Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

16% verse 50%


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> 16% verse 50% Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
16% verse 50% - 5/20/2013 9:14:52 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
The President had a pretty hard week, last week. Three big problems that were only added on by the GOP. But the curious issue I keep wondering is....WHY....do we the American people even listen to any of these GOP members that are in Congress? You might have heard that the President's numbers are in the 50-53% Range. While the whole of Congress (that would be both Democrats, Independents AND Republicans) is hovering at 16%. In fact, Americans seem to score Republicans (14%) worst than Democrats (19%).

So you may or may not like how the President is doing, but at least half the nation thinks he's doing an 'o.k.' job. Were as with Congress, 4/5 people in the nation think they are sucking at their jobs. So the question I have is, would you take.....ANYONE....in Congress seriously when they try to bash the White House for....ANYTHING?

Profile   Post #: 1
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/20/2013 9:38:59 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Well, the checks and balances of our government require (or nearly so) questioning of the opposition.   Now, if they want to make molehills into mountains rather than deal with the business of America, that can be construed as their duty.

Popularity polls notwithstanding, since you are going to see the teabaggers even less popular very soon. 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/20/2013 9:39:35 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

WHY....do we the American people even listen to any of these GOP members that are in Congress?

Why do they listen to the Dems who are mirror opposites?


quote:

So the question I have is, would you take.....ANYONE....in Congress seriously when they try to bash the White House for....ANYTHING?


I usually don't. I think most of them are self serving idiots on both sides.

That said I do hold out hope for Senator Stabenow.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/20/2013 10:30:00 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
The President had a pretty hard week, last week. Three big problems that were only added on by the GOP. But the curious issue I keep wondering is....WHY....do we the American people even listen to any of these GOP members that are in Congress? You might have heard that the President's numbers are in the 50-53% Range. While the whole of Congress (that would be both Democrats, Independents AND Republicans) is hovering at 16%. In fact, Americans seem to score Republicans (14%) worst than Democrats (19%).
So you may or may not like how the President is doing, but at least half the nation thinks he's doing an 'o.k.' job. Were as with Congress, 4/5 people in the nation think they are sucking at their jobs. So the question I have is, would you take.....ANYONE....in Congress seriously when they try to bash the White House for....ANYTHING?


I don't know that that's a fair comparison, actually. Think about it. When you are asked about your support of Congress, you are being asked to rate 537 people while you only have the opportunity to elect 3? Is anyone surprised that the numbers are so low? How do the elected officials rate according to their constituents? That would be a much more accurate comparison. 304M (or so) people have 1 President out of 1 total Presidents to rate.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/20/2013 10:32:34 AM   
FelineRanger


Posts: 658
Joined: 9/4/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

So the question I have is, would you take.....ANYONE....in Congress seriously when they try to bash the White House for....ANYTHING?



This has been going on at least since the Clinton Presidency when Congress was more concerned about which intern he was porking instead of the growing threat from al-Qaeda. A threat which Clinton tried to get a legal declaration of war against and was denied over the manufactured scandals that plagued his Presidency. My source for that is the 9/11 Commission Report, just in case anyone is interested.

_____________________________

Bill

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/20/2013 11:16:26 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

WHY....do we the American people even listen to any of these GOP members that are in Congress?

Why do they listen to the Dems who are mirror opposites?


quote:

So the question I have is, would you take.....ANYONE....in Congress seriously when they try to bash the White House for....ANYTHING?


I usually don't. I think most of them are self serving idiots on both sides.

That said I do hold out hope for Senator Stabenow.



Really?



Have the democrat leaders manufactured fake evidence against a republican?



Is there any chance you`ll stop lying?

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/20/2013 11:22:47 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
The President had a pretty hard week, last week. Three big problems that were only added on by the GOP. But the curious issue I keep wondering is....WHY....do we the American people even listen to any of these GOP members that are in Congress? You might have heard that the President's numbers are in the 50-53% Range. While the whole of Congress (that would be both Democrats, Independents AND Republicans) is hovering at 16%. In fact, Americans seem to score Republicans (14%) worst than Democrats (19%).
So you may or may not like how the President is doing, but at least half the nation thinks he's doing an 'o.k.' job. Were as with Congress, 4/5 people in the nation think they are sucking at their jobs. So the question I have is, would you take.....ANYONE....in Congress seriously when they try to bash the White House for....ANYTHING?


I don't know that that's a fair comparison, actually. Think about it. When you are asked about your support of Congress, you are being asked to rate 537 people while you only have the opportunity to elect 3? Is anyone surprised that the numbers are so low? How do the elected officials rate according to their constituents? That would be a much more accurate comparison. 304M (or so) people have 1 President out of 1 total Presidents to rate.


Do you get to elect the President's Cabinet? How about the US Supreme Court? If the Executive or the Judicial approval numbers were 16%, would you be 'flipping mad' about it? Oh hell yeah! Yet, your 'ok' with Congress, the third branch of our government sinking down to one third the approval numbers of the other two branches? Maybe we as Americans ought to hold the whole of Congress to the same standards as the other two branches. Right now, it seems the Republicans are pulling down the numbers more than the Democrats. This 'Benghazi' thing is to the current Republicans, what 'Iraq' was to Republicans a decade previous: takes your attention off how badly they are doing their jobs! "Look over here, DONT, look over there!" is the message they are pushing.

You can only elect three point, right? Yet, how many of them are lawyers? How many of them are NOT rich? Does that sound like an accurate picture of America? Isn't Congress the branch for all Americans and not certain Americans? An when its time to elect someone to represent us in Congress, the field is only a half dozen? Your going to tell me that there are only a half dozen able-bodied, intelligent persons in your state qualified for the position(s)? How about we restrict all campaign spending to only 1/10th of what the position pays? And if your not supporting yourself, but others, its restricted to 1/2 that amount for ALL candidates? We have seen countless times in which 'money talks' and Americans lose every time. Would certainly force people to 'live within their budget', wouldn't it? After all, can you take someone seriously who 'spends high on the hog' to get elected, and then demand them to 'balance the US budget'? How many years has that budget been in a deficit? Twelve years now?


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/20/2013 12:00:24 PM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline
I think DesideriScuri's got a point. People may not like Congress as a whole, but the majority do like thier particular representative, and they listen to that person.

It's in each representative's interest to do and say things to appeal to their constituency (and donors, and the party higher-ups), even if it seems ridiculous or obstructive to everybody else. Darrell Issa's Republican voter base, for example, probably loves it that he's making a big deal about Benghazi. Most people in the country don't think it's a scandal, but he's not concerned with "most" people, just the ones that can vote for him.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/20/2013 1:02:46 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

WHY....do we the American people even listen to any of these GOP members that are in Congress?

Why do they listen to the Dems who are mirror opposites?


quote:

So the question I have is, would you take.....ANYONE....in Congress seriously when they try to bash the White House for....ANYTHING?


I usually don't. I think most of them are self serving idiots on both sides.

That said I do hold out hope for Senator Stabenow.



Really?



Have the democrat leaders manufactured fake evidence against a republican?

Did I say anywhere that they had? I said I think most of them (on both sides) are self serving idiots but I kinda like Stabenow. Maybe you wouldn't look like such an idiot if you just learned how to read and quit putting words in peoples mouths.

Is there any chance you`ll stop lying?
Show me one lie in that post or admit that you just like making baseless accusations about people.



< Message edited by thishereboi -- 5/20/2013 1:04:28 PM >


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/20/2013 1:14:14 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
The President had a pretty hard week, last week. Three big problems that were only added on by the GOP. But the curious issue I keep wondering is....WHY....do we the American people even listen to any of these GOP members that are in Congress? You might have heard that the President's numbers are in the 50-53% Range. While the whole of Congress (that would be both Democrats, Independents AND Republicans) is hovering at 16%. In fact, Americans seem to score Republicans (14%) worst than Democrats (19%).
So you may or may not like how the President is doing, but at least half the nation thinks he's doing an 'o.k.' job. Were as with Congress, 4/5 people in the nation think they are sucking at their jobs. So the question I have is, would you take.....ANYONE....in Congress seriously when they try to bash the White House for....ANYTHING?

I don't know that that's a fair comparison, actually. Think about it. When you are asked about your support of Congress, you are being asked to rate 537 people while you only have the opportunity to elect 3? Is anyone surprised that the numbers are so low? How do the elected officials rate according to their constituents? That would be a much more accurate comparison. 304M (or so) people have 1 President out of 1 total Presidents to rate.

Do you get to elect the President's Cabinet? How about the US Supreme Court? If the Executive or the Judicial approval numbers were 16%, would you be 'flipping mad' about it? Oh hell yeah! Yet, your 'ok' with Congress, the third branch of our government sinking down to one third the approval numbers of the other two branches? Maybe we as Americans ought to hold the whole of Congress to the same standards as the other two branches. Right now, it seems the Republicans are pulling down the numbers more than the Democrats. This 'Benghazi' thing is to the current Republicans, what 'Iraq' was to Republicans a decade previous: takes your attention off how badly they are doing their jobs! "Look over here, DONT, look over there!" is the message they are pushing.
You can only elect three point, right? Yet, how many of them are lawyers? How many of them are NOT rich? Does that sound like an accurate picture of America? Isn't Congress the branch for all Americans and not certain Americans? An when its time to elect someone to represent us in Congress, the field is only a half dozen? Your going to tell me that there are only a half dozen able-bodied, intelligent persons in your state qualified for the position(s)? How about we restrict all campaign spending to only 1/10th of what the position pays? And if your not supporting yourself, but others, its restricted to 1/2 that amount for ALL candidates? We have seen countless times in which 'money talks' and Americans lose every time. Would certainly force people to 'live within their budget', wouldn't it? After all, can you take someone seriously who 'spends high on the hog' to get elected, and then demand them to 'balance the US budget'? How many years has that budget been in a deficit? Twelve years now?


Do we judge the President on the popularity of the SCOTUS? his Cabinet?




_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/20/2013 1:16:35 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Many here judge the presidents popularity by simple whatever he does is bad.

But they are a vast minority, and without much in the way of fact.

But, I think at the end of the dqy, the Presidency is not a popularity contest.  

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/20/2013 2:22:41 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Many here judge the presidents popularity by simple whatever he does is bad.
But they are a vast minority, and without much in the way of fact.
But, I think at the end of the dqy, the Presidency is not a popularity contest.  


Really? The President's popularity numbers aren't a popularity "contest"?

That's pretty fucking interesting there.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/20/2013 2:24:00 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Really?  Why did you say that?  It is strange the stupid shit you say.   You pretend it has to do with my posts, somehow.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/20/2013 3:06:58 PM   
muhly22222


Posts: 463
Joined: 3/25/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu

I think DesideriScuri's got a point. People may not like Congress as a whole, but the majority do like thier particular representative, and they listen to that person.

It's in each representative's interest to do and say things to appeal to their constituency (and donors, and the party higher-ups), even if it seems ridiculous or obstructive to everybody else. Darrell Issa's Republican voter base, for example, probably loves it that he's making a big deal about Benghazi. Most people in the country don't think it's a scandal, but he's not concerned with "most" people, just the ones that can vote for him.


DS definitely has a point here. It's not fair to simply say "16% of Americans like Congress, and 50% like the President." Nobody ever rates an institution the same way that they rate an individual.

Do I think Congress is doing a shitty job? Yes (then again, I don't have high marks for the President, either). But my representative, Jim Jordan...I think he's great. And that's not exactly a phenomenon.

_____________________________

I have always been among those who believed that the greatest freedom of speech was the greatest safety, because if a man is a fool, the best thing to do is to encourage him to advertise the fact by speaking.
-Woodrow Wilson

(in reply to graceadieu)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/21/2013 6:35:09 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

The President had a pretty hard week, last week. Three big problems that were only added on by the GOP. But the curious issue I keep wondering is....WHY....do we the American people even listen to any of these GOP members that are in Congress? You might have heard that the President's numbers are in the 50-53% Range. While the whole of Congress (that would be both Democrats, Independents AND Republicans) is hovering at 16%. In fact, Americans seem to score Republicans (14%) worst than Democrats (19%).

So you may or may not like how the President is doing, but at least half the nation thinks he's doing an 'o.k.' job. Were as with Congress, 4/5 people in the nation think they are sucking at their jobs. So the question I have is, would you take.....ANYONE....in Congress seriously when they try to bash the White House for....ANYTHING?


I don't take either the Republicans or Democrats seriously. When a Republican is in the White House, they consider the Presidency to be sacrosanct, while the Democrats do not. When a Democrat is in the White House, it's vice versa.

That's what I've noticed that stands out the most about political partisans (from both sides). Their principles of governance change depending on which party controls the White House.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/21/2013 12:13:14 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Do we judge the President on the popularity of the SCOTUS? his Cabinet?


We judge the current sitting president (regardless of which party they might be) on a host of different things. I say to judge the president fairly, not over petty or irrelevant things. Clinton got impeached for having an affair that did not do anything bad to the nation as a whole. Bush lied to the nation to get us into a war that got 4,000+ US Soldiers killed, 25,000+ US Soldiers injured, put 100,000+ civilians to the sword, and wasted $4 trillion dollars of borrowed money, but was never impeached. Which of these two should have been judged....HARSHER....for their actions?

How many conservatives judge the president picking of Eric Holder to being a 'bad idea'? There it is, before you DS, an example of the President being judged on WHO is in his cabinet.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/21/2013 12:36:29 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
The President had a pretty hard week, last week. Three big problems that were only added on by the GOP. But the curious issue I keep wondering is....WHY....do we the American people even listen to any of these GOP members that are in Congress? You might have heard that the President's numbers are in the 50-53% Range. While the whole of Congress (that would be both Democrats, Independents AND Republicans) is hovering at 16%. In fact, Americans seem to score Republicans (14%) worst than Democrats (19%).

So you may or may not like how the President is doing, but at least half the nation thinks he's doing an 'o.k.' job. Were as with Congress, 4/5 people in the nation think they are sucking at their jobs. So the question I have is, would you take.....ANYONE....in Congress seriously when they try to bash the White House for....ANYTHING?

I don't take either the Republicans or Democrats seriously. When a Republican is in the White House, they consider the Presidency to be sacrosanct, while the Democrats do not. When a Democrat is in the White House, it's vice versa.

That's what I've noticed that stands out the most about political partisans (from both sides). Their principles of governance change depending on which party controls the White House.


Your missing the point entirely. This is not about the President or the White House. This is about CONGRESS. Would you take the White House seriously if their approval numbers were 16%? Of course not! But why allow another major branch of the US Government to get that low?

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/21/2013 4:52:04 PM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
The President had a pretty hard week, last week. Three big problems that were only added on by the GOP. But the curious issue I keep wondering is....WHY....do we the American people even listen to any of these GOP members that are in Congress? You might have heard that the President's numbers are in the 50-53% Range. While the whole of Congress (that would be both Democrats, Independents AND Republicans) is hovering at 16%. In fact, Americans seem to score Republicans (14%) worst than Democrats (19%).

So you may or may not like how the President is doing, but at least half the nation thinks he's doing an 'o.k.' job. Were as with Congress, 4/5 people in the nation think they are sucking at their jobs. So the question I have is, would you take.....ANYONE....in Congress seriously when they try to bash the White House for....ANYTHING?

I don't take either the Republicans or Democrats seriously. When a Republican is in the White House, they consider the Presidency to be sacrosanct, while the Democrats do not. When a Democrat is in the White House, it's vice versa.

That's what I've noticed that stands out the most about political partisans (from both sides). Their principles of governance change depending on which party controls the White House.


Your missing the point entirely. This is not about the President or the White House. This is about CONGRESS. Would you take the White House seriously if their approval numbers were 16%? Of course not! But why allow another major branch of the US Government to get that low?


Well, now that you mention it, I don't really take approval polls all that seriously either. The only poll that matters is the one that comes on Election Day, and that's how the members of Congress and the President got their jobs in the first place. They have the job and the Constitutional powers that come with it. I take that seriously.

We'll see how it all turns out in 18 months at the mid-term elections.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/21/2013 7:49:58 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Do we judge the President on the popularity of the SCOTUS? his Cabinet?

We judge the current sitting president (regardless of which party they might be) on a host of different things. I say to judge the president fairly, not over petty or irrelevant things. Clinton got impeached for having an affair that did not do anything bad to the nation as a whole. Bush lied to the nation to get us into a war that got 4,000+ US Soldiers killed, 25,000+ US Soldiers injured, put 100,000+ civilians to the sword, and wasted $4 trillion dollars of borrowed money, but was never impeached. Which of these two should have been judged....HARSHER....for their actions?
How many conservatives judge the president picking of Eric Holder to being a 'bad idea'? There it is, before you DS, an example of the President being judged on WHO is in his cabinet.


Can you show that the President's approval rating has taken a hit because of appointing Holder?

Might want to look into the Clinton thing again, too. Rumor has it he was impeached over lying under oath...


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: 16% verse 50% - 5/22/2013 7:51:28 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
It was only a rumor, he was not impeached.  The house impeachment (which had no consent of the senate) was asswipe of the finest paper and he commented on how soft and inviting it felt to rub the signature of Newt Gingrich  repeatedly across his sphincter.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> 16% verse 50% Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109