RE: suggested addition to FAQ

RE: suggested addition to FAQ (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

LadyPact -> RE: suggested addition to FAQ (1/30/2013 3:46:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: wannapleez So as I noted earlier, it appears that the exchange containing the alleged offense was removed. 1. If I'm wrong, would someone please tell me what post number it starts with? It's on another thread. I would, however, really enjoy it if you would read something else instead. http://www.collarchat.com/m_4366316/tm.htm quote: 2. Would I be correct in assuming that only a moderator would have the ability to remove posts like that? Yes, that would be right. Individual users do not have the power to removed posts. Editing ability can be done by the poster of a comment for a limited time. A mod can edit a post, but as a general rule, that is only done for such things like removing alternative contact information or to take out a pic within a post that is too large and distorts the field. When a Moderator does that, it does show which Mod has done the edit. quote: 3. Assuming yes for #2, is it SOP for a moderator to remove something that might be offensive, depending on how it is interpreted? I've got no problem with that, though it does seem like an aberration. It seems that most of the time, the other posters (rightly or wrongly) sufficiently chastise the alleged offender. I hesitate to answer this because I'm sure Mods have various standards that they have to meet. Some stuff is pretty obvious and I'm sure others are interpretation. quote: 4. Assuming yes for #2, is it also SOP for the allegedly offending post to be removed with no alerting of the offender so that s/he can correct the issue (if needed), apologize (if needed), and avoid similar action in the future? This seems counter-intuitive if the goal is to achieve a better community (however you wish to define "better"). Have you happened to see other posters refer to gold mail? That's a moderator contacting a poster about having to remove a post, what the reason was, and a polite way of saying don't do it again. Anytime you get gold mail, you can ask what the content was of the post that was pulled.

TheLilSquaw -> RE: suggested addition to FAQ (1/30/2013 3:51:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: wannapleez Do you still see it as snarky and assholish, in light of what you know now? Yes, I still see that part of your post as snarky and assholish. For all the reasons I stated above. Your intent doesn't matter or change how it was perceived by me. quote: Did you perhaps make a typo on that number? Post 10 occured back on 1/21. This was more recent than that. Nope, it's post 10 (or 11) depending on which post number goes to that post the one on top or the one below it. Lol Perhaps you are looking in the wrong thread.

wannapleez -> RE: suggested addition to FAQ (1/30/2013 3:52:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact It's on another thread. I would, however, really enjoy it if you would read something else instead. http://www.collarchat.com/m_4366316/tm.htm Thanks for the clarification, the link to that other post that MariaB wrote, and the answers to my other questions. Now off to figure out which "another thread" it is.

wannapleez -> RE: suggested addition to FAQ (1/30/2013 3:54:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw Perhaps you are looking in the wrong thread. Yes, see my edit to the post you just replied to. I thought it was in this thread.

TheLilSquaw -> RE: suggested addition to FAQ (1/30/2013 3:56:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: wannapleez Now off to figure out which "another thread" it is. Playing with switches.

LadyPact -> RE: suggested addition to FAQ (1/30/2013 3:56:18 PM)
LilSquaw, the number of the post is in the bottom right corner, like this: http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4367628 That means your post was #142.

TheLilSquaw -> RE: suggested addition to FAQ (1/30/2013 3:57:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact LilSquaw, the number of the post is in the bottom right corner, like this: http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4367628 That means your post was #142. Lol Thanks. That is what I thought.

LadyPact -> RE: suggested addition to FAQ (1/30/2013 4:37:26 PM)
You are both welcome. I'm a computer twit about most stuff but I help where I can.

TheLilSquaw -> RE: suggested addition to FAQ (1/30/2013 4:48:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact You are both welcome. I'm a computer twit about most stuff but I help where I can. Ya would think after all my time here I would have known but truth is I never paid it much attention. Lol

wannapleez -> RE: suggested addition to FAQ (1/30/2013 5:18:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact LilSquaw, the number of the post is in the bottom right corner, like this: http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4367628 That means your post was #142. Another tip that I use -- and i don't know if this is the intention, but it works -- is that little green arrow pointing up right next to the post number. Then I don't have to remember if the number is at the bottom right or top right.

wannapleez -> RE: suggested addition to FAQ (1/31/2013 9:15:37 AM)
If I'm gonna gripe when things are done wrong, it is only fair that I acknowledge when things are done right (at least by my definitions of "wrong" and "right"). In this thread, the OP asks what TeamViewer is and how it's used in BDSM. The answer to the first half of the question is very simple to achieve -- it's the very first hit on a g00gle search -- in fact, the first three pages (and maybe more) of hits all point to the same thing or discussion thereof. Obviously, the OP didn't do the simplest due diligence -- the importance of which has been emphasized here -- and yet he wasn't berated at all for this. Kudos all around.

Page: << < prev 4 5 6 7 [8]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625