Phydeaux -> RE: Bravery and fortitude in Texas (7/28/2013 9:46:15 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Legal definition of a fetus.... quote:
A fetus is typically defined as a developing human at a certain point after conception to birth. http://definitions.uslegal.com/f/fetus/ Many states use the terms "unborn child" or "fetus/embryo". Viability has always followed medical application, including the Supreme Court. They prefer criminalizing an assault on a pregnant woman and recognizing her as the only victim. Currently, at least 38 states have fetal homicide laws. The states include: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin. At least 23 states have fetal homicide laws that apply to the earliest stages of pregnancy ("any state of gestation," "conception," "fertilization" or "post-fertilization"); these are indicated below with an asterisk 13 states use fetus... Wis. Stat. § 940.04 (2) et seq. declare that any person who intentionally destroys the life of an unborn quick child or causes the death of the mother by an act done with intent to destroy the life of an unborn child is guilty of homicide. It is unnecessary to prove that the fetus was alive when the act so causing the mother's death was committed. Many more use both.... Its well known, to most that is... that a fetus is within the womb... child outside of it. When the "child" is born dead, its a fetal demise... not a dead child. They are given a "fetal death certificate".... http://www.odh.ohio.gov/vitalstatistics/vitalmisc/fetaldth.aspx The legal definition of "fetal death" means: "death prior to the complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of a product of human conception... which after such expulsion or extraction does not breathe or show any other evidence of life such as beating of the heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles." So, do go on about how I dont understand the law. [;)] Not a fair argument taz. The whole point of the pro-choice crowd has been an attempt to control the terms. They can't be in favor of aborting a baby, so they call it a fetus. I have a google redirect virus at the moment so I can't provide links- but if you google laws + baby you can find the term baby was used in laws (prebirth) commonly prior to RvW. The whole idea of 'its a fetus one day, and a baby the next' based on an arbitrary date set by the supreme court is quite a logical contortion. *IF* you think that people should have the right to abort a baby, there should at least be no mamby-pamby euphemisms. Let people make clear eyed decisions. I also don't think abortion is a decision to be made casually or lightly. (But then I don't believe in casual sex either). I think if people are going to end another beings life (no matter where in the life cycle they are) they should be required to be educated as to the realities of the situation. Require the person making the decision to see the status of the baby. See that it has hands, and fingers and moves. What other major decisions in life are the participants encourage to not review the facts, and in fact laws have been passed to ensure that it isn't required? I don't (generally) support abortion. Just making my bias known. But as a separate issue, I don't believe that killing a child should ever be a trivial decision, and so I think it behooves us that the prospective mom have a clear eye to what is actually occurring.
|
|
|
|