muhly22222
Posts: 463
Joined: 3/25/2010 Status: offline
|
FR And if he has the right to do it, why shouldn't he? I assure you that his trial was not "100% perfectly legal, correct, and fair." Not because of any special knowledge of his case, just because whenever there's a trial, there's always an issue you can appeal on. Some evidentiary ruling, a Fourth Amendment issue, a Miranda issue, etc. There's always something. You say he's wasting the court's time. I don't know what their grounds for appeal will be, but is it possible a judge would disagree with you? And then it wasn't really a waste of time. Besides, even if OJ loses, there could be a valuable ruling to come out of one of their issues that affects cases in the future...in which case the appeal wasn't a waste of time, either.
_____________________________
I have always been among those who believed that the greatest freedom of speech was the greatest safety, because if a man is a fool, the best thing to do is to encourage him to advertise the fact by speaking. -Woodrow Wilson
|