mnottertail
Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004 Status: offline
|
Not so, there is the old imperfect self-defense which will lead to manslaughter. The statute does not have to mention burden of proof, he has admitted to killing him, his defense is self-defense. If he doesn't show any proof that he tried to get away, or that he wasn't the agressor, then a quick reading of the statute (because by god that is what the prosecution is arguing, he doesnt meet the exception in the statute based on his testimony and the testimony of others) then what you got? He definitely did not meet the definition of a stand your ground as you have so adamantly stated he did, and it is very iffy that he can meet the self defense exemption, because, we do not have any indication that he exhausted shit.....he didnt try to get away from the argument, the escalating situation. We have no testimony that he was not the aggressor
_____________________________
Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30
|