RE: Submission to Dominatrices.

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Submission to Dominatrices.

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Submission to Dominatrices.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Submission to Dominatrices. - 3/20/2013 10:31:35 PM

disretion7

Posts: 74
Joined: 3/19/2006
Status: offline

"I'm not trying to push a phone sex Domme nor trying to talk anybody into anything. I only shared my own experience because I'd heard from some who had no encounters of any kind worthwhile, affordable, or otherwise. I HAVE been to local munches and ALL I found were members pushing pro-Dommes."

Looking back at the quote you referened above, I mis-typed, and don't know why I wrote "ALL I found were" . I really only meant to say "I HAVE been to local munches and found there were members pushing pro-Dommes". Sorry about my mistake there. As to not liking the pushing of pro-Dommes, I never minded doing so (until I encountered the recent objections here that caused me to apologize) though, I, generally, don't advertise anybody because I'm not sure that THEY want me to, and I don't feel secure about speaking for others. I made one exception, on my profile page, because (if I recall right) that Domme DID want me to.

Since I've been saying so many stupid things, that is why I'm acknowledging mistakes, misteps, and offering to shut up, if I'm told to.

(in reply to disretion7)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: Submission to Dominatrices. - 3/21/2013 2:30:10 PM

disretion7

Posts: 74
Joined: 3/19/2006
Status: offline

quote:

I'm not trying to push a phone sex Domme nor trying to talk anybody into anything. I only shared my own experience because I'd heard from some who had no encounters of any kind worthwhile, affordable, or otherwise. I HAVE been to local munches and ALL I found were members pushing pro-Dommes.

I replied, yesterday, about the above paragraph which you, correctly, took issue with because of its contradictory message. I'm sorry that, for whatever reason, after I'd posted my reply and thought it was there permanently, it disappeared. So I'll try to re-do my reply.

Anyway, I'd apologized for that confusing message and noted that I'd never minded pushing pro-Dommes, but did not, generally, do so because I did not think the Dommes would want me to without their permission. I, also, noted that I made an exception on my profile because I thought THAT particular Domme wanted me to.

Then, I addressed the contradiction in of my phrase: "ALL I found were members pushing pro-Dommes". I'd mistyped that phrase and, being in a hurry, forgot to proofread it. What I really meant to say, in lieu of that phrase was, "I found members there pushing pro-Dommes.

BTW, since you've been walking me down memory lane, I had another recollection. There was ONE lifestyle-only Domme, I'd met at a munch, who considered playing with me, and confided (whether true, or not) that she has once been a pro-Domme. Nothing ever came of it and it has been enough years ago that Casey's Restaurant, on N. Monroe, Spokane, where I attended most of the munches, is closed down now.

(in reply to LadyPact)

Profile

Post #: 22