RE: Old adages (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


littlewonder -> RE: Old adages (7/10/2013 7:04:04 PM)

They were considered Masters because they were the ones who were being taught to take over the home, to be the head of the household.

Misters were the older men, the teacher of the Masters to take over the household. Boys actually were held in high esteem in many cultures. They got the bigger portion of the food and were taken care of before anyone else and got the larger portion of pretty much everything.





Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Old adages (7/10/2013 8:35:49 PM)

wckdmnd... adages like this have nothing to do with the character, quality, ethics, personality and other aspects of a person.

What truly makes both a Master or a slave, is the union of the two. A Master does not simply own anybody anymore than a slave is owned by everybody.

I have been Master, I have even been Daddy, I have also been a mere mortal Dom, and I've been in a Dom couple relationship. This said, every relationship has been unique in it's blending and combination of two people.

Even those brief moments of NSA Hookups, things are different in the combinations. My Desires to even use somebody in specific ways has varied. Sure there are some constants, must haves for me.

Each slave/sub has various degrees of appeal and offerings to be had. This is not all about sexual and kink either. I have enjoyed some Amazing Senses of humor, I have enjoyed moments of creativity and even impulse. Some have been bratty, some have been extremely pleasing at all costs.

While I have been Master, this does not make me a Master overall for just any sub/slave. Not any old slave will inspire or spark within me the desire to Truly want to own them. Sure they may be a slave, however unless I'm feeling it... they are not a slave for me. I will assure you that I am not all that Master like towards them as well.

If there is this certain spark, and it's mutual. Then truly a Master and a slave is born together at the same time. Which is the Birth of an actual M/s relationship.

These are my personal thoughts and views.




LadyPact -> RE: Old adages (7/10/2013 9:28:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: ARIES83

I didn't catch that thread but just to weigh in... I find the idea of being able to control someone who is a drug addict laughable... Unless you control them with drugs... But trying to get them off the drugs... Errr can someone link me that thread actually! I am feeling the need to issue some reality checks.



I didn't say that one can control a drug addict. I asked how she had the opportunity to become a drug addict while being an owned slave, and why the first time he noticed a problem he didn't take steps to prevent it from escalating (like therapy or something) to which the answer may very well be that he wasn't able to due to her behavior, which certainly isn't on him, or in any way his fault.

People don't become drug addicts over night. And when you are in a TPE relationship and notice a problem, there are a lot of steps you can take to ensure it doesn't gets out of hand. Ordering them to check into rehab and getting them therapeutic comes to mind for instance.
If you're not in a TPE relationship, or you're unwilling to put in that amount of work because they don't mean that much to you, that obviously changes things, and if a somebody starts using drugs behind your back it may very well be an indication that you're not in a TPE relationship, or that the relationship really didn't matter much to either of them.

I personally don't agree with the idea that there is nothing a partner/owner/spouse can do to prevent somebody from becoming a drug addict if they had never used the drug before they met you. That's not to say that failing to prevent it is the partner/owner/spouse's fault, if the other person doesn't want help, you're fucked, no matter what kind of relationship structure you're in. But considering that there are things you can do, I was curious about which of those things he did, and how it panned out, especially because in a TPE or D/s relationship, as the top you have more options to work with than if you're on an equal footing.

If she's a lying, cheating, stealing bitch, obviously nothing you can do about it, D/s relationship or not, but if that's the case drugs where the least of his problem.

I wasn't trying to judge, just curious as to the history behind what happened.

Between the two of you, this could be an awesome topic.




SailingBum -> RE: Old adages (7/10/2013 9:38:08 PM)

Never heard of that saying either. What I want to know how are you "born" a dom or anything else for that matter? There must be some sort of pretzel logic <twisted> going on.

BadOne




wckdmnd -> RE: Old adages (7/10/2013 9:41:11 PM)

and because you've never heard of it. it can't possibly exist can it. this is becoming tiresome




tazzygirl -> RE: Old adages (7/10/2013 9:56:37 PM)

Any saying can exist.. doesnt make it true.




ARIES83 -> RE: Old adages (7/11/2013 1:31:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
Between the two of you, this could be an awesome topic.


Thanks LP I'll take that as a compliment, I'm not really sure what the topic is, I haven't even seen the thread you gals are referring to.
I tend to think 'drug addict' trumps 'dynamic' same as ishtar, the only thing is really how did the train go off the tracks? The Driver? Could be but he could have been driving a fucked up train with heaps of hidden issues... Who knows.




LadyPact -> RE: Old adages (7/11/2013 6:17:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ARIES83
Thanks LP I'll take that as a compliment, I'm not really sure what the topic is, I haven't even seen the thread you gals are referring to.
I tend to think 'drug addict' trumps 'dynamic' same as ishtar, the only thing is really how did the train go off the tracks? The Driver? Could be but he could have been driving a fucked up train with heaps of hidden issues... Who knows.

Please do. It was intended to be a compliment.

It was really just a quick mention on the branding thread. Not a topic all on it's own. Could be an interesting subject though, even as just a general discussion without referring to a specific case.





DarkSteven -> RE: Old adages (7/11/2013 7:13:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SailingBum

What I want to know how are you "born" a dom or anything else for that matter?


Well, when I was born, the doctor didn't spank me. He offered me one of the nurses for me to spank. At that point, I knew I was a true Dom. After that, I spent the next several months in a lactation relationship.




tazzygirl -> RE: Old adages (7/11/2013 7:18:41 AM)

quote:

Well, when I was born, the doctor didn't spank me. He offered me one of the nurses for me to spank. At that point, I knew I was a true Dom. After that, I spent the next several months in a lactation relationship.


The Ultimate "one true wayism"!

[sm=bowdown.gif]




SailingBum -> RE: Old adages (7/11/2013 10:50:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven


quote:

ORIGINAL: SailingBum

What I want to know how are you "born" a dom or anything else for that matter?


Well, when I was born, the doctor didn't spank me. He offered me one of the nurses for me to spank. At that point, I knew I was a true Dom. After that, I spent the next several months in a lactation relationship.


Lucky you! All I got was a pacifier.

BadOne




SailingBum -> RE: Old adages (7/11/2013 11:01:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: wckdmnd

and because you've never heard of it. it can't possibly exist can it. this is becoming tiresome


What got your panties in a bunch??? I was not saying it was or was NOT a adage I pointed out that after more years than I care to count being active in the BDSM community I've never heard it said.

So knock that chip off your shoulder and stop being so defensive.

BadOne




Dyfrynt -> RE: Old adages (7/11/2013 12:49:55 PM)

Since this has descended into a trade barbs thread, which is always entertaining, but rarely of any value. Wckdmnd I never really understood what you were asking in your original post; would you mind restating your question?




FrostedFlake -> RE: Old adages (7/11/2013 1:09:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: wckdmnd

Using the old adage a submissive is born a slave is made. a dominant is born a Master is made. Why does it seem to be so much easier for most to accept someone who claims themselves to be slave than those that claim themselves to be Master?

Hey, everybody! I have a GREAT idea! Let's GENERALIZE!

Oh, I see. You already had that idea.




SeekingTrinity -> RE: Old adages (7/11/2013 1:47:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SailingBum


quote:

ORIGINAL: wckdmnd

and because you've never heard of it. it can't possibly exist can it. this is becoming tiresome


What got your panties in a bunch??? I was not saying it was or was NOT a adage I pointed out that after more years than I care to count being active in the BDSM community I've never heard it said.

So knock that chip off your shoulder and stop being so defensive.

BadOne


I'm thinking that all us not tripping over ourselves in a rush to agree might have started the journey of the undies into the Crack of Ass. The fact that a number of us who have been in BDSM for a bit haven't heard of this particular gem caused the twisting.




HarryVanWinkle -> RE: Old adages (7/11/2013 3:42:51 PM)

Old adages are usually grossly overgeneralized BS, this one included.

quote:

ORIGINAL: wckdmnd

Using the old adage a submissive is born a slave is made. a dominant is born a Master is made. Why does it seem to be so much easier for most to accept someone who claims themselves to be slave than those that claim themselves to be Master?






SailingBum -> RE: Old adages (7/11/2013 3:53:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SeekingTrinity


quote:

ORIGINAL: SailingBum


quote:

ORIGINAL: wckdmnd

and because you've never heard of it. it can't possibly exist can it. this is becoming tiresome


What got your panties in a bunch??? I was not saying it was or was NOT a adage I pointed out that after more years than I care to count being active in the BDSM community I've never heard it said.

So knock that chip off your shoulder and stop being so defensive.

BadOne


I'm thinking that all us not tripping over ourselves in a rush to agree might have started the journey of the undies into the Crack of Ass. The fact that a number of us who have been in BDSM for a bit haven't heard of this particular gem caused the twisting.




Thanks for clearing it up as I've not read the entire thread. So because we've not heard of it we're tiresome. Works for me.

BadOne




DesFIP -> RE: Old adages (7/11/2013 3:56:43 PM)

Back to the drug addiction, one of the largest segments of drug addicts are those addicted to prescription meds. People in chronic pain can easily find themselves addicted to substances provided by licensed medical professionals. If this was the case, then of course he wouldn't have seen it coming. He would have assumed that as she was seeing her doctor regularly, everything was okay.

I'm highly knowledgeable but in this kind of circumstance, I'd be blindsided also.




UllrsIshtar -> RE: Old adages (7/11/2013 6:12:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

Back to the drug addiction, one of the largest segments of drug addicts are those addicted to prescription meds. People in chronic pain can easily find themselves addicted to substances provided by licensed medical professionals. If this was the case, then of course he wouldn't have seen it coming. He would have assumed that as she was seeing her doctor regularly, everything was okay.

I'm highly knowledgeable but in this kind of circumstance, I'd be blindsided also.


He specifically said it was meth.

It's a little hard to miss somebody going from "never having used serious drugs before" to "meth addict" is you're in a committed relationship with them.




wckdmnd -> RE: Old adages (7/11/2013 8:10:57 PM)

No. Not tiresome because you've never heard of it. It's old to me because I heard it first 30 some odd years ago. It's not old to others cause they never heard it before. ok. why then, whether it's old or not to an individual, does that make it a sticking point? I'll admit. I'm offended by tazzygirl and stef and if I said why, I would break the ToS. But I've always found them to be offensive creatures. So, it's nothing new. Anyway, my take on the adage is that a sub is born means that as she/he grows up from a wee babe to an adult. The influences that are in their lives give them the raw materials of submission. Same with a dominant. But it's just raw material. It takes training to make the sub into a slave. Same as it takes training to make the dominant into a Master. So either is made. That's all really




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125