative, not exclusionary. This is usually indicated by a word such as "includes" or "such as".

The constitution states the extent of government power and that extent is equally as much a limitation as a prohibition would be by proper construction. In other words what ever is not expressly authorized is in fact prohibited.

Though it has been very creatively and imaginatively expanded, thank you fuckwad marshal for ushering in the police state. (pre-revolutionary english laws of the realm)

Now dont get me wrong, at least he admitted that there is no constitutional standing for a police state just before he bulldosed another chunk your rights under.

You see agenda driven judges started that shit. Even though it violates even todays rules of construction.

So in this case the constitution does not authorize it, rather than condemn it. The organic law is often written to exclude everything not included as the limitation, unlike statutes which incidentally all statutes in the final analysis violates someones rights with a one shoe fits all "regulation". Regardless if they are beneficial.

Welcome to the wonderful colorful world of law.


oh and statutes btw by proper construction standards are required to stipulate by positive coding and they must be properly enacted to be "legitimately" enforceable.

Shockingly many of the statutes in both states and feds have never been properly enacted. irs

Of course when you take your case to court when you feel your rights have been violated and if you are going up against a statute I assure you they have been, its too bad so sad because you get screwed and never thought to lok into because you believe its the only way it can possibly be and way it was intended to be.





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 1/20/2013 8:38:12 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 8:15:07 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
Well here is a good example of the 2nd Amendment at work..

http://news.msn.com/us/5-hurt-in-accidental-shootings-at-3-us-gun-shows

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 8:26:28 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
that is non sequitur reasonaing

like saying look what drivers licenses did
http://www.edgarsnyder.com/car-accident/cell-phone/cell-phone-statistics.html

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 8:30:42 AM   
leonine


Posts: 409
Joined: 11/3/2009
From: [email protected]
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


Pennsylvania girl, 5, suspended for threatening to shoot girl with pink toy gun that blows soapy bubbles

A 5-year-old Pennsylvania girl who told another girl she was going to shoot her with a pink Hello Kitty toy gun that blows soapy bubbles has been suspended from kindergarten....





Last year when I was going thru airport security, the official pulled over a Hello Kitty backpack for a hand search. He explained to the parents of the pink-dressed little owner that it was a routine random search, her number had come up and that was the rules. I couldn't resist making his embarrassment complete by commenting "Oh no, a pink terrorist! The worst kind!"

Glad to see the authorities are still on the watch for those little pink terrorists.

_____________________________

Leo9


Gonna pack in my hand, pick up on a piece of land and build myself a cabin in the woods.
It's there I'm gonna stay, until there comes a day when this old world starts a-changing for the good.
- James Taylor

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 8:39:39 AM   
MasterG2kTR


Posts: 6677
Joined: 8/7/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline
We have schools to educate our children, not just to make them book smart but also socially adept. The schools are definitely failing in that respect. Perhaps it's time to educate the schools in the arena of COMMON SENSE!!!

(in reply to leonine)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 8:45:22 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
This has nothing to do with how secure a gun is in the home and everything to do with the rampant paranoia of and over reaction of people in the educations system.

Last year, before an ill advised move to North Carolina, my grandson was asked about his family and what he enjoys doing with them.

At the time, my son would come out to the house and the two of us, with my grandson would go to the range. Not once did I allow my grandson to handle a weapon, ammo or anything remotely connected to a fire arm. He would sit in the lane observation chair in with ear protection and watch his father and I shoot.

That's what he enjoyed doing with pop-pop and his dad.

the school teacher called child services.

They talked to us, the range owner, the range safety person, and after a month, found the report groundless.

He and his mom has moved back to texas, and he is constantly asking me to take him to the range, but after the bullshit with the school and cs, his mom does not want me to take him, cant say that I blame her.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to leonine)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 8:49:36 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
here wrap your head around this one:

quote:



Patrick Henry, June 4, 1788

I have the highest veneration for those gentlemen; but, sir, give me leave to demand, What right had they to say, We, the people? My political curiosity, exclusive of my anxious solicitude for the public welfare, leads me to ask, Who authorized them to speak the language of, We, the people, instead of, We, the states? States are the characteristics and the soul of a confederation. If the states be not the agents of this compact, it must be one great, consolidated, national government, of the people of all the states. I have the highest respect for those gentlemen who formed the Convention, and, were some of them not here, I would express some testimonial of esteem for them. America had, on a former occasion, put the utmost confidence in them--a confidence which was well placed; and I am sure, sir, I would give up any thing to them; I would cheerfully confide in them as my representatives. But, sir, on this great occasion, I would demand the cause of their conduct. Even from that illustrious man who saved us by his valor [George Washington], I would have a reason for his conduct: that liberty which he has given us by his valor, tells me to ask this reason; and sure I am, were he here, he would give us that reason. But there are other gentlemen here, who can give us this information.
The people gave them no power to use their name. That they exceeded their power is perfectly clear. It is not mere curiosity that actuates me: I wish to hear the real, actual, existing danger, which should lead us to take those steps, so dangerous in my conception. Disorders have arisen in other parts of America; but here, sir, no dangers, no insurrection or tumult have happened; every thing has been calm and tranquil. But, notwithstanding this, we are wandering on the great ocean of human affairs. I see no landmark to guide us. We are running we know not whither. Difference of opinion has gone to a degree of inflammatory resentment in different parts of the country, which has been occasioned by this perilous innovation. The federal Convention ought to have amended the old system; for this purpose they were solely delegated; the object of their mission extended to no other consideration.





That should raise a few eyebrows!

they wrote the constitution to make it possible for them to forcibly collect taxes from a broke government.

these are all corporations and companys yes "the united states", when they do not pay their bills there is no requirement to publish private trust agreements between sovereigns.

any idea how important that little bit of fraud is? They reorganized! Like any other going into bankruptcy!

its why everything is red!



if you think there is try to sue for a mortgage that the original note was sold to a private trust. (voiding and making collection from you unenforceable in law, not that the courts give a fuck), It very nearly vanishes and only a series 7 can get it for you in a forensic audit.

see:
"Who authorized them to speak the language of, We, the people, instead of, We, the states?"

Patrick Henry understands the distinction that have long been ignored and or omitted not to the benefit of the "common people" though some People did benefit greatly.



anyway I digress.

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 1/20/2013 9:12:08 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 10:13:13 AM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
Zero tolerance policies and overreactions are the bastard offspring of 'political bandaids', and 'won't someone think of the children hysteria', and their greatest impact has been to ensure that no sensible solutions will ever be reached. And 'Educators' (as in policy makers) has become synonymous with such foolishness.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


Tazzy, it goes further than the "no tolerance" policies. These educators (and I use that word with reservation) use NO common sense. A two to three minute conversation with the little girl could have cleared this up. I am sure that she would have been overjoyed to tell all about her new toy bubble gun. The way THIS was handled, I am not so certain that the little girl's due process rights were not violated with the amount of time that she was interrogated and the fact that there was NO parent present. Pointing a chicken nugget, using your finger to make a gun to play cops and robbers, and drawing comic book pictures at school are NOT the signs of a kid going off the deep end.

These educators using the defense of, "it is the policy," and "I was only following orders," are using the same defenses that did not work at Nuremberg and should NOT work in these cases either. As Mr. Reynolds comments, "Tar and Feathers."




_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 10:48:20 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

Zero tolerance policies and overreactions are the bastard offspring of 'political bandaids', and 'won't someone think of the children hysteria', and their greatest impact has been to ensure that no sensible solutions will ever be reached. And 'Educators' (as in policy makers) has become synonymous with such foolishness.



and that goes for everything and ANYthing "political"!

and the more people scream for and or allow legislation the more ones personal rights get thrown into the political arena for someone else to choose what right you should or should not have and it will always be bastardized because what party wants to give up the funds, power and spotlight?

Some politicians will say anything for the single reason that it CREATES CONTROVERSY!

and controversy creates notoriety and the system is so fucked up that people will overlook what they said last year and elect them this year as they wiggle and change their position to tell the majority what they want to hear. How fucked up is that?

The statist democratic approach will always fuck over 49% of the people so 51% can have it there way of course who makes out on in spades that deal? Government! Not you. you get crumbs!






arguing over the mountain of shit they have and continue create becomes such a gigantic waste of time the average person simply says fuck it and often does not vote because voting for the lessor of 2 evils is still voting for evil.





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 1/20/2013 10:51:53 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 11:03:04 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterG2kTR

We have schools to educate our children, not just to make them book smart but also socially adept. The schools are definitely failing in that respect. Perhaps it's time to educate the schools in the arena of COMMON SENSE!!!


The schools are only there to deal with the "book smart" bit. Making the kids "socially adept" is the parents' lookout. If they aren't up to teaching their kids that, then they aren't competent to be raising children in the first place.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to MasterG2kTR)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 11:10:13 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterG2kTR

We have schools to educate our children, not just to make them book smart but also socially adept. The schools are definitely failing in that respect. Perhaps it's time to educate the schools in the arena of COMMON SENSE!!!


The schools are only there to deal with the "book smart" bit. Making the kids "socially adept" is the parents' lookout. If they aren't up to teaching their kids that, then they aren't competent to be raising children in the first place.


Really? Then why do we hear so much about homeschooled kids not get the needed "socialization"?


_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 12:32:40 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
My son was well socialized... between karate, boy scouts, music lessons, soccer, basketball.... I needed less socialization.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 12:39:32 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
R0, you are avoiding the issue.

Is it true, or not true, that a state cannot pass a law that conflicts with federal law?

And, since there is not a conflict with federal law, the states can pass gun control laws?

So, I am still waiting to see your argument on the unconstitutionality.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 1:18:47 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterG2kTR

We have schools to educate our children, not just to make them book smart but also socially adept. The schools are definitely failing in that respect. Perhaps it's time to educate the schools in the arena of COMMON SENSE!!!


The schools are only there to deal with the "book smart" bit. Making the kids "socially adept" is the parents' lookout. If they aren't up to teaching their kids that, then they aren't competent to be raising children in the first place.


Really? Then why do we hear so much about homeschooled kids not get the needed "socialization"?


Because the parents aren't competent to raise kids. Obviously.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 1:19:47 PM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

And, since there is not a conflict with federal law, the states can pass gun control laws?

So, I am still waiting to see your argument on the unconstitutionality.


The argument would be that state gun control laws violate the individual's federal right via the 14th amendment. One cannot be denied what the Federal allows. The state whispers in one ear NO while the Federal whispers YES.

The 14th amendment was a wet blanket thrown over the states, in essence federalizing them.

It's Animal House, in a way.

Larry's evil conscience: Fuck her. Fuck her brains out. Suck her tits, squeeze her buns. You know she wants it.
Larry's good conscience: For shame! Lawrence, I'm surprised at you!
Larry's evil conscience: Aw, don't listen to that jack-off. Look at those gazongas. You'll never get a better chance.
Larry's good conscience: If you lay one finger on that poor sweet helpless girl, you'll despise yourself forever... I'm proud of you, Lawrence.
Larry's evil conscience: You homo.


_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 1:26:37 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
The functional answer?
They can pass anything they want.
They can make a "regulation" via "statute" that anyone wearing pink shoes will be arrested fined and thrown in jail on sight for a year if they wanted to.

But will it make it through the courts? That is their ONLY concern.

Dont you wish you could do things where it didnt really matter if it was right or wrong and the costs in either direction always come back to you because dumb ass tax payers have to foot their own legal fees? and who is going to risk the 50 grand on any chance they could be ruled against and if you go up against the gov the chances of winning are slim unless its embarrassing obvious until it gets to the state supreme court, especially if its a muni case in wisconsin!

Then when they want to pass it bad enough they have some corrupt judge like in kelo, and the mayor v baltimore tip the scale with sometimes seemingly insignificant ruling and often these rulings are VERY carefully worded so it can be interpreted both ways or at least more than one way. The obvious way is typically in favor of the state.

Someone else hit a bullseye on the problems with law in this country.

In theory they cannot pass any law that is in conflict with either the state or the federal constitution(s).

In so far as federal law meaning federal code is concerned yes they can.

They have an arsenal of attorneys on staff known as legislative attorneys that the legislature drops their idea on their desk to find out how they can jam something through the courts, (their words), and dont kid yourself some of the staff that I have talked with have even more problems with the system than I do.

Of course when they do that they run the numbers to see if it is profitable and of course the people one by one and case by case simply do not have the resources to take every bullshit statute and reg to the supreme court so in wisconsin we have literally thousands of bullshit codes that are both obsolete and many unconstitutional being enforced because they have never been challenged!
and after its on the books for 20 years its cast in concrete.
Great for state profit margins though!

Does that sufficienty answer your question?

Now one for you.
If you hold the franchise office of citizen of some state or of the united states, then if you have a beef with some statute why are you not provided with legal services as any other employee of the government?



< Message edited by Real0ne -- 1/20/2013 1:33:03 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 1:42:39 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

The argument would be that state gun control laws violate the individual's federal right via the 14th amendment. One cannot be denied what the Federal allows. The state whispers in one ear NO while the Federal whispers YES.

The 14th amendment was a wet blanket thrown over the states, in essence federalizing them.


And yet the Constitutional interpretation of the SC doesnt agree with you. As long as no state denies you all guns, they arent in violation.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat - 1/20/2013 1:45:13 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Does that sufficienty answer your question?


Nope.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: School Acts on Terrorist Threat Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109