AthenaSurrenders
Posts: 3582
Joined: 3/15/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: peppermint quote:
ORIGINAL: SomethingCatchy To me, topping from the bottom means manipulation, nagging, harassing, and general irritating behavior. It's very clear to me when someone's doing it, and it's easy enough to say STOP or kick them out and never talk to them again. To me. topping from the bottom means exactly that. The person on the bottom (the person having something done to them) directs the top (the person doing the action). It has nothing to do with being a dominant or a submissive. There is nothing in the words topping from the bottom that means the bottom is also a submissive. The bottom, depending on what is being done, just might be a dominant. I agree with both of these definitions, I think people use the term in different ways. Peppermint's definition, for example, maybe the Mistress loves the sensation of hot wax, and says 'put my hands in cuffs because I find it hard not to squirm. Ok now the wax is ready, hold it at the height we discussed... a little higher... ok now just drip a little at first'. She's dictating the scene whilst being the one on the receiving end of the sensation. Or it might be two friends/play partners who have no power dynamic in place, but the person on the bottom is instructing or teaching the top - that's what you've been doing so far OP. There's nothing wrong with that at all, except that as you say, it's not as meaningful for you when you are just bottoming, you want to submit to someone else's desires and power. You probably more often hear the term used (along with 'not really a sub') the way SomethingCatchy defines it. That's when the submissive tries to get things his/her way and take away the dominants power, through manipulation - 'Is that the hardest you can hit? I barely felt it' - dictating the way he wants things done - 'you're not a real domme unless you do me with a strap on right now' - whining - 'that's not fair, you should use the cane!' - being disobedient in order to get a desired activity - 'no I won't do as you say, I suppose you'll have to punish me, let me lay over your lap for a spanking'. Generally trying to push the dominant into domming in the exact way the sub fantasises. Obviously this is very unattractive and frustrating for the dominant. In this case the sub isn't really submitting, he's trying to take control whilst preserving the fantasy that the dom/me is in charge. It annoys people because it basically reduces the d-type to a walking sex toy. On the other hand, in a strong successful dynamic it doesn't really happen. You can only top from the bottom, if the other person is bottoming from the top. If I said 'No I refuse to obey, I guess you'll have to spank me!' he wouldn't reward that with a spanking. He would refuse to take the submissive role and there would be consequences that I did not enjoy instead. I can still say 'I've always wanted to try x' or 'please can I have x' - that still leaves him with the power to decide if, when and how much we do. I can (and should!) also tell him how things make me feel, because then he's making informed decisions. And if we were doing something new that he hadn't done before, I might be giving him advice on how to do it. But I'm not trying to push him into obeying me. If that was too long to read: short version - don't be a manipulative ass and it won't be an issue. No one will take away your sub card for having a preference or asking for something nicely.
_____________________________
Being your slave, what should I do but tend Upon the hours and times of your desire?
|