Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: explicit primary photo


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: explicit primary photo Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 2:32:07 PM   
SylvereApLeanan


Posts: 8275
Joined: 11/1/2007
From: Hell
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CynthiaWVirginia

quote:

Another question.....
If the mods have an issue with a primary photo, do they send a gold letter or just pull a profile?


No gold note, the primary pic would just be deleted.


I thought you got a gold note from Support. That's how it used to be waaay back in the day, but who knows at this point.

quote:

I was surprised to find out that anus pix were okay, even with butt plugs in them, but that penis and/or scrotum in the primary pic was not. (Mod21 said something about it in the boards a year or two ago when several of us were complaining about a guy with an "impaled butthole" primary pic.)


I've seen impaled and/or gaping bum shots get pulled. Maybe it depends on who's reviewing at the time.

quote:


Well if you had sort of covered it up some, maybe say....with your mouth, it might have been acceptable.


Ahem. No photos of mouth hugs as a primary, please and thank you.


_____________________________

Sylverë
Dark Muse
30 Fluffy Points
Grumpy Cat is my spirit animal.
Shadow Governess & Mean Girl
"There's something that doesn't make sense. Let's go and poke it with a stick."— The Doctor

(in reply to CynthiaWVirginia)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 2:35:18 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan

Ahem. No photos of mouth hugs as a primary, please and thank you.



hehehe at mouth hugs


_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 2:54:53 PM   
CynthiaWVirginia


Posts: 1915
Joined: 2/28/2010
From: West Virginia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan


quote:

ORIGINAL: CynthiaWVirginia

quote:

Another question.....
If the mods have an issue with a primary photo, do they send a gold letter or just pull a profile?


No gold note, the primary pic would just be deleted.


I thought you got a gold note from Support. That's how it used to be waaay back in the day, but who knows at this point.



Oops, you're right. I'm so used to seeing people complaining in their profiles that their pic just disappeared...that I assumed there was no note. If there had been a note from Support I ASSumed they would have said so. *bonks head against desk*

(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 3:06:58 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		I like your primary photo. Dont see why it would get pulled.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 3:09:56 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I like your primary photo. Dont see why it would get pulled.



Thank you. :)

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 3:48:54 PM   
SylvereApLeanan


Posts: 8275
Joined: 11/1/2007
From: Hell
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CynthiaWVirginia

Oops, you're right. I'm so used to seeing people complaining in their profiles that their pic just disappeared...that I assumed there was no note. If there had been a note from Support I ASSumed they would have said so. *bonks head against desk*


Well, see...you ASSumed they were literate enough to read and comprehend the note. We all know how often people actually read things around here.


_____________________________

Sylverë
Dark Muse
30 Fluffy Points
Grumpy Cat is my spirit animal.
Shadow Governess & Mean Girl
"There's something that doesn't make sense. Let's go and poke it with a stick."— The Doctor

(in reply to CynthiaWVirginia)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 3:53:35 PM   
UllrsIshtar


Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I like your primary photo. Dont see why it would get pulled.


Ditto.

Looks really nice.

_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 3:59:55 PM   
SpiritedRadiance


Posts: 1341
Joined: 3/3/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw


quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir

I'm pretty sure it is genitalia, gaping holes, and penetration, but I, too, wonder beyond that.




Exactly those are the obvious things but there is a lot of gray area and I don't want my profile to go POOF because of a picture that I don't consider explicit but someone else might.



They send both an email and a cmail explaining that your photo was pulled. What is and isnt pulled is dependent on how many individual reports a photo gets from the report photo button. Clicking report photo 100 times doesnt get a photo removed if its the same person...

_____________________________

"Theres nothing in life like the feeling of cool leather sliding over your skin, the tears that fill your eyes as you realize someone else thinks you deserve it even if you havent reached that conclusion yet"- Forever to remember 11/5/11

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 4:44:32 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar

Ditto.

Looks really nice.


Thank you. :)


_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 4:56:44 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline 		Explicit photos might shock an unwary reader of CM's profiles, TLS. However, the site owners demonstrate their wisdom by understanding, unlike the rest of us, that no such readers will see the frequently explicit pictures to the right of the screen in the adverts. I hope that helps.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 5:08:30 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Explicit photos might shock an unwary reader of CM's profiles, TLS. However, the site owners demonstrate their wisdom by understanding, unlike the rest of us, that no such readers will see the frequently explicit pictures to the right of the screen in the adverts. I hope that helps.



That's funny but true!


_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 5:09:56 PM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SpiritedRadiance



They send both an email and a cmail explaining that your photo was pulled. What is and isnt pulled is dependent on how many individual reports a photo gets from the report photo button. Clicking report photo 100 times doesnt get a photo removed if its the same person...



I wasn't sure about the gold email b/c the one time my profile did go POOF well I had no idea why until a forum member pointed out the TOS violation.

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to SpiritedRadiance)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 6:26:20 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Explicit photos might shock an unwary reader of CM's profiles, TLS. However, the site owners demonstrate their wisdom by understanding, unlike the rest of us, that no such readers will see the frequently explicit pictures to the right of the screen in the adverts. I hope that helps.


Yet, if you check the login page, without logging in, you wont see photos that are sexually explicit, just tits. After logging in, still no sexually explicit photos as I understand the primary photo rule.

If thats sexually explicit to you... lol.. we need to have a chat.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 7:51:03 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline 		I remember some woman's dungfunnel pressed against glass, Tazzy. It was part of an ad that lasted a long, long time. A video clip, too.

Me, personally, I didn't much care but - put it this way - I could understand those females who complained about it. I wouldn't like to have a man's hairy khyber pulsating in front of my face upon logging in. Not tasteful while drinking one's morning tea.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/4/2013 10:08:40 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		I find most women dont mind a tastefully taken nude of another woman. I do tend to see women complain about open gash shots, about cock pics, about cum shots. I see men complain about all that except the open gash shots... lol

Compromise... take down the explicit photos as a primary. As secondary photos, only cum shots seem to get deleted...a nd of course the round of other photos which are against TOS.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/5/2013 7:38:37 AM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I find most women dont mind a tastefully taken nude of another woman. I do tend to see women complain about open gash shots, about cock pics, about cum shots. I see men complain about all that except the open gash shots... lol

Compromise... take down the explicit photos as a primary. As secondary photos, only cum shots seem to get deleted...a nd of course the round of other photos which are against TOS.


A site that is used by those in the adult industry that I am on states that no nude photos can be used as the primary photo. I admit I find that odd because it's used by those in or wanting to be in the adult industry (porn, phone sex, ect). However, I realized they used to say only artistic nudes but like the word explicit the word artistic can mean different things to different people.

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/5/2013 9:36:59 AM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact




As to others who assumed the primary photo was supposed to be appealing to Doms, from being familiar with LilSquaw and her posts, that wouldn't have been My first assumption that she wanted for the pic. I'd have said that she wanted the pic to be a reflection of something she enjoys and/or something that showed a reality based shot of one of her scenes. Since she does photo/video shoots often, I'm thinking she would like to have that side displayed, rather than it supposedly be used for imaginary 'seeking' when she already has a primary partner.




LP you are totally correct. :)









Sure. But nobody thinks TheLilSquaw is trying to impress a Dom with her picture. I mean look at it.
Hey, what about you-know-who's eyes. They impressed a lot of Doms. Oh yes. This one included.

< Message edited by Arturas -- 6/5/2013 9:38:52 AM >

_____________________________

"We master Our world."

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/5/2013 10:47:31 AM   
TheLilSquaw


Posts: 2340
Joined: 10/24/2012
From: Middle River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Sure. But nobody thinks TheLilSquaw is trying to impress a Dom with her picture. I mean look at it.



Awww... what a cute attempt at a personal shot at me.
How adorable.




< Message edited by TheLilSquaw -- 6/5/2013 10:49:15 AM >

_____________________________

LilSquaw
Lifestyle & ProSwitch
Fetish Model, Producer, and Website Owner

http://www.clips4sale.com/69201
http://www.kinkbomb.com/studio/Sadistic_Babygirl_

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/5/2013 11:22:15 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		Just wanted to say....TLS, you look incredible hon!!! Congratulations but then I liked your old pics too:)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: explicit primary photo - 6/5/2013 11:23:57 AM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline 		I didn't realize there was anyone who hadn't put Artie on ignore.

Having unblocked to read his latest, I can tell you it's typical for him to assume that any female not covered head to toe is looking for a twue domly type. Now back to hide.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to TheLilSquaw)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: explicit primary photo Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109