RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


njlauren -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/17/2013 11:38:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist

Charles,
I agree, how can a newbie "figure out who they are" if there is so much misinformation on the internet? Collarchat can be useful resource despite the instant communication of the internet allows a free flowing stream of errant information. When our vanguard is on their feet the truth and/or reasonable perspectives and information usually floats to the top in the long run.

There are other problems like when a relatively trusted source like Wikipedia has an errant entry that says the four letter acronym BDSM has six meanings? Since when did the DS in BDSM stand for D/s dominance submission??? They have rewritten history and a newbie that can't "figure out who they are" also can't learn where we have been or what the damn BDSM acronym stands for. Our history is pretty damn short, it shouldn't be that hard to get it and the acronym right.

You point out, "there was a time when being so open, wasn't the smartest thing to do" and mention the "old days" and how you had to go out of the way to meet your fellow leather enthusiast. Most of the clubs back in the 70s Detroit were backdoor clubs. They had parking in the rear and the front door was shut, some clubs had no sign out front or it was unlit. You had to know where they were and you had to walk through a Detroit back ally to get there. So not only did we have to go out of our way, but there was often some risk involved. I was never fond of parking my classic 1965 convertible Lincoln Continental in a Detroit back alley. My girl, liked one club so much she went there on her own with a gay friend of ours. Unfortunately he was a skinny little effeminate thing and didn't have the imposing stature I do. She was kidnapped from the ally and gang raped by two guys at gun point. Also, gay bashing in a Detroit back alley wasn't very pretty either.

Even though I was underage, I could get into the bars, clubs and parties because my 30 yo lover was the owner/editor of the swingers magazine that they advertised in it. The first public BDSM scene I witnessed was a gay boy tied to a cross in a bar. His Master pierced his ball sack with a sharp pointed steel tube like needle the size of a drinking straw and inflated his balls. My first question was, "where can I get one of those". I recently attended Beyond Leather and the Florida Bash, great leather events full of real live old school people doing what we always did. There was some TNG around but in real life it didn't feel like BDSM got watered down, polished up, painted over with 50 shades of grey, sung about in over produced pop songs and dished out to John Q Public in a Safe Sane Consensual manner. The leather folk still had their heart, 50 Shades was running joke and we expect Hollywood will step in soon and whitewash out all the leathermen, the edge players and produce a nice marketable movie of the leather lifestyle full of happy hetros playing slap & tickle in posh discotheques where Eyes Wide Shut and 50 Shades of Grey to converge in a love story where SSC will triumph over the evil doers.

I don't know if there is "loss of a community" or if BDSM is "losing it's identity" in real life like what is happening on the internet. But yes, it seems BDSM is getting a make over in the online world. If that is what it cost to change the DSM-V, it may be worth the price . . . let SSC and prudish non sense BDSM rule the net where everything is so ethereal there is no meaning to the words or acronyms and the meaning of anything is unfathomable, debatable and usually escapes words. Please God, keep all those asshats on the net and out of our events and clubs. 66 pages of "are Findom's legit" in a thread . . . LMAO. Hundreds and hundreds of leather folk in real life at two events never mentioned the word FinDom. There were no workshops about FinDomism. Sure, there were some pro Dommes there, but Findoms . . . nah. I tell ya', sometimes people take the net a little too seriously when they don't have real life exposure to counter balance the impressions they get.

Speaking of real life exposure, I'd like to point out that some people here at Collarchat (and FetLife) have an awful lot of posts yet have never been to an event. Some have never even experienced BDSM in person and only have online experience, yet they are prolific posters dishing advice like they know what it's all about . . . and they don't even know what the BDSM acronym really stands for. With that thought in mind I say, to figure out who you are and what BDSM is all about, step away from your computer, go to a leather event. Not a local munch because it takes no commitment to do a munch. Go to an event that has the authors of the books we read giving workshops and people committed enough to spend hundreds and hundreds of dollars to congregate with our fellow leather lisfestylers. There is where you will find the leather heart of BDSM beating strongly and the people there actually know what BDSM stands for.

Thank you for your reply.

Best wishes,
Kalon Eric

quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682
You do make some excellent points here RS. While I am glad that BDSM has become more acceptable in society over the past 10 years, I do not think it should be at the cost of the BDSM community losing it's identity. Times have changed but I have also had a thing for history. It really does help explain where we are at as people.

I can certainly thank those before me for helping to "pave" the way. A lot of things in life have changed quite a bit over the past 50 years. I am sure most people in the "South" can vouch for that. Sometimes, change is for the better but it does leave unintended actions. It leaves the impression of a "loss of a community".

I do like that S&M has been mostly removed from the DSM. With all these recent studies lately, people who are into BDSM are no more insane or sane than the rest of society.

1 benefit I could see from the "old days", is that someone who was really into this "Lifestyle", probably really had to go out of their way to meet like minded people. I am grateful for the internet and sites like Collarme here but it does seem these days, anyone who has read "50 shades of Grey" or seen Rihanna's "S&M" music video and now they are "pros" on the "Lifestyle". I do think it takes more than a book,song or movie to grasp this.

That all said, times have changed and I see a lot of it as an improvement. I don't think the past should be forgotten because there was a time when being so open, wasn't the smartest thing to do.

So, who carries the "torch" now? Without those who walked this path before, how can any "newbie" ever learn who they are. I come on Collarchat for the advice mostly. I don't even use Collarme except here and there. See if there's any new face's in my area. But beyond that, I come here in Collarchat for "lessons" taught in here. Even if I don't always agree with everybody, I do have enough respect to hear all points of views. That's the only way I can ever truly "learn". I learn from those with experience. The newbie is still trying to figure out who they are.




I think that your description of the old days is tinged with what my son calls 'the rolling the eyes' factor about how good things were back then and so forth, how back then 'things had an edge', 'it was different' and so forth, he rolls his eyes when I talk about how homogenized and clean NYC has become these days, where bohemians means a bunch of 20 somethings living in Williamsburg and pretending to be bohemian while living on mom and dad's money to do it, and so forth, where Times Square has become the haven of bloated tourists coming off tour buses to go to the tourist traps in the area and so forth (I used to love coming out of trans support groups in the west village and having tours of these midwest tourist types seeing us go into a restaurant as they queued up to go to get cupcakes at Magnolia bakery because it was on "Sex and the City" *lol*)...so I understand it, it was a crazy time, but as you point out, it also wasn't great, gays (not totally without cause) resented straights coming into 'their world', dykes and gays didn't get along great (back then, a dyke walking into a gay bar would be probably thrown out, same the other way around, and even when I started transition, there were dyke bars that would not make me feel very at home), plus to be honest a lot of those clubs were like Stonewall was, dirty, overpriced, often backed by the mob for protection, and often full of less than stellar behavior.....and yeah, it is easy to get resentful of those who didn't have to make the effort, and I appreciate those who went before because of it, but I also think in some ways, even with it becoming popularized and washed out in some cases, people have a lot more choices now then they did back then. Back not many years ago, to do needle play I had to find a contact at a place willing to look the other way on laws about selling needless, today, you can order what you want on Amazon. Want a Tens unit? Back then they were expensive, today you can get them on Amazon......it is so much easier.

I agree totally about getting out there and doing things, theory on the net is a fucking bore *lol*. Getting involved is a neat thing, and while you don't necessarily have to be someone who goes to leather conventions, even going ocassionally to a local S/M group, or maybe even visiting a public play party to watch and talk to people, is not a bad thing. I don't personally give a rat's tail about the term BD/SM or what it means (or doesn't mean), it was a made up name someone came up with to replace S/M, in part because of the negative connotations of S/M, and whatever it means it is a label..and maybe in the new order of things, labels won't mean much, which I think is a good thing, maybe it will allow avoiding some of the bullshit of whether a TPE is the only 'real' Master/slave relationship, or whether subs have to follow the 5 basic positions someone dreamed up or something (RS, not aiming my comments on BD/SM at you, I understand where you are coming from, I am talking labels in general). I think that has happened to a certain extent, I haven't seen too many leather people (I mean people like Lady P on here) in recent years telling others they know the only way, that you have to follow protocols and such, which was common in the early days. I was lucky, when I got into this lifestyle I generally met through TES and other places people who were seriously into this, but also stressed that the neat part about all this is, you live it as you want to and that is what it is all about, and those people lived it as strongly as anyone, so it made me finding my way pretty easy.




BambiBoi -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/17/2013 1:34:59 PM)

Really interesting responses... I see things a little differently. I love poker, and I predict BDSM will follow in its footsteps.

Let me tell you a story about poker. The game dates back easily to the 1800's. It was considered sinful, dirty, secretive, and underground. You were a pariah for indulging in this habit. Old Vegas comes around poker gets a capital city (ignoring the super-elite European casinos that were not accessible to so many).

By the 60's Vegas is the poker capital of the world.
In the 70's the World Series of Poker is founded and it becomes a legitimate "interest" rather than the eighth deadly sin. Big names start to appear, but only in the community. Few gain such notoriety as to almost become household names: Doyle Brunson comes to mind as lead author of Super System: How I Mades $1,000,000 Playing Poker
80's: Poker is played in smokey card rooms and some interesting (often illegal) cash games under the table.
90's: The movie Rounders gives lay people the lexicon, which introduced a huge influx of tourists into card rooms. Casinos started looking at poker rooms as a secure profit center, not a loss-leader. Online poker begins to take hold, letting people try this "poker thing" from the comfort of their living room.
2003: Chris Moneymaker (yes, that's his real name) falls ass backwards into millions of dollars starting from a $40 online tourney.
2007: Poker after Dark is a television show where the entire thing is watching big names in the community play poker and shoot the shit.
2013: US opens its first legal online poker site in a long, long time. 22 year old kids are winning the World Series of Poker (most say their experience comes from playing 5 tables at a time for 15 hours a day). Card rooms are filled with tourists and day-plays that are almost day-traders.

What does this mean for BDSM?

Fifty Shades of Grey (no matter how much you hate it) is our Rounders. There are a few more useful publications that are our Super System. SecondLife/Fetlife/CM are our online poker. I predict BDSM is going to soften around the edges and enter the mainstream. I don't see it dying by 2040 or any other time. Curious what will be considered "kinky" when everything we do now is mainstream. Maybe temperance?




ResidentSadist -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/17/2013 3:15:32 PM)

^ nice analogy!




tazzygirl -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/17/2013 9:05:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BambiBoi

Really interesting responses... I see things a little differently. I love poker, and I predict BDSM will follow in its footsteps.

Let me tell you a story about poker. The game dates back easily to the 1800's. It was considered sinful, dirty, secretive, and underground. You were a pariah for indulging in this habit. Old Vegas comes around poker gets a capital city (ignoring the super-elite European casinos that were not accessible to so many).

By the 60's Vegas is the poker capital of the world.
In the 70's the World Series of Poker is founded and it becomes a legitimate "interest" rather than the eighth deadly sin. Big names start to appear, but only in the community. Few gain such notoriety as to almost become household names: Doyle Brunson comes to mind as lead author of Super System: How I Mades $1,000,000 Playing Poker
80's: Poker is played in smokey card rooms and some interesting (often illegal) cash games under the table.
90's: The movie Rounders gives lay people the lexicon, which introduced a huge influx of tourists into card rooms. Casinos started looking at poker rooms as a secure profit center, not a loss-leader. Online poker begins to take hold, letting people try this "poker thing" from the comfort of their living room.
2003: Chris Moneymaker (yes, that's his real name) falls ass backwards into millions of dollars starting from a $40 online tourney.
2007: Poker after Dark is a television show where the entire thing is watching big names in the community play poker and shoot the shit.
2013: US opens its first legal online poker site in a long, long time. 22 year old kids are winning the World Series of Poker (most say their experience comes from playing 5 tables at a time for 15 hours a day). Card rooms are filled with tourists and day-plays that are almost day-traders.

What does this mean for BDSM?

Fifty Shades of Grey (no matter how much you hate it) is our Rounders. There are a few more useful publications that are our Super System. SecondLife/Fetlife/CM are our online poker. I predict BDSM is going to soften around the edges and enter the mainstream. I don't see it dying by 2040 or any other time. Curious what will be considered "kinky" when everything we do now is mainstream. Maybe temperance?


I see the history of BDSM a bit differently than you display. But a fairly good analogy nonetheless.




SatinWhip -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/17/2013 10:43:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BambiBoi
What does this mean for BDSM?

Fifty Shades of Grey (no matter how much you hate it) is our Rounders. There are a few more useful publications that are our Super System. SecondLife/Fetlife/CM are our online poker. I predict BDSM is going to soften around the edges and enter the mainstream. I don't see it dying by 2040 or any other time. Curious what will be considered "kinky" when everything we do now is mainstream. Maybe temperance?


Clever analogy but the only way I see BDSM following suit is if someone figures a way for an average Joe to hit the jackpot by tying people up and doing nasty shit to them. [:)]




inchargeinca -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/17/2013 11:46:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Itsthetruth

It looks like BDSM is experiencing a change in culture.You have the old timers from the past few decades and then the newer,younger generation.This issue is as old as time itself."Out with the old and in with the new".Do the oldtimer's share their experience or do they hate where BDSM is heading?How does the younger generation view themselves?Too many cliques in BDSM.When does common interest outweigh petty differences?In the end,cooperation will always triumph over competition.


The only real change I've seen in BDSM is that the Internet has made it more accessible. I do know some old-timers who complain that BDSM feels less special to them because it's become so available. In terms of all this "common interest outweigh petty differences," etc. I don't know what you're trying to say.





BambiBoi -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/18/2013 12:13:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SatinWhip

quote:

ORIGINAL: BambiBoi
What does this mean for BDSM?

Fifty Shades of Grey (no matter how much you hate it) is our Rounders. There are a few more useful publications that are our Super System. SecondLife/Fetlife/CM are our online poker. I predict BDSM is going to soften around the edges and enter the mainstream. I don't see it dying by 2040 or any other time. Curious what will be considered "kinky" when everything we do now is mainstream. Maybe temperance?


Clever analogy but the only way I see BDSM following suit is if someone figures a way for an average Joe to hit the jackpot by tying people up and doing nasty shit to them. [:)]


I agree. Money is more universally desirable, but is it that far fetched? Lets compare the willing suspension of disbelief. In the poker world, this broke guy named Chris Moneymaker was passing time playing online poker. He thought he was playing a $40 tournament. Turns out he was playing for a chair on the televised table of the biggest game of the year. Three days later he was a millionaire. The appeal was that you could get off your ass at 45 and go pro tomorrow. No other contest in the world had that kind of approachability. Can't roll out of bed and say "I think I'll be a chess master because I coached the high school chess club."

What would it take for your tongue in cheek comment to come to life? What if Johnny Depp came out as being unapologetically poly? Just goes on Leno with his two collared, sub girlfriends and says, "This is what makes me happy. Vicki, be a good toy and go sit in Jay's lap." How many people would think "fucking-A... What am I doing without that in my life!?"

50 Shades is getting a movie... It might strike a blockbuster chord where Story of O and The Secretary could not...

Tazzy, I agree that the history is loosely similar. My point is that BDSM was as Old Guard as described here and in other active threads and now we're here. Talking in a public online forum (many of us with profiles that show clear pictures and locations) just exchanging about WIITWD. And of course, the time tables need not match. If anything, I'd say BDSM today is where Poker was in 1965. Imagine where our scene will be in 50 years? I used to pay an arm and a leg for Playboy TV (but got rid of it when they stopped airing Night Court). I could easily imagine the BDSM version of Poker After Dark where young n' sexy Dr. Ruth Westheimers got together to flog people and talk about recent movies they had just seen. Things change much faster now, for better or worse. Our community already has big names that we know (Dossie Easton, John Warren). I give it less than 15 years before we have a household name for BDSM.

Thumbs up from ResidentSadist, that's high praise. [sm=mademyday.gif]





tazzygirl -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/18/2013 12:39:43 AM)

I think the Story of O was limited in release, it couldnt even get released in the UK at the time. I think a more appropriate film would be 9 1/2 weeks. Wild Orchid followed a few years later... both grossed far more internationally than they did in the US.

Many seem to forget the movie Exit to Eden (1994). While a comedy, it did have its BDSM moments and comedy seems to make things that are "uncomfortable" a bit more palatable.

We Americans seem to often believe we are the cultural hub for deviant behavior. But the international community is much more progressive than we are. Many films that are deviant in nature simply cannot find a market in the US because of the bible thumpers. but it is improving [:D]




goodgirlmary -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/18/2013 3:23:27 AM)

Coffee on the tablet! Lol awww my gosh too funy
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist

^ That puts you in generation X. So you are the X guard. [:)]


Hmmm.. does that make a conservative who is into the lifestyle "Right Guard"?





RedMagic1 -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/18/2013 5:48:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682
You do make some excellent points here RS. While I am glad that BDSM has become more acceptable in society over the past 10 years, I do not think it should be at the cost of the BDSM community losing it's identity.

Did it ever have an identity though? I think that's a real question. I really appreciate ResidentSadist's posts on this thread, but one thing you have to remember is that all that occurred in the days before internet. Different leather communities had different protocols and rules, from state to state, from area to area. It isn't as though there was one big rule book, then or now.

I know this might make RS puke, but I think the first true unifying force, the first semi-successful attempt to make "One BDSM," was the web site CastleRealm. And, of course, there was a lot of great stuff on CastleRealm, and a lot of absolute garbage and falsehood.

So this is part of the problem, I think. Attempts to create a "single BDSM identity" were produced by online fantasists, moreso than by people living in the real world. I've done a fair amount of leather history reading, though other people on these boards know more (and have lived it far more), because I wanted to know more about the roots of kink. But most people haven't, and they still get to be kinky!

Also, I think one driving force behind modern BDSM identity has not been mentioned yet: the US and Japanese porn industries. What people will pay real money to fap to has as much to do with what BDSM is turning into as anything else.




hrxxx -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/18/2013 9:27:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Itsthetruth

It looks like BDSM is experiencing a change in culture.You have the old timers from the past few decades and then the newer,younger generation.This issue is as old as time itself."Out with the old and in with the new".Do the oldtimer's share their experience or do they hate where BDSM is heading?How does the younger generation view themselves?Too many cliques in BDSM.When does common interest outweigh petty differences?In the end,cooperation will always triumph over competition.




For me has age and generation nothing to do with the cultural shifts that have occurred in BDSM but a new form of BDSM which have come through the internet like a virus, I'll try to describe the difference between BDSM and BDSM and my experience

Original BDSM Bondage Discipline Sadism and Masochism or Sadomasochism
Bandage and discipline comes in all probability from Japan where it has been practiced for hundreds of years, and probably also a reason why you can buy Japanese silk rope for bondage Discipline was formerly a natural part of female upbringing and later marriage in Japan.

Sadism is from France and comes from the Marquis de Sade which practice and wrote short stories and books about the pleasure, of inflicting pain on others, his books are very extreme and act on everything from rape to murder, one thing that goes over and over in his books and anal sex which is called sodomy or sodomisere. Following and practicing of the Marquis de Sade is called Sadists

Masochism is from Ukraine and comes from Leopold Ritter von Sacher-Masoch which practice and wrote books on the pleasure of getting inflicted pain. Following and practicing of Leopold Ritter von Sacher-Masoch's called Masochists.

Combining the four you BDSM the original.

Offspring from BDSM is
D / S Dominance and Submission that you can combine with the original BDSM
M / S Master and slave that you also can combine with the original BDSM

BDSM and D / S - M / S can you again combine with Fetish which is everything from dogplay to latex you name it's ther...

The new form of BDSM is called Bedroom-Dominant & Slave-Mouse.

A Bedroom-Dominant can be both Dominant and Master he gets his experience from the Internet, photographs, books, kink.com etc but he has no real experience, and will be one of the first to speak up if he's reading a thread on the net about something he has read is irresponsible but he has no real experience in it. Many times it is a typical Bedroom-Dominant married or in relationship to his Sub-Mouse and has been before they started with BDSM but he is also found single.

Sub-Mouse can be both sub and slave she gets her experience from the Internet, photographs, books, kink.com etc but she has no real experience, and will be one of the first to speak up if she read a thread online about something she has read is irresponsible but she has no real experience in it. Many times it is a typical Sub-Mouse married/or in relationship to her Bedroom-Dominant, and has been before they started with BDSM but she is also found single.

Bedroom-Dominant & Sub-Mouse can live in a 24/7 relationship but it is very far from the original BDSM and they will typically have a safe word even if they live in a TPE relationship, and that they have because they read in books on each other's boundaries and not fully aware of what they are doing..

When I start to practice BDSM was internet very small and there were not many who had the computer and the only way to get experience was about to do it with others who had experience. My first experience I had when I was 22 with a 12 year older switch girl, we were on and of for nearly 2 years and had no safe word in play, but we talked about our limits and learned to move on them without exceed them.

There are so many things you can not learn by reading about BDSM, but you've got to learn from the oldtimers who have experience, and the experience you learn in real life, you take with you to the next BDSM relationship whatever  it is 24/7 or play. Also, it is others who who learn from you and some of the first things you learn is that no two girls are alike, so what is right for one is not right for another.

There are many slaves and sub​​'s here on collarme seeking older with experience as oldtimers is not not finished, and those who learn from oldtimers becomes even oldtimers one day.

Anyone can buy a pair of handcuffs and blindfold go home in the bedroom use it once and call themselves BDSM engaged and unfortunately they are the largest share.

This is my personal opinion about the difference between old school BDSM and new school BDSM




sexyred1 -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/18/2013 9:45:58 AM)

I agree with Osidegirl, BDSM is more accessible online and through the media and entertainment worlds.

Before all this, it may have had a dark mystique about it since you had to know the secret password to get involved, so it was all hush, hush.

With the open attitude about everything in pop culture, now everyone thinks they are an expert at everything.

Worst of all, and this applies to not only BDSM but to vanilla life, easy access created unrealistic expectations of immediate gratification and/or fantasy fulfillment. Technology has truncated the ability to communicate in a deeper way, ie. give a guy your phone number and he does not call, he texts to get to know you.

Relatiionships of all types require investment and work. That does not translate into easy gratification and laziness.




Hillwilliam -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/18/2013 10:20:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

. give a guy your phone number and he does not call, he texts to get to know you.



I've never sent a text message of any kind.[8D]




SimplyMichael -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/18/2013 10:34:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SatinWhip

quote:

ORIGINAL: BambiBoi
What does this mean for BDSM?

Fifty Shades of Grey (no matter how much you hate it) is our Rounders. There are a few more useful publications that are our Super System. SecondLife/Fetlife/CM are our online poker. I predict BDSM is going to soften around the edges and enter the mainstream. I don't see it dying by 2040 or any other time. Curious what will be considered "kinky" when everything we do now is mainstream. Maybe temperance?


Clever analogy but the only way I see BDSM following suit is if someone figures a way for an average Joe to hit the jackpot by tying people up and doing nasty shit to them. [:)]


You didn't mean to be ironic but you have no idea how true this actually is. In the old days you were judged by hoe hot the recipent of your actions said you were, noe you are judged by how ell your audience views your scene.

Its a massive cultural shift, depending on what part of the elephant your blind man is grasping.

And the reward today is the most treasured of all time, pussy.




SimplyMichael -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/18/2013 10:41:41 AM)

We are talking as if BDSM is something monolithic.

Is it the dungeons?
The classes and public scene?
Is it the way people conduct relationships?

On some level, this shit had been done at least since ancient Greece. However, consent only became important in the mid 1970s. We then go to the 1980s when aids killed off the last of real gay leather as a firce and at the same time the massive influx of hets. But SOJ and TES were founded in the early 1970s, the same time A KEATHERMANS HANDBOOK was published. Its a complex timeline that isnt cut and dried but there has clearly been change and yet not so.much, we have kink on mainstream TV but oeople still struggle to create goodvrelationships.




Spiritedsub2 -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/18/2013 1:09:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

I agree with Osidegirl, BDSM is more accessible online and through the media and entertainment worlds.

Before all this, it may have had a dark mystique about it since you had to know the secret password to get involved, so it was all hush, hush.

With the open attitude about everything in pop culture, now everyone thinks they are an expert at everything.

Worst of all, and this applies to not only BDSM but to vanilla life, easy access created unrealistic expectations of immediate gratification and/or fantasy fulfillment. Technology has truncated the ability to communicate in a deeper way, ie. give a guy your phone number and he does not call, he texts to get to know you.

Relatiionships of all types require investment and work. That does not translate into easy gratification and laziness.

A funny article in HuffPost awhile ago noted that we can meet, get to know each other, get attached to each other, have cyber sex, fight, and break up all via text, never meeting in "meatspace", or as I like to call it, real life. It's funny but not entirely wrong. I am thinking texting should become a hard limit...




Spiritedsub2 -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/18/2013 1:17:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BambiBoi

.... Curious what will be considered "kinky" when everything we do now is mainstream. Maybe temperance?

Maybe love [:)]




Hiddendesires101 -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/18/2013 10:47:17 PM)

I think unfortunately people want to experience 50 shades of grey and misinterpret that as BDSM. Also i think the younger generation is getting more access to BDSM but it could also just mean more younger folks are talking about it. Its all about area to and the younger generation hasnt matured enough to tap into their true desires not until there much older.




sexyred1 -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/18/2013 11:02:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2


quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

I agree with Osidegirl, BDSM is more accessible online and through the media and entertainment worlds.

Before all this, it may have had a dark mystique about it since you had to know the secret password to get involved, so it was all hush, hush.

With the open attitude about everything in pop culture, now everyone thinks they are an expert at everything.

Worst of all, and this applies to not only BDSM but to vanilla life, easy access created unrealistic expectations of immediate gratification and/or fantasy fulfillment. Technology has truncated the ability to communicate in a deeper way, ie. give a guy your phone number and he does not call, he texts to get to know you.

Relatiionships of all types require investment and work. That does not translate into easy gratification and laziness.

A funny article in HuffPost awhile ago noted that we can meet, get to know each other, get attached to each other, have cyber sex, fight, and break up all via text, never meeting in "meatspace", or as I like to call it, real life. It's funny but not entirely wrong. I am thinking texting should become a hard limit...


I agree. It is fast becoming a hard limit!




sexyred1 -> RE: BDSM: Cultural Shift (6/18/2013 11:03:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

. give a guy your phone number and he does not call, he texts to get to know you.



I've never sent a text message of any kind.[8D]


A man after my own heart.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625