RE: Why do you believe?

RE: Why do you believe? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

MrBukani -> RE: Why do you believe? (7/5/2013 3:15:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminChi I believe that this thread will be locked until I send letters to numerous posters for numerous violations. Meanwhile, on other threads, do not make other posters the topic. You may attack posts but not posters. See? even the admin can be ironic. I almost missed that one.[:D]

MrBukani -> RE: Why do you believe? (7/5/2013 5:53:53 AM)
The Greatest Love of All Whitney: I believe the children are our future Me: I believe our children can make us live forever.

Kirata -> RE: Why do you believe? (7/5/2013 11:14:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrBukani That will make life and debate a lot easier If you want to make life and debate easier, stop claiming people said things they never said. K.

MrBukani -> RE: Why do you believe? (7/5/2013 12:43:32 PM)
ORIGINAL: Kirata Everything we know about Nature is in accord with the idea that the fundamental process of Nature lies outside space-time ~Henry Stapp Let's just go with this one K. cause it's difficult to know where you take your stand because you're often vague in these discussions. I will do that next. It's not your statement so it's a little easier to contest[:D] I thought about this extensively and have come to the conclusion Henry is wrong here. Nature contains everything also space and time and the fundamental proces that moves it. I take it this is an argument for the existance of God? I must admit I enjoy reading your posts but I don't know if you are christian, atheist, budhist or whatever. But I do learn things from you so thanks. NEXT Jesus I really had to look for it, I said 'you people' with a reason because I do think you take a side right? I take it you claim truth can be, subjective/relative wich is exactly what I am contesting. Because truth to me cannot be altered. Not even with quantum physics cause it's also a part of nature cause everything is.

Kirata -> RE: Why do you believe? (7/5/2013 12:56:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrBukani ORIGINAL: Kirata Everything we know about Nature is in accord with the idea that the fundamental process of Nature lies outside space-time ~Henry Stapp What does that have to do with your assertion that I claim "it's all subjective"? Give up already. K.

vincentML -> RE: Why do you believe? (7/5/2013 1:10:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: vincentML Any scientific experimentation to support an issue is subject to criticism. If someone cannot accept that basic tenet of science then he should not pretend to be scientific. He should remain in the safe cosy cave of his 'spiritual awareness.' Until a decisive case can be made that will withstand criticism it is pseudoscience. . . . junk science. I think there are several problems with your post. The first, obviously, is that nobody has claimed that the research is immune to criticism. You're just making shit up. The second is that criticism, too, is subject to review and not simply rendered valid by ideological fiat. Finally, the people behind the GCP are experienced researchers with impeccable credentials. Portraying them as purveyors of "junk" and "pseudoscience" is the last refuge of a scoundrel. Firstly, someone threw a hissy fit when I first posted the criticism and did not challenge it. The criticism was that the statistical variation was selective. No one here challenged that peer review. Secondly, appeal to authority or credentials of the researchers. Omg! Really? How junk sciencey is that?

MrBukani -> RE: Why do you believe? (7/5/2013 1:37:14 PM)
One more time 'you people' refers to the minority voting for the truth to be subjective/relative. Wich I 'think' you are part of. I render that to all becomes subjective. And reality is just a dream. Like 1+1=3 You don't have to make a direct claim for me to make a indirect statement. It was not the essence of that post anyway. Yes I give up on this knitpicking. Again I have to look up a rotten word like purveyors. pur·vey·or (pr-vr) n. 1. One that furnishes provisions, especially food. 2. One that promulgates something: a purveyor of lies. FUCK Now I have to look up promulgates Ah fuck it why would I.[:D] I said this before you are like a politician using difficult words, so loads of people don't understand. And you blame me for not getting it. I don't mind, I see right throught it. You know you can use easy words but choose to sound like a professor and love to make things hard for people with simple minds and those that are not native english.

Kirata -> RE: Why do you believe? (7/5/2013 2:13:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrBukani You know you can use easy words but choose to sound like a professor and love to make things hard for people with simple minds and those that are not native english. Firstly, I am not the topic. Secondly, you are not a mind-reader. And thirdly, this is an English language board and your incompetence is not my problem. K.

MrBukani -> RE: Why do you believe? (7/5/2013 2:54:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: MrBukani You know you can use easy words but choose to sound like a professor and love to make things hard for people with simple minds and those that are not native english. Firstly, I am not the topic. Secondly, you are not a mind-reader. And thirdly, this is an English language board and your incompetence it's not my problem. K. I don't have to read your mind I am just stating the obvious. Did I claim you are the topic?[:D]But I am not bothered about it and won't go prove it where I said so. Incompetence of hard words? You want to travel that way? Sure here we go. You are penchant and feckless in decorum and act on the pith to cadge intelligence. It inveighs and equivocates phlegmatic lassitude and you want to sound Quixotic. In short you are not here to help others but yourself.[:D] tata.

Page: << < prev 8 9 10 11 [12]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125