Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Seperation church and state


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Seperation church and state Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/26/2013 2:42:44 PM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

I ask this question. Is letting the government at taxpayer expense expense arrange for a minister (whether ordained or not) of whatever denomination come into your local school and attempt to convert YOUR child to their religion against your wishes and without your knowledge not prohibiting your "Free exercise thereof"?



In that vein, teachers impart all sorts of shit one may not approve of. And PSS is at taxpayer expense.

You do hit the anti-religion buzz words, don't you. And to think, some people object to science over religion. But science is good and wholesome, not full of fairy tales and unicorns but theoretical multi-verses, dark energy and quantum stuff.


< Message edited by Yachtie -- 4/26/2013 2:43:20 PM >


_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/26/2013 3:06:37 PM   
FunCouple5280


Posts: 559
Joined: 10/30/2012
Status: offline
I want to know how studying multiverses would lead to a lack of condom use, or a jihad..... In the end science calls it a theory not a law.....

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/26/2013 4:08:54 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

I ask this question. Is letting the government at taxpayer expense expense arrange for a minister (whether ordained or not) of whatever denomination come into your local school and attempt to convert YOUR child to their religion against your wishes and without your knowledge not prohibiting your "Free exercise thereof"?



In that vein, teachers impart all sorts of shit one may not approve of. And PSS is at taxpayer expense.

You do hit the anti-religion buzz words, don't you. And to think, some people object to science over religion. But science is good and wholesome, not full of fairy tales and unicorns but theoretical multi-verses, dark energy and quantum stuff.


You're right. There are a lot of folks who don't approve of verifiable fucking SCIENCE. There are also still a lot of folks who think that teaching math to girls is a waste of time. Is that against the constitution?

Nice try at a red herring

Anti-Religion buzzwords my ASS. How about antiscience buzzwords?

Is there anydamnthing that is verifiable in the Old Testament? It seems the OT has exactly as much FACTUAL backing as your aforementioned unicorns.

ETA. Maybe you should look at her comments under one of her talks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0ezYNWIDB0

It may be a new record. 3 lies in one sentence. Of course, some folks could use that as proof that she isn't preaching Christian dogma to HS students because we all know that Christians don't lie. It's one of the commandments.

< Message edited by Hillwilliam -- 4/26/2013 4:16:50 PM >


_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to Yachtie)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/26/2013 5:00:07 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


Is there anydamnthing that is verifiable in the Old Testament? It seems the OT has exactly as much FACTUAL backing as your aforementioned unicorns.


We totally have video of Charlton Heston climbing down Mount Sinai with the 10 Commandments. What more do you want?

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/26/2013 5:35:08 PM   
FrostedFlake


Posts: 3084
Joined: 3/4/2009
From: Centralia, Washington
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: FrostedFlake


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Could you, please, show me where "seperation of church and state" appears in our constitution?



Peace and comfort,



Michael


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Establishment_Clause


I didn't see that phrase, anywhere. Sorry.

Here's a hint; Try: "Thomas Jefferson Letter to Rev ..."

You'll find the phrase in President Jefferson's correspondance with a New England Fundementalist minister but you won't find it in the constitution.



Peace and comfort,



Michael



I'll try again.

quote:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.


That's one.

quote:

Or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.


That's two.

quote:

No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.


That's three.

I trust that is easy enough to understand for everyone.

_____________________________

Frosted Flake
simul justus et peccator
Einen Liebhaber, und halten Sie die Schraube

"... evil (and hilarious) !!" Hlen5

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/26/2013 6:54:35 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
Your slight about "everyone understanding" aside, YOU don't seem to understand that you still haven't shown me the phrase: "Seperation of church and state" in the US Constitution.

Is that so difficult to find?


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to FrostedFlake)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/26/2013 7:21:13 PM   
Princess2086


Posts: 1
Joined: 2/10/2013
Status: offline
I was reading some of the above posts, and I wanted to use my history degree.

Seperation of Church and State, does not mean a lack of religion in politics or the removal of religion from goverment backed programs ( ie. Schools, courthouses, afterschool programs, State Capital Buildings).

What Seperation of Church and State means is that no Federal Religion will be established, such as the Church of England. That no one will be denined the rights of an American Citizen because of his/her religion.

In 1789, when our consituion was written, it was illegal for a Catholic to hold a goverment job in England. The Sepetatists fled England in fear of imprisonment. Several of our states were established by people fleeing England because they did not believe in the right religion.

It was for thoses reasons we have Seperation of Church and State, not to keep ministers out of public schools.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/26/2013 8:27:16 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
Does this really need to turn into another Religious vs. Atheists thread? How about sticking to the subject?

There are many Christians who don't think this woman belongs lecturing at schools. Regardless of her personal agenda being of a religious nature, the point is that she is giving misinformation, and the fact that the principal threatened the student body president for complaining about it.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/26/2013 8:56:24 PM   
FrostedFlake


Posts: 3084
Joined: 3/4/2009
From: Centralia, Washington
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Your slight about "everyone understanding" aside, YOU don't seem to understand that you still haven't shown me the phrase: "Seperation of church and state" in the US Constitution.

Is that so difficult to find?


Everyone here knows what a bright boy you are, DS. It a lead pipe cinch you can see what is in front of you.

No law can force you to profess a given faith.

No law can prevent you doing just that.

No law can exclude you from public office on account of your faith or your lack of faith.

That is separation of church and state. I know you can see that. If you have a point, make it.

_____________________________

Frosted Flake
simul justus et peccator
Einen Liebhaber, und halten Sie die Schraube

"... evil (and hilarious) !!" Hlen5

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/26/2013 8:56:46 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

It may be a new record. 3 lies in one sentence.

How anyone who has been in P&R as long as you can make such a claim is beyond me.

K.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/26/2013 10:23:00 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
Not too many people seem to be having the trouble understanding the Constitution that you are having... here, let's try one more time.

Art III sec 2


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Your slight about "everyone understanding" aside, YOU don't seem to understand that you still haven't shown me the phrase: "Seperation of church and state" in the US Constitution.

Is that so difficult to find?




_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/26/2013 11:02:12 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

Not too many people seem to be having the trouble understanding the Constitution that you are having... here, let's try one more time.

Art III sec 2

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Your slight about "everyone understanding" aside, YOU don't seem to understand that you still haven't shown me the phrase: "Seperation of church and state" in the US Constitution.


ARTICLE III, Section 2

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; — to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; — to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; — to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; — to Controversies between two or more States; — between a State and Citizens of another State [Modified by Amendment XI]; — between Citizens of different States; — between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.


K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 4/26/2013 11:04:30 PM >

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/27/2013 12:48:56 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Could you, please, show me where "seperation of church and state" appears in our constitution?



Peace and comfort,



Michael


I found a link that works..

"Separation of church and state" (sometimes "wall of separation between church and state") is a phrase used by Thomas Jefferson and others expressing an understanding of the intent and function of the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The phrase has since been repeatedly used by the Supreme Court of the United States."


"The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ...." and Article VI specifies that "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States." The modern concept of a wholly secular government is sometimes credited to the writings of English philosopher John Locke, but the phrase "separation of church and state" in this context is generally traced to a January 1, 1802 letter by Thomas Jefferson, addressed to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut, and published in a Massachusetts newspaper."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_church_and_state_in_the_United_States#The_First_Amendment

< Message edited by egern -- 4/27/2013 12:55:23 AM >

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/27/2013 1:26:34 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
This is about as close to the correct answer as we're going to get.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Princess2086

I was reading some of the above posts, and I wanted to use my history degree.

Seperation of Church and State, does not mean a lack of religion in politics or the removal of religion from goverment backed programs ( ie. Schools, courthouses, afterschool programs, State Capital Buildings).

What Seperation of Church and State means is that no Federal Religion will be established, such as the Church of England. That no one will be denined the rights of an American Citizen because of his/her religion.

In 1789, when our consituion was written, it was illegal for a Catholic to hold a goverment job in England. The Sepetatists fled England in fear of imprisonment. Several of our states were established by people fleeing England because they did not believe in the right religion.

It was for thoses reasons we have Seperation of Church and State, not to keep ministers out of public schools.


It's pretty funny, watching the usual suspects try to contort and twist and put that phrase into the constitution when it isn't there, at all.

You can give me all the opinion articles from wikipedia that you want, telling us that that is the interpretation but the phrase DOES NOT EXIST IN THE US CONSTITUTION.

When you start giving me interpretations, you start going into "I wish this were the way it is" land. Yes, Jefferson interpretted the first amendment to be a "seperation of church and state" (when he was writing to a fundementalist minister that wanted Jefferson to get the state of {?}Massachusetts {?} to stop "harrassing" his particular sect).

Jefferson wrote that phrase as a way of saying: "The federal government is not going to get involved in a pissing contest between your religion and the state in which you live".

It is fun to watch the usual suspects try to convince themselves that they're right, even though the phrase is NOT in our constitution. It's also fun to see the passive-agressive behaviors that some need to employ. I have another candidate for oblivion, as a result.



Peace and comfort,



Michael


< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 4/27/2013 1:28:11 AM >


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Princess2086)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/27/2013 3:37:36 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

This is about as close to the correct answer as we're going to get.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Princess2086

I was reading some of the above posts, and I wanted to use my history degree.

Seperation of Church and State, does not mean a lack of religion in politics or the removal of religion from goverment backed programs ( ie. Schools, courthouses, afterschool programs, State Capital Buildings).

What Seperation of Church and State means is that no Federal Religion will be established, such as the Church of England. That no one will be denined the rights of an American Citizen because of his/her religion.

In 1789, when our consituion was written, it was illegal for a Catholic to hold a goverment job in England. The Sepetatists fled England in fear of imprisonment. Several of our states were established by people fleeing England because they did not believe in the right religion.

It was for thoses reasons we have Seperation of Church and State, not to keep ministers out of public schools.


It's pretty funny, watching the usual suspects try to contort and twist and put that phrase into the constitution when it isn't there, at all.

You can give me all the opinion articles from wikipedia that you want, telling us that that is the interpretation but the phrase DOES NOT EXIST IN THE US CONSTITUTION.

When you start giving me interpretations, you start going into "I wish this were the way it is" land. Yes, Jefferson interpretted the first amendment to be a "seperation of church and state" (when he was writing to a fundementalist minister that wanted Jefferson to get the state of {?}Massachusetts {?} to stop "harrassing" his particular sect).

Jefferson wrote that phrase as a way of saying: "The federal government is not going to get involved in a pissing contest between your religion and the state in which you live".

It is fun to watch the usual suspects try to convince themselves that they're right, even though the phrase is NOT in our constitution. It's also fun to see the passive-agressive behaviors that some need to employ. I have another candidate for oblivion, as a result.



Peace and comfort,



Michael





its very close to the correct answer.

the king used to have bishops/parsons on staff.

they shared control in a manner of speaking.

religious canon law and common law

I explained this several times already.

Not everyone believed the way the next person believed

a witch like brewing her tea and casting spells while the next person chomped on unleavened bread, and the state with their own variety of religion most closely aligning with secular humanism.

as soon as the state makes one shoe fits all rules they just created a religion based on a set of beliefs by the majority if they call themselves a damobacrappy.

Hence the infringement and restriction on freedom of religion.

I just posted in another thread several state constitutions proving to everyone that you have no right "to exercise" any religion but the state religion. Its in every state constitution.

and since the state forces you at gun point to exorcize according to their regulatory beliefs about what is right and wrong conduct etc the state established itself as a religion.

the establishment of acceptable behavior and "right thinking" is after all what most all religions take part in!

and that is BANG bulls eye on target answer! lol

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 4/27/2013 3:56:10 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/27/2013 3:45:52 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

Not too many people seem to be having the trouble understanding the Constitution that you are having... here, let's try one more time.

Art III sec 2

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Your slight about "everyone understanding" aside, YOU don't seem to understand that you still haven't shown me the phrase: "Seperation of church and state" in the US Constitution.


ARTICLE III, Section 2

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; — to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; — to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; — to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; — to Controversies between two or more States; — between a State and Citizens of another State [Modified by Amendment XI]; — between Citizens of different States; — between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.


K.




yeh and anyone who has a case not arising UNDER the constitution is fucked LOL

besides most cases are tried under state constitutions that usurped your right "To Exercise" your religion among other things.










< Message edited by Real0ne -- 4/27/2013 3:47:43 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/27/2013 3:48:00 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FrostedFlake
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr
Your slight about "everyone understanding" aside, YOU don't seem to understand that you still haven't shown me the phrase: "Seperation of church and state" in the US Constitution.
Is that so difficult to find?

Everyone here knows what a bright boy you are, DS. It a lead pipe cinch you can see what is in front of you.
No law can force you to profess a given faith.
No law can prevent you doing just that.
No law can exclude you from public office on account of your faith or your lack of faith.
That is separation of church and state. I know you can see that. If you have a point, make it.


The point he is making,IMO, is that the oft-quoted phrase never appears in the text of the Constitution. Most of the time that people criticize some religious "thing" that happens at a public function (state-sponsored/run public institution, event, etc.), they use the quote as if it's in the Constitution, making the religious "thing" automatically unConstitutional. Since the phrase isn't actually in there, there needs to be a better explanation of why the "thing" is unConstitutional.

In voter's rights discussions, there will be quotes taken directly from the Constitution to show why a law, idea, program or policy is or isn't Constitutional. There have been criticisms of some when the underlying basis for a belief is a quote from the Declaration of Independence, as it does not contain the authority that the Constitution carries.

I believe that is the point DS is making.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to FrostedFlake)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/27/2013 4:02:38 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
well separation of church and state is not the same as establishment of religion.

they conveniently combined them so the state covers everything all by itself eliminating the need to worry about it.

the state is a religion that forces everyone to exercise according to their dogma.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/27/2013 6:02:09 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

This is about as close to the correct answer as we're going to get.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Princess2086

I was reading some of the above posts, and I wanted to use my history degree.

Seperation of Church and State, does not mean a lack of religion in politics or the removal of religion from goverment backed programs ( ie. Schools, courthouses, afterschool programs, State Capital Buildings).

What Seperation of Church and State means is that no Federal Religion will be established, such as the Church of England. That no one will be denined the rights of an American Citizen because of his/her religion.

In 1789, when our consituion was written, it was illegal for a Catholic to hold a goverment job in England. The Sepetatists fled England in fear of imprisonment. Several of our states were established by people fleeing England because they did not believe in the right religion.

It was for thoses reasons we have Seperation of Church and State, not to keep ministers out of public schools.


It's pretty funny, watching the usual suspects try to contort and twist and put that phrase into the constitution when it isn't there, at all.

You can give me all the opinion articles from wikipedia that you want, telling us that that is the interpretation but the phrase DOES NOT EXIST IN THE US CONSTITUTION.

When you start giving me interpretations, you start going into "I wish this were the way it is" land. Yes, Jefferson interpretted the first amendment to be a "seperation of church and state" (when he was writing to a fundementalist minister that wanted Jefferson to get the state of {?}Massachusetts {?} to stop "harrassing" his particular sect).

Jefferson wrote that phrase as a way of saying: "The federal government is not going to get involved in a pissing contest between your religion and the state in which you live".

It is fun to watch the usual suspects try to convince themselves that they're right, even though the phrase is NOT in our constitution. It's also fun to see the passive-agressive behaviors that some need to employ. I have another candidate for oblivion, as a result.



Peace and comfort,



Michael


May I assume that means you are OK wth someone coming into your child's school and converting them to their religion and away from yours without your knowledge or consent?
Think hard before you answer. That person might be muslim.
It's a simple yes/no question.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Seperation church and state - 4/27/2013 6:10:22 AM   
oldermdcpl4fun


Posts: 1
Joined: 8/19/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Could you, please, show me where "seperation of church and state" appears in our constitution?



Peace and comfort,



Michael


Can you show me where an individual right to bear arms exists. Where corporate free speech is established? Where the notion that spending money is speech is mentioned?

Are you protesting these "activist" ideas?

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Seperation church and state Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109