BitYakin
Posts: 882
Joined: 10/15/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
If you had read the thread you would no there are no such thing as races of humans. All we really have are ethnic groups. As I just showed, Celts and Germanic peoples are separate ethnic groups that originated in different places (BTW just because the Celts used to live in France and Germany doesn't mean the people who live there now are descended from Celts.)
sooo for all intents and purposes you are saying I am right, that racism wasn't the correct term?
you see earlier you contented the scott and irish were racially differant from french and gemans because of differant ancestory, nowww you say well there just ethinicly differant, which I think is what popeye said and I pointed out....
just so we are clear here, and I am asking not trying to put words in your mouth here, are you saying there is not such thing as racial differance? that there is only a SINGLE race on the planet the HUMAN RACE, and that genetics is basicly hogwash???
that if you go back far enough we are all decended from "adam and eve" and I don't mean that in the religious sense, but in the sense that we all decended from a single source?
and thats OK, I'd even concede that possibility, but then you have to admit that there are NO RACES PERIOD, birds fish mammals if you go back FAR ENOUGH are all decended form some SINGLE COMMON SPARK OF LIFE
I think I lean more towards the differant races in that at some point, species split, forked may be a better term, that its even possible humankind may have decended from more than one source at some point.... and I do not know that, but it POSSIBLE that caucasians decended from say chimpanze while the negro decended from say maybe gorilla and maybe asian from orangatuan. and again I am not proposing that as FACT, just possible, and thereby creating three seperate distinct races, then from those three races a multitude of culture evovled...
now on to your religious comments
I may be mistaken but I think it was you and I that were talkng about abortion on another thread and you contended that to protest at an abortion clinic absolutley posotively HAD to be a political issue. that it was NOT POSSIBLE for a religious group to protest an abortion clinic for purely religious and/or moral issues, I think you even called then TERRORISTS
and I could be mistaken, it was awhile back and maybe that was someone else, so if I am wrong I apologize now
anyhow the point is, if you get to claim that, by virtue of thier religion being opposed to abortion that EVERY SINGLE CHRISTIAN who opposes abortion is politically motivated and a terrorist to boot, then I get to claim every single islamic is......
and the old saying goes, you are known by the company you keep! if I hang out with gangsters I have to accept people wll assume I am gangster, if I hang out with drug using hippies I have to accept people will assume I am drug using hippie.
are there exceptins to this rule, OF COURSE, are there mulsems who are not terrorists of course. all I am saying is if you choose to align yourself with a group I will assume at the very least you are SYPMATHETIC to thier cause, and tolerant of thier tactics...
why would I hate him, what has he done to me?
thats simple, because he CHOSES to align himself with a group who from what I can tell absolutley HATES ME AND MY WAY OF LIFE, what has he done, to me nothing presonally, but he has endorsed a group that as a whole seems intent on the destruction of my entire way of life!
are you saying if you had been alive during WW2 and some person openly acknowledged he was a NAZI you'd welcome him with open arms?
< Message edited by BitYakin -- 7/6/2013 4:21:34 PM >
|
RE: How's that Arab Spring working out for ya President... - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread