RE: 13 "Benghazis" That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: 13 "Benghazis" That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/11/2013 6:53:59 AM)

What question is there to answer, how many ambassadors died?  Who fuckin cares?  Zero probably.  How many World Trade Center people have died under Obama?

I mean what the fuck?  So the question being asked is the 60 embassy employees (none of them ambassadors (big fucking deal, just a job) but all of them americans dying) where were the troop to defend them in these countries?  What sort of fuckin moron would have embassies staffed in these countries, where were the troops, who knew what when, where was the investigation on the cover up of why these weren't investigated?

How about the (at least) 100 deaths due to torture under W?  Where is the investigation?  Why the cover up?  

9/11 happens and W blames Saddam.   Is a video worse? Where is the investigation?  Why the cover up?  Where were the troops? 




DesideriScuri -> RE: 13 "Benghazis" That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/11/2013 10:11:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
What question is there to answer, how many ambassadors died?  Who fuckin cares?  Zero probably.  How many World Trade Center people have died under Obama?
I mean what the fuck?  So the question being asked is the 60 embassy employees (none of them ambassadors (big fucking deal, just a job) but all of them americans dying) where were the troop to defend them in these countries?  What sort of fuckin moron would have embassies staffed in these countries, where were the troops, who knew what when, where was the investigation on the cover up of why these weren't investigated?
How about the (at least) 100 deaths due to torture under W?  Where is the investigation?  Why the cover up?  
9/11 happens and W blames Saddam.   Is a video worse? Where is the investigation?  Why the cover up?  Where were the troops? 


You can't even accept that Obama covered up that there was a terrorist attack that resulted in the death of our Ambassador.

All you can do is bring up asswipe about Bush. Guess what, Ron. Bush isn't in office anymore. This is on Obama. The 13 terrorist attacks from the OP? They were called "Benghazi's." Since there was no cover up of their being terrorist attacks, they certainly aren't the same as Benghazi. I don't know what you think, but it sure seems like Obama is being blamed for covering up the real reasons behind the attacks and having his people do that for him. How is it not clear that Obama and his Administration covered that up, shifting blame onto the producer of a Youtube video?

Now, Sec. of State Clinton may have more to answer for, but, isn't that part of what the hearing is about? Instead of allowing the investigation to take place, you are casting aspersions left and right, and shifting blame.

Sadly, I don't expect much more out of you than that anymore.




Fightdirecto -> RE: 13 "Benghazis" That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/11/2013 10:53:04 AM)

The Republicans keep searching for the "smoking gun" connected to the four American deaths in Bengazi which will enable them to (a) possibly impeach President Obama, (b) per-emptively head off a possible future President Hillary Clinton, and (c) energize their base for the Republicans facing re-election (such as Lindsey Graham). Problem is they can't find that "smoking gun", no matter how many hearings, how many witnesses, how many investigations they create.

Albert Einstein supposedly said, "Insanity is when you do the same thing, over and over again, hoping that the next time you'll get the result you want" (or words to that effect). Apparently the Republicans, therefore, are insane.




thompsonx -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/11/2013 4:24:17 PM)

quote:

I just love the eye for and eye mentality of morality.


This post does not seem to comprehend the "eye for an eye" statute in the code of hamarabi.




jlf1961 -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/11/2013 5:14:53 PM)

Hey, Dubya didnt give a flying fuck about the non combatants killed in Iraq and Afghanistan by US munitions, why would a few state department paper pushers matter?

Of course, the Dems didnt make a fuss, so are they entirely without shame?




Owner59 -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/11/2013 7:23:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FunCouple5280

lol So, I suppose two wrongs make a right in your mind? Hack




I guess you don`t get it but it`s the hypocrisy that folks won`t take.....


Notice the news lately?[8|]


If your party wasn`t trying to abuse this tragedy.......folks wouldn`t be mentioning the gop`s utter ignorance of the other 13 embassy attacks.....



No need to thank me for explaining it....glad to do it anytime.....[;)]




thompsonx -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/12/2013 6:48:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Hey, Dubya didnt give a flying fuck about the non combatants killed in Iraq and Afghanistan by US munitions, why would a few state department paper pushers matter?

Of course, the Dems didnt make a fuss, so are they entirely without shame?



????????????????????




mnottertail -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/13/2013 7:24:06 AM)

quote:


You can't even accept that Obama covered up that there was a terrorist attack that resulted in the death of our Ambassador.


LOLOLOLOFUCKINGL. Covered it up, did he?  He has had very limited success if that is what he is trying to do.  He has had about as much success at that cover up as the teabaggers have at their cover up of their political ineptitude and fiscal buffoonery.




DesideriScuri -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/13/2013 7:42:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
quote:

You can't even accept that Obama covered up that there was a terrorist attack that resulted in the death of our Ambassador.

LOLOLOLOFUCKINGL. Covered it up, did he?  He has had very limited success if that is what he is trying to do.  He has had about as much success at that cover up as the teabaggers have at their cover up of their political ineptitude and fiscal buffoonery.


His ineptitude is quite humorous.




mnottertail -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/13/2013 7:46:21 AM)

Nowhere near the howling drivel of the teabaggers.   And they are not covering up their ineptitude and general destruction of America either.




DesideriScuri -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/13/2013 7:49:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Nowhere near the howling drivel of the teabaggers.   And they are not covering up their ineptitude and general destruction of America either.


You forgot "asswipe" in your response. Need more coffee this morning?




mnottertail -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/13/2013 8:21:47 AM)

Nah, everyone knows it is asswipe.




DesideriScuri -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/13/2013 9:36:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Nah, everyone knows it is asswipe.


And yet, no one has shown how the "13" were called anything other than precisely what they were...




mnottertail -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/13/2013 9:45:16 AM)

Well, WMD... Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.  So as the thing developed, you are shitting hysterically over the word usage.

How about the 'fiscally conservative' teabaggers?  That's a big cover up then.




joether -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/13/2013 10:42:42 AM)

Imagine if Democrats were in power, President Obama, leading the charge into Iraq over 'Massive Stockpiles of Weapons of Mass Destruction'. And after all the killing, maiming, death, destruction, and loads of stealing going on; we find Iraq really didn't have any where in the neighborhood of what the administration accused it. Who here would be dumb or ignorant enough to think the Republicans WOULDN'T attack the administration 10,000 times as mighty as they are now with Benghazi?

How many Republicans held their own party to the full accounting and responsibility with the abuse of power that the Bush administration go away with? The OP is correct in this instance with the article. If your going to slam another political party over one event that took place, its fair to ask if they hold THEIR OWN PARTY TO TWICE THE LEVEL OF ACCOUNTING AND RESPONSIBILITY. If they don't, its simply doing the actions for political points.....NOT.....to right the wrongs or find the truth of the events that took place.

That is why many Americans already see this for what it is; its simply history repeating itself. Republicans are looking for.....ANYTHING....to impeach President Obama. Regardless of how silly, stupid, or completely 'right wing lunatic-ish' it comes across. They....KNOW....that if Hillary Clinton runs in 2016, that not one among them would stand an even or better odds for the White House. So, this is a smear campaign. But not to entice Americans to the 'GOP side', but to keep their already 'lowest information voters' whom vote for them fanatically from ever listening to facts. Or allow them to.......think for themselves......on the issue.

Four people died in Benghazi. All of them were well trained. They knew going in what the job was and how dangerous events could become. They knew full well they could die in any number of thousands of ways. And took precautions to the best of their abilities. Mourn for the four dead Americans. They are a precious lost to us. But don't try pushing time, energy and most of all, taxpayer dollars, on hearing after hearing looking for something.....ANYTHING....to pin on Democrats. Last I checked, 20 1st graders and 6 adults also lost their lives in....The United States of America....just a few months ago. Violence was the furthest thing from the teacher's minds, let alone the children's. Yet Republicans pushed that whole event under the rug as fast as they could....if only to please their Gun Industry masters.

Anyone whom has A) a brain, B) a will, and C) a education; knows this whole Benghazi thing is a silly waste of time, energy and taxpayer money. Aren't the conservatives on this and other boards......CONSTANTLY.....bashing Democrats and the President for wasting taxpayer money? Yet when their own party, the one that they VOTE in favor of, does this silly stuff over and over......where is the accountability and responsibility of power?

Why is this Benghazi thing an issue to the GOP? Because the GOP doesn't have a leg to stand on with....ANY OTHER ISSUE. When was the last time the GOP actually did something for the 99% of US Citizens that DIDN'T benefit the top 1% even more? I have to go back to the 1980's to find the last example....




Edwynn -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/13/2013 11:09:34 AM)

~FR~

You just aren't getting it:

The major tremendously costly (in both financial and diplomatic and any sense of real national security terms) transgressions and missteps of the past administration are magically wiped away by any similar-but-of-far-less magnitude missteps of the current administration. Whichever such missteps are a part of dealing with such smelly leftovers or not.

Sorry bub, but the last administration doesn't slide out of it quite so easily.

Not to worry, though. As soon as the next Republican prez comes along, Obama is off scott free, by your account.

So, by this logic, get ahead of the curve and quit griping now about Obama.






thompsonx -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/13/2013 11:14:55 AM)

quote:

Four people died in Benghazi. All of them were well trained. They knew going in what the job was and how dangerous events could become. They knew full well they could die in any number of thousands of ways. And took precautions to the best of their abilities. Mourn for the four dead Americans. They are a precious lost to us.


Please correct me if I am wrong but dont ambasadors and state department employees have he job of pimping korporte amerika?
If that is true: then if one is one of the 98% that is getting fucked by the 2% one finds oneself hardpressed to come up with a reason to feel sorry for them.
Your thoughts?




mnottertail -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/13/2013 11:16:39 AM)

Ja Huntie, I don't know that the guy was actually passing out Vegas brochures to these assholes, but.......




Edwynn -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/13/2013 11:21:40 AM)

You are 'legitimizing' terrorism, you are arguing for communism, or for an Islamic British or French or US theocracy, or wishing that we all were back in animal furs, in even mentioning such things.

Hey, don't blame me for all that, I just read the morning paper, and there we are, you know?

Oh, but just wait till the rest of the crowd comes home after a full day of hate radio. Then those who come in from the "econ" blogs to tell us 'the real story,' etc.

Good to be a part of an "informed democracy," innit?








DesideriScuri -> RE: 13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News (5/13/2013 11:23:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Well, WMD... Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.  So as the thing developed, you are shitting hysterically over the word usage.
How about the 'fiscally conservative' teabaggers?  That's a big cover up then.


So, here's a question for you (and this is proof positive of one of Rich's threads), what does WMD have to do with this thread?

"13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News"

Which of those 13 were called anything but what they were?

And, you were right. You didn't need to list "asswipe" in one of your earlier posts, simply because everything you're posting here is pure asswipe.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875