Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Transparency?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Transparency? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 6:41:16 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

you still dont get it

this not difficult

when you hire an attorney to REPRESENT you..... YOU TELL THE ATTORNEY what you want.


And he tells me what he can get.

quote:

When you have a representative in government to speak on your behalf in a parliamentary court concerning how you are to be governed the ONLY WAY YOU CAN TELL THEM HOW TO VOTE IS BY REFERENDUM AND YOUR VOTE!


200 million people for every law to be passed. In NJ alone, to run a special election, 15 million dollars. And this is what yoiu are advocating.

quote:

See if you do not tell them, then they are ruling you, and this is not a democracy then is it, and you would suck as a citizen and fail your fellow citizens because instead of being a part of the citizenry you sat on your ass and let some official simply DICTATE for you and us whatever the hell they wanted to push through as law which incidentally is exactly the way its done.


We do tell them with, supposedly, every election. Some politicians just happen to listen to those who have money more than those who dont.

Dont like the system? Change it.

quote:

An attorney cant plead your case (represent you) if they have no clue how you plead, how the hell do you expect some legislator to plead your case without your vote telling them what you want?


I agree. Which is why we can write or call our legislators and tell them how we feel. Cant you?

quote:

Just a bunch of dictators you probably call leaders.


Better them than you.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 6:46:03 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Yes, thank you.

I disagree.

For example, do we need to know the access code for nuclear warheads?

No.

but the military is required to be subordinate to the civilian authority and it is NOT

Do we need to know what is on your tax returns? I doubt you file.. but you get the point.

Private records are not public policy


No.

Do we need to know where every CIA and FBI agent are in the world?

In the world has what to do with americans in america?


No.

Do we need to know the account numbers and bank locations for all the accounts held by every politician?

RESOUNDING YES they are public servants and as public servants should be 100% accessible and accountable to the constituents they serve at all times. before, during, and after

No.

Do we need to know the social security number of the marine who holds Obama's umbrella?

Again you name private affairs that have no affect in the public.

No.

There are lots of things we dont need to know.





This would apply to agency creation and policy to be used for the most part in american governance et al and regarding the inhabitants of america.



lol... not all accounts are public.

quote:

In the world has what to do with americans in america?


They are americans, no? They are employed by us, no? Shouldnt we know where they are every moment of the day? I mean, golly, if I get Boehner's personal checking account number, why shouldnt I have the phone number of Agent 23?

quote:

Again you name private affairs that have no affect in the public.


And yet so are the bank accounts of the politicians.

You are so biased that you cant even see your own hypocrisy.



its not my problem that you fail to grasp the finer points between public and private affairs.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 6:49:57 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

you still dont get it

this not difficult

when you hire an attorney to REPRESENT you..... YOU TELL THE ATTORNEY what you want.


And he tells me what he can get.

quote:

When you have a representative in government to speak on your behalf in a parliamentary court concerning how you are to be governed the ONLY WAY YOU CAN TELL THEM HOW TO VOTE IS BY REFERENDUM AND YOUR VOTE!


200 million people for every law to be passed. In NJ alone, to run a special election, 15 million dollars. And this is what yoiu are advocating.

quote:

See if you do not tell them, then they are ruling you, and this is not a democracy then is it, and you would suck as a citizen and fail your fellow citizens because instead of being a part of the citizenry you sat on your ass and let some official simply DICTATE for you and us whatever the hell they wanted to push through as law which incidentally is exactly the way its done.


We do tell them with, supposedly, every election. Some politicians just happen to listen to those who have money more than those who dont.

Dont like the system? Change it.

quote:

An attorney cant plead your case (represent you) if they have no clue how you plead, how the hell do you expect some legislator to plead your case without your vote telling them what you want?


I agree. Which is why we can write or call our legislators and tell them how we feel. Cant you?

quote:

Just a bunch of dictators you probably call leaders.


Better them than you.



yeh if you do not know wtf you are doing he will need to tell you what you can get rather then you tell him what you are oging for,

thats right, 15 million buckeroos, think of how nicely trimmed our government and legal system will become rather then the clucsterfuck we have now.

WRONG you still do not fucking get it!

No referendum no vote, no representation. Not real difficult.

actually I would require a vote so better me than them, at least I would be listening to you!

um... on second thought

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 7:20:56 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

its not my problem that you fail to grasp the finer points between public and private affairs.


politicians bank accounts are not public domain

marines are government owned

Figured it out yet?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 7:24:17 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
PRISM Program: Obama Administration Held 22 Briefings For Congress On Key FISA Law
Obama administration officials held 22 separate briefings or meetings for members of Congress on the law that has been used to justify the National Security Agency's controversial email monitoring program, according to data provided by a senior administration official.
According to the official, the sessions that took place over the course of 14 months starting in October 2011 touched on Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments Act, which gives the attorney general and director of national intelligence the authority to gather intelligence on non-U.S. citizens for up to one year. Section 702 has been cited by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper as the legal basis for the NSA's PRISM program, which has allowed the government to track email communication data.
The Guardian and The Washington Post revealed the existence of the PRISM program and another data-monitoring action last week. In defending PRISM from criticism, Clapper stated that U.S. citizens were not, and are not, targeted for the data dragnet. He and others have also insisted that Congress has had ample opportunity to review the program and provide feedback.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/prism-program-obama_n_3416973.html


This isn't what's before us, though. Great argument, but it doesn't apply.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 7:25:40 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

yeh if you do not know wtf you are doing he will need to tell you what you can get rather then you tell him what you are oging for,


Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure darling... anything you say.

I just killed someone, caught with the smoking gun, admitted to the police that I did it to rob him, singed a confession... now Im gonna tell my lawyer I expect a full acquittal and he damn well better get me one.

quote:

thats right, 15 million buckeroos, think of how nicely trimmed our government and legal system will become rather then the clucsterfuck we have now.


Too many laws for you to filter through and try to find ways to get around and hide from? Yeah, I can see why that would upset you.

quote:

actually I would require a vote so better me than them, at least I would be listening to you!

um... on second thought


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You would listen to the one supplying you with the best... ummm...

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 7:30:52 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

yeh if you do not know wtf you are doing he will need to tell you what you can get rather then you tell him what you are oging for,


Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure darling... anything you say.

I just killed someone, caught with the smoking gun, admitted to the police that I did it to rob him, singed a confession... now Im gonna tell my lawyer I expect a full acquittal and he damn well better get me one.

quote:

thats right, 15 million buckeroos, think of how nicely trimmed our government and legal system will become rather then the clucsterfuck we have now.


Too many laws for you to filter through and try to find ways to get around and hide from? Yeah, I can see why that would upset you.

quote:

actually I would require a vote so better me than them, at least I would be listening to you!

um... on second thought


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You would listen to the one supplying you with the best... ummm...



Only 60 fucking million laws and growing by over 1500 per year in this state alone.

when was the last case you ever took to court pro se? (and won) LMAO

shit talk is cheap. you already admitted to shirking your duty as a citizen in favor of parliamentary dictators to save a penny or two IN THEORY when I doubt you have any data what so ever to support the notion that a vote up front is cheaper than all the legal battles afterward not to mention the loss of liberty which is priceless.

I am concerned about the low standards I see out here, I dont have an issue with law, I have an issue with shortsightedness save a penny today so we can spend 100 bucks tomorrow mentality





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 6/10/2013 7:47:25 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 7:44:59 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
I dont need to take a case to court. Thats not my field. When was the last time you delivered a baby with a nuchal cord times 3... successfully.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 7:47:08 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
PRISM Program: Obama Administration Held 22 Briefings For Congress On Key FISA Law
Obama administration officials held 22 separate briefings or meetings for members of Congress on the law that has been used to justify the National Security Agency's controversial email monitoring program, according to data provided by a senior administration official.
According to the official, the sessions that took place over the course of 14 months starting in October 2011 touched on Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments Act, which gives the attorney general and director of national intelligence the authority to gather intelligence on non-U.S. citizens for up to one year. Section 702 has been cited by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper as the legal basis for the NSA's PRISM program, which has allowed the government to track email communication data.
The Guardian and The Washington Post revealed the existence of the PRISM program and another data-monitoring action last week. In defending PRISM from criticism, Clapper stated that U.S. citizens were not, and are not, targeted for the data dragnet. He and others have also insisted that Congress has had ample opportunity to review the program and provide feedback.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/prism-program-obama_n_3416973.html


This isn't what's before us, though. Great argument, but it doesn't apply.




Ummm....yes it is.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 7:49:17 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

shit talk is cheap. you already admitted to shirking your duty as a citizen in favor of parliamentary dictators to save a penny or two IN THEORY when I doubt you have any data what so ever to support the notion that a vote up front is cheaper than all the legal battles afterward not to mention the loss of liberty which is priceless.


I have watched you bitch for years that the government isnt valid.. its not "fair" ...Its not "our" government.

Well, babes, I tend to deal with reality, not your fantasy world of what you believe or dont believe. If you dont like the government, you got two options...change it or move. Otherwise, as much as you bitch, moan and cry, its the government we got.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 8:02:01 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
you seem to forget that once law is outside the reasonable understanding of the common man and woman it is absolutely worthless and no longer the law of the land and no longer the law of the people.

Anyone who does not take the time or does not understand the law and require an attorney they are incapable of properly assessing anything to do with governments and courts and are rightfully a ward of the state.

If there are too many laws that would cause people a hardship to take the time to learn them to properly exercise their citizen duties then there are too many laws.

another unwitting admission



_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 8:04:05 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Dude.. change the system. You sitting here on a message board bemoaning about what it SHOULD be isnt accomplishing a damn thing.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 8:08:50 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

shit talk is cheap. you already admitted to shirking your duty as a citizen in favor of parliamentary dictators to save a penny or two IN THEORY when I doubt you have any data what so ever to support the notion that a vote up front is cheaper than all the legal battles afterward not to mention the loss of liberty which is priceless.


I have watched you bitch for years that the government isnt valid.. its not "fair" ...Its not "our" government.

Well, babes, I tend to deal with reality, not your fantasy world of what you believe or dont believe. If you dont like the government, you got two options...change it or move. Otherwise, as much as you bitch, moan and cry, its the government we got.


Because I am a critic of government violating compacts treaties covenants and contracts hardly means the koolaid versions are correct.

So back your shit up.

Lets see the referendums circulated among the inhabitants of the several states used for the creation of said states.

very simple. SOGOTP

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 8:13:59 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Dude.. change the system. You sitting here on a message board bemoaning about what it SHOULD be isnt accomplishing a damn thing.


and the people (you?) simply stirring the SAME stank day in and day out and whining about the same ole nazis and commies and why they cant be more bipartisan is doing what exactly?




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 8:16:55 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
WTF? I could care less about the referendums passed around in colonial times... not like they had a xerox machine or a way to save that kinda shit. And, after almost 200 years, its a moot point anyways. Take your arguments to the WH, go visit Congress... be useful, ffs. I deal with reality... what is now... not what should or may have been 2 centuries ago and why what they are doing now isnt valid because of what may or may not have happened then.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 8:18:16 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Dude.. change the system. You sitting here on a message board bemoaning about what it SHOULD be isnt accomplishing a damn thing.


and the people (you?) simply stirring the SAME stank day in and day out and whining about the same ole nazis and commies and why they cant be more bipartisan is doing what exactly?





That ... stuff... is starting to affect your brain....


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 8:20:53 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
PRISM Program: Obama Administration Held 22 Briefings For Congress On Key FISA Law
Obama administration officials held 22 separate briefings or meetings for members of Congress on the law that has been used to justify the National Security Agency's controversial email monitoring program, according to data provided by a senior administration official.
According to the official, the sessions that took place over the course of 14 months starting in October 2011 touched on Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments Act, which gives the attorney general and director of national intelligence the authority to gather intelligence on non-U.S. citizens for up to one year. Section 702 has been cited by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper as the legal basis for the NSA's PRISM program, which has allowed the government to track email communication data.
The Guardian and The Washington Post revealed the existence of the PRISM program and another data-monitoring action last week. In defending PRISM from criticism, Clapper stated that U.S. citizens were not, and are not, targeted for the data dragnet. He and others have also insisted that Congress has had ample opportunity to review the program and provide feedback.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/prism-program-obama_n_3416973.html


This isn't what's before us, though. Great argument, but it doesn't apply.



and even that directly violates the rights of non citizen nationals under 8 USC

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 6/10/2013 8:21:34 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 9:12:41 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

WTF? I could care less about the referendums passed around in colonial times... not like they had a xerox machine or a way to save that kinda shit. And, after almost 200 years, its a moot point anyways. Take your arguments to the WH, go visit Congress... be useful, ffs. I deal with reality... what is now... not what should or may have been 2 centuries ago and why what they are doing now isnt valid because of what may or may not have happened then.



well whether you give a shit or not will
not work in court. Either yo uahve the
goods or you do not.

No its not moot, not what so ever is it moot.

If it were moot I could say this is the
united counties of kansas with a big fuck you,
but oh no you would bring all the documents
into court and prove beyone a shadow of a
doubt that the union is really the united states
wouldnt you.

So its not moot, you just know damn well
you do not have a leg to stand on and cannot
prove a damn thing because the inhabitants
never voted for to have this government.

Thats right law is structured and has very
formal procedures that must be adhered to,
to be lawful, that you already admitted you
know nothing about. If that process is not
followed the acts are not lawfully binding,
regardless if you accept it or not.

In fact the people in the state of
wisconsin did not want to become
a state but they pushed it through
anyway.



Now you want to toot that the documents
are too old when we even have copies of
the original magna charta from the year 1200?


shits getting as weak as zero!

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 6/10/2013 9:16:21 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 9:47:56 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Transparency? - 6/10/2013 10:05:24 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Now you want to toot that the documents
are too old when we even have copies of
the original magna charta from the year 1200?


Just because we have that doesnt mean all documents survived.

Just as recently as last year, the British government released documents from colonial times.

Painstaking measures were taken to prevent post-independence governments from ever learning of the files’ existence. The order to destroy the most sensitive information was issued in 1961 after Iain Macleod, secretary of state for the colonies, directed that post-independence governments should not get any material that "might embarrass Her Majesty's government".

http://www.businessinsider.com/british-empire-documents-2012-4#ixzz2VsfOwdGE

So, if you think every piece of paper survived... lol... I got a bridge to sell ya... some beach front property in Kansas as well.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Transparency? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.113