RE: Bravery and fortitude in Texas (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


VideoAdminChi -> RE: Bravery and fortitude in Texas (7/28/2013 8:47:12 AM)

Unlocked. Sorry for the delay.

I realize this topic is volatile but posters must still stick to the topic and not make other posters the topic.




slvemike4u -> RE: Bravery and fortitude in Texas (7/28/2013 9:17:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

That was in retort to the belief that is a woman doesnt know she is pregnant by her 20th week, she is stupid.

I dont agree with men having to pay child support for a baby that isnt theirs.

I also think its bullshit that a man who has spent years raising a child suddenly stops caring for that child because he finds out its not his "blood" child. Which simply goes back to the fact that a sperm donor is a more appropriate term for some men.

Edited because reading one post does not lead to actual comprehension....lol




Phydeaux -> RE: Bravery and fortitude in Texas (7/28/2013 9:46:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Legal definition of a fetus....

quote:

A fetus is typically defined as a developing human at a certain point after conception to birth.


http://definitions.uslegal.com/f/fetus/

Many states use the terms "unborn child" or "fetus/embryo".

Viability has always followed medical application, including the Supreme Court.

They prefer criminalizing an assault on a pregnant woman and recognizing her as the only victim.
Currently, at least 38 states have fetal homicide laws. The states include: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin. At least 23 states have fetal homicide laws that apply to the earliest stages of pregnancy ("any state of gestation," "conception," "fertilization" or "post-fertilization"); these are indicated below with an asterisk



13 states use fetus...

Wis. Stat. § 940.04 (2) et seq. declare that any person who intentionally destroys the life of an unborn quick child or causes the death of the mother by an act done with intent to destroy the life of an unborn child is guilty of homicide. It is unnecessary to prove that the fetus was alive when the act so causing the mother's death was committed.

Many more use both.... Its well known, to most that is... that a fetus is within the womb... child outside of it. When the "child" is born dead, its a fetal demise... not a dead child. They are given a "fetal death certificate"....

http://www.odh.ohio.gov/vitalstatistics/vitalmisc/fetaldth.aspx

The legal definition of "fetal death" means: "death prior to the complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of a product of human conception... which after such expulsion or extraction does not breathe or show any other evidence of life such as beating of the heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles."

So, do go on about how I dont understand the law. [;)]


Not a fair argument taz. The whole point of the pro-choice crowd has been an attempt to control the terms.
They can't be in favor of aborting a baby, so they call it a fetus.

I have a google redirect virus at the moment so I can't provide links- but if you google laws + baby you can find the term baby was used in laws (prebirth) commonly prior to RvW.

The whole idea of 'its a fetus one day, and a baby the next' based on an arbitrary date set by the supreme court is quite a logical contortion.

*IF* you think that people should have the right to abort a baby, there should at least be no mamby-pamby euphemisms. Let people make clear eyed decisions.

I also don't think abortion is a decision to be made casually or lightly. (But then I don't believe in casual sex either).
I think if people are going to end another beings life (no matter where in the life cycle they are) they should be required to be educated as to the realities of the situation. Require the person making the decision to see the status of the baby. See that it has hands, and fingers and moves.

What other major decisions in life are the participants encourage to not review the facts, and in fact laws have been passed to ensure that it isn't required?

I don't (generally) support abortion. Just making my bias known. But as a separate issue, I don't believe that killing a child should ever be a trivial decision, and so I think it behooves us that the prospective mom have a clear eye to what is actually occurring.




tazzygirl -> RE: Bravery and fortitude in Texas (7/28/2013 10:03:55 AM)

quote:

Not a fair argument taz. The whole point of the pro-choice crowd has been an attempt to control the terms.
They can't be in favor of aborting a baby, so they call it a fetus.


Not true. Medicine calls it a fetus....

zygote
blastocyst
embryo
fetus

Fetus is actually the 4th stage.

quote:

I have a google redirect virus at the moment so I can't provide links- but if you google laws + baby you can find the term baby was used in laws (prebirth) commonly prior to RvW.


And? RvW decision was partly based upon viability, which requires medical applications.

quote:

The whole idea of 'its a fetus one day, and a baby the next' based on an arbitrary date set by the supreme court is quite a logical contortion.


Yet a factual one supported by science.

quote:

*IF* you think that people should have the right to abort a baby, there should at least be no mamby-pamby euphemisms. Let people make clear eyed decisions.


PEOPLE dont decide... a woman decides. When a woman goes to the OBGYN, he doesnt speak about her "baby's age", its "gestational age".

quote:

I think if people are going to end another beings life (no matter where in the life cycle they are) they should be required to be educated as to the realities of the situation. Require the person making the decision to see the status of the baby. See that it has hands, and fingers and moves.


So you can feel better about her decision?

roughly 81% of abortions occur before the fetus develops a human looking face and fingernails. So you want to push... what?

quote:

What other major decisions in life are the participants encourage to not review the facts, and in fact laws have been passed to ensure that it isn't required?

I don't (generally) support abortion. Just making my bias known. But as a separate issue, I don't believe that killing a child should ever be a trivial decision, and so I think it behooves us that the prospective mom have a clear eye to what is actually occurring.


You are assuming they dont know.

You are also making the assumption that the level of knowledge they must possess be the one you demand. Yet, you dont take into account the reasons for these abortions, nor do most, not just you, care.




Phydeaux -> RE: Bravery and fortitude in Texas (7/28/2013 10:43:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Not a fair argument taz. The whole point of the pro-choice crowd has been an attempt to control the terms.
They can't be in favor of aborting a baby, so they call it a fetus.


Not true. Medicine calls it a fetus....

zygote
blastocyst
embryo
fetus

Fetus is actually the 4th stage.


True. But I have yet to hear a doctor say - concratulations- your having a zygote/blastocyst/embryo/fetus. Very common for them to say .. 'baby' as well.

When couples go to IVF - they are not asked if they want a fetus; they are going to have a baby.
It *is* a logical contortion when its a baby when its wanted and a fetus when its not.
quote:




quote:

I have a google redirect virus at the moment so I can't provide links- but if you google laws + baby you can find the term baby was used in laws (prebirth) commonly prior to RvW.


And? RvW decision was partly based upon viability, which requires medical applications.


A) you quoted the definition of fetus. The definition of 'baby' (definition #5) is also a human fetus. So the term baby is also linguistically correct.
B). You quoted that many states use the term fetus in their laws. I point out that this is a trend that grew noticeably after RvW. Prior many (most?) used the term baby.
C).. You said it is well known to most.. "that a fetus is within the womb... child outside of it". But again this is a development that is relatively recent. Again, it is perfectly correct to say it is a baby before birth and a baby after birth.
quote:





quote:

The whole idea of 'its a fetus one day, and a baby the next' based on an arbitrary date set by the supreme court is quite a logical contortion.

*IF* you think that people should have the right to abort a baby, there should at least be no mamby-pamby euphemisms. Let people make clear eyed decisions.


PEOPLE dont decide... a woman decides. When a woman goes to the OBGYN, he doesnt speak about her "baby's age", its "gestational age".


Last I checked women are people. Are you saying otherwise? Really?

quote:



quote:

I think if people are going to end another beings life (no matter where in the life cycle they are) they should be required to be educated as to the realities of the situation. Require the person making the decision to see the status of the baby. See that it has hands, and fingers and moves.


So you can feel better about her decision?


Don't be needlessly offensive.
I dont thing euthanasia or abortion should be something undertaken lightly.
I think it should be something with a three day waiting period to change minds.
I think you should have all the information needed to make the best decision you can make.
Personally, I think its a crying shame that we spend money to kill babies and yet spend very little to make it possible for the mother to put the baby up for adoption.

quote:


roughly 81% of abortions occur before the fetus develops a human looking face and fingernails. So you want to push... what?


So how does that change what I said?
quote:



quote:

What other major decisions in life are the participants encourage to not review the facts, and in fact laws have been passed to ensure that it isn't required? .


You are assuming they dont know.
To say that everyone should be informed is not to say that I assume they don't know. However, just as you have to get pre divorce counseling in many states (required by the state) I don't find it unreasonable to set standards.

For example - do they know what welfare benefits are available to them. Do they know what support groups are available in the area?
quote:





You are also making the assumption that the level of knowledge they must possess be the one you demand. Yet, you dont take into account the reasons for these abortions, nor do most, not just you, care.



I am not making an assumption. I am promulgating what I think is a good idea. I am perfectly willing, btw, to tailor the legislation as you say for the circumstances of the abortion.




tazzygirl -> RE: Bravery and fortitude in Texas (7/28/2013 11:57:35 PM)

quote:

True. But I have yet to hear a doctor say - concratulations- your having a zygote/blastocyst/embryo/fetus. Very common for them to say .. 'baby' as well.


Because that is what the parents typically want to hear. The minute they dont, the physician switches to fetus.

quote:

When couples go to IVF - they are not asked if they want a fetus; they are going to have a baby.
It *is* a logical contortion when its a baby when its wanted and a fetus when its not.


I agree, for the lay people, it is. Check a chart, it says fetus. We dont say "baby anomaly" we say "fetal anomaly" or "birth defect". Its not only switched when the pregnancy is undesired.

quote:

A) you quoted the definition of fetus. The definition of 'baby' (definition #5) is also a human fetus. So the term baby is also linguistically correct.
B). You quoted that many states use the term fetus in their laws. I point out that this is a trend that grew noticeably after RvW. Prior many (most?) used the term baby.
C).. You said it is well known to most.. "that a fetus is within the womb... child outside of it". But again this is a development that is relatively recent. Again, it is perfectly correct to say it is a baby before birth and a baby after birth.


When laws are based upon morality, they use emotionally triggering words. When RvW came along, it was not based upon morality, but public health. The same issue, public health, is what caused many places to make abortion illegal. Death bed fever was rampant among women who aborted or simply miscarried, not to mention those who gave birth.

Since the courts went with public health, and with medicine as a part of its determining factor, not morality, the laws reflected that change.

quote:

Last I checked women are people. Are you saying otherwise? Really?


Last I checked, men cant have abortions. Are you saying otherwise? Really?

quote:

Don't be needlessly offensive.


Oh, Im not, it was a serious question.

quote:

I dont thing euthanasia or abortion should be something undertaken lightly.


What makes you think anyone takes either of those decisions lightly?

quote:

I think it should be something with a three day waiting period to change minds.


I have known women who wouldnt have been alive in three days. Make that a stipulation and they will hold ever woman to it, including those who need an abortion immediately to save their own lines.

quote:

I think you should have all the information needed to make the best decision you can make.


Again, what information? Thet the fetus has fingers and toes? Every woman knows that. You are missing information in your determination that they dont have all the information.

quote:

Personally, I think its a crying shame that we spend money to kill babies and yet spend very little to make it possible for the mother to put the baby up for adoption.


In the U.S. 400,540 children are living without permanent families
in the foster care system. 115,000 of these children are eligible for adoption, but nearly 40% of these children will wait over three years in foster care before being adopted.


http://www.ccainstitute.org/why-we-do-it-/facts-and-statistics.html

Do we re-open orphanages?

quote:

So how does that change what I said?


The majority of those obtaining abortions dont fit into the category you want them to be in per your previous post....

quote:

Require the person making the decision to see the status of the baby. See that it has hands, and fingers and moves.


quote:

To say that everyone should be informed is not to say that I assume they don't know. However, just as you have to get pre divorce counseling in many states (required by the state) I don't find it unreasonable to set standards.

For example - do they know what welfare benefits are available to them. Do they know what support groups are available in the area?


So lets put more onto the welfare roles to make this decision more palatable? What of their other children? What of their careers? Many of these women dont need welfare if they dont go through with the pregnancy.

Pre-divorce counseling isnt required unless one partner insists the marriage is salvageable. If both are in agreement it isnt.

I find only Arkansas and Arizona require pre-divorce counseling.

MEDIATION OR COUNSELING REQUIREMENTS:
Divorcing parents are required to complete at least 2 hours of parenting classes or submit to mediation in regard to addressing parenting, custody, and visitation issues. [Based on Arkansas Code 9-12-322]


http://divorcesupport.about.com/od/usstatedivorcelaws/a/ark_law.htm

Couples who entered into a “covenant marriage” are required to seek marital counseling before filing for divorce. A covenant marriage is based upon the belief that couples often end their marriage without attempting to resolve their conflicts. The pair agrees to attend premarital counseling before they get married and enter counseling when marital problems arise.

http://www.divorcenet.com/resources/divorce/divorce-state-laws/louisiana-divorce-questions-answers

I dont see even a large minority of states requiring it for all marriages.




metamorfosis -> RE: Bravery and fortitude in Texas (7/29/2013 12:05:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
The whole idea of 'its a fetus one day, and a baby the next' based on an arbitrary date set by the supreme court is quite a logical contortion.


No more so than calling a growing mass of a few hundred cells a human being.

quote:

I also don't think abortion is a decision to be made casually or lightly. (But then I don't believe in casual sex either).


Are you assuming that the decision usually is made casually or lightly, or that casual sex is usually involved?

quote:

What other major decisions in life are the participants encourage to not review the facts, and in fact laws have been passed to ensure that it isn't required?


I don't know about legislation, but the factory farmed meat industry comes to mind.

quote:

... I don't believe that killing a child should ever be a trivial decision, and so I think it behooves us that the prospective mom have a clear eye to what is actually occurring.


There's a fine line between that kind of graphic illustration and emotional blackmail.




metamorfosis -> RE: Bravery and fortitude in Texas (7/29/2013 12:24:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
The whole point of the pro-choice crowd has been an attempt to control the terms.


That's the whole point of politics in general. Let's not pretend that the phenomenon is confined to either side of the abortion debate.





metamorfosis -> RE: Bravery and fortitude in Texas (7/29/2013 12:58:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
...you quoted the definition of fetus. The definition of 'baby' (definition #5) is also a human fetus. So the term baby is also linguistically correct.


Agreed.




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 8 [9]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875