njlauren -> RE: Is rape about power? (5/19/2013 9:50:23 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aswad quote:
ORIGINAL: kalikshama I believe it was a disempowering disservice to girls and women to drop it from the curriculum. I agree, but hey, around these parts, the minister of health went on the record saying that rape is almost murder... The vintage misogyny of ascribing such boundless power to the penis, and none to its passive receptacles(!), never ceases to amaze and disgust me. IWYW, — Aswad. So what you are basically saying is that we shouldn't have rape laws, since if a woman is raped, she has a part in it happening? So we should put women in Burkhas, and if they get raped on a date because the guy went to far, do what the cops did in Steubenville and laugh it off? In Steubenville, the girl was stupid, she got fucked up, drunk out of her head, and put herself in a bad position, but arguing her stupidity in any way ameliorated what they did is absolutely tragic... If you want to argue that women can do things to prevent rape, in being smart, I agree. This is a BD/SM board, and what do we tell newbies about safety, about protecting themselves? Why do we have safewords? If you are arguing that women can help prevent rape, I totally agree, I would never argue that one, but once a rape occurs, the fault has to be with the perpetrator. I don't think a guy who does date rape because he thought he had consent is very different then a serial rapist, and in court it is treated very differently, it is why we have judges. But if a girl gets drunk, kind of passes out, and the guy rapes her, the blame is all his, because he had control in that case. The other thing that leaves out is that most men are stronger than the women they rape, and besides using weapons, they have physical strength to overwhelm the girl they are with.... What I object to is the idea that once the crime has happened, that the person who is the victim has anything to answer for legally and I reject outright the idea that somehow men don't have to be totally in control of themselves. If a man doesn't have impulse control and ends up raping a woman, that is her fault, not the fact that maybe she shouldn't have been drinking or doing drugs; she has some culpability I think but not legally. That is like telling me that if a drunk driver hits my car and hurts me because I was driving on New Years Eve when a lot of drunks are out on the roads it is partially my fault, when the drunk has the responsiblity. The reason I object is because that becomes a really slippery slope legally, it is saying 'nod nod wink wink you know how it is, boys will be boys, etc' or the religious fueled nonsense, so prevalent in Islam especially, that women are seductresses and men can't control themselves, so women have to be locked up in burkhas, not allowed to drive, if they go someplace have to be with a male relative and so forth, it assumes that men can't control themselves and women are to blame, and that is horseshit. First of all, it insults men, it assumes that most of them are driven only by their dicks, have no control over it, and that is bullshit, most men out there are in control, at least where it comes to rape, they know the difference and woud never think of doing something like that, they would be horrified (it is interesting to note that one of the groups with the highest rape rates tend to be jocks, and it isn't surprising that this has been traced to a culture of entitlement given them; put it this way, it is rarely in high school the kid with the 2400 SAT and the 4.0 GPA, it is more likely to be a member of the football team, the star athlete, which with the power they are given, not surprising). How do we prevent rape? Throwing the book at those found guilty helps, but I think there is a lot more. Empowering women to protect themselves, teaching them about protecting themselves, self respect, not putting themselves in bad situations is a good idea (It was something learned in my own journey; as a male, I never felt particularly afraid, I assumed a lot; when I was in transition, I learned a lot about fear, about possible threats, of protecting myself), telling girls they have the right to say no, to not be forced. I think we also have to do a lot with boys, to get rid of the silent crap that exists, that when they date someone they don't own them, the person owes them nothing other then treating them with respect, and that as boys/men they have a duty to protect the person they are with, including from themselves. Most of the men I know would be horrified to think they had taken something from the woman they were with (or man, if gay), they were brought up to respect women, and in general, most men accused of rape when you question them, have somehow not learned that, they either have hatred or they grew up in misogynystic surroundings that assumed women were still somehow owned by men, or the like. I think of the kids in Ohio who sat and watched while the girl was raped, boys and girls, and who defended those who did it. That doesn't change the nature of rape, it simply does what you can to prevent it, and that is two different things. I won't stand for any claims that the victim was responsible, if someone goes over that line, for whatever reason they are wrong, totally wrong, this isn't like an auto accident, if you , man or woman, take advantage of someone else against their will, you are totally guilty....the penalty might be different, there are shades of gray (different if someone slipped over the line, versus a Douchbag who roofied a girl), but the guilt is there. I think the power issue is highlighted by statutory rape laws (which are different then other kinds of rape, but still). An adult having sex with an underage child has power over that child simply by being adult, and the law is written that having that power means that the child cannot consent, the power overrides that. While statutory rape is different, one premise is the same, that the perp used their power to do something bad; with a child, the power adults have over children, in adult rape, using whatever power they had (physical force, a weapon, the drunken state of their victim) to have sex without the others consent; power may not have been the motivation in all cases (and I agree saying it is always about power, that that is the motivation, is wrong) but the legal consequences in almost all cases are based on misusing power in doing the rape.
|
|
|
|