explicit primary photo

explicit primary photo (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

TheLilSquaw -> explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 11:29:53 AM)
I wanted to change my primary picture but the label "explicit" made me stop. That is such a general term IMO. Although I have changed my primary before it's typically always been a "foot". The picture that I want to post as my primary, isn't explicit to ME. However, that doesn't mean the mods would agree or that others would agree. It is of me and my male slave in mixed wrestling, he's nude but I'm not. Obviously genitals or gaping holes qualify but where is that line drawn?

searching4mysir -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 12:35:34 PM)
I'm pretty sure it is genitalia, gaping holes, and penetration, but I, too, wonder beyond that.

TheLilSquaw -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 12:44:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: searching4mysir I'm pretty sure it is genitalia, gaping holes, and penetration, but I, too, wonder beyond that. Exactly those are the obvious things but there is a lot of gray area and I don't want my profile to go POOF because of a picture that I don't consider explicit but someone else might.

UllrsIshtar -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:03:52 PM)
To me the line is at "in your face genitalia". So I don't consider a picture of a person just standing there, or engaged in some sort of activity, who also happens to be nude, to be "explicit". But a picture of that same person, where there objective of the picture seems to be to draw attention specifically to the genitalia, I do consider to be "explicit". It seems to work for me, because I've never had any of my nude pics pulled, even as a primary picture.

Arturas -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:12:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw I wanted to change my primary picture but the label "explicit" made me stop. That is such a general term IMO. Although I have changed my primary before it's typically always been a "foot". The picture that I want to post as my primary, isn't explicit to ME. However, that doesn't mean the mods would agree or that others would agree. It is of me and my male slave in mixed wrestling, he's nude but I'm not. Obviously genitals or gaping holes qualify but where is that line drawn? IF you like showing explicit pictures that's OK for you. If your interested in what attracts a Dom's attention it is not really that. You attract wankers with nude pictures. You attract Dom's with honest eyes. Yearning eyes. Searching eyes. Beautiful eyes. Look at my girl's eyes, you can find out who she is from my profile. It was her eyes that attracted me in her famous side profile shot, I think she still has it on her profile, maybe. From the emails I saw on her account, it attracted many more than just little ole me, her Dom.

mnottertail -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:14:56 PM)
That is a pretty damn explicit picture of your feet, squaw

TheLilSquaw -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:16:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Arturas IF you like showing explicit pictures that's OK for you. If your interested in what attracts a Dom's attention it is not really that. You attract wankers with nude pictures. You attract Dom's with honest eyes. Yearning eyes. Searching eyes. Beautiful eyes. Who says I am looking to attract a doms attention? Lol I KNOW my profile or posts don't even elude to that. IMO you can have explicit pictures that are not nude. However, other than the obvious gaping holes or genitals what qualifies as explicit? ETA: Since when do YOU speak for every dom on CM? (just ask'n)

TheLilSquaw -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:17:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail That is a pretty damn explicit picture of your feet, squaw To a foot guy that could be considered explicit. Lol It def. qualifies as wank material. [:D]

JstAnotherSub -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:22:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw quote: ORIGINAL: Arturas IF you like showing explicit pictures that's OK for you. If your interested in what attracts a Dom's attention it is not really that. You attract wankers with nude pictures. You attract Dom's with honest eyes. Yearning eyes. Searching eyes. Beautiful eyes. Who says I am looking to attract a doms attention? Lol I KNOW my profile or posts don't even elude to that. IMO you can have explicit pictures that are not nude. However, other than the obvious gaping holes or genitals what qualifies as explicit? ETA: Since when do YOU speak for every dom on CM? (just ask'n) Not just the ones on CM, but all of em worldwide!!!

TheLilSquaw -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:23:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub Not just the ones on CM, but all of em worldwide!!! DAMN! I gotta tell my primary that since I know he missed that memo. heheh Another question..... If the mods have an issue with a primary photo, do they send a gold letter or just pull a profile?

Arturas -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:26:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw quote: ORIGINAL: Arturas IF you like showing explicit pictures that's OK for you. If your interested in what attracts a Dom's attention it is not really that. You attract wankers with nude pictures. You attract Dom's with honest eyes. Yearning eyes. Searching eyes. Beautiful eyes. Who says I am looking to attract a doms attention? Lol Btw.. IMO you can have explicit pictures that are not nude. However, other than the obvious gaping holes or genitals what qualifies as explicit? ..and I don't mean to imply you were. I just added that just in case. to answer your question, I would suggest a dirty toilet is explicit if you want to be one, blood covered needles if you are into needle play, a horse in heat if you are into, horses. However, again, serious Doms will not be impressed by gapping holes, breasts in their faces or dirty toilets and that is okay if you are not looking to impress but to simply be explicit for your own needs.

mnottertail -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:26:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail That is a pretty damn explicit picture of your feet, squaw To a foot guy that could be considered explicit. Lol It def. qualifies as wank material. [:D] Turn around and make full wet lips in fire engine red, I really don't give a shit about feet. That would be wank material.

Arturas -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:29:07 PM)
quote: ETA: Since when do YOU speak for every dom on CM? (just ask'n) Never. It is my opinion. Value it as you see fit.

tsatske -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:30:12 PM)
My secondary pic used to be my primary until I moved it on the advice of some peeps from the forum. You can see it on my profile if you wish. It is of me, standing, wearing naught but heels and a collar. I do have one sub guy who write me constantly wanting to tell me over and over how great my heels are. Anyway, my profile never got pulled and I've never gotten a gold letter.

TheLilSquaw -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:30:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Arturas ..and I don't mean to imply you were. I just added that just in case. to answer your question, I would suggest a dirty toilet is explicit if you want to be one, blood covered needles if you are into needle play, a horse in heat if you are into, horses. However, again, serious Doms will not be impressed by gapping holes, breasts in their faces or dirty toilets and that is okay if you are not looking to impress but to simply be explicit for your own needs. Again who are YOU to say what a "serious dom" will be impressed by. You can say what YOU would be impressed by but can you honestly make a general statement that speaks for every other dom? (obviously you can but..) And again... where did you get the idea that "impressing" a dom was my intent? Heck why would that even get factored in to what qualifies as explicit? Lmfcao

tazzygirl -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:30:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw I wanted to change my primary picture but the label "explicit" made me stop. That is such a general term IMO. Although I have changed my primary before it's typically always been a "foot". The picture that I want to post as my primary, isn't explicit to ME. However, that doesn't mean the mods would agree or that others would agree. It is of me and my male slave in mixed wrestling, he's nude but I'm not. Obviously genitals or gaping holes qualify but where is that line drawn? Primary Explicit... no cock shots, no gaping holes. Penetration by a cock is, obviously, against the rules. No cum shots anywhere. You can have your submissive and you in a photo, as long as his cock and anus isnt showing, shouldnt be an issue.

tazzygirl -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:32:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tsatske My secondary pic used to be my primary until I moved it on the advice of some peeps from the forum. You can see it on my profile if you wish. It is of me, standing, wearing naught but heels and a collar. I do have one sub guy who write me constantly wanting to tell me over and over how great my heels are. Anyway, my profile never got pulled and I've never gotten a gold letter. Because your secondary would be fine as a primary. Tits on the primary have never been an issue that I saw. You arent showing anything else there.

Arturas -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:32:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Arturas quote: ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw I wanted to change my primary picture but the label "explicit" made me stop. That is such a general term IMO. Although I have changed my primary before it's typically always been a "foot". The picture that I want to post as my primary, isn't explicit to ME. However, that doesn't mean the mods would agree or that others would agree. It is of me and my male slave in mixed wrestling, he's nude but I'm not. Obviously genitals or gaping holes qualify but where is that line drawn? IF you like showing explicit pictures that's OK for you. If your interested in what attracts a Dom's attention it is not really that. You attract wankers with nude pictures. You attract Dom's with honest eyes. Yearning eyes. Searching eyes. Beautiful eyes. Look at my girl's eyes, you can find out who she is from my profile. It was her eyes that attracted me in her famous side profile shot, I think she still has it on her profile, maybe. From the emails I saw on her account, it attracted many more than just little ole me, her Dom. Yes. It is her last picture in order. She is "explicit" in her beauty and her passion. You are "explicit" in foot bottoms.

TheLilSquaw -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:33:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tsatske My secondary pic used to be my primary until I moved it on the advice of some peeps from the forum. You can see it on my profile if you wish. It is of me, standing, wearing naught but heels and a collar. I do have one sub guy who write me constantly wanting to tell me over and over how great my heels are. Anyway, my profile never got pulled and I've never gotten a gold letter. I like that 2nd picture, but that makes me question even more what qualifies as explicit.

Hillwilliam -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:35:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tsatske My secondary pic used to be my primary until I moved it on the advice of some peeps from the forum. You can see it on my profile if you wish. It is of me, standing, wearing naught but heels and a collar. I do have one sub guy who write me constantly wanting to tell me over and over how great my heels are. Anyway, my profile never got pulled and I've never gotten a gold letter. I think the reason they advised you to move that pic was so you would attract fewer wankers.

Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875