Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Minimum wage


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Minimum wage Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 2:54:59 PM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
I appreciate you reply NTUY but I don't think we could settle this difference, it's one that needs to be settled over a pint of beer because there are major ideological differences between us. For a start, the belief that if you are poor, what you get from the state is not earned. The state spends far more money on the rich than it does on the poor. As your fellow countryman Noam Chomsky has observed “The country was founded on the principle that the primary role of government is to protect property from the majority, and so it remains.”. The American rich pay very little if anything in tax, yet they feel they should have the privilege of living in a country where the infrastructure is paid for by poorer people than themselves. Their argument being, they are the wealth producers. I beg to differ. They rely on a country supplying their companies with an educated work force paid for mainly by the lower middle class.

Everybody has a responsibility to the society they live in and yes there are the feckless poor but there are also the feckless rich. Why should the feckless poor be condemned and not the feckless rich? I understand where this idea of not paying tax came from in the US, the founding fathers who were in my eyes as venal and as self serving as their English counterparts in the 18th century. However, the tax issue in the US is mythic and a misconception and I can only assume that people keep buying into the no tax stance through media propaganda. Paying tax for the benefit of society as a whole does not cripple society, it allows society to have a public infrastructure that benefits the whole of society.

I've travelled a lot in the US and while I can see most people appear to have a good standard of living, I've seen poverty in the US that I have not seen in Europe. I'm not saying that all is good in Europe, I know it isn't but the belief that the state is there for all the people and not just some of the people is something I hold to.

It's late here and I've had a drink so I'll cut to the chase. You mention food stamps. How much do you think it costs to administer them? It is far cheaper to accept that people have a minimal need and give them the money and let them make their own choices than having expensive civil servants administering charity and making the poor feel a burden on society. How is taking away the esteem away from the poor going to give them the confidence to get up and make a future for themselves? One of the problems with a society that thinks its poor is feckless is to convince the poor they are feckless.

It's evening here and I've had a good time so I'll come back to this.

(in reply to perverseangelic)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 3:47:19 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
To the poster that said that you should put your money in the bank:

If you put your money in a savings account and leave it there you will actually lose money.  The savings will be worth less and less over time.  This is because the rate of inflation is greater than the rate of interest, sometimes by a significant amount.

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to perverseangelic)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 4:30:41 PM   
ArtCatDom


Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

Excellent posts, Art. Good to see you posting again, as well.
 
Excellent posts from a lot of folks, for that matter. I know much of Europe has equal or near equal wealth as the USA, but their growth is stagnant; I'd love to hear from all of you as to how you see that impacting the "welfare" states.


Thanks! Good to see the same old faces and a few new ones around. Are you still causing trouble? *mock stern look*

By the by, I think Europe's problem lies in a conflation of protectionism, ill-thought general economic policies, poor central banking decisions, bad immigration policy and bad currency policy. To put it in a nutshell at least.

*meow*


(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 4:32:32 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
Food for thought:
 
A few weeks ago, the Internal Revenue Service released data on tax year 2003. The data show that the top 1 percent of taxpayers, ranked by adjusted gross income, paid 34.3 percent of all federal income taxes that year. The top 5 percent paid 54.4 percent, the top 10 percent paid 65.8 percent, and the top 25 percent paid 83.9 percent.

http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_bartlett/bartlett200512070900.asp
And an opposing view:
 

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 4:44:35 PM   
ArtCatDom


Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline
No offense intended, but you are really and truly clueless about the state of the welfare system. The problem is not how much we give out, but how the money allotted is spent and (ironically) how low the income limits are set for benefits eligibility.

The Medicaid (and related "welfare" health care) system spend over five dollars for every dollar in benefits paid. Cash assistance welfare spends slightly over four dollars for every dollar in benefits paid.

Someone working full-time with minimum wage in most states is not eligible for cash assistance or Medicaid. They will be generally eligible for HEAP (relatively small grant to subsidize winter heating bills) and a minimal amount of food stamps. Slightly more money than that makes you ineligible for food stamps. HEAP assistance actually goes through a decent range of the working poor wage scale.

Your "going back to school" example is highly outdated. That program simply doesn't exist in most places any more. You are not eligible for public assistance in New York for example if the reason you're not working is because you're attending school. (Which seems a bit bass-ackwards to me.)

Also, you neglect that in every state there are work requirements for receiving public assistance unless you are disabled.

Finally, you also neglect that every state has a limit to the amount of cash assistance anyone can receive.

*meow*

(in reply to NeedToUseYou)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 4:46:48 PM   
ArtCatDom


Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline
perverseangelic, I don't mean to ask a terribly personal question, but do you pay for state subsidized insurance or are you on a "Medicaid HMO" plan?

*meow*

(in reply to perverseangelic)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 4:54:37 PM   
ArtCatDom


Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline
Consider as impressive as those numbers sound that the wealthiest still pay a lessor share of taxes than their share of wealth.

Just an additional thought.

*meow*

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 5:05:02 PM   
NeedToUseYou


Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005
From: None of your business
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ArtCatDom

No offense intended, but you are really and truly clueless about the state of the welfare system. The problem is not how much we give out, but how the money allotted is spent and (ironically) how low the income limits are set for benefits eligibility.

The Medicaid (and related "welfare" health care) system spend over five dollars for every dollar in benefits paid. Cash assistance welfare spends slightly over four dollars for every dollar in benefits paid.

Someone working full-time with minimum wage in most states is not eligible for cash assistance or Medicaid. They will be generally eligible for HEAP (relatively small grant to subsidize winter heating bills) and a minimal amount of food stamps. Slightly more money than that makes you ineligible for food stamps. HEAP assistance actually goes through a decent range of the working poor wage scale.

Your "going back to school" example is highly outdated. That program simply doesn't exist in most places any more. You are not eligible for public assistance in New York for example if the reason you're not working is because you're attending school. (Which seems a bit bass-ackwards to me.)

Also, you neglect that in every state there are work requirements for receiving public assistance unless you are disabled.

Finally, you also neglect that every state has a limit to the amount of cash assistance anyone can receive.

*meow*


LOL, no offense intended, lead to insult. It's quicker just to insult directly.

I did mention the it costs money to administer the programs, however I was unable to find actual numbers. 5 dollars for every dollar. Well, that's even more reason to do away with the system.

Anyway, maybe my work to school was off, I'll have to look into it. I know my sister qualified because she had children about five years ago and she didn't loose any benefits. So, maybe it's changed in that time. I know 1 year ago my friend from high school who had no kids was receiving food stamps(link card now). Perfectly healthy but lazy as crap. Why that is if it's so restrictive I can't explain. I know multiple families were the boyfriend works and lives in the household but has a fake address so the girlfriend still can receive her food stamps(link card), and medical card. So, maybe it's getting better, but the fraud is rampant. And my "friend" worked sometimes under the table probably why he qualified. Who knows I'll ask them next time I visit how they are still getting benefits and living without working regularly.





(in reply to ArtCatDom)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 5:05:12 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ArtCatDom

Consider as impressive as those numbers sound that the wealthiest still pay a lessor share of taxes than their share of wealth.

Just an additional thought.

*meow*


Very true .

(in reply to ArtCatDom)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 5:20:31 PM   
ArtCatDom


Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline
I think you pointed out another problem very succinctly, that I did not. That is, that fraud is rampant within the system and counterfraud measures are grossly underfunded. Of course that might have something to do with inefficient spending and insane overstaffing.

What state is your sister in? In MOST states that have ended the school subsidy, so to speak, but not all. (Though even in the states where it is exists, it is highly restricted.)

I think with your friend receiving food stamps, you probably hit the nail on the head with him working under the table (or possibly lying about other income, though I can't say obviously not knowing him).

I don't think the inefficient spending is a reason to do away with the system per se. Hm, let me be more clear. It's a good reason to do away with the system, but not welfare itself, if that makes sense.

*meow*

(in reply to NeedToUseYou)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 5:31:59 PM   
perverseangelic


Posts: 2625
Joined: 2/2/2004
From: Davis, Ca
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ArtCatDom

perverseangelic, I don't mean to ask a terribly personal question, but do you pay for state subsidized insurance or are you on a "Medicaid HMO" plan?

*meow*


Honestly, I'm not sure how it works. I filled out a bunch of forms about how much money I make, and they calculated my contribution (which is $50 a year). This covers office visits and one of my medications, for the other two, I'm on patient assistance with the pharmacutical company (y'know, the one where the govt. gives you tax breaks if you provide medince free of charge to the poor).

All I know is that I do a pile of paperwork, and give them $50 a year, and I get the care and medicine I need. I appologize for not being informed about this, but it's a point of huge stress for me 'cause it's always iffy if I'll continue to qualify.

It's a horrid catch-22. I have to make -under- a certain amount to qualify for aid, and if I go over, I loose my help. However, the kind of health coverage I need isn't affordable till I make FAR more than I do now. So I either make less, and get help, or make more fail to qualify, and cant' afford care. Untill I make a serious jump in earnings, I'm kinda screwed.

This is my frustration--those of us who kinda fall through the cracks. We're working as hard as we can, because we don't think it's good to rely on the goverment to provide, but working as hard as we can doesn't go far enough. ~sigh~

And 's not that personal. I brought it up, I should be able to handle questions.

< Message edited by perverseangelic -- 6/29/2006 5:35:12 PM >


_____________________________

~in the begining it is always dark~

(in reply to ArtCatDom)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 5:32:48 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Welfare is a whopping $195 a month in my county.

ya know- i feel speeding tickets unfairly punish every day folks.  200.00 fine is harder for somone earning $6 an hour to pay....

how come we no longer hear about unfunded mandates??

(in reply to ArtCatDom)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 5:54:43 PM   
ArtCatDom


Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline
Thanks for answering. It is appreciated. Just because you broached the subject doesn't mean that asking further questions about it isn't prying, at least the way I was raised.

I can quite understand the stress and you're quite right; there's a large number of people who cannot afford health insurance but make "too much" to qualify for any kind of assistance.

-weary

(in reply to perverseangelic)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 6:03:07 PM   
NeedToUseYou


Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005
From: None of your business
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ArtCatDom

I think you pointed out another problem very succinctly, that I did not. That is, that fraud is rampant within the system and counterfraud measures are grossly underfunded. Of course that might have something to do with inefficient spending and insane overstaffing.

What state is your sister in? In MOST states that have ended the school subsidy, so to speak, but not all. (Though even in the states where it is exists, it is highly restricted.)

I think with your friend receiving food stamps, you probably hit the nail on the head with him working under the table (or possibly lying about other income, though I can't say obviously not knowing him).

I don't think the inefficient spending is a reason to do away with the system per se. Hm, let me be more clear. It's a good reason to do away with the system, but not welfare itself, if that makes sense.

*meow*



well this is the best I could find relating to the school thing. She went for a 2 year degree, so in illinois according to the site it counts as working, so benefits would have been unaffected.

Since 1996, 49 states, with the sole exception of Oklahoma, and the District of Columbia have passed legislation and/or taken administrative actions to allow postsecondary education to count as a work activity under TANF (Center for Women Policy Studies, 2002). 
  • Eleven states count postsecondary education as a work activity for 12 months -- Alaska, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Nevada, North Dakota, Texas, Washington, and West Virginia
  • Connecticut allows postsecondary education to count as work for six months and Kansas allows postsecondary education for "less than 12 months."
  • Tennessee counts postsecondary education as a work activity for 16 months while Oregoncounts 18 months of postsecondary education and training as work.
  • Fifteen states count postsecondary education as a work activity for 24 months: Arizona, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, and Virginia. 
  • Nineteen states and the District of Columbia allow postsecondary education to count as work for longer than 24 months -- Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, North Carolina, South Carolina, Vermont, Wisconsin, and WyomingGeorgia is the only state that allows recipients to enroll in graduate programs.
  • Five states -- Iowa, Maine, New Mexico, Vermont, and Wyoming -- and the District of Columbia use state Maintenance of Effort (MOE) funds to permit recipients to attend college without the limitations of federal TANF work and time limit requirements.
  • Forty eight states and the District of Columbia provide such support services as child care and transportation to TANF recipients who are enrolled in allowable postsecondary education programs.
  • Colorado, Montana, New York, North Carolina and Ohio have passed along responsibility for certification of work activities to the county level.  In Florida, while the state allows postsecondary education alone to fulfill the work requirements for up to 12 months, regional workforce boards make the final determination regarding who will participate in education activities and the extent to which the state will provide financial assistance to TANF recipients who are students.
  • Most states require TANF students to be enrolled in a degree program that leads to employment, to maintain a certain grade point average, to make "satisfactory progress" in their degree programs, and to complete the program in a specified amount of time.  



    http://216.146.235.184/report.cfm?ReportID=77

    (in reply to ArtCatDom)
  • Profile   Post #: 54
    RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 6:29:02 PM   
    UtopianRanger


    Posts: 3251
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: SirKenin

    To the poster that said that you should put your money in the bank:

    If you put your money in a savings account and leave it there you will actually lose money.  The savings will be worth less and less over time.  This is because the rate of inflation is greater than the rate of interest, sometimes by a significant amount.


    Not only that.... but if your dealing in fiat currency, like the dollar, it's depreciated {On purpose} between thirty-eight and forty-five percent in the last seven-year span of the Bush presidency. So you better have a hellva good hedge if you just wanna break even.


     - R







    < Message edited by UtopianRanger -- 6/29/2006 6:30:17 PM >


    _____________________________

    "If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

    -General George S. Patton


    (in reply to SirKenin)
    Profile   Post #: 55
    RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 11:23:10 PM   
    meatcleaver


    Posts: 9030
    Joined: 3/13/2006
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: ArtCatDom

    By the by, I think Europe's problem lies in a conflation of protectionism, ill-thought general economic policies, poor central banking decisions, bad immigration policy and bad currency policy. To put it in a nutshell at least.

    *meow*



    I'd generally agree with you on this. However, the USA protects its industry as well so that doesn't explain the difference in economic performance. Europe's immigration has many of the same problems as the US too. Though on general economic policies they are too often politically motivated in Europe, which I understand why, economics is being used as a tool for unification, it's misconceived but I understand the general motivation.

    (in reply to ArtCatDom)
    Profile   Post #: 56
    RE: Minimum wage - 6/29/2006 11:58:49 PM   
    ArtCatDom


    Posts: 478
    Joined: 1/20/2005
    Status: offline
    NTYU,

    I wrote them and asked from which citation they derived the information regarding cash assistance and education filling work requirements in New York State. I can tell you as a resident of New York State, that in no less than three counties that this is simply not true. In one county, they count student aid as income. In the other two I am aware of people's experiences in, school hours were rejected as work hours. Regulations or laws that aren't used, hardly can be said to have an impact.

    I also asked them to clarfy this discrepency:
    quote:

    Since 1996, 49 states, with the sole exception of Oklahoma, and the District of Columbia have passed legislation and/or taken administrative actions to allow postsecondary education to count as a work activity under TANF (Center for Women Policy Studies, 2002). Since 1996, 49 states, with the sole exception of Oklahoma, and the District of Columbia have passed legislation and/or taken administrative actions to allow postsecondary education to count as a work activity under TANF (Center for Women Policy Studies, 2002).


    quote:

    Nineteen states and the District of Columbia allow postsecondary education to count as work for longer than 24 months -- Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, North Carolina, South Carolina, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Georgia is the only state that allows recipients to enroll in graduate programs.


    And I also asked for the source citation of their claim about child care and transportation, as in at least New York State this is misleading, at best, since here you are required to fulfill work requirements to receive child care assistance. Also, transportation assistance in New York is almost practically nonexistant.

    This source seems riddled with assertions contrary to realities on the ground. However, I'll withhold complete judgement until they get back to me about the relevent citations.

    -weary

    < Message edited by ArtCatDom -- 6/29/2006 11:59:31 PM >

    (in reply to NeedToUseYou)
    Profile   Post #: 57
    RE: Minimum wage - 6/30/2006 12:01:40 AM   
    ArtCatDom


    Posts: 478
    Joined: 1/20/2005
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: UtopianRanger

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: SirKenin

    To the poster that said that you should put your money in the bank:

    If you put your money in a savings account and leave it there you will actually lose money.  The savings will be worth less and less over time.  This is because the rate of inflation is greater than the rate of interest, sometimes by a significant amount.


    Not only that.... but if your dealing in fiat currency, like the dollar, it's depreciated {On purpose} between thirty-eight and forty-five percent in the last seven-year span of the Bush presidency. So you better have a hellva good hedge if you just wanna break even.


     - R


    It certainly has not lost that much value by measure of inflation alone.

    What currency exchange are you using as the basis for this assertion?

    -weary

    (in reply to UtopianRanger)
    Profile   Post #: 58
    RE: Minimum wage - 6/30/2006 12:04:25 AM   
    ArtCatDom


    Posts: 478
    Joined: 1/20/2005
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: ArtCatDom

    By the by, I think Europe's problem lies in a conflation of protectionism, ill-thought general economic policies, poor central banking decisions, bad immigration policy and bad currency policy. To put it in a nutshell at least.

    *meow*



    I'd generally agree with you on this. However, the USA protects its industry as well so that doesn't explain the difference in economic performance. Europe's immigration has many of the same problems as the US too. Though on general economic policies they are too often politically motivated in Europe, which I understand why, economics is being used as a tool for unification, it's misconceived but I understand the general motivation.


    Yes it does explain part of the differance. The United States has overall acted in a significantly less protectionist fashion than Europe in recent times.

    Europe, while having some parallels to the American immigration system, certainly has several distinctive features distinguishing it from the US policy such as liberlized guest worker programs, for example.

    -weary

    (in reply to meatcleaver)
    Profile   Post #: 59
    RE: Minimum wage - 6/30/2006 12:47:48 AM   
    NeedToUseYou


    Posts: 2297
    Joined: 12/24/2005
    From: None of your business
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: ArtCatDom

    NTYU,

    I wrote them and asked from which citation they derived the information regarding cash assistance and education filling work requirements in New York State. I can tell you as a resident of New York State, that in no less than three counties that this is simply not true. In one county, they count student aid as income. In the other two I am aware of people's experiences in, school hours were rejected as work hours. Regulations or laws that aren't used, hardly can be said to have an impact.

    I also asked them to clarfy this discrepency:
    quote:

    Since 1996, 49 states, with the sole exception of Oklahoma, and the District of Columbia have passed legislation and/or taken administrative actions to allow postsecondary education to count as a work activity under TANF (Center for Women Policy Studies, 2002). Since 1996, 49 states, with the sole exception of Oklahoma, and the District of Columbia have passed legislation and/or taken administrative actions to allow postsecondary education to count as a work activity under TANF (Center for Women Policy Studies, 2002).


    quote:

    Nineteen states and the District of Columbia allow postsecondary education to count as work for longer than 24 months -- Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, North Carolina, South Carolina, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Georgia is the only state that allows recipients to enroll in graduate programs.


    And I also asked for the source citation of their claim about child care and transportation, as in at least New York State this is misleading, at best, since here you are required to fulfill work requirements to receive child care assistance. Also, transportation assistance in New York is almost practically nonexistant.

    This source seems riddled with assertions contrary to realities on the ground. However, I'll withhold complete judgement until they get back to me about the relevent citations.

    -weary


    hmmm, well,  man, I'll tell you just take my word on it, she went to college on public aid in Illinois. I'm to tired to find a better source. LOL. It took about a half an hour to hunt that one down.  I don't know what law, loophole, that allowed it but it occured.

    Good luck

    (in reply to ArtCatDom)
    Profile   Post #: 60
    Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
    All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Minimum wage Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
    Jump to:





    New Messages No New Messages
    Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
    Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
     Post New Thread
     Reply to Message
     Post New Poll
     Submit Vote
     Delete My Own Post
     Delete My Own Thread
     Rate Posts




    Collarchat.com © 2025
    Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

    0.094