Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Good for the goose as well as the gander?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Good for the goose as well as the gander? Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 11:13:30 AM   
DOM68005


Posts: 6069
Joined: 12/5/2006
From: Nebraska
Status: offline 		I am of the male species. I have read enough posts and profiles to know the female of the species prefer not to see a picture of the male third leg. Many post in their profiles that doing so will get that email reply deleted or dropped into the bulk file.
Why is it then that females by a large margin put their front lower bits in many profiles and pictures?

< Message edited by DOM68005 -- 2/10/2013 11:14:59 AM >
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 11:16:06 AM   
MsLadySue


Posts: 2254
Joined: 12/18/2004
Status: offline 		Probably because men are visual creatures.

_____________________________

In order for you to insult me, I would first have to value your opinion.
I love it when someone insults me. That means I don't have to be nice anymore.

(in reply to DOM68005)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 11:17:43 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline 		The only way not to include My front lower bits would be to have all of My shots from the neck up.

Seriously, breasts are not genitalia. I do kind of laugh when men try to equate the two.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to MsLadySue)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 11:18:26 AM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline 		Well if you have read posts on this forum.
You would know and understand that like anything it is based on personal preference.
As long as the picture isn't a violation of the TOS.

There are men and women that like nude pics, some that don't.
Some that like cleavage shots, some that don't.
Some that like foot pics, some that don't.

Eh... you can't please everyone.
As long as you stay within the TOS, are true to yourself, and understand everything has consequences.


Btw... the search feature is your friend. There are a few recent posts regarding Naked and nude photos.

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to DOM68005)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 11:21:27 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline 		READ!

http://www.collarchat.com/m_4367666/tm.htm

http://www.collarchat.com/m_4366576/tm.htm

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to DOM68005)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 11:21:28 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DOM68005

I am of the male species. I have read enough posts and profiles to know the female of the species prefer not to see a picture of the male third leg. Many post in their profiles that doing so will get that email reply deleted or dropped into the bulk file.
Why is it then that females by a large margin put their front lower bits in many profiles and pictures?


Um. By my estimate, I'd say that maybe 1% or less show their vagina pics on collarme. What is this "large margin" you speak of?

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to DOM68005)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 11:25:18 AM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline 		Not all of us do. The same type of men who put that in are the same type of women who have those as well. Those of us who say we don't want to see it though are the ones you will see no bits pictures.



_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to DOM68005)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 11:35:20 AM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

The only way not to include My front lower bits would be to have all of My shots from the neck up.

Seriously, breasts are not genitalia. I do kind of laugh when men try to equate the two.



You're absolutely right LP, but would you agree that both genitalia and breasts sexualize a pic?

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 11:49:46 AM   
lizi


Posts: 4673
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline 		In the case of women putting out nude pics for men, well that would be smart marketing now wouldn't it? Men generally like to see nudity. Women don't, men don't always make the transfer over from what they prefer, to understanding what their intended market would prefer. So a women advertising herself to a man by using nude bait is using bait which would probably get her a response from a large percent of men out there.

(in reply to DOM68005)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 11:51:23 AM   
Baroana


Posts: 1480
Joined: 11/13/2011
Status: offline 		I don't put any lower front bits in my pictures. I don't know who does, but I suspect they are men posing as women. Also, women know what attracts men. Pornographic photography is certainly not a goose and gander situation.

(in reply to lizi)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 11:55:03 AM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline 		Baroana, you hit on a good one, the males posing as female.

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to Baroana)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 12:00:53 PM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Level


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

The only way not to include My front lower bits would be to have all of My shots from the neck up.

Seriously, breasts are not genitalia. I do kind of laugh when men try to equate the two.



You're absolutely right LP, but would you agree that both genitalia and breasts sexualize a pic?


I would say in our culture women's breasts are hyper-sexualized. Some people are uncomfortable with discreet breast-feeding, for goodness' sake!

< Message edited by hlen5 -- 2/10/2013 12:09:40 PM >

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 12:08:03 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline 		You're right, my friend. They do "double duty", so t o speak, as both nutrient provider, and as objects of desire.

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to hlen5)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 12:10:26 PM   
Subano


Posts: 101
Joined: 1/15/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
Seriously, breasts are not genitalia. I do kind of laugh when men try to equate the two.


Clearly breasts are secondary sexual characteristics (i.e., genitalia).
And, you clearly realize that, despite what you wrote.
There is a REASON that breasts develop at puberty - and it isn't only to feed a baby (as evidenced by all other mammals NOT developing permanent breasts unless/until lactating under hormonal influence, i.e., for a baby).

There are many theories WHY humans have developed the breasts as a sexual characteristic, ranging from those I know (such as they replaced the buttocks when early hominids such as Homo erectus stood on two legs) to plenty, I'm sure, that I don't know.

But, clearly LadyPact is mistaken, and she knows it (she just wants to believe it's not true).

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 12:15:58 PM   
EsotericLady


Posts: 713
Joined: 1/2/2013
Status: offline 		I don't believe he was talking breasts when he said front LOWER bits.
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

The only way not to include My front lower bits would be to have all of My shots from the neck up.

Seriously, breasts are not genitalia. I do kind of laugh when men try to equate the two.



(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 12:16:07 PM   
Cilicia


Posts: 72
Joined: 1/23/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lizi

In the case of women putting out nude pics for men, well that would be smart marketing now wouldn't it? Men generally like to see nudity. Women don't,


I think the women want their cake both ways.

They want to attract using what men find attractive - but then they want to complain that men only see them for what they show.

Men themselves aren't devoid of double standards, but keeping in tune with the OP's original question, women want to be seen for what men want but they themselves don't appear to want men to act the same way.

Just another one of those gender differences that make us human beings.

(in reply to lizi)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 12:16:21 PM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline 		It's well known that cleavage is capable of short circuiting the male brain.

They are saying, with the latest cockshot protest, that this is not working similarly for them, you'll have to come up with something else.

_____________________________

Walking nightmare...

(in reply to DOM68005)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 12:16:56 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline 		I think genitalia means the reproductive organs, so she is correct.

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to Subano)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 12:18:15 PM   
EsotericLady


Posts: 713
Joined: 1/2/2013
Status: offline 		What photos are you looking at, DarkSteven? LOL
quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven


quote:

ORIGINAL: DOM68005

I am of the male species. I have read enough posts and profiles to know the female of the species prefer not to see a picture of the male third leg. Many post in their profiles that doing so will get that email reply deleted or dropped into the bulk file.
Why is it then that females by a large margin put their front lower bits in many profiles and pictures?


Um. By my estimate, I'd say that maybe 1% or less show their vagina pics on collarme. What is this "large margin" you speak of?


(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? - 2/10/2013 12:20:24 PM   
pompeii


Posts: 934
Joined: 1/4/2007
From: Silicon Valley, San Jose, California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DOM68005

I am of the male species. I have read enough posts and profiles to know the female of the species prefer not to see a picture of the male third leg. Many post in their profiles that doing so will get that email reply deleted or dropped into the bulk file.
Why is it then that females by a large margin put their front lower bits in many profiles and pictures?


As another male of the species, I am confused which 'bits' you refer to.
Reading this thread, it seems breasts popped up - but lower bits would be the kitty area.

Would the OP clarify if the bits he speaks of are the breasts or the vagina?

(in reply to DOM68005)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Good for the goose as well as the gander? Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094