RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


njlauren -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/27/2013 4:00:36 PM)

Charles-

One note, if I had to give you any advice, stay away from fetish parties/play parties as a place to meet people, and rather, get involved in some bd/sm groups, munches, meetings, whatever. If a group (not a promoter, a group) is throwing a play party, maybe, but having gone to BD/SM clubs and fetish parties and the like, you may not do very well there. I am talking only of my own experience, but fetish parties usually IME consisted of the following groups: 1)couples (or more) there to play with themselves or their friends, they already are in relationships and aren't interested 2)single males, hoping to find someone 3)people simply into the fetish aspects of i t, they love the clothing and such, and are not really into the rest of it (a lot of them, quite frankly, also struck me as being narcissistic, but whatever) 4)Gawkers, going to see the freaks (if a publicly promoted party), and that is about it. In my years of going to those kinds of things, I rarely saw women not with someone, and rarely if ever saw a dominant female there without her sub(s). I occassionally did find single women there (not talking married, I mean not with a BF or whatever), and often they were sub curious. Obviously, this is my experience and perceptions, everyone's experiences may vary, but fetish and play parties IME didn't look that promising for relationships. Someone may play with you, but that is not the same thing as wanting a relationship.




JeffBC -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 6:38:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder
I was thinking the same thing on this thread. And I would agree with you. It's been my experience as well. It has nothing to do with being afraid to ask. It's just that like wants like.

This.

And I have no idea why we like to tell ourselves lies about the mating game. It ought to be obviously true exactly as you said previously LW... you work hard on how you look... you wanted a partner who did the same. It's my general observation that most of us could look pretty good IF we chose to focus on it. I've said to Carol for years that if you're female, have long hair, and are reasonably slim then you're a hottie if you want to be. It took her a long time to believe that until I got her down to a size 4 and long hair and then suddenly....

For most people these are not unobtainable goals. For men it's really not that much different. Get down to 15% body fat and put on some nice clothes. Men also have the extra burden of "and now start a corporation" (exaggeration) but it is what it is. Play the game or don't but at least acknowledge the rules. NONE Of that, however, gets rid of the other criteria we all use. Even when I find my matching 6 or whatever I still want her to also have a lot of other internal qualities and for me, at least, it'd be way harder to find those than it would be to find a 6... or a 10 for that matter. It isn't either/or. It's both.

Now... just to argue against myself I strongly suspect there have been a few 8-10's in my life that have wished that I would approach them. I never have nor will I ever. In my case it isn't because of lack of confidence although earlier in my life it probably was. But nowadays it's just a cold-blooded assessment of what I'm likely to find inside the pretty packaging.




BlkTallFullfig -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 7:01:18 AM)

Charles, how about trying on a button up shirt, or a cute T-shirt, have someone take several pictures of you alone, not playing under women's arses, and using those for your profile? If it's not too much trouble. I imagine a cleaned up picture goes a long way, in attracting women. M




Charles6682 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 10:11:53 AM)

I've been following the advice on here so far.I took down all the fetish videos I had,put up one descent photo and many more to come.I deleted alot of the fetish only references on my profile.I will be putting up nicer pcitures as time goes on.




Charles6682 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 10:16:13 AM)

There are 2 fetish clubs near where I live.1 seems mainly geared towards "play only".The other Fetish club seems more like a educational type of club.I'm sure theres play but they also have classes,group meetings,educational outreach and so on.




MissSpiderKiss -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 10:37:59 AM)

Well personally speaking I go for complete submission, I would rather have a dig ugly sub/slave who has completely submitted than some so called beautiful person who is up there own ass, just my opinion




njlauren -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 10:38:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682

There are 2 fetish clubs near where I live.1 seems mainly geared towards "play only".The other Fetish club seems more like a educational type of club.I'm sure theres play but they also have classes,group meetings,educational outreach and so on.

Let me clarify something, so people don't flame me about it..when I said fetish club, I was talking about the kind of place that is open on Friday and Sat nights, has play space and people go there to play......as opposed to a fetish group (and maybe some groups have their own playspace/club, wouldn't surprise me but haven't seen it). Groups like Black Rose and TES in NYC are the latter......they sponsor play parties, of course and so forth, but they also have regular meetings with topics and demos and so forth....and that is where you might find someone IMO.




njlauren -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 10:56:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder
I was thinking the same thing on this thread. And I would agree with you. It's been my experience as well. It has nothing to do with being afraid to ask. It's just that like wants like.

This.

And I have no idea why we like to tell ourselves lies about the mating game. It ought to be obviously true exactly as you said previously LW... you work hard on how you look... you wanted a partner who did the same. It's my general observation that most of us could look pretty good IF we chose to focus on it. I've said to Carol for years that if you're female, have long hair, and are reasonably slim then you're a hottie if you want to be. It took her a long time to believe that until I got her down to a size 4 and long hair and then suddenly....

For most people these are not unobtainable goals. For men it's really not that much different. Get down to 15% body fat and put on some nice clothes. Men also have the extra burden of "and now start a corporation" (exaggeration) but it is what it is. Play the game or don't but at least acknowledge the rules. NONE Of that, however, gets rid of the other criteria we all use. Even when I find my matching 6 or whatever I still want her to also have a lot of other internal qualities and for me, at least, it'd be way harder to find those than it would be to find a 6... or a 10 for that matter. It isn't either/or. It's both.

Now... just to argue against myself I strongly suspect there have been a few 8-10's in my life that have wished that I would approach them. I never have nor will I ever. In my case it isn't because of lack of confidence although earlier in my life it probably was. But nowadays it's just a cold-blooded assessment of what I'm likely to find inside the pretty packaging.


There is a subtle point in all this, and that is two things are being mixed here, how someone presents themselves and what their physical type is. When we talk 8-10s we are talking physical morphology and genes more then anything else, their potential. A 10 who doesn't take care of themselves is going to end up looking like shit, look what happens to beautiful people who end up hooked on drugs and crap, or who let themselves go as they age (among other things, those young women who can eat anything and not gain weight, when they hit their late 30's and 40's, are going to pay for it).

I am not disagreeing that someone who takes care of themselves, works out, has proper hygiene, and so forth, is not going to be more attractive, but that isn't the same thing. Someone who is an 7 might become a 9 through the wonders of silicon and liposuction, but they still have to take care of it. Someone who doesn't care about themselves is not going to be very attractive, but that is not the same thing as being a 6 or a 10, a troll can be a troll at any potential.

One of the things about the scene community is often some of the biggest lifestyle people (and again, this is just my observation), the ones in lifestyle relationships, are not 'beautiful people' but rather then use what they have. There are a lot of dommes who according to the standards of the beautiful people, are not in that class, who might be technically overweight or not have the perfect figure, but when they come into a room they turn heads. One of my conclusions was that in my observations, generally the 'beauties' by traditional standards often were more into the fetish clothing and being seen, not the lifestyle people (and please, understand, this is a)my observations and b)cannot be used as a rule. It might be easier for a boy toy sub to attract a pretty domme initially, but in the end, as someone else wrote quite well, the package underneath is going to be what ends up cementing the relationship. A slob is a slob, but a sub who is ordinary or hasn't been graced with great jeans, who does everything they can to present themselves, who is truly submissive, in the end is going to do better then the pretty boy with attitude. The dominant who may be short and technically not on the skinny side, who has average looks, might get subs who are stunning because they are the total package and it shows.

Looks matter, but what you do with them IMO matter more in the long term. Like I said, looking for fuck buddies, 10's will go with 9's and 10's, but when it comes to relationships, not so sure that works out.




Charles6682 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 10:57:32 AM)

I agree Lauren and I will be going towards the latter.The club with groups,classes and etc.




LadyPact -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 10:58:40 AM)

The last thing I'd call Black Rose is a 'fetish club'. Sorry, that's the old fashioned in Me that says leather organizations are leather lifestyle based, rather than fetish based. There are clubs that are fetish oriented. Literally places to dress up and basically show off outfits.

I think what njlauren might be referring to would be a public BDSM club such as The Woodshed, which wouldn't be too far away from the OP. (That might even be the one that the OP referred to when discussing one that has classes and such.) Most major clubs that I'm familiar with hold some educational events, various times for certain demographics, and/or munch groups.

Since I'm on the subject of munch groups, the majority of groups that I've been associated with over the years do tend to have a play space of some kind. That's usually a space in somebody's home that the group has use of for an evening or some kind of co-op. Up here, we have the minority situation where a space is rented for a community event every couple of months. These are some dedicated folks. They rent the space, spend the entire day setting up the dungeon, we have our community event from 7:00 PM to whenever, and they tear it all down the next day. That's some serious dedication if you ask Me.

Charles, if you did happen to be talking about the Woodshed, I haven't been there personally, but everybody I have ever spoken to who has attended has had good things to say about it. They regularly post in the Upcoming Events section to give you an idea about some of the educational events that they offer.




Charles6682 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 11:34:29 AM)

The Woodshed does have a very positive reputation here in the state of Florida and it seems it even has a good reputation beyond the USA borders.I do see alot of Europeans here where I live.I'm quite use to it now.Theres people literally from all over the world here.I guess word does travel back home.




Charles6682 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 11:48:03 AM)

Sorry,I thought I did take down all my fetish photos but I did miss a few.Now all the fetish photos are deleted from my profile.




Charles6682 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 11:52:56 AM)

MissSpiderKiss,that leaves me with another question.Whats more important to Dommes on here when it comes to submissives,the looks or the submission?




mnottertail -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 11:55:51 AM)

Neither one of those prolly would be a first choice, but nobody wants to take night of the living dead over to munch with ma and pa either. 




littlewonder -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 12:37:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissSpiderKiss

Well personally speaking I go for complete submission, I would rather have a dig ugly sub/slave who has completely submitted than some so called beautiful person who is up there own ass, just my opinion


Why can't you have both beauty and submission???

It IS possible to have both. You don't need to choose one over the other.

Getting back to the looks thing that njlauren spoke about where even the not so beautiful women command attention in bdsm events, I will admit that it's the only place I have ever seen that and it's something that always confuses me and probably another reason I think I don't really understand public bdsm stuff. It's just not what you see outside of bdsm. So in bdsm it seems that looks don't matter as much and it could be that the numbers are small and people look for kink or fetishes more than they do looks. It's a numbers game I think and so it's going to be very different than the rest of society.




Charles6682 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 12:42:24 PM)

Sure,both can be possible.I am just wondering which is more important?Of course every response is different.But the overall consensus is what I am seeking here.




littlewonder -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 12:46:35 PM)

For me, both. I never settled for one over the other. I wanted it all....both looks and dominance and intelligence, and everything else I was seeking. It's why I was single for over 8 years before meeting Master. Why should any one part be more important? Why settle?




Charles6682 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 12:54:39 PM)

What happens when aging takes its course?Not everyone is going to be "10" forever?




MstrPBK -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 12:55:20 PM)

I believe it is. With certain population segments trying to tell others that 'politically correct' is the only correct the S&M and BSDM community has to adapt. I am a Master who seeks those male slaves who understands what the 'New Millennium' slave has to be in public.

MstrPBk
St. Paul, MN USA




littlewonder -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/28/2013 1:04:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682

What happens when aging takes its course?Not everyone is going to be "10" forever?


You can if you take care of your body, soul and mind. I'm big on taking care of yourself so that when you are old, you will not have all the problems and such that you see among older folks.

Eat right, don't smoke, limit drink, exercise, keep your mind fresh, nurture your soul. You'd be amazed how well you will hold up if you do what it takes to stay that way.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625