Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri Thus, the award. Thus, the insurance. Thus, the cost. Thus, welfare by the scenic route. If you have a problem in the system, fix that problem, rather than introducing a new one. quote:
Would also like to see capping the way a lawyer gets paid for the suit, too. Keeping the award going to the victim without being unduly soaked up by the lawyer(s) is imperative, too. This will simply mean that the ones that need these awards can't afford to pay the lawyer, giving the opposite outcome of the intended one. Incidentally, if the Constitution poses an obstacle to introducing solutions at the Federal level, then fix these things at the State level instead. If memory serves, there are fewer restrictions on what States can do than on what the Federal level of government can do. And it's easier to sell a good idea at the State level than in Congress, presumably. Study the models in Europe, particularly in Germany (with 80 million people, they will give an indication of how this scales) and also in the three countries Norway, Denmark and Sweden (they're so comparable that it's easier to isolate factors, and all three have great historical records and statistics to go by), then formulate one that will work for your State. Slip it to the right person. If that doesn't work, start pushing the idea to people that will listen, build a movement, make your representatives listen. A good starting point is to visit one of these places, or ideally live there a while, get a feel for what works and what doesn't. IWYW, — Aswad.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|