RE: lawsuits against the govt/NSA, Obama, Holder, etc.. - 6/11/2013 10:53:49 PM
|
|
|
Real0ne
Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
The first lawsuit will be tossed out. All government officials have immunity from civil suits related to their official activities.
he wrote a pretty good complaint and included a jury demand, fuck yeh!
at a minimum that judge should be toast, of course commander-in-chief means sovereign so not so sure how they intend to pull the ohaha gig off.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
25. The NSA began a classified surveillance program to intercept the telephone communications of persons inside the United States, a program that continues to this date. The U .S. government* on the orders authorization of the President* the Attorney General, the DOJ and
the NSA, has obtained a top secret court order that directs V erizon to turn over the telephone records of over one hundred million Americans to the NSA on an ongoing daily basis.
26. On April 25,2013, D efendant Judge Roger V inson, acting in his official and personal capacities and under the authority of D efendant Obama, his Attorney G eneral and the DOJ, ordered that the Custodian of Records shall produce the production of tangible things from V erizon Business Network Services, Inc. on behalf of MCI Communication Services Inc, individually and collectively, to the NSA and continue production on an ongoing daily basis
thereafter.
27. D efendant V inson ordered access to electronic copies of the following tangble things: all call detail records or "telephony metadata" created by Verizon for communications (i) between the United States and abroad; or (ii) wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls. Tel ephony metadata includes comprehensive communications routing information, including but not limited to session identifying information (e.g. originating and terminating telephone number, International Mobile Subscriber Identity (I MS I) number, International Mobile station Equipment Identity (IMEI) number, etc.) trunk identifier, telephone calling card numbers, and time and duration of call.
28 Defendant Vinson’s Order requires Verizon to turn over on gin ating and term mating telephone numbers as well as the location, time, and duration of the calls. In essence, the Order gvesthe NSA blanket access to the records of over a hundred million of V enzon custom ers’ dom estic and foreign phone calls made between Apnl 25, 2013, when the Order
was signed, and July 19, 2013, when the Order is supposedto, onitsface, expire.
29. D efendant V inson, in an attempt to keep his illegal acts and those of other D efendants as a secret, further ordered that no person shall disclose to any other person that the FBI or NSA has sought or obtained tangible things under his order.
30. Based on knowledge and belief, this Order issued by Defendant Vinson is the broadest surveillance order to ever have been issued; it requires no level of reasonable suspicion or probable cause and incredibly applies to all V erizon subscribers and users anywhere in the United States and overseas.
31. Defendant V insorfs Order shows for the first time that, under Defendant Obama's administration, the communication records of over one hundred million of U S. citizens are being collected indiscriminately and in bulk - regardless of whether there is reasonable suspicion or any“probable cause” of any wrongdoing
32 . On June 5, 2013, The Guardian published an article entitled, "NSA collecting phone records of millions of V erizon customers daily. Exclusive: Top secret court order requiring V erizon to hand over all call data shows scale of domestic surveillance under Obama."
33. Since June 5,2013, Defendants Obama, Holder, Alexander, McAdan, Vinson, V erizon, the DOJ, and the NSA have been widely condemned among American citizens regarding their failure to uphold the U.S. Constitution and intentionally violating the fundamental ri^its of
Plaintiffs, members of the class, and over one hundred million of other Americans.
34. As just one ex ample, S enator Rand P aul called the surveillance of V erizon phone records "an astounding assault on the constitution,11 and has called for a class action lawsuit such as this one.
35. In fact* the news of Judge V inson’s Order com es as the Obama administration is under fire following revelations that the DOJ has seized two m onths of telephone records of a number of Associated Press’ reporters and editors, claiming that the requests were part of an investigation into the leak of classified information, as well as the telephone records and em ails of reporters and management of F ox N ews. This is thus a pattern of eg:egious
ongoing illegal, criminal activity.
36. Such schemes by the Defendants in concert with the government have subjected untold number of innocent people to the constant surveillance of government agents. As Jameel Jaffeer, the ACLU’s deputy legal director, stated, “ItisbeyondOrwellian, and it provides further evidence of the extent to which basic democratic rights are being surrendered in secret to the demands of unaccountable intelligence agencies.”
37. T o date, D efendants have not issued substantive and meaningful explanations to the Am eric an people describing what has occurred. To the contrary, criminal charges are reportedly being pur sued by Defendants Obama, Holder, the DOJ, and the NSA against the leakers of this plot against American citizens in a further effort suppress, obstruct justice, and to keep Defendants’ illegal actions as secret as possible.
http://media.philly.com/documents/VerizonNSAlawsuit.pdf
_____________________________
"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile
Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?
Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!
"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session
|
|
|
|
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread