kookycreature -> RE: Younger slaves & older Masters (4/21/2013 10:30:14 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: lizi quote:
ORIGINAL: kookycreature My whole post got eaten by the glitch monster the first time around - not amused. Successful Age Gap Relationships. While the linked article is concerning primarily a vanilla relationship, many qualities can come over into BDSM - compatible ideals, trust, honest and open communication amongst other things. I am 22, while my Master/boyfriend is in his mid-60s. Do we get odd looks? Probably. Do friends and family ostracize us? No. Because we don't make or see age as any sort of issue; it's a minor quality. More important are mutual goals and interests, mutual attraction and trust. I'm not with him for his money, and he is not for me for my looks. He doesn't act his age either, and has actually said that if he ever starts doing so, he'll understand if I up and leave. I do not have 'Daddy issues' either, as my relationship with my own father is perfectly healthy. To summarise... age-gaps in vanilla relationships and age-gaps in BDSM are entirely up to the people involved in it. There is no such thing as an overall 'right' upper age limit. Some are happy with 40+ year gaps. Some will only have a 30, 20 or 10 year gap. Some won't even entertain that, and want someone within a few years or even younger! Age gaps must not be judged by the years, but by the qualities that they have. Are both partners emotionally happy? Are both partners communicating well? Is there trust and open honesty? Is there no physical, emotional or mental abuse? That's my $0.02. So things work for you with an older partner, how wonderful. You chose the right person for you. and you prefer an older man...that's great. It's wonderful to see people choosing what is the right thing for them, and having the ability to make that choice. I honestly don't care what other people choose, as long as it's right for them. I wonder why it is that it seems to be wrong to some older men if the choice is NOT to be with an older partner? Then, there is much whining and butthurt. I wonder why it's ok with them for a younger woman to choose an older man, but it's not ok for a younger woman to not choose an older man? Choices, whatever they are, should be the prerogative of the chooser, and the reasons that the choices exist aren't really up for debate. A choice is a choice, and we're all entitled to them no matter if the base for the choice is whimsy or a deep seated need. I have no idea. Maybe they are not accustomed to being rejected? Choice should be just that, choice, be it in a negative or positive response to the asker.
|
|
|
|