Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is moving the goal posts"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is moving the goal posts" Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 2/26/2013 8:27:40 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
quote:


Are you claiming Bush was a Tea Party member?!? ROTFLMAO!

No impugnment (although I think the word you are actually casting about for is impugnation....)


Nope. Not looking for impugnation.

quote:

You are slobbering like Cujo and laughing like Woody Woodpecker over some asswipe in your head.
I'm being impugned by innuendo here with that bit of asswipe, and for the record before we get there with your impugnations and innundo?  I have never said nor will I ever say in the as you are fond of of saying 'Are you claiming.....' (and then assigning some asswipe projection on me)


So, reflective listening skills are lost on you. Okay. Got it. So, how is a person to ask for a clarification?

quote:

Let me be clear about this.  I have never and will never accuse you of saying that you fuck sheep.
We clear?  


Whew. Glad we got that one cleared up.

Glad to not have any tangents with you...


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 2/26/2013 8:37:52 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		So, how is a person to ask for a clarification?

How about this, point out where I spoke about George Bush and said he was a member of the Tea Party, or where something like that happened.

Because projecting your fucking ignorant asswipe on my views is not honest in any way or shape or form.

quote:


Glad to not have any tangents with you...


So, are you saying you do fuck sheep? ROTFLMAO.

Q.E.D.

See how one has absolutely nothing to do with the other?  See how it might be considered innuendo and impugnment? See how it clearly has nothing whatsoever to do with what you said, as all your dishonest asswipe questions do to me, but is designed to cast aspersions that are not intended, never implied, never said, a eliding of the point,  but crafted in the worst possible light, each and every time?    


You are caught.  slink away.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 2/26/2013 11:39:12 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
So, how is a person to ask for a clarification?
How about this, point out where I spoke about George Bush and said he was a member of the Tea Party, or where something like that happened.
Because projecting your fucking ignorant asswipe on my views is not honest in any way or shape or form.
quote:


Glad to not have any tangents with you...

So, are you saying you do fuck sheep? ROTFLMAO.
Q.E.D.
See how one has absolutely nothing to do with the other?  See how it might be considered innuendo and impugnment? See how it clearly has nothing whatsoever to do with what you said, as all your dishonest asswipe questions do to me, but is designed to cast aspersions that are not intended, never implied, never said, a eliding of the point,  but crafted in the worst possible light, each and every time?    
You are caught.  slink away.


So, in post #56, did you, or did you not claim that the bank bailout were teaparty-sponsored? Considering that Bush pushed for and passed TARP, then he must be part of the tea party, right?

And, considering that the first Tea Party protest was over TARP and ARRA, how is it that the Tea Party sponsors that Corporate Welfare?

I certainly I hope I don't have to digitize this stuff so it sticks. But, blaming the Tea Party for the bank bailouts is wrong.

As far as the Tea Party and OWS being similar, well, they are, imo. The problems that they protested were similar, but who they were protesting were quite different. OWS was screaming at Wall Street, as if Wall Street is going to see them as reason to make a change. The Tea Party protested to DC, where the changes will have to take place. I am cynical that either will end up being successful. DC likes being bought by Wall Street, and Wall Street profits by buying DC. That's what Wall Street does. However, that's not what DC is supposed to do, by any stretch.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 2/26/2013 11:48:45 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		No, I claimed no such thing, I said teabaggers, didn't I, haven't you read on every fuckin thread that there is no Tea Party? That it has been co-opted?


It is non-extant, vanished, sucked up by the teabaggers.

Show me a T-Montana somewhere, every damn one of them is 'republican'.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-20/why-should-taxpayers-give-big-banks-83-billion-a-year-.html
Dump this teabagger sponsored corporate welfare, and we are in business, no cuts whatsoever, and any agreement on cuts would be icing on the cake. 

That is clipped from you quoting me, where does it mention the non existant Tea Party or Bush?

Those are as germain to what I said as fucking sheep is, do you get it?

If you are a republican, you are a teabagger, end of fuckin joke.  There are no real republicans left in this old world with the exception of MusicMystery and myself.

They left the building way before elvis.  



And I showed you the banks getting 85 billion corporate and you posted on it....and one of the fundamental precepts of the TEA PARTY is?    


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 2/26/2013 12:57:17 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
No, I claimed no such thing, I said teabaggers, didn't I, haven't you read on every fuckin thread that there is no Tea Party? That it has been co-opted?
It is non-extant, vanished, sucked up by the teabaggers.
Show me a T-Montana somewhere, every damn one of them is 'republican'.
quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-20/why-should-taxpayers-give-big-banks-83-billion-a-year-.html
Dump this teabagger sponsored corporate welfare, and we are in business, no cuts whatsoever, and any agreement on cuts would be icing on the cake. 

That is clipped from you quoting me, where does it mention the non existant Tea Party or Bush?
Those are as germain to what I said as fucking sheep is, do you get it?
If you are a republican, you are a teabagger, end of fuckin joke.  There are no real republicans left in this old world with the exception of MusicMystery and myself.
They left the building way before elvis.  


"If you are a republican, you are a teabagger."

Bush was a republican. Ergo, Bush is a member of the Tea Party (and, yes, I know you keep using the derogatory term in place of it). Thanks for playing.

quote:

And I showed you the banks getting 85 billion corporate and you posted on it....and one of the fundamental precepts of the TEA PARTY is?    


Not sure which you are referring to, but "too big to fail" certainly isn't.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 2/27/2013 8:08:45 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
That is clipped from you quoting me, where does it mention the non existant Tea Party or Bush?
Those are as germain to what I said as fucking sheep is, do you get it?
If you are a republican, you are a teabagger, end of fuckin joke.  There are no real republicans left in this old world with the exception of MusicMystery and myself.
They left the building way before elvis.  


"If you are a republican, you are a teabagger."

Bush was a republican. Ergo, Bush is a member of the Tea Party (and, yes, I know you keep using the derogatory term in place of it). Thanks for playing.

Sure, he's made the claim republican=teabagger which I disagree with him on but it's certainly his position. However, he's also made it quite clear that definitionally what he means with the terms tea party and teabagger are not equivalent.

In other words Tea Party≠tea bagger.

Please stop lying about other people's positions.

< Message edited by GotSteel -- 2/27/2013 8:09:23 PM >

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 2/28/2013 3:15:13 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
That is clipped from you quoting me, where does it mention the non existant Tea Party or Bush?
Those are as germain to what I said as fucking sheep is, do you get it?
If you are a republican, you are a teabagger, end of fuckin joke.  There are no real republicans left in this old world with the exception of MusicMystery and myself.
They left the building way before elvis.  

"If you are a republican, you are a teabagger."
Bush was a republican. Ergo, Bush is a member of the Tea Party (and, yes, I know you keep using the derogatory term in place of it). Thanks for playing.

Sure, he's made the claim republican=teabagger which I disagree with him on but it's certainly his position. However, he's also made it quite clear that definitionally what he means with the terms tea party and teabagger are not equivalent.
In other words Tea Party≠tea bagger.
Please stop lying about other people's positions.


And, he's also said there is no Tea Party anymore, so who is calling a "teabagger?" Or, is he saying that he knows that the Republicans in Congress participate in the intimate act of "teabagging?"


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 2/28/2013 6:32:41 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		Why don't you grab up a couple of remedial english courses.  I am forbidden, btw,  to call them nutsuckers, so I don't.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 2/28/2013 6:33:27 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 2/28/2013 4:48:25 PM   
FatDomDaddy


Posts: 3183
Joined: 1/31/2004
Status: offline 		Look how angry you are.... must be hard living with all that hate.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 2/28/2013 5:03:40 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline 		He is one of the most positive posters here with one of the best senses of humor on here......speak for yourself.







All you offer is glib,trite,snark,smug.arrogant and willful ignorance.


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to FatDomDaddy)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 2/28/2013 8:22:00 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
He is one of the most positive posters here with one of the best senses of humor on here......speak for yourself.


Which isn't so much a positive review of him as a horrible condemnation of the rest of us.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 2/28/2013 9:05:30 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 2/28/2013 9:07:48 PM >

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 2/28/2013 10:19:34 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
And, he's also said there is no Tea Party anymore, so who is calling a "teabagger?"

republican=teabagger

Both he and I have already explained that part of his position to you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
No, I claimed no such thing, I said teabaggers, didn't I, haven't you read on every fuckin thread that there is no Tea Party? That it has been co-opted?


It is non-extant, vanished, sucked up by the teabaggers.

Show me a T-Montana somewhere, every damn one of them is 'republican'.


< Message edited by GotSteel -- 2/28/2013 10:20:17 PM >

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 3/1/2013 5:43:07 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

Look how angry you are.... must be hard living with all that hate.



Nah, I laugh alot because I get to fuck with all the untutored imbeciles alot, and they go off, and it gives me wood.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to FatDomDaddy)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 3/1/2013 3:47:10 PM   
FatDomDaddy


Posts: 3183
Joined: 1/31/2004
Status: offline 		a lot huh?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is... - 3/2/2013 7:18:15 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		yeah, I am trying to get that one into common usage, since people are freely using cohorts now.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to FatDomDaddy)
Profile   Post #: 76
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Bob Woodward on Sequester: President Obama "is moving the goal posts" Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094