Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/15/2013 9:10:34 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967
Who's banning abortion? Where does it say the government has to fund it, or make it easy for girls and women to obtain?

There are numerous laws restricting the government from paying for all but the direst cases. In most states Medicaid will only pay if the mother's life is in danger. A member of the US armed services cannot get an abortion in a military medical center even if she wants to pay for it herself.

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/15/2013 9:17:57 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Where does it say the government has to fund it, or make it easy for girls and women to obtain?

And where does it say that the government should erect roadblocks in the private lives of women seeking a legal medical procedure?

Should we require that men prove they're married and faithful before allowing them to purchase Viagra?

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/15/2013 9:18:39 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Another "made up" position.....lol


We are all familiar with that position.

"Government funds PP"

An estimated 85 percent of couples who are having regular intercourse without birth control will get pregnant within a year. Whereas, the typical use failure rate for birth control pills is 3 percent and the perfect use failure rate is .1 percent. The efficacy rates of major birth control methods have been rigorously tested, so we can make causal claims about how many unplanned pregnancies a particular method prevents, relative to unprotected sex.

About half of all unplanned pregnancies end in abortion in the U.S., no matter how many hurdles the anti-choicers put between women and the constitutional rights.

If you take 100 healthy couples who are having sex, but who aren't planning to get pregnant, and let them go at it for a year without birth control, you can expect about 85 pregnancies, and 42 abortions. If those same couples were using the Pill in the basically conscientious but slightly imperfect way that most people do, you'd expect about 3 unplanned pregnancies and 1.5 abortions. 42 is greater than 1.5. QED.


http://prospect.org/article/mainstreaming-anti-contraception

Birth control reduces abortions.

But the pro-life grounds dont want anyone to focus on that aspect.

What they want to concentrate on is that "innocent lives" are at risk. Lets not look at the lives that are already here. Lets not consider the reduced income another mouth represents. And "heaven" forbid we actually discuss the "drain" on the economy from having more single mothers on welfare.

Oh no, lets just watch as they decide that women can no longer have sex.

Does that mean all the men will be having sex with each other?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/15/2013 9:20:13 PM   
SilverMark


Posts: 3457
Joined: 5/9/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Another "made up" position.....lol


We are all familiar with that position.

"Government funds PP"

An estimated 85 percent of couples who are having regular intercourse without birth control will get pregnant within a year. Whereas, the typical use failure rate for birth control pills is 3 percent and the perfect use failure rate is .1 percent. The efficacy rates of major birth control methods have been rigorously tested, so we can make causal claims about how many unplanned pregnancies a particular method prevents, relative to unprotected sex.

About half of all unplanned pregnancies end in abortion in the U.S., no matter how many hurdles the anti-choicers put between women and the constitutional rights.

If you take 100 healthy couples who are having sex, but who aren't planning to get pregnant, and let them go at it for a year without birth control, you can expect about 85 pregnancies, and 42 abortions. If those same couples were using the Pill in the basically conscientious but slightly imperfect way that most people do, you'd expect about 3 unplanned pregnancies and 1.5 abortions. 42 is greater than 1.5. QED.


http://prospect.org/article/mainstreaming-anti-contraception

Birth control reduces abortions.

But the pro-life grounds dont want anyone to focus on that aspect.

What they want to concentrate on is that "innocent lives" are at risk. Lets not look at the lives that are already here. Lets not consider the reduced income another mouth represents. And "heaven" forbid we actually discuss the "drain" on the economy from having more single mothers on welfare.

Oh no, lets just watch as they decide that women can no longer have sex.

Does that mean all the men will be having sex with each other?

Tazzy, to answer your last question, NO!...

_____________________________

If you have sex with a siamese twin, is it considered a threesome?

The trouble with ignorance is that it picks up confidence as it goes along.
- Arnold H. Glasow

It may be your sole purpose in life to simply serve as a warning to others!

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/15/2013 9:20:45 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
LOL..whew.. I was worried!

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to SilverMark)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/16/2013 1:30:44 AM   
MariaB


Posts: 2969
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen



That claim is absolutely ludicrous.
If 800,000 abortions occur each year and 1.4% are after 21 weeks then only 11,200 abortions occur after 21 weeks. Your claim is that roughly 10% of those result in a live birth. Just how incompetent do you doctors are?

BTW Jessen's claims are unsupported by any evidence and there are shall we say extreme doubts about every claim involved. First off a 32 weeks abortion was never legal anywhere in the US. Roe v Wade says abortions can be banned after the fetus is viable outside the womb and there is no doubts that a 32 week fetus is viable.

There is quite a little industry of people who make wild claims about themselves touring churches, especially fundamentalist churches. This includes people who claim to be former satanic high priests and muslim terrorists. She seems to be part of that group.


http://www.worldometers.info/abortions/

According to WHO, every year in the world an estimated 40-50 million women faced with an unplanned pregnancy decide to have an abortion. This corresponds to approximately 125,000 abortions per day.

In the USA, where nearly half of pregnancies are unintended, and four in 10 of these are terminated by abortion [1] , there are over 3,000 abortions per day. Twenty-two percent of all pregnancies in the USA (excluding miscarriages) end in abortion. [2]

Then there is this http://liveactionnews.org/babies-born-alive-after-abortions-part-3-nurses-tell-their-stories/

and this http://www.lifenews.com/2013/04/05/1270-babies-born-alive-after-failed-abortions-in-the-united-states/

I shake my head at that that bolded statement of yours. You only have to do a little research to find that many late abortions survive, many don't because they are murdered or neglected after birth (which is fortunately illegal).



< Message edited by MariaB -- 6/16/2013 1:32:03 AM >


_____________________________

My store is http://e-stimstore.com

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/16/2013 4:09:13 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen



That claim is absolutely ludicrous.
If 800,000 abortions occur each year and 1.4% are after 21 weeks then only 11,200 abortions occur after 21 weeks. Your claim is that roughly 10% of those result in a live birth. Just how incompetent do you doctors are?

BTW Jessen's claims are unsupported by any evidence and there are shall we say extreme doubts about every claim involved. First off a 32 weeks abortion was never legal anywhere in the US. Roe v Wade says abortions can be banned after the fetus is viable outside the womb and there is no doubts that a 32 week fetus is viable.

There is quite a little industry of people who make wild claims about themselves touring churches, especially fundamentalist churches. This includes people who claim to be former satanic high priests and muslim terrorists. She seems to be part of that group.


http://www.worldometers.info/abortions/

According to WHO, every year in the world an estimated 40-50 million women faced with an unplanned pregnancy decide to have an abortion. This corresponds to approximately 125,000 abortions per day.

In the USA, where nearly half of pregnancies are unintended, and four in 10 of these are terminated by abortion [1] , there are over 3,000 abortions per day. Twenty-two percent of all pregnancies in the USA (excluding miscarriages) end in abortion. [2]

Then there is this http://liveactionnews.org/babies-born-alive-after-abortions-part-3-nurses-tell-their-stories/

and this http://www.lifenews.com/2013/04/05/1270-babies-born-alive-after-failed-abortions-in-the-united-states/

I shake my head at that that bolded statement of yours. You only have to do a little research to find that many late abortions survive, many don't because they are murdered or neglected after birth (which is fortunately illegal).



Saline stopped being used for late term abortions back in the 70's so any nurse making those claims better be at least in her 60's today.

As to the claim about 1200 babies surviving late term abortions. I found that claim, emphasis on claim, in a lot of anti choice sites but could not find an actual source for it.

I will once again point out that Jessen has never made her BC public, the one she claims is signed by the doctor who supposedly tried to abort her. Her birth mother has never been identified. Basically no part of her claims can actually be verified and the idea that an abortion would ever have been allowed on a 32 week fetus is simply absurd.

You need to approach this with a lot more skepticism. Like I said there is an industry of people with dubious claims going around speaking at churches. I no more believe Mike Warnke was a Satanic High Priest than I believe Kamal Saleem is a former terrorist than I believe Gianna Jessen survived an abortion. Extraordinary claims require at least some evidence and none of these claims have any evidence at all.

(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/16/2013 6:21:19 AM   
MariaB


Posts: 2969
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
Ok Ken, try googling abortion survivors and see what you come up with. It really isn't just a bunch of histrionic women wanting our sympathy because they are having a bad day. Perhaps Gianna was a bad choice, perhaps not.

On the link I gave you their was another link to 'source' http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01279.x/full
Short communication: Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a population-based study 1995 to 2004. This is a completely unbiased study.

Lets get one thing straight here. I'm pro abortion because I think every woman has a right to choose about being an incubator or not. I am anti late term abortion except for major fetal abnormalities and I am against Dilation and Extraction, a cruel and inhumane practice on a healthy 2nd trimester foetuses. Pulling a six inch leg and then a six inch arm off the foetus, ripping out its spine or intestines or crushing its skull to kill it is not something I believe we have a right to choose, especially when only days before it was kicking, blowing bubbles, sucking its thumb and being startled by outside noises. If a woman needs an abortion through choice then she needs to get it done in her first trimester.

Its worth noting that most women who have had late term abortions deeply regret what they for the rest of their lives. Whilst women will admit to first trimester abortions and find a shoulder to cry on, very few will admit to late term abortions of a healthy foetus and even if they did, there would be very few shoulders offered. Up until easy access to the internet, abortion clinics lied to pregnant mothers about the procedures and the possibility of live births from induced abortions. They made light about what D&E procedures entailed. I'm glad its out in the open, that we can all plainly see what happens because only now can we make good informed choices.

_____________________________

My store is http://e-stimstore.com

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/16/2013 6:28:44 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

I shake my head at that that bolded statement of yours. You only have to do a little research to find that many late abortions survive, many don't because they are murdered or neglected after birth (which is fortunately illegal).


A christian site.

And we discussed that link to lifenews in depth. You only see the snippet they want you to see. Guess they thought showing the ER physician and many others at that same meeting would be too much for the christian coalition to handle.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/16/2013 6:36:46 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB

Ok Ken, try googling abortion survivors and see what you come up with. It really isn't just a bunch of histrionic women wanting our sympathy because they are having a bad day. Perhaps Gianna was a bad choice, perhaps not.

On the link I gave you their was another link to 'source' http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01279.x/full
Short communication: Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a population-based study 1995 to 2004. This is a completely unbiased study.

Lets get one thing straight here. I'm pro abortion because I think every woman has a right to choose about being an incubator or not. I am anti late term abortion except for major fetal abnormalities and I am against Dilation and Extraction, a cruel and inhumane practice on a healthy 2nd trimester foetuses. Pulling a six inch leg and then a six inch arm off the foetus, ripping out its spine or intestines or crushing its skull to kill it is not something I believe we have a right to choose, especially when only days before it was kicking, blowing bubbles, sucking its thumb and being startled by outside noises. If a woman needs an abortion through choice then she needs to get it done in her first trimester.

Its worth noting that most women who have had late term abortions deeply regret what they for the rest of their lives. Whilst women will admit to first trimester abortions and find a shoulder to cry on, very few will admit to late term abortions of a healthy foetus and even if they did, there would be very few shoulders offered. Up until easy access to the internet, abortion clinics lied to pregnant mothers about the procedures and the possibility of live births from induced abortions. They made light about what D&E procedures entailed. I'm glad its out in the open, that we can all plainly see what happens because only now can we make good informed choices.

Look at the stats in the study you present, 2nd trimester abortions are very rare and are almost always done because something is seriously wrong either with the fetus or the woman. Also note that the rate of live births after late term abortions has declined quite a bit over the decade the study covers. Note that when the infant was born alive none survived very long.

As to searching for abortion survivors I already did that research there are a few documented cases but they aren't trotted around to churches making a living telling tales.

(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/16/2013 7:02:32 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

How fucking hard is that? WTF is wrong with you people who support taking rights of others but are too lazy to stand up and do some research into the shit you're spewing? A fetus has a right...but the mother doesn't? Why? Without lapsing into some idiotic, repetitive spew about immorality, explain to me WHY? Or stfu and leave people to live their OWN lives THEIR OWN way.


If you are done ranting maybe this would be a good time to point out that I am pro-choice.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to MistressKel)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/16/2013 7:07:37 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Lets get one thing straight here. I'm pro abortion because I think every woman has a right to choose about being an incubator or not.


Pro abortion? Try pro choice. If she has the choice, then its her decision. Pro abortion would mean there is no choice, just like with the pro life group.

quote:

I am anti late term abortion except for major fetal abnormalities........ If a woman needs an abortion through choice then she needs to get it done in her first trimester.


So, by the 16th week, she better have it done or not at all? Viability isnt till the 20th.

quote:

Its worth noting that most women who have had late term abortions deeply regret what they for the rest of their lives. Whilst women will admit to first trimester abortions and find a shoulder to cry on, very few will admit to late term abortions of a healthy foetus and even if they did, there would be very few shoulders offered.


In the US, they are very rare.

The point at which an abortion becomes late-term is often related to the "viability" (ability to survive outside the uterus) of the fetus. Sometimes late-term abortions are referred to as post-viability abortions. However, viability varies greatly among pregnancies. Nearly all pregnancies are viable after the 27th week, and no pregnancies are viable before the 21st week. Everything in between is a "grey area".

Three articles in the JAMA could not agree on the definition of late term.

quote:

In 1997, the Guttmacher Institute estimated the number of abortions in the U.S. past 24 weeks to be 0.08%, or approximately 1,032 per year


Why is that important?

How many of those 1000 were for deformities? We arent speaking of a twisted spine here folks. We are speaking of fetuses without a brain, or a skull.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anencephaly

Anencephaly can be diagnosed prenatally with a high degree of accuracy. Given that anencephaly is a fatal condition, parents receive the option of abortion either in the second or third trimester of pregnancy, depending on the abortion laws in the state.

In the United States, anencephaly occurs in about 1 out of every 10,000 births.

Doing the math... roughly 400 just for this condition alone out of 4 million live births a year.

Factor in that some of these were also performed for the life of the mother.

Now we are up to.... 700 a year?

Another 200 for other fetal conditions

In Potter syndrome, the primary problem is kidney failure. The kidneys fail to develop properly as the baby is growing in the womb. The kidneys normally produce the amniotic fluid (as urine).

Potter phenotype refers to a typical facial appearance that occurs in a newborn when there is no amniotic fluid. The lack of amniotic fluid is called oligohydramnios. Without amniotic fluid, the infant is not cushioned from the walls of the uterus. The pressure of the uterine wall leads to an unusual facial appearance, including widely separated eyes.

Potter phenotype may also lead to abnormal limbs, or limbs that are held in abnormal positions or contractures.

Oligohydramnios also stops development of the lungs, so the lungs do not work properly at birth.

Outlook (Prognosis)
This is a very serious condition, usually deadly. The short-term outcome depends on the severity of lung involvement. Long-term outcome depends on the severity of kidney involvement.


http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001268.htm

OCCURRENCE RATE: The incidence of Potters Syndrome is said to be somewhere between 1 in 2000 and 1 and 5000 the average would suggest to be on occurrence rate of approximately 1 in 4000 births.

That alone would mean 1000 births a year. I am sure many end up as an abortion.

The numbers seem stark when presented as 1000 late term abortions a year. Until you start to look at why those abortions are performed.

What each state allows for late term abortions....

http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_PLTA.pdf

The rules are quite strict in most cases.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/16/2013 11:33:02 AM   
MariaB


Posts: 2969
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
I believe abortion is the right of a woman up until the baby is viable outside of the womb, with or without assistance. I believe a woman should have the right to choose if her child has major and life threatening deformities. Is that clear enough?

Bring in a subject as sensitive as this one into the arena and theres going to be some varied and emotional responses. I've said what I think and just feel exasperated by the usual but expected pedantic behaviour on these forums.



_____________________________

My store is http://e-stimstore.com

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/16/2013 11:52:35 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
What pedantic behavior? Im sorry if pointing out what is not obvious is not to your liking on this issue. Of course emotions run high on both sides. It should be between the woman and her physician. Period.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/16/2013 12:05:41 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
So science is showing that when a stimuli is applied that the fetus may react? Well duh. There is a huge difference in something reacting to stimuli and it actually being processed. If the studies were not politically motivated, or used so much for political fodder, I might actually be more interested in them.

The uneducated or those that do not know will not think of anything but "feels pain" when reading about this. They will not think about, how is it processed, at what point does a conscious mind develop (based on science) and process this information. They will not think of anything more than " oh my god. they are hurting babies" and that is the message they want to get across to females that have an abortion. It is already well documented that an abortion causes a huge amount of emotional distress in the vast majority of those having them, so they are now going to use emotion, and not logic, in their war to sway those away from abortion.

I can understand why people are anti-abortion. I can understand someone believing in a just cause. I can understand them rationalizing the most horrible methods (even more emotional pain and scarring) that are not the complete truth. I can understand radicals and fanatics. I also understand that if you want to reduce abortions then you put the support systems in place to cut down on unwanted pregnancy.


_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act - 6/16/2013 5:25:46 PM   
cordeliasub


Posts: 528
Joined: 11/4/2012
Status: offline
quote:

I also understand that if you want to reduce abortions then you put the support systems in place to cut down on unwanted pregnancy.


AMEN and AMEN


(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 76
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094