Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Politics and consumerism


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Politics and consumerism Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 4:39:09 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
I would never trust my valuables to any jewelry store (or bank) that was incompetent enough to allow any outsiders except cops to bring guns inside with them, because whoever set up their LP was a freaking moron.



_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to TricklessMagic)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 4:42:34 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

I would never trust my valuables to any jewelry store (or bank) that was incompetent enough to allow any outsiders except cops to bring guns inside with them, because whoever set up their LP was a freaking moron.

I'm betting they couldn't get insurance if they didn't forbid carrying a gun inside the store.

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 4:58:34 PM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic

My money, my right to choose how to spend it. Politics makes a different. For the longest time Pink Pistols had a list of anti-gun companies that financed anti-gunners, and so I refused to do business with anyone on that list. Anytime I learn a company is anti-gun I tell my buddies and sometimes we'll mail out letters to them letting them know we won't be patronizing their businesses or products. A big jewelry chain around here doesn't allow law abiding folks to carry concealed weapons on there premises.I picked up a friend who worked there and the manager and I got to talking. Once the manager picked up that I have a great deal of money (I showed them my latest bank balance at the time and it had five figures to the left of decimal point) he started trying to turn me on to what deals they had on jewelry and I politely explained I don't do business with anti-American companies.


Are you kidding? I hope you're fucking kidding.

What jewelry store - or any store other than a place that actually sells guns - would allow someone who's not a law enforcement officer to carry a gun in their premesis? If someone came by our business with a gun, I'd call 911, not do business with them. I think any rational business owner would do the same. I don't need some crazy fucker with a gun giving me a heart attack and scaring off our paying members.

(in reply to TricklessMagic)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 5:47:54 PM   
TricklessMagic


Posts: 248
Joined: 9/14/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu


quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic

My money, my right to choose how to spend it. Politics makes a different. For the longest time Pink Pistols had a list of anti-gun companies that financed anti-gunners, and so I refused to do business with anyone on that list. Anytime I learn a company is anti-gun I tell my buddies and sometimes we'll mail out letters to them letting them know we won't be patronizing their businesses or products. A big jewelry chain around here doesn't allow law abiding folks to carry concealed weapons on there premises.I picked up a friend who worked there and the manager and I got to talking. Once the manager picked up that I have a great deal of money (I showed them my latest bank balance at the time and it had five figures to the left of decimal point) he started trying to turn me on to what deals they had on jewelry and I politely explained I don't do business with anti-American companies.


Are you kidding? I hope you're fucking kidding.

What jewelry store - or any store other than a place that actually sells guns - would allow someone who's not a law enforcement officer to carry a gun in their premesis? If someone came by our business with a gun, I'd call 911, not do business with them. I think any rational business owner would do the same. I don't need some crazy fucker with a gun giving me a heart attack and scaring off our paying members.


Your business, your right to choose, and then it's my right to choose not to spend my money at your business. And then tell everyone I know, and the internet, that you are against lawful concealed carry of firearms and let them decide. I live in Florida, concealed carry is legal. And concealed means "concealed." I carry concealed anywhere that's not a bank, courthouse, or hospital and I rarely go to hospitals. I went jogging today and I had a Model 40 S&W .38 special in concealed holster. I went out grocery shopping later and i had Glock 23 in my left jeans pocket behind my fat leather wallet. I've never once been called out for carrying and I used to carry a Brazilian Contract Colt 1917 that came to me a wreck with a bent barrel at the three inch mark, that I nickel plated and shortened the barrel to two inches, dehorned the hammer, I left the trigger guard, no need to Fitz it. It was a big pistol that I carried in a shoulder holster or back carry (made my own custom leather flat pack carry with padding).

Grocery stores in Florida let people carry guns so long as they are concealed, gas stations, movie theaters, restaraunts, gyms, bookstores (I get a Latee three to four times a week at a nearby bookstore and I always have at least one gun on my person).

Now I understand you are from Maryland and folks don't operate like us southerners. Somehow you folks from New England (except for New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, New York that isn't part of the five boroughs known as NYC) just get scared shitless over gun ownership and such. I don't get the big deal, but then I don't have to. I don't get what's so scary over someone going about their business with a gun on their hip. Doesn't bother me when I go to Georgia to visit family or hunting (usually an occassion for both). Now someone waving a gun around would be grounds for concern, surely. But I guess some folks just think folks are evil and dangerous, I mean with all the crazy anti-American laws in New York, Maryland, Illinois, California, D.C. I guess those folks in those parts have a greater tendency for it.

If you can't see my gun, how do you know I have a gun? My grandfather who lived in NYC broke the law for everyday he lived in NYC, he always carried a Colt 1903 .32 ACP and snub nose .38 revolver till the day he passed in a hospital at the ripe old age of 89. But hey, you think what you want, even if it's wrong.

(in reply to graceadieu)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 5:55:08 PM   
LizDeluxe


Posts: 687
Joined: 10/2/2011
Status: offline
Thanks for the replies from everyone. One of the guys who supplies parts for one of my hobbies has really good stuff. Good prices, excellent quality control, great service and lots of free technical advice. He's way at the far right end of the political scale and very vocal about it. Lots of folks I know won't buy from him and will settle for lesser quality parts just to avoid him. That's what prompted the question.

Personally, it's not a big deal to me. Getting the best value for my dollar is very important to me. We all have our viewpoints. Even if we don't donate money to those causes we still probably vote in favor of them on election day. Actually, I'm somewhat surprised by the responses. I expected them to split much more down party lines.



_____________________________

While is there no liberal talk radio? There are at least five conservative talk radio shows available over the air every day in the radio market I live in. Why does the liberal message fail to attract listeners?

(in reply to graceadieu)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 6:00:53 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
You are contradicting yourself. There is no difference between walking into a jewelry store and walking into a bank with a gun.
They are both private property, and they both have a good reason to know who is and isn't armed on their property, based on the much higher likelihood of a robbery on such premises. If you had said coffeeshop or clothing store that wouldn't be so much of an issue.

And as with most people who don't give a rat's ass about the Constitution or the rights of others, you are pretending that what private individuals do on their private property to protect themselves is violating your rights...... Which is simply ignorance of the facts of life.


quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic


Your business, your right to choose, and then it's my right to choose not to spend my money at your business. And then tell everyone I know, and the internet, that you are against lawful concealed carry of firearms and let them decide. I live in Florida, concealed carry is legal. And concealed means "concealed." I carry concealed anywhere that's not a bank, courthouse, or hospital and I rarely go to hospitals. I went jogging today and I had a Model 40 S&W .38 special in concealed holster. I went out grocery shopping later and i had Glock 23 in my left jeans pocket behind my fat leather wallet. I've never once been called out for carrying and I used to carry a Brazilian Contract Colt 1917 that came to me a wreck with a bent barrel at the three inch mark, that I nickel plated and shortened the barrel to two inches, dehorned the hammer, I left the trigger guard, no need to Fitz it. It was a big pistol that I carried in a shoulder holster or back carry (made my own custom leather flat pack carry with padding).

Grocery stores in Florida let people carry guns so long as they are concealed, gas stations, movie theaters, restaraunts, gyms, bookstores (I get a Latee three to four times a week at a nearby bookstore and I always have at least one gun on my person).

Now I understand you are from Maryland and folks don't operate like us southerners. Somehow you folks from New England (except for New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, New York that isn't part of the five boroughs known as NYC) just get scared shitless over gun ownership and such. I don't get the big deal, but then I don't have to. I don't get what's so scary over someone going about their business with a gun on their hip. Doesn't bother me when I go to Georgia to visit family or hunting (usually an occassion for both). Now someone waving a gun around would be grounds for concern, surely. But I guess some folks just think folks are evil and dangerous, I mean with all the crazy anti-American laws in New York, Maryland, Illinois, California, D.C. I guess those folks in those parts have a greater tendency for it.

If you can't see my gun, how do you know I have a gun? My grandfather who lived in NYC broke the law for everyday he lived in NYC, he always carried a Colt 1903 .32 ACP and snub nose .38 revolver till the day he passed in a hospital at the ripe old age of 89. But hey, you think what you want, even if it's wrong.



< Message edited by Powergamz1 -- 5/5/2013 6:12:57 PM >


_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to TricklessMagic)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 6:12:13 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
In my case, the *only* retailer in the region for one of my hobbies, is well known locally for his extreme views (think '9/11 was faked' for starters). If he has something I want at a fair price, I'll weigh getting it there against postage, shipping, and delivery time to get it elsewhere. How his neurons are firing doesn't particularly bother me.

If he suddenly felt the need to drape his merchandise in rebel flags, or 'dead baby parts' graphic anti-abortion/vegan type stuff, I'd figure he had pushed it too far. Difference between being a believer, and proselityzing.


quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe

Thanks for the replies from everyone. One of the guys who supplies parts for one of my hobbies has really good stuff. Good prices, excellent quality control, great service and lots of free technical advice. He's way at the far right end of the political scale and very vocal about it. Lots of folks I know won't buy from him and will settle for lesser quality parts just to avoid him. That's what prompted the question.

Personally, it's not a big deal to me. Getting the best value for my dollar is very important to me. We all have our viewpoints. Even if we don't donate money to those causes we still probably vote in favor of them on election day. Actually, I'm somewhat surprised by the responses. I expected them to split much more down party lines.





_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to LizDeluxe)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 6:44:16 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe
Personally, it's not a big deal to me. Getting the best value for my dollar is very important to me. We all have our viewpoints. Even if we don't donate money to those causes we still probably vote in favor of them on election day. Actually, I'm somewhat surprised by the responses. I expected them to split much more down party lines.

well.. when its your own hard earned money you are spending when deciding who to do business with, its much more personal.. and people do switch parties sometimes too.. when I was a kid and did vote, my vote & the party I supported changed.. my views on a womans right to choose has always been exactly the same..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to LizDeluxe)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 6:48:15 PM   
TricklessMagic


Posts: 248
Joined: 9/14/2009
Status: offline
Eh in Florida it's against the law to carry concealed firearms into a bank. Now I could be wrong but that's the impression I've operated under. And it's your opinion there is no difference but I can't put my life savings into an account in a jewelry. A jewelry store is a retailer, just like a clothing store, pawnshop, or other dealer in goods.

I'm not saying jewelry stores don't have the right. I'm simply saying I refuse to shop there, that's my right, it's also my right to share that info with the public if I so choose. I don't have the right to stop others from shopping there or demanding the jeweler shut down, I just have the right to choose how I spend my money and let others have the info with which to make their decisions. It's okay, the jewelry store I go to is privately owned and the owner and I are gun folk. I handled his wife's concealed carry course qualifier, and his prices are superior (I met him two years after discovering the issue with the other store). He doesn't put up signs preventing law abiding folks from lawfully carrying "concealed firearms" because the reality, the simple reality, is that the sign won't stop criminals, only law abiding people. I realize that reality is lost on some folks.

Okay the issue of private property, again, I repeat, pay attention. I'm not saying they don't have the right. I'm simply saying I choose not to spend my money in establishments that operate in such fashion. I'm not stopping anyone from patronizing them. Okay, got it, do you understand? Do you need any more help? If controlling their property is such a concern where law abiding people lawfully carrying firearms is such a concern, then foregoing my patronage is an acceptable loss to them as well as the loss of others who disagree with them. I'm not trying to interfere with their rights. I'm not protesting in front of their store, I'm simply adding their name to a list of businesses that are anti-2nd Amendment so others can make their own choices about whether or not to do business with them. That's called freedom of speech, okay?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

You are contradicting yourself. There is no difference between walking into a jewelry store and walking into a bank with a gun.
They are both private property, and they both have a good reason to know who is and isn't armed on their property, based on the much higher likelihood of a robbery on such premises. If you had said coffeeshop or clothing store that wouldn't be so much of an issue.

And as with most people who don't give a rat's ass about the Constitution or the rights of others, you are pretending that what private individuals do on their private property to protect themselves is violating your rights...... Which is simply ignorance of the facts of life.


quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic


Your business, your right to choose, and then it's my right to choose not to spend my money at your business. And then tell everyone I know, and the internet, that you are against lawful concealed carry of firearms and let them decide. I live in Florida, concealed carry is legal. And concealed means "concealed." I carry concealed anywhere that's not a bank, courthouse, or hospital and I rarely go to hospitals. I went jogging today and I had a Model 40 S&W .38 special in concealed holster. I went out grocery shopping later and i had Glock 23 in my left jeans pocket behind my fat leather wallet. I've never once been called out for carrying and I used to carry a Brazilian Contract Colt 1917 that came to me a wreck with a bent barrel at the three inch mark, that I nickel plated and shortened the barrel to two inches, dehorned the hammer, I left the trigger guard, no need to Fitz it. It was a big pistol that I carried in a shoulder holster or back carry (made my own custom leather flat pack carry with padding).

Grocery stores in Florida let people carry guns so long as they are concealed, gas stations, movie theaters, restaraunts, gyms, bookstores (I get a Latee three to four times a week at a nearby bookstore and I always have at least one gun on my person).

Now I understand you are from Maryland and folks don't operate like us southerners. Somehow you folks from New England (except for New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, New York that isn't part of the five boroughs known as NYC) just get scared shitless over gun ownership and such. I don't get the big deal, but then I don't have to. I don't get what's so scary over someone going about their business with a gun on their hip. Doesn't bother me when I go to Georgia to visit family or hunting (usually an occassion for both). Now someone waving a gun around would be grounds for concern, surely. But I guess some folks just think folks are evil and dangerous, I mean with all the crazy anti-American laws in New York, Maryland, Illinois, California, D.C. I guess those folks in those parts have a greater tendency for it.

If you can't see my gun, how do you know I have a gun? My grandfather who lived in NYC broke the law for everyday he lived in NYC, he always carried a Colt 1903 .32 ACP and snub nose .38 revolver till the day he passed in a hospital at the ripe old age of 89. But hey, you think what you want, even if it's wrong.




(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 7:47:08 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
No, that's called spin. You specifically claim people who don't want you on their private property unless you follow their rules are 'anti-2nd amendment'. Bull. They could be the reincarnation of James Madison, and have every right to say 'no outside guns in my premises'. Same thing for people who own businesses at high risk for armed robbery. The two positions aren't mutually exclusive.


And 'Now I could be wrong but'... WTF?? 'Operated under'? So you are carrying in public, and you haven't even bothered to learn the basic laws on the matter?



http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0790/Sections/0790.06.html

Let me guess, 'sovereign citizens don't need no stinking permits'.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic

Eh in Florida it's against the law to carry concealed firearms into a bank. Now I could be wrong but that's the impression I've operated under. And it's your opinion there is no difference but I can't put my life savings into an account in a jewelry. A jewelry store is a retailer, just like a clothing store, pawnshop, or other dealer in goods.

I'm not saying jewelry stores don't have the right. I'm simply saying I refuse to shop there, that's my right, it's also my right to share that info with the public if I so choose. I don't have the right to stop others from shopping there or demanding the jeweler shut down, I just have the right to choose how I spend my money and let others have the info with which to make their decisions. It's okay, the jewelry store I go to is privately owned and the owner and I are gun folk. I handled his wife's concealed carry course qualifier, and his prices are superior (I met him two years after discovering the issue with the other store). He doesn't put up signs preventing law abiding folks from lawfully carrying "concealed firearms" because the reality, the simple reality, is that the sign won't stop criminals, only law abiding people. I realize that reality is lost on some folks.

Okay the issue of private property, again, I repeat, pay attention. I'm not saying they don't have the right. I'm simply saying I choose not to spend my money in establishments that operate in such fashion. I'm not stopping anyone from patronizing them. Okay, got it, do you understand? Do you need any more help? If controlling their property is such a concern where law abiding people lawfully carrying firearms is such a concern, then foregoing my patronage is an acceptable loss to them as well as the loss of others who disagree with them. I'm not trying to interfere with their rights. I'm not protesting in front of their store, I'm simply adding their name to a list of businesses that are anti-2nd Amendment so others can make their own choices about whether or not to do business with them. That's called freedom of speech, okay?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

You are contradicting yourself. There is no difference between walking into a jewelry store and walking into a bank with a gun.
They are both private property, and they both have a good reason to know who is and isn't armed on their property, based on the much higher likelihood of a robbery on such premises. If you had said coffeeshop or clothing store that wouldn't be so much of an issue.

And as with most people who don't give a rat's ass about the Constitution or the rights of others, you are pretending that what private individuals do on their private property to protect themselves is violating your rights...... Which is simply ignorance of the facts of life.


quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic


Your business, your right to choose, and then it's my right to choose not to spend my money at your business. And then tell everyone I know, and the internet, that you are against lawful concealed carry of firearms and let them decide. I live in Florida, concealed carry is legal. And concealed means "concealed." I carry concealed anywhere that's not a bank, courthouse, or hospital and I rarely go to hospitals. I went jogging today and I had a Model 40 S&W .38 special in concealed holster. I went out grocery shopping later and i had Glock 23 in my left jeans pocket behind my fat leather wallet. I've never once been called out for carrying and I used to carry a Brazilian Contract Colt 1917 that came to me a wreck with a bent barrel at the three inch mark, that I nickel plated and shortened the barrel to two inches, dehorned the hammer, I left the trigger guard, no need to Fitz it. It was a big pistol that I carried in a shoulder holster or back carry (made my own custom leather flat pack carry with padding).

Grocery stores in Florida let people carry guns so long as they are concealed, gas stations, movie theaters, restaraunts, gyms, bookstores (I get a Latee three to four times a week at a nearby bookstore and I always have at least one gun on my person).

Now I understand you are from Maryland and folks don't operate like us southerners. Somehow you folks from New England (except for New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, New York that isn't part of the five boroughs known as NYC) just get scared shitless over gun ownership and such. I don't get the big deal, but then I don't have to. I don't get what's so scary over someone going about their business with a gun on their hip. Doesn't bother me when I go to Georgia to visit family or hunting (usually an occassion for both). Now someone waving a gun around would be grounds for concern, surely. But I guess some folks just think folks are evil and dangerous, I mean with all the crazy anti-American laws in New York, Maryland, Illinois, California, D.C. I guess those folks in those parts have a greater tendency for it.

If you can't see my gun, how do you know I have a gun? My grandfather who lived in NYC broke the law for everyday he lived in NYC, he always carried a Colt 1903 .32 ACP and snub nose .38 revolver till the day he passed in a hospital at the ripe old age of 89. But hey, you think what you want, even if it's wrong.







_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to TricklessMagic)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 8:03:34 PM   
TricklessMagic


Posts: 248
Joined: 9/14/2009
Status: offline
It's called freedom of choice. Are you mad I choose not to do business with people who seek to have me needlessly disarmed. We all have a right to make choices, and either reap the reward or suffer the consequences. I'm not arguing with them having the right. I've said repeatedly that they have the right to choose not to allow lawfully carried firearms on their property What's got you so upset? <smiles>

If you don't want to be in a business that involves a high risk of armed robbery, don't get into the business, simple as that. Telling me, a law-abiding individual I can't lawfully carry a firearm on your premises won't stop a criminal intent on robbing, from robbing, it will only stop me from entering the business premises. I mean Jesus Christ, if your business is that dangerous I can't lawfully carry a firearm on the property and you don't have law enforcement in significant number on the property performing pat downs and metal detectors, I don't want to be on your premises because your so scared of criminals, it must be a dangerous place to be. Part of the reason I'll never again visit Chicago, D.C., NYC, Maryland, or New Jersey, it's just so darned dangerous that they have to have these incredibly anti-American laws to disarm law abiding citizens.

Oh I'm well aware of the laws on the matter, it just happens that cops in Florida aren't, and I don't want to be arguing with one over having a gun in bank. And yes I have a concealed carry permit. I'm an NRA certified Pistol Instructor, and the vast majority of my students have gotten their permits. So keep dancing buddy, you might something to bring into this conversation other than I'm a bad guy because I won't spend money in establishments that don't share my view point, and will instead choose to spend money in places that share my view point. Oh I'm so bad, I do what so many Americans choose to do wah wah wah, lol.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

No, that's called spin. You specifically claim people who don't want you on their private property unless you follow their rules are 'anti-2nd amendment'. Bull. They could be the reincarnation of James Madison, and have every right to say 'no outside guns in my premises'. Same thing for people who own businesses at high risk for armed robbery. The two positions aren't mutually exclusive.


And 'Now I could be wrong but'... WTF?? 'Operated under'? So you are carrying in public, and you haven't even bothered to learn the basic laws on the matter?



http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0790/Sections/0790.06.html

Let me guess, 'sovereign citizens don't need no stinking permits'.


(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 8:08:18 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
Just a couple cents on where the subject seems to be turning.

1) The whole point of carrying a concealed weapon is that it is CONCEALED, not flashed around to advertise to the world what a dangerous mutherfucka you are.

2) There is no such thing as a concealed carry permit for a guest in my home. It can wait in the car, get put up on a shelf in the closet until you leave, or you and it can get the hell out.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to TricklessMagic)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 8:10:45 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic (snip)

It's called freedom of choice. Are you mad I choose not to do business with people who seek to have me needlessly disarmed. We all have a right to make choices, and either reap the reward or suffer the consequences.


Come on, man. The lunatic left is all about freedom of choice as long as you listen to them when it comes to which way to choose. You've been around long enough to have figured that out.

You know ... women should have the right to choose ... unless they choose to be a stay-at-home mom, raising a family. That kind of thing.



Peace and comfort,



Michael


< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 5/5/2013 8:12:26 PM >


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to TricklessMagic)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 8:18:08 PM   
TricklessMagic


Posts: 248
Joined: 9/14/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Come on, man. The lunatic left is all about freedom of choice as long as you listen to them when it comes to which way to choose. You've been around long enough to have figured that out.

You know ... women should have the right to choose ... unless they choose to be a stay-at-home mom, raising a family. That kind of thing.



Peace and comfort,



Michael



No the lunatic left is only interested in freedom of choice if you choose what it is they want you to choose. Yes I have figured it out, but i like to play with those on the left who are liars, fools, and traitors (none of those terms are mutually exclusive by the way when dealing with libs). It's fun to watch them try and say I'm a bad guy when all I'm saying is they have the right to choose, I have the right to choose, and that's all it comes down to. They, the libs, say I'm a bad guy because I want folks to have the right to choose, and to reap the rewards, or suffer the consequences. Remember freedom, to libs, is wrong, abhorrent, and immoral. Bow to the state and collectivism as they demand. Something I find amusing as so many are all about evolution (I believe in evolution for the record).

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 8:21:48 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
Now you are simply trolling. I made a common sense observation that I wouldn't trust my valuables in a place where the security was run so unprofessionally, and you seem desperate to spin that into an anti-2nd amendment pooh flinging game where none exists.

In your spew, you managed to let slip that you haven't got a clue what the permit laws actually are, but have been carrying onto other people's property anyway... that would seem like fodder for a different thread. One about personal responsibility, competence, and all that.

As far as the rest of your projection, good luck getting me to waste time falling for your strawmen.



quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic

It's called freedom of choice. Are you mad I choose not to do business with people who seek to have me needlessly disarmed. We all have a right to make choices, and either reap the reward or suffer the consequences. I'm not arguing with them having the right. I've said repeatedly that they have the right to choose not to allow lawfully carried firearms on their property What's got you so upset? <smiles>

If you don't want to be in a business that involves a high risk of armed robbery, don't get into the business, simple as that. Telling me, a law-abiding individual I can't lawfully carry a firearm on your premises won't stop a criminal intent on robbing, from robbing, it will only stop me from entering the business premises. I mean Jesus Christ, if your business is that dangerous I can't lawfully carry a firearm on the property and you don't have law enforcement in significant number on the property performing pat downs and metal detectors, I don't want to be on your premises because your so scared of criminals, it must be a dangerous place to be. Part of the reason I'll never again visit Chicago, D.C., NYC, Maryland, or New Jersey, it's just so darned dangerous that they have to have these incredibly anti-American laws to disarm law abiding citizens.

Oh I'm well aware of the laws on the matter, it just happens that cops in Florida aren't, and I don't want to be arguing with one over having a gun in bank. And yes I have a concealed carry permit. I'm an NRA certified Pistol Instructor, and the vast majority of my students have gotten their permits. So keep dancing buddy, you might something to bring into this conversation other than I'm a bad guy because I won't spend money in establishments that don't share my view point, and will instead choose to spend money in places that share my view point. Oh I'm so bad, I do what so many Americans choose to do wah wah wah, lol.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

No, that's called spin. You specifically claim people who don't want you on their private property unless you follow their rules are 'anti-2nd amendment'. Bull. They could be the reincarnation of James Madison, and have every right to say 'no outside guns in my premises'. Same thing for people who own businesses at high risk for armed robbery. The two positions aren't mutually exclusive.


And 'Now I could be wrong but'... WTF?? 'Operated under'? So you are carrying in public, and you haven't even bothered to learn the basic laws on the matter?



http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0790/Sections/0790.06.html

Let me guess, 'sovereign citizens don't need no stinking permits'.





_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to TricklessMagic)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 8:24:44 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic

No the lunatic left is only interested in freedom of choice if you choose what it is they want you to choose.

Bullshit.

The fact is that you have the freedom to choose to carry a concealed firearm and business owers have the freedom to choose to not allow you to do so on their property.

The correct behavior would be to live and let live. Your claimed behavior is trying to force others to adhere to your beliefs.

(in reply to TricklessMagic)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 8:25:35 PM   
TricklessMagic


Posts: 248
Joined: 9/14/2009
Status: offline
Tah tah

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 8:32:12 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
I'm impressed by how he jogs with a concealed weapon. He's closer to his "piece" than a lovestruck, teenage girl is to her smartphone or an upset baby is to its pacifier. I didn't realize a person could have a co-depended relationship with his firearm.

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 8:34:54 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
Ahhh, the 'Flounce'. Why am I not surprised?
quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic

Tah tah



_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to TricklessMagic)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Politics and consumerism - 5/5/2013 9:02:51 PM   
TricklessMagic


Posts: 248
Joined: 9/14/2009
Status: offline
Okay, help me out here, I've admitted that stores can choose to not allow people with lawful firearms on their premises. So the problem you all have, is that I prefer to give my business to a store that does allow me to lawfully carry a firearm on their premises. You have a problem with my freedom of choice because I take issue with another person's choice and simply choose to not encourage it with my hard earned money. Is that what we are getting at?

I'm not forcing anyone to do anything, unless you have some bullshit definition of force where by my own choice to not act in the interest of another party is forcing them to do something. Anti-2nd Amendment groups publish all kinds of info on gun friendly states and people, but I'm a bad guy if I publish factual info on businesses that don't want folks lawfully carrying firearms on their property. So people can make their own choice. Last I checked boycotts were still legal and readily used by both lefties and Americans. Oh wait yes, I forget, liberals equals hypocrisy, my mistake.

Also, who decides what is "correct behaviour?" God, the collective of human beings, or our justice system. Remember two out of three can be flawed and tends to be.

All I'm seeing here is a bunch of lefties taking issue with freedom of choice where it affects folks that might believe the same line of thinking they have. Aren't all us gun owning folks bad in the eyes of gun haters, if we're so bad in your eyes you shouldn't miss our money or even need it, for shame you should boycott us from buying goods in your stores, you should turn away our money and support. That would at least be the honest thing. lol oh wait my bad, I forgot who I was talking about tah tah.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: TricklessMagic

No the lunatic left is only interested in freedom of choice if you choose what it is they want you to choose.

Bullshit.

The fact is that you have the freedom to choose to carry a concealed firearm and business owers have the freedom to choose to not allow you to do so on their property.

The correct behavior would be to live and let live. Your claimed behavior is trying to force others to adhere to your beliefs.


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Politics and consumerism Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.236