RedMagic1
Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lilly425 I still struggle, however, with the ideas that have been ingrained in me that I shouldn’t be too “easy” or too accommodating in a relationship – that I should play “hard to get” because men want a challenge. Maybe it's just me, but within a few weeks of leaving my parents' home, life presented me with challenges aplenty. For most of us, as we get older, these challenges get bigger, and harder to surmount. Sick children, job layoffs, death of loved ones. It's good to have a team member who is 100% on your side, to deal with the things that are genuinely challenging. "You don't get to have sex tonight even though I want you to" seems, in comparison, to be less of a "challenge" and more like penny-ante bullshit. Withholding intimacy for artificial reasons isn't healthy in vanilla. I don't see why your partner being dominant (or male) makes any difference to the question you are asking. Unless the two of you are fuckbuddies, not boyfriend/girlfriend type material. If you have no investment in each other outside the bedroom, then you might have a valid concern. But if you're interested in building a team, a united front against the world, whether it's for six months or sixty years, why not act as though you're both playing on the same side?
_____________________________
Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others. - 15th century Aztec
|