RE: REMINDER

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: REMINDER

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: REMINDER

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 4:38:11 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

I am right on time, I think. STET.

Ron

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Brosco)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 4:42:56 AM

Brosco

Posts: 238
Joined: 5/29/2006
Status: offline

smiles.... it must be wonderful to know ya perfect and always right:)

_____________________________

Any Dom that believes he is in complete control ... has a very clever subbie.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 4:46:07 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

LOLOLOLOL,

It is a great comfort to me, Brosco.

Ron
and a great tagline, BTW.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 6/25/2006 4:47:03 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Brosco)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 5:05:00 AM

Brosco

Posts: 238
Joined: 5/29/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOLOLOLOL,

It is a great comfort to me, Brosco.

Ron
and a great tagline, BTW.

TY... and i'm sure it is.

all the best

Brosco

_____________________________

Any Dom that believes he is in complete control ... has a very clever subbie.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 5:11:48 AM

ShiftedJewel

Posts: 2492
Joined: 12/2/2004
Status: offline

(fast reply)

It isn't that we cannot talk about our nestlings, we do it all the time. We (as a group) actually talk about a few things that are on the edge of taboo quite often. The big deal are of course... the words. There are words that government agencies have tagged, not necessarily the proper words either, they use slang as well. Anyway, those words that are tagged show up in a search of the internet, your cell phone.. whatever... and big brother looks it over to see if it appears to be a threat of some sort, or, you know, something that should be looked into. Depending on the context in which the word is used they then have the option of "looking in to it"... and that, boys and girls, brings unwanted attention to this site. Collarme is doing a wonderful job of flying just under the radar in a time when "adult" sites are having some pretty serious issues, or should I say, the world in general is having some pretty serious issues with these kinds of sites. Thus the use of "unmentionables", "short people" and in my case... nestlings along with other "code" words for some iffy subjects just helps keep the wolves at bay.

Jewel

_____________________________

Don't ask, trust me, you won't like the answer... no one ever does.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 5:12:51 AM

IrishMist

Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brosco

So, I ask again, why did a thread about saying 'no children' get pulled into this category?

Pay attention now.

You said the "C" word, which is taboo.

On the other hand, I often talk about my UNMENTIONABLE here with no problems at all

_____________________________

If I said something to offend you, please tell me what it was so that I can say it again later.

(in reply to Brosco)

Profile

Post #: 26

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 5:23:54 AM

IronBear

Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: IrishMist

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brosco

So, I ask again, why did a thread about saying 'no children' get pulled into this category?

Pay attention now.

You said the "C" word, which is taboo.

On the other hand, I often talk about my UNMENTIONABLE here with no problems at all

But that is because you are such a sweetheart lass.......

_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to IrishMist)

Profile

Post #: 27

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 5:25:53 AM

Brosco

Posts: 238
Joined: 5/29/2006
Status: offline

uuuummmmmmmm so lets see... a discussion about a profile that mentions that 'no children' is a requirement is unmentionable? sorry, i just don't get it. A profile that states 'no children' ... and not as a kink... but purely as 'baggage' is not allowed? A discussion about whether potential partners should state acceptance or not of having children is against a TOS. More to the point, one that states openly that children with a potential partner rules them out is against TOS

WOW - I musta really lost the plot here

_____________________________

Any Dom that believes he is in complete control ... has a very clever subbie.

(in reply to IrishMist)

Profile

Post #: 28

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 5:28:40 AM

TxBadMan

Posts: 198
Joined: 4/7/2006
From: Moody, Texas
Status: offline

edited

< Message edited by TxBadMan -- 6/25/2006 5:29:23 AM >

_____________________________

Chris

(in reply to IronBear)

Profile

Post #: 29

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 5:34:34 AM

IrishMist

Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005
Status: offline

quote:

But that is because you are such a sweetheart lass.......

LOL it's very kind of you to say so Master Ironbear

Fortunatly, we both know that to be an untruth

quote:

uuuummmmmmmm so lets see... a discussion about a profile that mentions that 'no children' is a requirement is unmentionable? sorry, i just don't get it. A profile that states 'no children' ... and not as a kink... but purely as 'baggage' is not allowed? A discussion about whether potential partners should state acceptance or not of having children is against a TOS. More to the point, one that states openly that children with a potential partner rules them out is against TOS

WOW - I musta really lost the plot here

/sigh

If you start a post about unmentionables, and use the "C" word instead anywhere in it, it will get pulled. Certain WORDS are against the TOS. Very simple.

_____________________________

If I said something to offend you, please tell me what it was so that I can say it again later.

(in reply to IronBear)

Profile

Post #: 30

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 5:40:37 AM

Wolfspet

Posts: 143
Joined: 1/11/2004
Status: offline

I am a mod on another bdsm site. How we handle it is mentioning children in passing is OK, but they cannot be the content/focus of the posting. If the thread had to do with wanting someone who has no children, that makes children the target and content of the post, which is a taboo subject. I know there are quite a few yahoo groups that discuss parenting issues within the "lifestyle".

(in reply to TxBadMan)

Profile

Post #: 31

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 6:30:25 AM

feastie

Posts: 1793
Joined: 6/4/2004
Status: offline

The C word is a flag. It hits in a webcrawl, which will mean possible investigations into the site. Avoiding trouble for the site is the purpose for the ban.

_____________________________

Snarky and loving it.

Disclaimer: Any views expressed in any post are my opinions only. They may or may not be yours.

(in reply to Wolfspet)

Profile

Post #: 32

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 6:32:16 AM

Wulfchyld

Posts: 2618
Joined: 12/7/2005
Status: offline

*Eyes feastie suspiciously*

Agent Smith?

_____________________________

Loki, forum god of Mischief

Submission is not a gift... it is plunder!
Where there is a whip, there is a way!
Dom/mes of a feather, beat the f*ck out of slaves together

(in reply to feastie)

Profile

Post #: 33

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 6:46:18 AM

feastie

Posts: 1793
Joined: 6/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wulfchyld

*Eyes feastie suspiciously*

Agent Smith?

*Smiles enigmatically and winks*

_____________________________

Snarky and loving it.

Disclaimer: Any views expressed in any post are my opinions only. They may or may not be yours.

(in reply to Wulfchyld)

Profile

Post #: 34

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 7:21:15 AM

windchymes

Posts: 9410
Joined: 4/18/2005
Status: offline

We're assuming that Big Brother won't ever catch on that we use the word "unmentionables" to mean a taboo subject. Do you think Big Brother can't create an id and browse the boards here? Hell, maybe they already take part and someone we all know and love is one of "them"? How do you know they haven't already flagged the word "unmentionable"? So then what? Create a new code word once a week that means "unmentionable"?

I think the mods here do a bang-up job in keeping the boards clean and legal. There is no way to keep Big Brother from doing spot checks whenever they want to, whether we actually send up a flag to attract attention, or just go about our posting business.

< Message edited by windchymes -- 6/25/2006 7:22:01 AM >

_____________________________

You know it's going to be a GOOD blow job when she puts a Breathe Right strip on first.

Pick-up artists and garbage men should trade names.

(in reply to feastie)

Profile

Post #: 35

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 7:21:29 AM

Slipstreme

Posts: 817
Joined: 1/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

I know there are quite a few yahoo groups that discuss parenting issues within the "lifestyle".

Mind posting some you find helpful, if the mods agree, that way any mention of how to keep it quiet come up, people can be referred to these groups?

I don't know why I even care about this subject, cause honestly, I don't want any, but I believe the info should be out there for those that need to know.

_____________________________

Living the Dichotomy

Painslut? How about "Endorphin Junkie"?

For information about "the furry thing" please check out my profile journal entry for: 1/17/2006

Alpha of a leather family of four. Master to the slave z.

(in reply to feastie)

Profile

Post #: 36

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 7:31:58 AM

IronBear

Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: windchymes

We're assuming that Big Brother won't ever catch on that we use the word "unmentionables" to mean a taboo subject. Do you think Big Brother can't create an id and browse the boards here? Hell, maybe they already take part and someone we all know and love is one of "them"? How do you know they haven't already flagged the word "unmentionable"? So then what? Create a new code word once a week that means "unmentionable"?

I think the mods here do a bang-up job in keeping the boards clean and legal. There is no way to keep Big Brother from doing spot checks whenever they want to, whether we actually send up a flag to attract attention, or just go about our posting business.

Have you seen my comments on another thread and forum when I commented that 99.99% of CM membership consists of CIA and Homeland Security who are checking out the other 00.01% members who are just normal kingsters in case they are playing with Explosive Dildos, Wire Guided Vibrators and But Plugs and the like as well as sending students to learn the latest in torture usable for interrogating the latest suspects held as terrorists...... One source has it that CM is owned by the Whire House and is secretly funded and staffed so they can in turn keep an eye on all covert opperations run by Homeland Security and the CIA. Not sure where the FBI comes into all this but they will have their fingers in somewhere judging by their new appropriation budget for additional condoms....

< Message edited by IronBear -- 6/25/2006 7:33:25 AM >

_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to windchymes)

Profile

Post #: 37

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 7:34:57 AM

feastie

Posts: 1793
Joined: 6/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: windchymes

We're assuming that Big Brother won't ever catch on that we use the word "unmentionables" to mean a taboo subject. Do you think Big Brother can't create an id and browse the boards here? Hell, maybe they already take part and someone we all know and love is one of "them"? How do you know they haven't already flagged the word "unmentionable"? So then what? Create a new code word once a week that means "unmentionable"?

I think the mods here do a bang-up job in keeping the boards clean and legal. There is no way to keep Big Brother from doing spot checks whenever they want to, whether we actually send up a flag to attract attention, or just go about our posting business.

It's up to Collarme what words they designate as off-limits, regardless of the fact that we could (and probably are) even now infiltrated. The C word is definitely a flag word, unmentionable may be, as would be nestling or any other. However, it is known that the C word is...take what's known, in other words.

_____________________________

Snarky and loving it.

Disclaimer: Any views expressed in any post are my opinions only. They may or may not be yours.

(in reply to windchymes)

Profile

Post #: 38

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 8:02:00 AM

kittinSol

Posts: 16926
Status: offline

The debate is interesting in the context of the collarme.com forum: we still have to hear from the powers that be.

(PS: there were a couple of threads started in the middle of the week by the very sick person ModXi mentions in her original post.)

_____________________________

(in reply to feastie)

Profile

Post #: 39

RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 8:22:31 AM

marieToo

Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline

For those of you who may not know. There was a thread pulled, only minutes before this "Reminder" was posted. It was a heated discussion. One in which I spoke strongly, thats why I remember this whole situation. The thread spoke of the buying/selling of human beings, and the "breeding" and raising of children as slaves (that was *my* take on it anyway).

Im not contesting the removal of that thread.

Im only shedding light on the fact that this reminder was posted to Kedikat's OP (about why people dont say in their profiles that they are parents with dependents) right *after* they pulled a very heated thread about "breeding" and raising children into the lifestyle. I think Kedikat sort of took the *brunt* for that, since he was simultaneously posting about the mention in profiles of people having children.

Just my take on it.

(in reply to kittinSol)

Profile

Post #: 40