DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Edwynn quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: Edwynn So no, no scientific proof that Chic Filet does not make the best chicken sandwich in Atlanta, but some small region in the city thinks not. Along with other people in other locations of the metro area that drive past the Chic Filet to pull into the local establishments selling chicken sandwiches. Again, thanks for humbling me. Edwynn, you have your choice for what establishment provides the best product/service, right? What does it matter if that's a Chic-Fil-A or Dirk Diggler's House o' Chicken (any resemblance to a real establishment is completely random, and should in no way be taken as support nor denial of same)? Apply the question to whatever establishment you think provides the best whatever product. Would you continue to be a customer of an establishment if that customer's politics is opposite yours, even if the products/services rendered were far and above their nearest competitor? That's all that's being asked in the OP. To the extent that I discriminate at all by patronizing or not a given establishment, I would much more discriminate based on their having much to say about politics at all more that the particulars of the politics. As I said, I am more biased against stupid, which makes me biased against politics. The few small businesses where I know the proprietor personally, they pretty much despise politics, so it's an easy choice to do business there. That is the response, at least the way I've interpreted the OP, that LizDeluxe was looking for.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|