RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


muhly22222 -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 5:16:44 AM)

quote:

IF they wanted to hit the finish line, why not when it was full or when the mob was passing through. most of thew field had already passed the line. the timing is curious


Actually, according to Darren Rovell's Twitter feed, the average finish time last year was at 4 hours, 18 minutes. The first bomb went off at 4:09:40...so it was pretty close to the time when the most people would be near the finish line.

As soon as I saw that, I knew it had to have been planned, rather than having some natural cause. As far as who is responsible, I know people here are thinking domestic terrorists, and it may well be. I won't speculate, though...I don't see any reason why it couldn't be international terrorists or domestic terrorists.




Hillwilliam -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 5:56:23 AM)

I'm thinkng domestic crazies.
Here's my logic. Over the past few decades, there have been 4 other major attacks.
When foreign powers were involved (2 WTC attacks) they were quick to claim credit.
When domestic crazies did it (Atlanta and OKC) there was silence.

I realize that 4 is a small sample size (I took statistics as well in grad school and nailed it)

I'll add that when the Islamic extremits have hit abroad (large sample size unfortunately) they quite readily claim responsibiliy.

As for their fears of retaliation, what fear? To be martyred is their highest honor.




tj444 -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 6:41:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad
ETA: Someone mentioned finding it "incongruent" to place a bomb at the finish line of a marathon. I submit that it's the ideal location, since people will be dehydrated and more vulnerable to blood loss, as well as exhausted. Also, the attacker may have assumed that people would gather near the finish line, rather than moving away. Or it may just have been the most convenient spot. Potentially, it could've been a targetted attack, too, meant for one person, but that seems unlikely. And, killing in itself isn't usually the goal.

IWYW,
— Aswad.

The finish line is where all/most of the media cameras are located.. having cameras rolling as bombs are going off, the panic and people screaming, running, terror, etc.. it is the ideal place for maximum impact for everyone in the US & around the world viewing the news with those feeds/tapes.. not to mention the bomber, if he/they got away can also watch and relive it everytime those tapes are played..




Owner59 -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 7:09:20 AM)

My FB friends....the cons among them, are hoping in the worst way it`s not domestic......they already have it figured out(scary brown ME people),what to do and are mouth-breathing at this point.....


There`s also a lot of them either blaming the President,mitt-craven-romney-style......and attacking him personally......which is just a continuation of the normal fux-news-extremist regurgitations.


My guess is that the rightist media won`t be able to help themselves and will feed the knuckle draggers, plently of red meat.




tweakabelle -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 7:24:30 AM)

Jeffrey Goldberg is far from my favourite columnist. But he certainly caught my sentiments about the horrible events in Boston when he penned the following:

Boston Bomb Attack No Excuse for Media Speculation

"[....] But after an explosion about which we know almost nothing, and in the face of sudden, violent death at the finish line of the Boston Marathon, this is not the time to guess about the perpetrators or to recommend policy fixes that would prevent such attacks from taking place. It certainly is no time to suggest that a political party you happen not to like is to blame for a tragedy about which you know nothing.

In an era in which none of us like to leave anything unsaid, and in which technology offers us the opportunity to say things fast, we often succumb to the urge to speculate. Shortly after the 2011 shootings in Norway, I asked publicly whether a Mumbai-type attack had visited Europe, the implication being that Muslim terrorists were behind the atrocity. It was perfectly plausible to suggest that Muslim terrorists were to blame -- except that they weren’t. I learned my lesson.

Tomorrow or the next day, when law enforcement officers and journalists have done their work, there will be time to analyze and criticize and learn from whatever it is we just saw. But not today. Please, let’s wait to find out who did this and why it happened.
"

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-15/boston-bomb-attack-no-excuse-for-media-speculation.html

Let's take his advice and devote our thoughts to those whose loved ones were killed and injured. There will lots of time to analyse these events and learn such lessons as we can later




DomKen -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 7:40:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

I'm thinkng domestic crazies.
Here's my logic. Over the past few decades, there have been 4 other major attacks.
When foreign powers were involved (2 WTC attacks) they were quick to claim credit.
When domestic crazies did it (Atlanta and OKC) there was silence.

I realize that 4 is a small sample size (I took statistics as well in grad school and nailed it)

I'll add that when the Islamic extremits have hit abroad (large sample size unfortunately) they quite readily claim responsibiliy.

As for their fears of retaliation, what fear? To be martyred is their highest honor.

Also the symbolism of the day, income tax deadline and Patriot's Day, is far more important to the domestic crazies than it would be to foreigners.




Owner59 -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 7:45:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

I'm thinkng domestic crazies.
Here's my logic. Over the past few decades, there have been 4 other major attacks.
When foreign powers were involved (2 WTC attacks) they were quick to claim credit.
When domestic crazies did it (Atlanta and OKC) there was silence.

I realize that 4 is a small sample size (I took statistics as well in grad school and nailed it)

I'll add that when the Islamic extremits have hit abroad (large sample size unfortunately) they quite readily claim responsibiliy.

As for their fears of retaliation, what fear? To be martyred is their highest honor.

Also the symbolism of the day, income tax deadline and Patriot's Day, is far more important to the domestic crazies than it would be to foreigners.



The last mile was dedicated to the Sandy hook victims.....also very symbolic.




JeffBC -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 7:50:08 AM)

~fast reply~

No matter who did this and why, my fervent hope is that this is not the immediate cause/justification for yet another massive loss of freedom in the United States and/or massive, semi-random force projection elsewhere. I'm all for finding the guilty parties but I'd like to preserve what freedom we have left while I'm doing it. I am sickly certain that Obama will not see it the same way. We shall see.




mnottertail -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 7:53:11 AM)

Obama is gonna take your bombs away sort of thing or?




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 8:15:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad
Since there's been plenty of bickering in the other threads, I figured I'd make a thread for all the insensitive posts about the incident.

Have at it, folks, and let's keep it in this thread.

was tha emphasis on tha disrespectful comments unintended when ya started a whole thread bout them? [8|]




JeffBC -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 8:34:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Obama is gonna take your bombs away sort of thing or?

We shall see Ron. My concern is that we have yet another round of "Patriot Act". Surely given our history you can't think the concern is totally unwarranted? Given Obama's personal history it seems perfectly plausible. But we shall see what he does when he DOESSOMETHING(tm).




mnottertail -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 8:36:46 AM)

I do not have great hopes that the congress won't go into menopausal spins and tirades if thats what you mean.





DesideriScuri -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 8:54:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
Jeffrey Goldberg is far from my favourite columnist. But he certainly caught my sentiments about the horrible events in Boston when he penned the following:
Boston Bomb Attack No Excuse for Media Speculation
"[....] But after an explosion about which we know almost nothing, and in the face of sudden, violent death at the finish line of the Boston Marathon, this is not the time to guess about the perpetrators or to recommend policy fixes that would prevent such attacks from taking place. It certainly is no time to suggest that a political party you happen not to like is to blame for a tragedy about which you know nothing.
In an era in which none of us like to leave anything unsaid, and in which technology offers us the opportunity to say things fast, we often succumb to the urge to speculate. Shortly after the 2011 shootings in Norway, I asked publicly whether a Mumbai-type attack had visited Europe, the implication being that Muslim terrorists were behind the atrocity. It was perfectly plausible to suggest that Muslim terrorists were to blame -- except that they weren’t. I learned my lesson.
Tomorrow or the next day, when law enforcement officers and journalists have done their work, there will be time to analyze and criticize and learn from whatever it is we just saw. But not today. Please, let’s wait to find out who did this and why it happened.
"
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-15/boston-bomb-attack-no-excuse-for-media-speculation.html
Let's take his advice and devote our thoughts to those whose loved ones were killed and injured. There will lots of time to analyse these events and learn such lessons as we can later


The problem, as I see it, with this "anti-speculating" idea is that the news networks have pretty much conditioned us to expect instant information. Running with the idea that "we don't know what really happened so we're not going to offer any explanation" isn't what the masses want. The masses want answers, almost instantaneously. If News Network A isn't offering anything, switch to News Network B, etc. until we get the information we are craving (forget for now that the information may not have any basis in reality). With advertising dollars the way they are, it behooves news networks to pose explanations and speculate with the "we think" disclaimer, knowing that most people aren't going to hear the "we think" part anyway.

The reality of situations like this are that no one knows what happened (except the perpetrator) immediately after the incident. Speculating is what We do. It makes it ridiculously difficult, for those of us what want just the facts, to find out what happened.




Rule -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 8:58:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies
the usual reaction of the US when someone throws a stone at their greenhouse is to throw boulders, rocks and bucket loads of shit in the general direction of countries they don't like. I am sure some intel will pop up fairly soon pointing to somewhere far away where evil people live and then the drones will fly.

Intel will probably show that North Korea was responsible ...




angelikaJ -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 8:59:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

I'm thinkng domestic crazies.
Here's my logic. Over the past few decades, there have been 4 other major attacks.
When foreign powers were involved (2 WTC attacks) they were quick to claim credit.
When domestic crazies did it (Atlanta and OKC) there was silence.

I realize that 4 is a small sample size (I took statistics as well in grad school and nailed it)

I'll add that when the Islamic extremits have hit abroad (large sample size unfortunately) they quite readily claim responsibiliy.

As for their fears of retaliation, what fear? To be martyred is their highest honor.

Also the symbolism of the day, income tax deadline and Patriot's Day, is far more important to the domestic crazies than it would be to foreigners.


I am not really certain that either Tax day or Patriot's Day had much to do with it.

I am seeing this totally differently: this was not just a an attack on a major American city; this was an attack at an International event that brings in people from all over the country and all over the world.
It is true that many of the International runners are part of the "elite" group that start and finish earlier but there were many visitors staying in the nearby hotels.


The timing of the detonations was such that maximum harm was done.
This is when most of the people will be crossing the finish line and the bystanders are made up of the friends and loved ones who ran.
And after the bombs went off, the race ended for everyone who had not yet arrived.
Many people who come to Boston to run, just want to finish and that was taken away from them.
Tied into a tragedy such as this is of course, survivor's guilt.
Terrorists terrorize and this one certainly did.





RacerJim -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 9:12:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Civillian deaths rarely make the world a better place.


QFT.

And nobody has claimed responsibility yet, which usually means it's domestic.

IWYW,
— Aswad.



Domestic doesn't necessarily rule out a foreign connection.




RacerJim -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 9:19:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: deathtothepixies

Assuming this is an act of terror.........

how many people are going to die because of this? At the moment it is 2, the usual reaction of the US when someone throws a stone at their greenhouse is to throw boulders, rocks and bucket loads of shit in the general direction of countries they don't like. I am sure some intel will pop up fairly soon pointing to somewhere far away where evil people live and then the drones will fly.

How many people are going to die because of this?

Will those deaths make the world a better place?


Unless it`s state sponsored,there won`t be any mass bombings.......

If it`s political terror,either of the domestic or imported ilk,they will be brought to justice and punished.

The multiple nature of the attack tells me it`s a major operation.



if it is state sponsered........ the WMD intel re Iraq was fake, what if Iran were to be blamed for this?

Terrorist acts don't go unpunished by the US and so far it has got you where?
ps. unfortunately when I say you I have to include us ie. Britain

Will those deaths make the world a better place?

"the WMD intel re Iraq was fake,". Fake about what and according to who?




kdsub -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 9:23:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Maybe they have finally understood that when they open their mouths they are likely to find a tomahawk flying down their throats.


You do realize you're exhibiting some of the same prejudice LL waved around on the other thread, right?

IWYW,
— Aswad.




Speaking the truth is never prejudice...Now my comment will only apply IF it is a foreign terrorist act. As in my previous comments I am waiting for the evidence before pointing fingers.

I think it is also important to define the difference between foreign and domestic terrorism. What do you mean?

Butch




mnottertail -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 9:32:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim
"the WMD intel re Iraq was fake,". Fake about what and according to who?


Fake about everything and according to intelligence agencies.

You have been credibly cited voluminously about this, and your ignoring it doesn't make you look smart.   You were getting better laughs with your birther asswipe.  May want to revisit those jokes again.




lovmuffin -> RE: The Insensitive Boston Thread (4/16/2013 9:43:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

I'm thinkng domestic crazies.
Here's my logic. Over the past few decades, there have been 4 other major attacks.
When foreign powers were involved (2 WTC attacks) they were quick to claim credit.
When domestic crazies did it (Atlanta and OKC) there was silence.

I realize that 4 is a small sample size (I took statistics as well in grad school and nailed it)

I'll add that when the Islamic extremits have hit abroad (large sample size unfortunately) they quite readily claim responsibiliy.

As for their fears of retaliation, what fear? To be martyred is their highest honor.

Also the symbolism of the day, income tax deadline and Patriot's Day, is far more important to the domestic crazies than it would be to foreigners.


I am not really certain that either Tax day or Patriot's Day had much to do with it.

I am seeing this totally differently: this was not just a an attack on a major American city; this was an attack at an International event that brings in people from all over the country and all over the world.
It is true that many of the International runners are part of the "elite" group that start and finish earlier but there were many visitors staying in the nearby hotels.


The timing of the detonations was such that maximum harm was done.
This is when most of the people will be crossing the finish line and the bystanders are made up of the friends and loved ones who ran.
And after the bombs went off, the race ended for everyone who had not yet arrived.
Many people who come to Boston to run, just want to finish and that was taken away from them.
Tied into a tragedy such as this is of course, survivor's guilt.
Terrorists terrorize and this one certainly did.





From what I heard reported, many had crossed the finish line and the crowd had thinned out. The race was winding down and waiting for the stragglers to come in. The carnage could have been much worse.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875