RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


JeffBC -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 9:02:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt
How much looks matter to a person has nothing to do with BDSM, it has to do with how shallow they are.

Or, getting rid of the judgement bias... "how mono-focused they are on one particular attribute."

If some woman only wants to talk to the Brad Pitts of the world I have no problem with that. But she will need to understand that other women want that too. In my head I sort of see various characteristics as having price tags attached. The price tag is a supply/demand thing... how likely is it for this thing to occur and how strongly is it sought after. From my male viewpoint...

I want her to be a cheerleader: +20
I want her to be rich: +40
I want her to be well balanced: +10
I want her to be honorable: +40
etc.

In the end I can pile up as many attributes as I want. The question is can I afford them? Perhaps I only have 20 chips to spend myself (in terms of my own overall dating attractiveness). Well, maybe that cheerleader thing is the most important thing to me so I'm all set. One can only hopes that that's going to produce happiness. Instead of "shallowness" I see it as "clear set of priorities which I'm glad aren't mine."

And insofar as Awareness' ludicrous response about men and only wanting to fuck hot women ... he's blatantly wrong. Yes, I'm in a minority and yes men are often led around by their dicks just as he indicates he is. But I know several men who consciously steer away from women who are too pretty... myself among them. There's just too much baggage and too many flies buzzing around for it to be interesting to me.




ClassAct2006 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 10:44:58 AM)

That's a bhit like how I analyse it except I use a sea saw analogy in terms of plus and negative points. Some things will so negative I would not go near him - married or drug user or no job or dreadfully physically repulsive and 300 pounds or very low IQ or whatever.
Others are not so important - he has children great; he doesn't - very different from me, slight negative point; he has a similar life to mine, good job etc - plus point - negative - very low earnings, in and out of work, rents a flat, no assets, stability, income.
However I don't mathematically score it.

There needs to be some visual attraction and mental connection and he needs to be fast and bright and then of course he must be dominant just as he probably wants to find me attractive to some extent, have the right mental connection (people under estimate how important someone who is kind is on both sides) and she must be sub.

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt
How much looks matter to a person has nothing to do with BDSM, it has to do with how shallow they are.

Or, getting rid of the judgement bias... "how mono-focused they are on one particular attribute."

If some woman only wants to talk to the Brad Pitts of the world I have no problem with that. But she will need to understand that other women want that too. In my head I sort of see various characteristics as having price tags attached. The price tag is a supply/demand thing... how likely is it for this thing to occur and how strongly is it sought after. From my male viewpoint...

I want her to be a cheerleader: +20
I want her to be rich: +40
I want her to be well balanced: +10
I want her to be honorable: +40
etc.

In the end I can pile up as many attributes as I want. The question is can I afford them? Perhaps I only have 20 chips to spend myself (in terms of my own overall dating attractiveness). Well, maybe that cheerleader thing is the most important thing to me so I'm all set. One can only hopes that that's going to produce happiness. Instead of "shallowness" I see it as "clear set of priorities which I'm glad aren't mine."

And insofar as Awareness' ludicrous response about men and only wanting to fuck hot women ... he's blatantly wrong. Yes, I'm in a minority and yes men are often led around by their dicks just as he indicates he is. But I know several men who consciously steer away from women who are too pretty... myself among them. There's just too much baggage and too many flies buzzing around for it to be interesting to me.





Dyfrynt -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 10:45:20 AM)

To the OP:
I have been watching this thread for a while now, and honestly I couldn't figure out just what was being asked, and how it should be answered. Finally getting a handle on how to respond.

Charles, you are correct. You cannot compete with people who have much more money and/or much better looks than you. Few of us can. And beautiful people (however you wish to define that) tend to gravitate towards other beautiful people.

That doesn't mean you are SOL. It does mean you have to try harder. You've indicated during this thread that you are willing to take up many of the good suggestions you have been given. That's shows a great attitude.

The other part is purely a numbers game. And it will take time. It is so easy to become frustrated with a lack of success. You cannot let that get to you or you are done.

As an example I will mention my brother. He is over 40 and he constantly complains that he cannot find a single women over 30 who hasn't already been married, and who doesn't have kids.

I have had five relationships with women over 30 who may have been married before, but who have never had kids. And believe me I am not beating my own drum here. I am very average looking, on the short side, and not exactly a paragon of male physique. The women I have had relationships with were all pretty or cute to me, but none of them would rate more than average in looks.

My point? I'm out there actively beating the bushes while my brother, for the most part, sits at home and grouses. Success is a mix of dogged determination along with no small matter of pure luck.

Sure hope all this meandering helps.




littlewonder -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 11:07:51 AM)

Well I guess I'll be one who agrees with Awareness on this. Yes, I know...shocked me too. [:D]

Yes, men want to fuck hot women, at least most men I've ever known in my lifetime. I've never met a man who didn't. It could be a gender gap thing. I dunno.

A lot of women wanna fuck hot guys. Not all though. It seems there are a lot of women out there who don't care about the looks. I can't really say I get it but it seems to be prevalent.

Myself, yeah, it's about looks. Had Master not been hot to me when I met him, I would have had one coffee and left...no matter how smart, no matter how skillful, confident or anything else he is. I gotta find a guy hot and he's gotta find me hot, which is why I work on how I look.

And yes, confidence is extremely important. And yes, even Dommes want a man who oozes confidence. So while you may not be hot, there are women out there who don't care so much about looks as long as you have everything else they want....confidence, strength, skills, intelligence.

These can all be learned and even your looks can be changed. Find clothing that fits you correctly, lose weight, get a manicure and pedicure, get a decent haircut or keep the baldness in order....aka...shave it or keep it neat, don't leave stray hairs that just look weird. Go to the gym, get a facial, get some plastic surgery if you think it will help you. Whatever. It all can be fixed.

So if you're not getting a woman, ask yourself why. Ask the women around you why they think you are having problems. Hopefully they will be honest with you.

Personally to me it sounds like you're so caught up in shooting vids that you've lost all perspective on reality and in real women and not what is in the vids or the type you work with who are going to tell you whatever you want to hear just to make sure they get out of you what they want.




RedMagic1 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 12:06:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder
Yes, men want to fuck hot women, at least most men I've ever known in my lifetime. I've never met a man who didn't. It could be a gender gap thing. I dunno.

There's a certain "been there, done that," phenomenon, though. Kind of like ChatteParfait's post, but in reverse. If I'd never dated a woman who was waaaaay hotter than me, superficial-looks-wise, I'd probably still want to, just to prove to myself I could. But I have, and I didn't find it satisfying. So I prioritize other characteristics now.

Regarding the "gender gap," I was living with a woman whose face was average but whose body was perfect -- as in, heterosexual women would spontaneously tell her to "eat a fucking French fry, bitch," when she worked out in shorts and a sports bra. I once told her that I felt a bit guilty that she was giving me such a wonderful body, and I was giving her a body that was just a bit above average. She looked shocked, and replied, "I don't think about that at all. I just see my body as one more thing I can provide to the relationship."




Charles6682 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 12:23:59 PM)

I agree with RedMagic to some degree.Since I have already done alot of videos with some very attractive women,perhaps that "thrill" is gone too.I've been there,done that,got the T-shirt to prove it.I have accomplished everything I wanted to when it comes to videos.Since I have done alot of things I thought I never would,I am well beyond the point of just seeking another "play partner".




littlewonder -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 12:30:02 PM)

If that shallow remark was aimed at me, I'll take it. I've never claimed to not be shallow and I'm fine with it. I have no problems accepting it, thankyouverymuch. I work hard on how I look and I wanted a guy who does the same.





cordeliasub -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 12:56:52 PM)

I think that sometimes it just boils down to realistic. I remember watching a House episode where a gorgeous woman was married to a so-so man. House didn't get it. He said something to the effect of 9's marry 9's, 4's marry 4's etc. And in general, he is right (most of the time). Looks are not the first thing my list, but then again I can tell when I look at someone whether there is a "hubba hubba" or a "hmmmm....no." Most of it has to do with hygiene, neatness, matching clothing, and whether I have to look up or down to look them in the eye. However - as much as I am comfortable in my own skin and love myself, I am....well, I'll be generous and say I am somewhere between a 6 or 7 if we are gonna use stereotypical scoring (Hey - remember I said I was being generous LOL). For me to approach someone who is objectively a 9.5 is just something I am not going to do because I don't like embarrassing myself. However.....I am probably not going to be able to get past an outside that is a 3.

So thought many things combine to decide attraction for me, I do have a scale, so to speak. I think we all do whether we admit it or not.




ChatteParfaitt -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 12:58:41 PM)

I agree there should be chemistry between people, but what creates great chemistry is a matter for debate, and if I knew the answer, I'd be a very rich woman now (and more attractive!).

Chemistry is not all about looks. One of the sexiest men I've ever seen (in the movies) was not classically handsome and didn't have a great body. He was also short, I believe 5'7" -- and yet he became a huge star and managed to pull one of the best looking and sexiest female actors around at the time. They became a couple on stage and off.

I'm talking about Humphrey Bogart, and his co-star Lauren Bacall. He was 45, she was 20.

It was his personality that made him a star, not his looks. He managed to be 'hot' despite his looks.





ClassAct2006 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 1:12:42 PM)

It's not shallow to want someone you find attractive. Most people end up with someone around the same level of looks unless it's impoverished woman wanting a meal ticket (and occasionally the other way round).

Those who want someone they find reasonably attractive (which is most of us) also want someone we get on with. Both are important. I've tried a relationship for a bit where I did not find someone attractive as an experiment and it didn't work. It is not even that I need someone with film star looks but I need a certain composition of features on the face which I find attractive, someone probably as smiley and kind as I think I am and also who can dress reasonably well and isn't obese. I don't think that's being shallow. I also hate men with any facial hair at all. Some of these things are just personal preference.

I agree with the brother above writing about his brother. Some people I know say there are no men around, it's impossible to find a boyfriend as a woman over 40. It isn't at all. Some people are just so negative, try nothing, never go out, see the glass as half full and are such a bunch of misery no one would ever want to date them and others have criteria so hard to find they are virtually walking around with a sign saying - I don't want anyone. However that doesn't mean conversely you should have no requirements at all, everyone finds their own balance of what are essential requirements and what does or does not matter. Eg I don't have to have someone who has children although I prefer it as that has been and is my life. Other women without children may really want someone who has none too.



quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

If that shallow remark was aimed at me, I'll take it. I've never claimed to not be shallow and I'm fine with it. I have no problems accepting it, thankyouverymuch. I work hard on how I look and I wanted a guy who does the same.







sexyred1 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 3:31:25 PM)

You need to be realistic.

It is not shallow to want to be with someone attractive; that is the law of attraction and always has been and will be.

The thing is, attraction is subjective. So someone thinking that a man or woman is hot, may not register as hot to someone else.

Honestly? The most stereotypically hot women have been cheated on, even though people are so shocked. It happens.

Everyone is attracted to hot, beautiful and handsome. The thing is to STAY attracted to them and to be in a relationship that is multifaceted, you need more than looks.

The problem with online as well as offline, is that if you do not find someone attractive enough to get to know them, you will never know how wonderful, smart, loyal, adjective, adjective, adjective, or how perfect they are for you, because the looks filter was not suitable.

So what do you do? Keep trying to meet people in all types of settings and above all, be confident about yourself. To me, that is the most attractive quality.

I have been with drop dead gorgeous men my entire life and the ones I remember, are the ones who may not have been standard issue gorgeous, but who thrilled me and KEPT me thrilled with their minds and hearts.




njlauren -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 6:36:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682

Also,not every male sub is some desperate guy just waiting to get abused by any Woman that walks by.In my day to day living,I can certainly be assertive when I need to be.I also know how to defend myself.If I some some punk bully picking on somebody weaker than them,you better dam believe I'd be right there to stop that.Submission and kindness do not always equal weakness.I am a human being first and I believe in doing the right thing.

I do agree that there are some male subs who could benefit from treatment.I've talked to therapist about this and the DSM,(what Doctors use to diagnose mental illness) actually mentions these things in greater detail.Luckily,I had a good friend who also had a degree in pyschology who was always very open minded and understanding.Not all therapists are BDSM friendly.Good thing for my friend,I felt very comfortable talking to her about all of this,plus it was all free!She assured me I was not crazy,lol,As long as it does not interupt someones day to day living.It can be easy for someone who is already depressed to be taking advantage of by those who may not have that person best interest at heart.

Last,being a open submissive for me requires strength.I have talked with Dommes who do view submissives has people with a strong backbone.Those are really the Dommes I should be listening to.



The whole wimpy sub, lowly worm, worthless sub is something I never understood, and quite frankly, I never understood why a dominant would want someone like that. I have known enough lifestyle people, ranging from weekend players to serious D/s,M/s people, that very few want the lowly worm kind of male sub, or the female sub that is totally in the thrall of their D or M. Whether a bedroom sub or lifestyle, from what I have seen most dominants seem to enjoy a sub who is strong and self centered, who has energy and will of life that they in effect turn over to their dominant to use as they see fit, it is a gift. I have seen the kind of weak, needy sub type and quite honestly, the dominants who seem to attract that kind of sub scare the crap out of me, they seemed more like abusers looking for cover, someone who won't complain or walk away, rather then a sub gladly submitting.

I have known more then a few dommes over the years, and quite honestly, I don't think looks are the big thing for them, I have seen male subs who could be models, but the overwhelming majority of male subs I have known were pretty much average joe types. From the femme dommes I was friendly with, in their relationships they were looking for someone that they clicked with, both on the D/s, BD/SM level, and on a personal one, what I kept hearing was that the personal was more important than the BD/SM portion, in who they ended up in relationships with (and again, this is simply my observations, for what it is worth). The personality of the person, compatibility of interests, intelligence, and to a certain extent looks played a role in it. The self proclaimed asshole in another post made a good point, Dommes are still women, and an unattractive specimen, someone who doesn't take care of themselves, has hygiene issues, isn't self assured, isn't gainfully employed, seems to think being a sub means the domme 'doing them', are going to have a really hard time, the way they would with vanilla women. Again, only speaking from what I have seen, but it seems like the male subs who hooked up actually seemed to like/love their domme as a person, the whole package, where the BD/SM/D/s, whatever, was a part of the package, not the whole thing.

I honestly think porn and erotic crappy stories and the like have led to the idea that a male sub is some sort of wimpy sissy, dependent on their domme as a kind of mommy or something, and while that type does exist, I don't think it is common, but that is what is portrayed.

My advice? Work on the things you think are missing in your life, bring yourself to the point where you are happy with yourself, comfortable with who you are, and I bet if you start socializing in the community, you will find someone. You seem like a decent guy, you are actually listening to what people are writing, and if so, your problem is probably a)trying to hook up on here or anywhere else online and b)scaring people off with your profile:). Get out of virtual space, socialize in the wider world of us weirdos, and i bet something good will happen.




njlauren -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 6:50:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

Well I guess I'll be one who agrees with Awareness on this. Yes, I know...shocked me too. [:D]

Yes, men want to fuck hot women, at least most men I've ever known in my lifetime. I've never met a man who didn't. It could be a gender gap thing. I dunno.

A lot of women wanna fuck hot guys. Not all though. It seems there are a lot of women out there who don't care about the looks. I can't really say I get it but it seems to be prevalent.

Myself, yeah, it's about looks. Had Master not been hot to me when I met him, I would have had one coffee and left...no matter how smart, no matter how skillful, confident or anything else he is. I gotta find a guy hot and he's gotta find me hot, which is why I work on how I look.

And yes, confidence is extremely important. And yes, even Dommes want a man who oozes confidence. So while you may not be hot, there are women out there who don't care so much about looks as long as you have everything else they want....confidence, strength, skills, intelligence.

These can all be learned and even your looks can be changed. Find clothing that fits you correctly, lose weight, get a manicure and pedicure, get a decent haircut or keep the baldness in order....aka...shave it or keep it neat, don't leave stray hairs that just look weird. Go to the gym, get a facial, get some plastic surgery if you think it will help you. Whatever. It all can be fixed.

So if you're not getting a woman, ask yourself why. Ask the women around you why they think you are having problems. Hopefully they will be honest with you.

Personally to me it sounds like you're so caught up in shooting vids that you've lost all perspective on reality and in real women and not what is in the vids or the type you work with who are going to tell you whatever you want to hear just to make sure they get out of you what they want.


Thing is, the guy you find hot, other women might find to be "eh" in the looks department, hotness is in the eye of beholder. If someone asked me who I thought a hot guy was, I would tell you Liam Neeson (especially when in a movie busy killing and maiming scores of people *lol*), while a lot of people would tell you it is guys like Channing Tatum, who I find to be, eh......(and I would love to know why anyone would find Ashton Kushner hot..*gag*). On the female side, I was looking at the academy awards, and the woman I found most attractive was the wife of the guy who won for best supporting actor (the german actor in Djhango in chains), she was one of the young beauties with the silicon tits, she isn't that young, but I found her really hot, so there:). (Course, then there is Halle Berry, she is beyond hot..how some fucking idiot could cheat on her, I'll never understand...).

I will put this on another tack, a lot of men and women want to fuck the hot gal, the hot guy, but few end up wanting to marry them, being a fuck buddy and being a partner/mate/companion, are two totally different things. Sometimes they come together, but most of the time, the guy or gal who goes after the hot fuck buddy finds themselves disappointed IME.




njlauren -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 6:57:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cordeliasub

I think that sometimes it just boils down to realistic. I remember watching a House episode where a gorgeous woman was married to a so-so man. House didn't get it. He said something to the effect of 9's marry 9's, 4's marry 4's etc. And in general, he is right (most of the time). Looks are not the first thing my list, but then again I can tell when I look at someone whether there is a "hubba hubba" or a "hmmmm....no." Most of it has to do with hygiene, neatness, matching clothing, and whether I have to look up or down to look them in the eye. However - as much as I am comfortable in my own skin and love myself, I am....well, I'll be generous and say I am somewhere between a 6 or 7 if we are gonna use stereotypical scoring (Hey - remember I said I was being generous LOL). For me to approach someone who is objectively a 9.5 is just something I am not going to do because I don't like embarrassing myself. However.....I am probably not going to be able to get past an outside that is a 3.

So thought many things combine to decide attraction for me, I do have a scale, so to speak. I think we all do whether we admit it or not.


What Dr. House and many people forget is that on the scale of looks, most people are pretty much going to be in the range of 4 to 7, 1-3 and 8-10 are outliers of a sort (bell curve). More importantly, there is an old saying with a lot of truth to it, some of the most lonely people are stunning women and good looking men who are out on the bell curve themselves. 8's, 9's and 10's are rare, and one of the reason they tend to end up with each other is because they are the only ones with self confidence to ask the other one out. 7's think they have no chance with a 9, so they never ask, and you hear this time and again. It is why an ordinary guy can end up with a beautiful woman, someone once asked Anne Bancroft why she married Mel Brooks, and she said because he made her laugh and also saw her as his Annie, his own special person. It doesn't mean looks don't matter, but when it comes to relationships what is very interesting is studies have shown that relationships of two beautiful people are more likely to bust up then a more plain person with a beauty...maybe because they actually put more effort into the other things, other then looking beautiful.




Charles6682 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 7:20:33 PM)

Thank you Lauren,I appericate your words.After some careful thinking with reading these posts,I'll agree that I have put too much on my looks and I have made the mistake of mixing business with pleasure with these videos.Normally,I try not to get attached to any of the girls I have shot with just because of situations like this.I let my guard down,got suckered in and got emotional.That may be another area I do need to work on.I can be emotional.Not the cry baby crap.But sometimes,it can be easy to be suckered in once in "sub space".I've been thinking about getting away from the whole video aspect to this and actually meet some REAL Dommes who actually live this lifestyle,not just when some camera is on to make some money.




littlewonder -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 7:26:01 PM)

I keep thinking that you have only ever been with dommes on camera and not outside of that and makes me wonder how you will react with those outside of cameras and just how different it's going to be for you. It's just something you should be aware of so you don't come away thinking they should be just like the ones you filmed with and now you're angry and jaded that they're not "real".




JeffBC -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 7:43:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ClassAct2006
Those who want someone they find reasonably attractive (which is most of us) also want someone we get on with. Both are important.

Heh... whodathunk it could be that simple?

I kind of like being shallow though so I think I'm gonna go with it (for the record, I'm getting my shallow point currently because I'm stripping a few spare pounds off of Carol)




Charles6682 -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 7:58:20 PM)

I have been to real fetish parties before and have been around REAL Dommes.I do know the difference.I really prefer the ring thing than doing anymore videos anyways.The videos did provide me a unique chance to explore some things that I probaly would not have been able to any other way.




njlauren -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 9:54:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682

I have been to real fetish parties before and have been around REAL Dommes.I do know the difference.I really prefer the ring thing than doing anymore videos anyways.The videos did provide me a unique chance to explore some things that I probaly would not have been able to any other way.

I think I have a perspective on this that may help, least I hope it does. I have seen professional fetish/bd-sm videos shot (and let me tell you, watching them shot is even less interesting that watching many of them when they are done) and the problem is that is not real. I am not saying that what you might feel as a sub is not real, the whole thing is, it isn't bd/sm, it is really play acting to a large extent in my view of it. Yeah, I have seen videos of real domme and sub combinations go at it (I mean they are a lifestyle couple for real), and it is pretty intense, but most videos are hired hands playing for the camera, and it is about getting off joe sixpack who is going to buy it, it has little to do with those involved.

In a sense, it is what I experienced when I transitioned from my start in BD/SM, playing in commercial S/M houses, to having it in my life. Pro sessions can be fun, and i learned a lot about my sensation play self there, met some really wonderful ladies who worked there, but in a sense, it wasn't real, as intensely as I tried. The problem there is the focus, despite what their ads say and what they tell you, is those sessions were about me, I was paying, and in the end, the ladies there knew that. There really wasn't any return flow from me to them, the energy that makes this great, and in reality there wasn't really the dynamic there. I did play with a pro domme once out on the left coast that was quite different, but even that wasn't totally there.

When I first started working with my wife, when we introduced it into our lives, she would get really mad at me, because I was in the mode of in effect her doing me...rather then me de facto 'doing her'. She wasn't getting any energy back, I was lost in my own world, and she was in the role of a pro domme serving the client, and it doesn't work for a couple.I didn't know any better, I kind of had the idea it was totally about the kinkiness of the play, the better toy, but in reality, it is a shared experience. The movie also is generally not a shared experience, because for the most part (other then lifestyle couples doing it), it is the sub/domme doing it for someone else, the paying audience, it isn't about either of them IMO. Relationship BD/SM, with or without D/, goes well beyond the sensation play/masochist/sadist aspects to use horribly inadequate words, any more then sex between a romantic couple is not simply about the sex. What you do in a video or in a pro domme sessions is roughy akin to a fuck buddy, though at least with fuck buddies you both are getting something out of it. Doing a video might even be something of a turn on, after all, it is still sexuality, but it isn't a relationship either. I think LP hit the nail on the head about the domme who asked you if you wanted to be her slave, I think that was a put up to make you work better in the video. If she was sincerely interested in it, she would grab you after the video, ask you if you might be interested, and then at the very least set up some sort of meeting to talk about it, what she was looking for, etc (keep in mind that a M/s doesn't have to be a relationship like you are looking for, it can be very businesslike almost). To be honest, the fact that she used the word slave kind of set off something in me, that to me is like someone meeting you at a bar and saying do you want to get engaged, slavery whatever it means to people is usually something that is worked into. Perhaps she simply used that as a general purpose term for sub, as many pro dommes do, but in the context of a relationship I don't think too many dominants would think of entering into a Dom/sub relationship, let alone M/s, just by having done a video together. I think she was yanking your chain, and you should take zero from what happened.

I think others hit the nail on the head, real dommes are also real women; the woman at that movie shoot was an actress for that film playing a role and she played you, too (for all you know, she may not even be in BD/SM, but does this strictly for money, as a lot of the people in those films do). My advice is to be strong in yourself, take care of the things that make you feel less strong, and then when in places where the wild dommes are (paraphrase the late, great Maurice Sendak), use that confidence but humble charm to charm the socks off them, and see what happens:)

One other nugget, be very, very careful about appearances. That women in the incredible looking woman in the really hot fetish wear with a whip on her belt may not be any more a dominant then I am, there are more then a few people there who are fetishists for the look (which is perfectly fine), but some of them put on a show about being the domme when they really aren't, they just like jerking with people, so if you get blown off by someone, don't think it is you, and that type is not uncommon. Sometimes that woman wearing the jeans and a dark t shirt on the other hand might be the domme of your dreams:)




FrostedFlake -> RE: Is a BDSM relationship possible without the looks (2/25/2013 10:18:34 PM)

quote:

I'm going to skip that nonsense about what happens in the tabloids. I don't care and neither should anybody else. I mean, other than so-called beautiful people sometimes make bad relationship choices, too, what was really the point?


Skip this too, if you prefer.

The point was, the gal has all the looks you could hope for but guys don't want to be around her. And so she is stuck with whoever she can get. In this case a fellow willing to fight her Ex on the lawn over custody with her child present. This all but begs CPS to show up with a writ. A wonderful fellow. How did she get into this? Toxic personality.

And what is the theme of this thread? Is it the relative importance of looks and personality?

It is clear I haven't been clear, or there is something else going on. In either case I apologize to the OP.

Edit : Grammar.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625