Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: immigration reform during a job shortage


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: immigration reform during a job shortage Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/30/2013 4:35:35 PM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline
It should be obvious from the discussion on this thread that the so-called "immigration problem" cannot be solved without also looking at many other things, including, but not limited to: wages, education, cost of education, etc.

We would have far fewer illegal immigrants if employers didn't benefit so much. Large scale farming, restaurants, gardening/lawn services, domestic labor, contracting (for home renovation) are all businesses that I know, for a fact, hire illegals. These are just the businesses of which I am aware. I am sure there are many, many more.

One also has to ask oneself why Americans feel that some of this work is beneath them. The only way to improve wages in some of these sectors is to have more Americans working in them. As long as we allow the employers to rely on illegals, it gives the employers leverage they should NOT have.

in addition, the huge student loans that most people need to take out in order to attend college also needs to be looked at. Part of the reason Americans prefer not to take low paying jobs is their debt load. This could be alleviated quite a bit if we moved more towards a system like they have in some European countries where higher education is highly subsidized by the government. If a young person didn't have a ton of debt, maybe they could envision working at a lower paying job for at least a short period of time, until something better comes along.

I also strongly feel that one reason Americans have such a tough time with farm and domestic labor is because, in huge parts of this country, this was work that was historically done by mostly black slaves. And somehow, I think Americans (particularly white Americans) truly feel this type of work is beneath them (even if wages were higher). There is a massive mind shift that needs to occur where all work, including the work of stay-at-home mothers, is valued. All labor, blue or white collar, professional or service, needs to be respected and valued. We are a dysfunctional society in that regard. Working in retail selling people things they don't even need is considered "better" work than manual labor. How did we get to this point? And what does it say about us as a culture? Sadly, nothing positive.

_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to defiantbadgirl)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/30/2013 4:38:46 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
I also strongly feel that one reason Americans have such a tough time with farm and domestic labor is because, in huge parts of this country, this was work that was historically done by mostly black slaves. And somehow, I think Americans (particularly white Americans) truly feel this type of work is beneath them (even if wages were higher).


Wow. Really? It'd never occurred to me that this might be a factor in this day and age. I'd be really intrigued to see evidence for this. (That last wasn't meant to convey a sarky tone, btw.)

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/30/2013 4:45:27 PM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88


Have you not seen the housing and construction on the rise? Unemployment falling? Stock market up? There are jobs if you want them and will do them, we are definitely seeing signs of a positive change in New England.


Things are getting a bit better here in Colorado as well.

Back to the original premise of the thread: DBG, you seem to have the idea that enforcing existing laws will make it easier for US citizens to get jobs (I can't call us Americans because Mexicans are Americans too!). I'm not sure how that would work. The existing laws are not proving much of a deterrent.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to Aynne88)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/30/2013 5:14:40 PM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
I also strongly feel that one reason Americans have such a tough time with farm and domestic labor is because, in huge parts of this country, this was work that was historically done by mostly black slaves. And somehow, I think Americans (particularly white Americans) truly feel this type of work is beneath them (even if wages were higher).


Wow. Really? It'd never occurred to me that this might be a factor in this day and age. I'd be really intrigued to see evidence for this. (That last wasn't meant to convey a sarky tone, btw.)


In many European countries (that also had slavery but they abolished slavery much sooner), people actually take pride in manual labor and work in the service industry (France comes to mind). I have never in my life (I am American born and raised, but have traveled extensively and lived in other countries for work) seen any place that comes even close to America in the disdain that it holds for blue collar labor, particularly farm and domestic labor.

The slave thesis is just a hypothesis. It could be other things, too. But I've never encountered a society so hostile towards honest labor of certain types. Just plain sad. And when I think about what distinguishes farm and domestic labor, it is difficult not to see the connection to slavery. And I don't think that's a coincidence.

I think it is the death knell for a society that claims to be a democracy and without a rigid class system, to be this disdainful of certain types of labor. Just wrong. All labor needs to be valued.

_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/30/2013 6:01:47 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
I also strongly feel that one reason Americans have such a tough time with farm and domestic labor is because, in huge parts of this country, this was work that was historically done by mostly black slaves. And somehow, I think Americans (particularly white Americans) truly feel this type of work is beneath them (even if wages were higher).

Wow. Really? It'd never occurred to me that this might be a factor in this day and age. I'd be really intrigued to see evidence for this. (That last wasn't meant to convey a sarky tone, btw.)

In many European countries (that also had slavery but they abolished slavery much sooner), people actually take pride in manual labor and work in the service industry (France comes to mind). I have never in my life (I am American born and raised, but have traveled extensively and lived in other countries for work) seen any place that comes even close to America in the disdain that it holds for blue collar labor, particularly farm and domestic labor.
The slave thesis is just a hypothesis. It could be other things, too. But I've never encountered a society so hostile towards honest labor of certain types. Just plain sad. And when I think about what distinguishes farm and domestic labor, it is difficult not to see the connection to slavery. And I don't think that's a coincidence.
I think it is the death knell for a society that claims to be a democracy and without a rigid class system, to be this disdainful of certain types of labor. Just wrong. All labor needs to be valued.


One problem for this, though, would be all the migrant farmers in the northern areas, where slavery wasn't as common. And, what does it mean if people didn't immigrate until after slavery was abolished?

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/30/2013 6:04:03 PM   
defiantbadgirl


Posts: 2988
Joined: 11/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fellow

quote:

What happened to JOBS JOBS JOBS? Why does the government want to give illegals a path to citizenship right now during a job shortage? American citizens should come first and there's too much competition for jobs as it is. Why make it worse?


Are you assuming your government works for American citizens at large? It is wrong assumption, facts tell quite a different story. The government is not stupid, it is always useful to ask a question: who benefits?


FOR THE PEOPLE BY THE PEOPLE. The American people vote politicians in. Their wages are paid by American taxpayers. The American people are their employers.

_____________________________


Only in the United States is the health of the people secondary to making money. If this is what "capitalism" is about, I'll take socialism any day of the week.


Collared by MartinSpankalot May 13 2008

(in reply to Fellow)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/31/2013 12:38:29 AM   
Fellow


Posts: 1486
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

FOR THE PEOPLE BY THE PEOPLE. The American people vote politicians in. Their wages are paid by American taxpayers. The American people are their employers.


Illusions, illusions. The useful idiots vote politicians in. Their wages are taken from American taxpayers. The American people are their human resources (otherwise known as serfs).

(in reply to defiantbadgirl)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/31/2013 12:59:14 AM   
vegasgunguy


Posts: 2
Joined: 4/19/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
I also strongly feel that one reason Americans have such a tough time with farm and domestic labor is because, in huge parts of this country, this was work that was historically done by mostly black slaves. And somehow, I think Americans (particularly white Americans) truly feel this type of work is beneath them (even if wages were higher).


Wow. Really? It'd never occurred to me that this might be a factor in this day and age. I'd be really intrigued to see evidence for this. (That last wasn't meant to convey a sarky tone, btw.)


In many European countries (that also had slavery but they abolished slavery much sooner), people actually take pride in manual labor and work in the service industry (France comes to mind). I have never in my life (I am American born and raised, but have traveled extensively and lived in other countries for work) seen any place that comes even close to America in the disdain that it holds for blue collar labor, particularly farm and domestic labor.



Americans love to work, as long as they can get ahead, and dont have 60 cents on ever dollar they make taked away from them..

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/31/2013 3:01:53 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
I also strongly feel that one reason Americans have such a tough time with farm and domestic labor is because, in huge parts of this country, this was work that was historically done by mostly black slaves. And somehow, I think Americans (particularly white Americans) truly feel this type of work is beneath them (even if wages were higher).


Wow. Really? It'd never occurred to me that this might be a factor in this day and age. I'd be really intrigued to see evidence for this. (That last wasn't meant to convey a sarky tone, btw.)


In many European countries (that also had slavery but they abolished slavery much sooner), people actually take pride in manual labor and work in the service industry (France comes to mind). I have never in my life (I am American born and raised, but have traveled extensively and lived in other countries for work) seen any place that comes even close to America in the disdain that it holds for blue collar labor, particularly farm and domestic labor.

The slave thesis is just a hypothesis. It could be other things, too. But I've never encountered a society so hostile towards honest labor of certain types. Just plain sad. And when I think about what distinguishes farm and domestic labor, it is difficult not to see the connection to slavery. And I don't think that's a coincidence.

I think it is the death knell for a society that claims to be a democracy and without a rigid class system, to be this disdainful of certain types of labor. Just wrong. All labor needs to be valued.


I'm not sure that some Americans' disdain for blue collar or farm work has much to do with slavery (although I could be wrong). It may be more of a generational thing. All four of my grandparents grew up on farms, and they were mainly family farms where everyone in the family worked it with little or no outside help. None of them looked down on anyone who did manual labor. In fact, I've known some people from that generation whose parents would punish them if they said anything disparaging about working people.

I think that American attitudes on this probably changed after World War II, in the 1950s and 60s when times were much better, wealth was abundant, and opportunities were everywhere. More and more people were going to college and getting white collar jobs. TV and movies were showing people how glamorous and sophisticated city life was, while people living in rural areas were called "bumpkins," "rednecks," "hillbillies," "trash," etc. I think that this attitude reached a crescendo by the 1980s, during the time of Reagan, unbridled capitalism, with so many people entranced and dazzled by the "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous." Those who don't make it and those who might work low-wage jobs are commonly referred to as "losers" in our society.

The attitude might be summed up with Henry Hill's line from the movie Goodfellas: "For us to live any other way was nuts. Uh, to us, those goody-good people who worked shitty jobs for bum paychecks and took the subway to work every day, and worried about their bills, were dead. I mean they were suckers. They had no balls. If we wanted something we just took it. If anyone complained twice they got hit so bad, believe me, they never complained again."

Perhaps slavery might have had an indirect connection to the attitudes you're describing, but I think the influence is probably more recent than that.




(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/31/2013 6:05:35 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
What I am telling you that inflation in and of itself isn't inherently evil. You live in the past where economists think that it is. It is one way to help push the economy ahead.

We've tried this value based approach where the lowest price wins the day. Guess what. Doesn't work. Drives jobs out of the country and into the lowest wage regions of the world. If you really want to lose lets keep chasing that. There is no way we can win that battle.

We need to grow up and realize all of the other successful economies around the world are managed. We'd do well to begin managing ours. The rich won't like it but tough shit. Something as simple as North American Content requirements would help the whole region out. The Auto industry can attest to that. Lastly, we need Economic Patriots in our businesses that care as much about their country as the size of their portfolio.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/31/2013 6:10:18 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Yeah radical thinking. Raise prices to increase margins. Who would have thought of that. That will in turn give the employer more ability to give his workers more money....Which....wait for it.....they will spend on OTHER products!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Producers can only raise prices if there is sufficient demand. Without demand, raising prices often has the effect of lowering demand further which leads to increased inventory and worker layoff. Prices respond to demand. They cannot just be raised by fiat.


Yes but the walmarts of the world toss that on its head. Even if there is demand they are going to drive prices down in an effort to help their bottom line. Good business right? Except it fucks up the rest of the economy. If you are a US manufacturer of a product that goes into one of our retail outlets you can't raise prices cause you will be moved out of those stores as soon as you do. Since there is no such thing as local vendors anymore only the Walmart/Target groups one can't afford to lose that business and still be IN business.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/31/2013 6:14:05 AM   
imdoingitagain


Posts: 77
Joined: 4/7/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

What I am telling you that inflation in and of itself isn't inherently evil. You live in the past where economists think that it is. It is one way to help push the economy ahead.

We've tried this value based approach where the lowest price wins the day. Guess what. Doesn't work. Drives jobs out of the country and into the lowest wage regions of the world. If you really want to lose lets keep chasing that. There is no way we can win that battle.

We need to grow up and realize all of the other successful economies around the world are managed. We'd do well to begin managing ours. The rich won't like it but tough shit. Something as simple as North American Content requirements would help the whole region out. The Auto industry can attest to that. Lastly, we need Economic Patriots in our businesses that care as much about their country as the size of their portfolio.

Let me understand this:
The US built itself on a free market, became a world power doing so. Free market made us one of the richest countries on the planet. More and more regulations appear. The economy has now hit a speed bump which can be overcame. Your conclusion from all of this is that the free market "doesn't work"?

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/31/2013 6:20:08 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
When was the US a "free" market? Come again?

(in reply to imdoingitagain)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/31/2013 7:05:00 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk
What I am telling you that inflation in and of itself isn't inherently evil. You live in the past where economists think that it is. It is one way to help push the economy ahead.
We've tried this value based approach where the lowest price wins the day. Guess what. Doesn't work. Drives jobs out of the country and into the lowest wage regions of the world. If you really want to lose lets keep chasing that. There is no way we can win that battle.


"Value based" approaches aren't where the "lowest price wins the day." The value based approach is where the best overall value wins the day. People buy Snap On tools, why? Because they are made in the US? No. Less expensive tools are made in the US, too. Because they are guaranteed for life? That factors in, but they aren't the only American-made tools guaranteed for life, and they aren't the least expensive American-made tools guaranteed for life, either. Then, why? It's because they are that good. Armstrong Tools are made in America, guaranteed for life, and are pretty much that damn good, too. You won't see "Armstrong Tools" trucks going all over the place servicing the customers, though. Value, baby. Craftsman tools are still made in America, and guaranteed for life. Many mechanics choose to pay sometimes at least double to get Snap On, not because they can't get Craftsman, but because they don't want to be traveling to Sears all the time getting replacements. Snap On tools are simply better tools. In value-based purchasing, price plays a part, but it isn't the only part.

quote:

We need to grow up and realize all of the other successful economies around the world are managed. We'd do well to begin managing ours. The rich won't like it but tough shit. Something as simple as North American Content requirements would help the whole region out. The Auto industry can attest to that. Lastly, we need Economic Patriots in our businesses that care as much about their country as the size of their portfolio.


I like how you've changed your "American made" demands to "North American Content." Don't think that has gone unnoticed. I do find it hilarious that you've just sold out your support of the USA to the auto Unions. Still doesn't explain your distaste for vehicles made in the US, by American workers, but that have "foreign" nameplates.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/31/2013 7:07:17 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

Yeah radical thinking. Raise prices to increase margins. Who would have thought of that. That will in turn give the employer more ability to give his workers more money....Which....wait for it.....they will spend on OTHER products!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Producers can only raise prices if there is sufficient demand. Without demand, raising prices often has the effect of lowering demand further which leads to increased inventory and worker layoff. Prices respond to demand. They cannot just be raised by fiat.

Yes but the walmarts of the world toss that on its head. Even if there is demand they are going to drive prices down in an effort to help their bottom line. Good business right? Except it fucks up the rest of the economy. If you are a US manufacturer of a product that goes into one of our retail outlets you can't raise prices cause you will be moved out of those stores as soon as you do. Since there is no such thing as local vendors anymore only the Walmart/Target groups one can't afford to lose that business and still be IN business.


You want workers to be paid more so they can have more to spend, regardless of what it does to the prices of things they are buying, but gripe when the things they are buying are costing less, leaving a worker with more to spend on other stuff?!?

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 1/31/2013 8:00:13 AM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
I also strongly feel that one reason Americans have such a tough time with farm and domestic labor is because, in huge parts of this country, this was work that was historically done by mostly black slaves. And somehow, I think Americans (particularly white Americans) truly feel this type of work is beneath them (even if wages were higher).


Wow. Really? It'd never occurred to me that this might be a factor in this day and age. I'd be really intrigued to see evidence for this. (That last wasn't meant to convey a sarky tone, btw.)


In many European countries (that also had slavery but they abolished slavery much sooner), people actually take pride in manual labor and work in the service industry (France comes to mind). I have never in my life (I am American born and raised, but have traveled extensively and lived in other countries for work) seen any place that comes even close to America in the disdain that it holds for blue collar labor, particularly farm and domestic labor.

The slave thesis is just a hypothesis. It could be other things, too. But I've never encountered a society so hostile towards honest labor of certain types. Just plain sad. And when I think about what distinguishes farm and domestic labor, it is difficult not to see the connection to slavery. And I don't think that's a coincidence.

I think it is the death knell for a society that claims to be a democracy and without a rigid class system, to be this disdainful of certain types of labor. Just wrong. All labor needs to be valued.


I'm not sure that some Americans' disdain for blue collar or farm work has much to do with slavery (although I could be wrong). It may be more of a generational thing. All four of my grandparents grew up on farms, and they were mainly family farms where everyone in the family worked it with little or no outside help. None of them looked down on anyone who did manual labor. In fact, I've known some people from that generation whose parents would punish them if they said anything disparaging about working people.

I think that American attitudes on this probably changed after World War II, in the 1950s and 60s when times were much better, wealth was abundant, and opportunities were everywhere. More and more people were going to college and getting white collar jobs. TV and movies were showing people how glamorous and sophisticated city life was, while people living in rural areas were called "bumpkins," "rednecks," "hillbillies," "trash," etc. I think that this attitude reached a crescendo by the 1980s, during the time of Reagan, unbridled capitalism, with so many people entranced and dazzled by the "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous." Those who don't make it and those who might work low-wage jobs are commonly referred to as "losers" in our society.

The attitude might be summed up with Henry Hill's line from the movie Goodfellas: "For us to live any other way was nuts. Uh, to us, those goody-good people who worked shitty jobs for bum paychecks and took the subway to work every day, and worried about their bills, were dead. I mean they were suckers. They had no balls. If we wanted something we just took it. If anyone complained twice they got hit so bad, believe me, they never complained again."

Perhaps slavery might have had an indirect connection to the attitudes you're describing, but I think the influence is probably more recent than that.






Just to be clear, I am NOT referring to family farms. People who own property are not farm labor as that term is typically understood. I am talking about people who are hired to work on farms and ranches for pay, but who do not have an ownership stake in the underlying business. Any business owner, whether a farmer, doctor, plumber, etc. tends to work hard because it is their own business they are supporting and often, they do better, the harder and smarter they are willing to work.

I do agree with your observation about more recent history. But I do think part of the current mentality is rooted in attitudes from the past. When generations of people grow up constantly seeing only certain types of people in certain types of jobs, attitudes get created that take a long time to shake. If you go any large scale farming operation in the U.S. you will see a largely Hispanic workforce. Walk into any restaurant in New York city and you will see immigrant labor. So after a certain time, people who do not see themselves as that demographic ("I am white. I am American born. etc.) will not choose to see themselves in those kinds of jobs.

And just as a general comment on the overall thread:

There is also another side to this that adds another wrinkle. If you walk into many restaurants in the city, often, the waiters and bartenders will be white. But the busboys, dishwashers, prep people, etc. will all be immigrants. So it is not that white Americans don't work in the restaurant industry. They tend to work in certain roles. But the reverse of this is that an American born black person, for example, will have tremendous difficulty being hired as a waiter or bartender in many locations. There is an inherent racism and ethnocentrism in the types of jobs which are considered "appropriate" for certain types of people over others. And this gets reflected in the immigration patterns that we have, and the type of work that certain types of immigrants end up doing, but it is also reflected in what type of American will be hired for those same jobs.

Again, I feel that the issue of immigration and jobs is intertwined with many other issues in our society. And some of these issues require us taking a long and hard look at ourselves. For those who really want a world where there are jobs, this requires rethinking what honest labor is. In a world where white collar workers in finance have actually stolen money from investors, perhaps it is time to rethink what is "respectable" work and even what is "clean" work. I find it interesting that people who do not want to dirty themselves with blue collar work, often have no problem engaging in criminal activity in their white collar jobs (things like embezzlement, tax avoidance, etc.) Again, there is a built in dysfunction to the entire system. We want jobs, but only jobs that we deem "appropriate". And then we complain when jobs get outsourced to a labor pool that is less picky.

Everyone in a truly free and democratic society cannot be white collar. Everyone in such a society cannot be wealthy. But a society has to be willing to provide basics like education and healthcare in order to give people opportunities. And in addition, it has to foster a healthy attitude towards work, in general, regardless of what the work is.

People are not "better" because they sit in an office all day. And the unemployed who claim there is no work, when immigrants continue to enter the country and find work - again, this begs the question. Yes, Americans aren't finding the type of work they would like to do. But that doesn't mean there aren't jobs that are in desperate need of filling. Most studies on farm labor have shown that if you deported illegal labor you would grind that industry to a halt. And then how are the rest of us supposed to eat? Literally, if you deported illegals tomorrow, crops in fields would lie unharvested, unpicked, etc. and just rot because Americans would rather see food rot than actually work in the fields.

Again, I think this whole discussion is masking larger issues in our society that actually need attention. I am a liberal. I believe in a social safety net. I believe in supporting people in many, many ways through the thoughtful and compassionate use of collective tax dollars. But this also requires certain other components to work. And one of those is a respect for work.

_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 2/1/2013 4:42:55 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

Just to be clear, I am NOT referring to family farms. People who own property are not farm labor as that term is typically understood. I am talking about people who are hired to work on farms and ranches for pay, but who do not have an ownership stake in the underlying business. Any business owner, whether a farmer, doctor, plumber, etc. tends to work hard because it is their own business they are supporting and often, they do better, the harder and smarter they are willing to work.


That's true, although it's still pretty hard, back-breaking work just the same. But that just goes to show that it's not the actual "job" that Americans won't do, but that it's the working conditions which repel them from working in certain sectors.

quote:


I do agree with your observation about more recent history. But I do think part of the current mentality is rooted in attitudes from the past. When generations of people grow up constantly seeing only certain types of people in certain types of jobs, attitudes get created that take a long time to shake. If you go any large scale farming operation in the U.S. you will see a largely Hispanic workforce. Walk into any restaurant in New York city and you will see immigrant labor. So after a certain time, people who do not see themselves as that demographic ("I am white. I am American born. etc.) will not choose to see themselves in those kinds of jobs.


That could be, although there might also be other factors. Your restaurant example reminded me of someone who wanted to get a job in a restaurant, but because she couldn't speak Spanish, she wouldn't have been able to communicate with the cook, who spoke only Spanish. It's not that they didn't want the job, but under the circumstances, they were unable to get it.

A lot of these phenomena are still relatively recent, within the past 20-30 years. I still remember when white and/or American-born people would still take those jobs, and there didn't seem to be any shame in it. It's only been in the past few decades that Americans suddenly feel that jobs like that are beneath them.

quote:


And just as a general comment on the overall thread:

There is also another side to this that adds another wrinkle. If you walk into many restaurants in the city, often, the waiters and bartenders will be white. But the busboys, dishwashers, prep people, etc. will all be immigrants.


Some of this may also be regional, as the demographics can vary across the country.

quote:


So it is not that white Americans don't work in the restaurant industry. They tend to work in certain roles. But the reverse of this is that an American born black person, for example, will have tremendous difficulty being hired as a waiter or bartender in many locations. There is an inherent racism and ethnocentrism in the types of jobs which are considered "appropriate" for certain types of people over others. And this gets reflected in the immigration patterns that we have, and the type of work that certain types of immigrants end up doing, but it is also reflected in what type of American will be hired for those same jobs.


Perhaps the situation is self-perpetuating, since people may resist applying for jobs they have tremendous difficulty in getting. I would still say that it would probably have a lot to do with the working conditions than the actual work itself, particularly in situations where there is inherent racism and ethnocentrism. That may also put some people off, more than the actual work.

quote:


Again, I feel that the issue of immigration and jobs is intertwined with many other issues in our society. And some of these issues require us taking a long and hard look at ourselves. For those who really want a world where there are jobs, this requires rethinking what honest labor is. In a world where white collar workers in finance have actually stolen money from investors, perhaps it is time to rethink what is "respectable" work and even what is "clean" work. I find it interesting that people who do not want to dirty themselves with blue collar work, often have no problem engaging in criminal activity in their white collar jobs (things like embezzlement, tax avoidance, etc.) Again, there is a built in dysfunction to the entire system. We want jobs, but only jobs that we deem "appropriate". And then we complain when jobs get outsourced to a labor pool that is less picky.


Some of these issues may be cultural. A lot of people seek to achieve "status," and much of that comes in to either having a high position or a lot of money. It's gotten to the point today where it's only the money that matters, and it doesn't matter how it was earned (just as long as you don't get caught).

quote:


Everyone in a truly free and democratic society cannot be white collar. Everyone in such a society cannot be wealthy. But a society has to be willing to provide basics like education and healthcare in order to give people opportunities. And in addition, it has to foster a healthy attitude towards work, in general, regardless of what the work is.


I agree.

quote:


People are not "better" because they sit in an office all day. And the unemployed who claim there is no work, when immigrants continue to enter the country and find work - again, this begs the question. Yes, Americans aren't finding the type of work they would like to do. But that doesn't mean there aren't jobs that are in desperate need of filling. Most studies on farm labor have shown that if you deported illegal labor you would grind that industry to a halt. And then how are the rest of us supposed to eat? Literally, if you deported illegals tomorrow, crops in fields would lie unharvested, unpicked, etc. and just rot because Americans would rather see food rot than actually work in the fields.


I'm not sure if it would be that bad. I'd like to see some of those studies. There may be some short-term difficulties in filling the openings, but if they tried hard enough, they could find a way. I don't see very many want ads for farm labor around here, although there aren't that many in the area where I live.

But when the Corrections Department needed employees, they embarked on an all-out ad campaign, with TV and radio commercials all over the place. Full-page ads in the paper.

So, I have to wonder, are these industries even trying to get native workers anymore, or have they just become too accustomed to the status quo that they've become complacent and absolutely dependent upon that labor pool?




(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 2/1/2013 7:50:34 AM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline
FR

For those who think immigrants take jobs away from Americans (this article is dealing with legal immigrants, but the same arguments apply to illegals - the situation isn't actually any different).

http://blogs.cgdev.org/globaldevelopment/2012/02/do-farm-workers-from-developing-countries-take-jobs-from-americans.php

The one thing I will grant is that farm labor is seasonal work. And obviously that is an issue. However, if one is unemployed, or underemployed, it still begs the question of why one wouldn't want to work at least some of the time. The attitude of I will just sit and wait and complain about those who are willing to work, does not fly with me. And again, let me remind everyone, I am a liberal. I've made it clear on this thread and many others, about the many government programs that I support. But I do believe in honest work.

_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to DaNewAgeViking)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 2/1/2013 8:06:23 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk
What I am telling you that inflation in and of itself isn't inherently evil. You live in the past where economists think that it is. It is one way to help push the economy ahead.
We've tried this value based approach where the lowest price wins the day. Guess what. Doesn't work. Drives jobs out of the country and into the lowest wage regions of the world. If you really want to lose lets keep chasing that. There is no way we can win that battle.


"Value based" approaches aren't where the "lowest price wins the day." The value based approach is where the best overall value wins the day. People buy Snap On tools, why? Because they are made in the US? No. Less expensive tools are made in the US, too. Because they are guaranteed for life? That factors in, but they aren't the only American-made tools guaranteed for life, and they aren't the least expensive American-made tools guaranteed for life, either. Then, why? It's because they are that good. Armstrong Tools are made in America, guaranteed for life, and are pretty much that damn good, too. You won't see "Armstrong Tools" trucks going all over the place servicing the customers, though. Value, baby. Craftsman tools are still made in America, and guaranteed for life. Many mechanics choose to pay sometimes at least double to get Snap On, not because they can't get Craftsman, but because they don't want to be traveling to Sears all the time getting replacements. Snap On tools are simply better tools. In value-based purchasing, price plays a part, but it isn't the only part.

quote:

We need to grow up and realize all of the other successful economies around the world are managed. We'd do well to begin managing ours. The rich won't like it but tough shit. Something as simple as North American Content requirements would help the whole region out. The Auto industry can attest to that. Lastly, we need Economic Patriots in our businesses that care as much about their country as the size of their portfolio.


I like how you've changed your "American made" demands to "North American Content." Don't think that has gone unnoticed. I do find it hilarious that you've just sold out your support of the USA to the auto Unions. Still doesn't explain your distaste for vehicles made in the US, by American workers, but that have "foreign" nameplates.



Since you didn't want or can't answer to what I wrote I will assume you aren't bright enough to figure it out or agree with me.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: immigration reform during a job shortage - 2/1/2013 8:44:33 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk
Since you didn't want or can't answer to what I wrote I will assume you aren't bright enough to figure it out or agree with me.


Your entire argument was predicated on an incorrect statement. Value-based decisions are made every single time, without fail. You do it every time you choose. You just don't realize it. You place a higher value on the item having a "North American" label (aren't you one of the ones that was bitching about NAFTA?!?), than not. And, that is perfectly fine. I have no problem with your doing that. But, don't push your value assessments onto others unless they want you to.

Would I be correct in assuming that if you have to choose between A Chevy Traverse or a Honda Pilot, you'll get the Pilot?

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: immigration reform during a job shortage Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141