BitaTruble
Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006 From: Texas Status: offline
|
quote:
This project develops an index of economic and personal freedom in the American states. In my opinion, due to the subjective weight of the criteria, they have failed in their purpose. Two of the criteria, tax and tort, make up over 40% of the overall 'freedom' index while civil liberties (which in a discussion of 'personal freedom' would seem to deserve more weight) comes in at just .6%. "Calculating the “freedom value” of each variable was a Herculean endeavor, to be perfectly honest, but we did it because we wanted to make the investment in a dramatic improvement to the study’s methodology. For some variables, precious little scholarly investigation revealed the information we wanted, and our calculations end up being more like “guesstimates” than precise estimates." .. to me that paragraphs translates to "We did our best to make sure all was factual but when we couldn't get precise, we guessed and set the weight of a particular variable based on that guess." I think that's a fair assessment of that particular paragraph. I can make a guess just as well and 'guess' that Marriage is more important than Tort laws to 'most' people and weigh that personal freedom much higher than the Tort stuff and Tort got 11%! So, again, subjective. I think it serves the purpose the authors intended for the audience whom they want to capture or retain. Other than that, it doesn't seem to be of much use for those who may weigh the variables in a different manner as one can see when clicking on the 'user' generated portion of the site.
_____________________________
"Oh, so it's just like Rock, paper, scissors." He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."
|