RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


jlf1961 -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 9:22:59 AM)

As I said, I think Israel is wrong in the building of settlements.

But do you know how many times the UN has condemned Israel for building settlements?




crazyml -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 9:34:15 AM)

I think the the distinction might possibly be that the people being mistreated by Israel aren't Israelis?




Switcheroo1983 -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 11:13:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

@Switcheroo

All politics, as they say, are local. The princes, kings and dictators of the Arab, Persian, and Turk nations have their own legitamacies to guard against impending insurgencies. You are quite correct in stating the surrounding nations have not been helpful. After the Iraqis were driven north in 1991, Kuwait expelled 200,000 Palestinians. However, let's not deflect from Israel's continuing effort to take all of Palestine for its State.

You are correct, let's not. This is just a very bitter topic for me, and I am quite angry at the surrounding nations' "leaders" being more concerned with driving diamond-encrusted cars/building gigantic indoor ski resorts than aiding the Palestinians. If these nations wanted to put the squeeze on Israel and the US and the UN they would put the squeeze on the oil. But, yeah, diamond-encrusted cars...




vincentML -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 11:32:20 AM)

quote:

You are correct, let's not. This is just a very bitter topic for me, and I am quite angry at the surrounding nations' "leaders" being more concerned with driving diamond-encrusted cars/building gigantic indoor ski resorts than aiding the Palestinians. If these nations wanted to put the squeeze on Israel and the US and the UN they would put the squeeze on the oil. But, yeah, diamond-encrusted cars...


@Switcheroo

Your feelings are valid. No question. But give a few years. They will all be lying next to Sadaam. The natives are restless. Especially, after the US becomes a major producer of shale oil. Between Canada and the US that is nearly a reality. [the pollution and corruption of our land is another issue for another day]




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 11:39:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

It's tragic that all parties involved seem willing to do everything in their power to ensure that there is to be no peace there.

A false equivalency when you take a close look at the Oslo Accords and the proposal Arafat walked away from at Camp David . . . they scream inequity. The Israelis are squatters on Palestinian land, not vice versa.

Wasn't we over dis? Arafat got over 90% of da land he demanded an' da territory was contiguous accordin' ta Clinton's top middle east man Dennis Ross http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/mideastdispatches/archives/000555.html but jus' walked away an' started da second intifada.




Switcheroo1983 -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 11:50:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


@Switcheroo

Your feelings are valid. No question. But give a few years. They will all be lying next to Sadaam. The natives are restless. Especially, after the US becomes a major producer of shale oil. Between Canada and the US that is nearly a reality. [the pollution and corruption of our land is another issue for another day]

Indeed. God willing, the corrupt regimes will topple, the monarchies/faux theocracies exposed, and the People given a voice, and freedom truthfully seen.

Take care, mate.




vincentML -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 12:00:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

As I said, I think Israel is wrong in the building of settlements.

But do you know how many times the UN has condemned Israel for building settlements?

Doesn't that make Israel an outlaw nation deserving of reprobation, both internationally and biblically?

There are some influencial people who will make concerted efforts at preventing anti-Israeli speech and action. Here is an example where various political figures along with Alan Dershowitz are leading a campaign to stifle an event scheduled to take place on 7 Feb at Brooklyn College where students invited speakers who are

"advocates of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS) aimed at stopping Israeli oppression of the Palestinians [one speaker is a Palestinian (Omar Barghouti) and the other a Jewish American (philosopher Judith Butler)]. The event is being co-sponsored by numerous student and community groups, including Students for Justice in Palestine, the college's LGBT group, pro-Palestinian Jewish organizations, and an Occupy Wall Street group.

When I wrote about this earlier in the week, opposition to the event was confined to the usual suspects devoted to so-called "pro-Israel" advocacy, including many with a long history of trying to destroy anyone critical of the Israeli government. The controversy was largely fueled by BC alumnus Alan Dershowitz, who denounced the event in a New York York Daily News Op-Ed as a "hate orgy". Dershowitz - with whom I had a lengthy and contentious email exchange yesterday on this and other topics (see below) - previously led the successful campaign to pressure DePaul University into denying tenure to long-time Israel critic Norman Finkelstein (after his tenure had been approved by an academic committee), all but destroying Finkelstein's career as an academic.

Dershowitz has been joined in his current crusade by a cast of crazed and fanatical Israel-centric characters such as Brooklyn State Assembly member Dov Hikind. Ignoring the BDS movement's explicit non-violence stance, Hikind publicly (and falsely) claimed that the event speakers (to whom he referred as "Barghouti and…the lady") "think Hamas and Hezbollah are nice organizations, and they probably feel the same way about al-Qaida".

Hikind called on the college's President, Karen Gould, to resign, recklessly insinuating (needless to say) that she's an anti-Semite: "Perhaps President Gould wasn't bullied; maybe she secretly approves. . . . I can only speculate to what her motivation or lack of motivation is in allowing this irresponsible endorsement of this loathsome event by her College." In 2011, Hikind led the campaign to force Brooklyn College to fire the young adjunct professor Kristofer Petersen-Overton for the crime of writing a pro-Palestinian paper (after firing him, the college rehired him days later)."


SOURCE You may have some problems with the link. It is erratic. Sorry.

Here is an alternative link ALTERNATIVE SOURCE




vincentML -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 12:04:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

It's tragic that all parties involved seem willing to do everything in their power to ensure that there is to be no peace there.

A false equivalency when you take a close look at the Oslo Accords and the proposal Arafat walked away from at Camp David . . . they scream inequity. The Israelis are squatters on Palestinian land, not vice versa.

Wasn't we over dis? Arafat got over 90% of da land he demanded an' da territory was contiguous accordin' ta Clinton's top middle east man Dennis Ross http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/mideastdispatches/archives/000555.html but jus' walked away an' started da second intifada.

The LIE is that the land was contiguous. So, you would be okay with your neighbor coming into your backyard, building seven or eight shacks while leaving your land "contiguous?" In the West Bank the land is contiguous if you do not acknowledge the roads that connect the settlements and act as surrounding barriers to the Palestinian plots, which Arafat called "cantons."




Powergamz1 -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 12:40:29 PM)

I'm not playing your games. All you've done is pile a strawman argument on top of your earlier agit-prop.

The obvious conclusion is that you have zero interest in discussing useful solutions to what the Israeli government, military, and power-mongers have done wrong over recent decades, and are merely using that as a platform to drag in the same old denier rhetoric.

You are perfectly capable of researching the well documented history, you can read that those 'indigenous' people were shoved there as Trans-Jordanians, as part of the geo-politics orchestrated by the Brits both before and after WWII.

And you have every access to the facts that the current situation developed from the 1920s death squads in a direct line through the Holocaust into various extremist forms via the Ikwhan and now Hamas today. All with the same actual genocidal goal.

And you are quite capable of seeing the neo-colonial powers playing their games for profit, the fading super powers wrangling for 'stability in the region', and the writ of Abd Al-Wahhab, the vested interests of the family Saud, and the ghost of Al-Husayni laughing from the grave.



quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Why isn't it possible to condemn and discuss rationally Israel's land grabs and horrible treatment of the Palestinian settlers as the venal political bullshit that they are, without wrapping it in the revisionist rhetoric of 'genocide', and 'indigenous peoples'?

My use of the term genocide was a bit strong and I corrected it in post 6. However, not to ignore that many innocent Palestinians were killed by Israeli troops during the ethnic cleansing of late 1947/early 1948 and some 531 palestinian villages were destroyed or occupied:

According to Ilan Pappé, the 1948 Palestinian exodus consisted of the forced relocation of close to 800,000 Palestinians. This was more than half of the Palestinian population at that time. It also involved the destruction of 531 Palestinian villages, and the emptying of 11 entire Palestinian urban neighborhoods.[3] The event is referred to, by Palestinians, as the Nakba, the catastrophe.[1] The thesis that Pappé presents is that the Nakba was a calculated and intentionally executed ethnic cleansing perpetrated by Zionist Israelis. He states, with emphasis, that there is no room for ambivalence in this matter. His references include Zionist quotations and writings, military and political archives, and the diaries of David Ben-Gurion. SOURCE

As for indigenous people, the Palestinians were the vast majority in the land when the Zionist movement began circa 1880. they comprised maybe 90% of the population south of Lebenon. So, how are they not the indigenous people?

How do you propose a rational discourse about land grabs, horrible treatment of the Palestinians [who were not settlers as you state] and other political venal bullshit? How does it become "revisionist rhetoric?" Revisionist to what? Israeli propaganda? American news sources? Are you even aware of the Israeli New Historians? SOURCE

Would you have the world paint lipstick on this continuing atrocity?





WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 4:30:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

It's tragic that all parties involved seem willing to do everything in their power to ensure that there is to be no peace there.

A false equivalency when you take a close look at the Oslo Accords and the proposal Arafat walked away from at Camp David . . . they scream inequity. The Israelis are squatters on Palestinian land, not vice versa.

Wasn't we over dis? Arafat got over 90% of da land he demanded an' da territory was contiguous accordin' ta Clinton's top middle east man Dennis Ross http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/mideastdispatches/archives/000555.html but jus' walked away an' started da second intifada.

The LIE is that the land was contiguous. So, you would be okay with your neighbor coming into your backyard, building seven or eight shacks while leaving your land "contiguous?" In the West Bank the land is contiguous if you do not acknowledge the roads that connect the settlements and act as surrounding barriers to the Palestinian plots, which Arafat called "cantons."

well now mr arafat can call da camp david solution wat he wants. he also called jesus da first palestinian martyr lol. da settlements barak tried ta keep were near da green line so roads weren't da issue. its no lie da land was contiguous an' a contiguous state waz also part of da clinton parameters for da further talks in 2001 dat he also walked aways from.




Switcheroo1983 -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 5:21:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh


well now mr arafat can call da camp david solution wat he wants. he also called jesus da first palestinian martyr lol. da settlements barak tried ta keep were near da green line so roads weren't da issue. its no lie da land was contiguous an' a contiguous state waz also part of da clinton parameters for da further talks in 2001 dat he also walked aways from.


Mr. Arafat, sadly, now no longer calls anything anymore. He is deceased. I found myself agreeing with many things the man had to say. He was Nationalist, not a zealot. One of his greatest fears was a group like Hamas ever taking control in Palestine. However, when he called Jesus (PBUH) a "Palestinian Martyr" I wanted to shit. That had to be one of Mr. Arafat's worst moves as it angered his Muslim allies and alienated his Christian allies (fun fact - roughly 15% of Palestinians are Christian). Although it wasn't your intent, wantsoftheflesh, you brought back cringful memories.




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 5:53:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Switcheroo1983
quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh
well now mr arafat can call da camp david solution wat he wants. he also called jesus da first palestinian martyr lol. da settlements barak tried ta keep were near da green line so roads weren't da issue. its no lie da land was contiguous an' a contiguous state waz also part of da clinton parameters for da further talks in 2001 dat he also walked aways from.

Mr. Arafat, sadly, now no longer calls anything anymore. He is deceased. I found myself agreeing with many things the man had to say. He was Nationalist, not a zealot. One of his greatest fears was a group like Hamas ever taking control in Palestine. However, when he called Jesus (PBUH) a "Palestinian Martyr" I wanted to shit. That had to be one of Mr. Arafat's worst moves as it angered his Muslim allies and alienated his Christian allies (fun fact - roughly 15% of Palestinians are Christian). Although it wasn't your intent, wantsoftheflesh, you brought back cringful memories.

[:o] funny i often have dat effect on folks. lol

da one arafat quote i do like is "Palestine is the cement that holds the Arab world together, or it is the explosive that blows it apart.". true enough.




DomKen -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 5:55:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
However, let's not deflect from Israel's continuing effort to take all of Palestine for its State.

If Israel wanted all of the occupied territories why did they evacuate the Gaza Strip settlements?




tweakabelle -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 9:55:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh

LOL Tweaky I kno ya have a real big thang bout da jewish state so I woundn't expect ya ta understand dat there are other conflicts in this here world dat are an' were in recent years much worse wit massively more civilians a dyin' an' people fleeing. yet da unhrc only focus on israel wit da horror in syria an' sudan before gettin almost a free pass. Same wit china in tibet an' religious persecution in da arab world. Sorry but dats bias darlin'.

I can only conclude from the above pretentious gibberish that your thoughts are as jumbled and incomprehensible as the prose(?) you post on the topic.




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 10:00:38 PM)

gee guess yer apology/justification message over a yr ago for attackin' me after we were briefly a debatin' da same topic is now void? [:D]




tweakabelle -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 10:04:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
If you commit as many crimes as the nasty terrorist State of Israel does, expect to be called to account. Who else has apartheid, ethnic cleansing, multiple gross violations of the Geneva Conventions (ie war crimes) targeted assassinations, State-organised abduction, torture and murder of children, regular massacres and atrocities etc all happening as part of official State policy?

China
Turkey
Congo
North Korea

Funny how some people, who totally are not antisemites of the worst sort, only care about one single place where people are being mistreated by their government.

Does China have apartheid? Or Turkey? Or the Congo? Or even North Korea. Not that I have heard of.

I do applaud your realism in putting North Korea and Israel in the same category. Should I conclude that you have finally realised that the rest of the world is correct to do the same?

And finally, please refrain from the sad tired ántisemtite' BS. Apologists for Israeli apartheid do not possess the right to smear their opponents as racists - it merely advertises their own ignorance and hypocrisy.

And once again here's the question you declined to answer:

What is not to condemn about a State - Israel - that practices apartheid, ethnic cleansing, war crimes, child abduction torture and murder (to list just a few matters, there are lots more) as part of official State policy?




tweakabelle -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 10:09:49 PM)

quote:


But do you know how many times the UN has condemned Israel for building settlements?


Obviously not enough as the settlements/colonies are still being built and making any progress towards peace impossible.

Israel had a clear choice between expanding its colonies/settlements and peace. It chose expanding the colonies/settlements as we all know. By explicitly rejecting peace, Israel is inescapably morally responsible for every subsequent death, injury and incident in the ongoing conflict.




tweakabelle -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/3/2013 10:21:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh

gee[sic] guess yer[sic] apology/justification message over a yr[sic] ago for attackin'[sic] me after we were briefly a debatin'[sic] da[sic] same topic is now void? [:D]

I have kindly omitted pointing out all the grammatical errors in your post.

Your prose is incomprehensible.

I have no recall of ever apologising to you or any one else over any comment I have made on this issue ever. It is mischevious and misleading (to put it nicely) of you to suggest I have. Such tactics are of course straight out of the hasbara training manual.

So, I have no idea what you are rabbiting on about and even less interest.




SadistDave -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/4/2013 1:40:26 AM)

For the life of me, I cannot think of anything the Palistinians have ever done for America. We give them hundreds of millions of dollars in aid every year even though they are quite vocal about their hatred for America. They use money we give them to fund terrorist actions against Israel, the only country in the Middle East that is actually friendly to America. Israel supports America militarily, and has supported U.S. interests in the U.N. more than any Middle Eastern country. If Palestine should ever become a full member of the U.N., they will become yet another vote against American interests. America's official position should be "Fuck the Palestinians!".

As for the Geneva Convention; the Palestinians live in Israel but, Palestine is not a sovereign state. They are not living in a separate country under the protection of Israel. In fact they are not under the protection of Israel in any way, shape, or form. Therefore, the Palestinians do not fall under the protection of the Geneva Convention as a country or as a country under the protection of Israel. The Palestinians are non-citizens. Meanwhile, Israel is a sovereign state, which gives them every right to make settlements for Israeli citizens anywhere within the borders of Israel. Israel is well within it's rights to do whatever they like with non-citizens within the borders of their own sovereign nation.

-SD-





thursdays -> RE: Israeli Settlements Violate Fourth Geneva Convention (2/4/2013 1:57:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave

For the life of me, I cannot think of anything the Palistinians have ever done for America. We give them billions of dollars every year even though they are quite vocal about their hatred for America.

Could you cite a source for this claim of "billions of dollars"?

I ask because my understanding is that Israel is the recipient of the "billions of dollars", while palestine gets a tiny fraction (see www.fas.org).

Obviously, if it turns out that the Palistinians don't get billions of dollars of aid, then your point is somewhat less "compelling".

quote:



They use money we give them to fund terrorist actions against Israel, the only country in the Middle East that is actually friendly to America.


Ah, yes. You don't know much about the Middle East, do you? What about Eqypt, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait?

quote:



Israel supports America militarily, and has supported U.S. interests in the U.N. more than any Middle Eastern country.



I'm sure that Israel is an avid supporter of the US in the UN, given all that money that the US gives them.

They do, though, have a tendency to fuck the US over when it suits them too.

quote:



If Palestine should ever become a full member of the U.N., they will become yet another vote against American interests. America's official position should be "Fuck the Palestinians!".


And how would America benefit from this position?

quote:



As for the Geneva Convention; the Palestinians live in Israel but, Palestine is not a sovereign state. They are not living in a separate country under the protection of Israel. In fact they are not under the protection of Israel in any way, shape, or form. Therefore, the Palestinians do not fall under the protection of the Geneva Convention as a country or as a country under the protection of Israel. The Palestinians are non-citizens. Meanwhile, Israel is a sovereign state, which gives them every right to make settlements for Israeli citizens anywhere within the borders of Israel. Israel is well within it's rights to do whatever they like with non-citizens within the borders of their own sovereign nation.

-SD-


I don't think that people are complaining that Israel (a state that owes its existence to a UN resolution) is building settlements within its own borders. I think that what people are getting snippy about is it's propensity for building settlements outside its own borders, as defined by numerous UN resolutions.

It's always struck me as odd that you have a state that was created by a UN resolution that is so happy to ignore those UN resolutions that are inconvenient. But hey!




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875