fucktoyprincess -> RE: Does being religious mean that you are: (4/22/2013 11:53:12 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: littlewonder quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML [:D] Yup. I always wear my scarlet letter on my sleeve for all to see. I invite littlewonder to explain how her ethics and morals are different from mine. Cuz, yanno, we all love being put into that little "different" box. [8|] Since you asked: Let's just say my views on sexuality, I am going to bet are the very opposite of yours. I really have no idea since I don't keep track of your beliefs but I'm going to bet they are since my views are biblically related. I'm also going to bet my beliefs on submission of wives to their husbands is different than your beliefs. Let's see, there's also the belief that you put God and your love of God into your every thought, every act, before all else, keeping away from gluttony, marriage is to be honored and celebrated as a covenant between God and the couple, honesty in business, do not gossip...just to name a few.... And even if we did share the same morals, WHY I have my morals are most likely completely different from yours and that really does matter for me. It's the intention, not the action. If three people, one a Christian, one a Buddhist and one an atheist, each choose to help a poor person why does the intention matter at all? Aren't each of their actions "good" as we would think of "goodness". Or are the Buddhist and atheist just "evil" because of their intention being different from yours? Does this mean when the Buddhist and the atheist help a poor person, that they are doing "evil" because their intentions don't match your religion? I'm just a bit confused about how actions don't matter. Does this mean if someone kills someone in the name of god that that is okay because their intention is "good". In other words we shouldn't judge actions, just intentions, and the intentions of anyone who shares your faith is automatically "good" and the intentions of everyone else is automatically "evil"?
|
|
|
|