OrionTheWolf
Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic For me personally I would no more think of calling you or any Dom/Gorean or Regular Master/Sir/Lord/ as a "boy" if he was younger than me(as the other poster suggested) unless it was a condescending comment. And I do them quite well without resorting to that. I tend not to use a term to denigrate anyones "orientation" within the BDSM arena. Used in general, similar to "boys will be boys" when referring to males above the age of 18, I see no harm in it. If we were in a protocol zone, then that would be different. quote:
Im neither insulted or offended, by the term girl, chick, broad. etc. If its meant as a slight towards me, that just says more about their lack of couth than mine. If it is meant as an intentional slight, I would agree that it is incorrect to use it then, but that is not apparent to me. quote:
While I dont read everything you write in the Gorean fora, Ive never seen you refer to a freewoman as a freegirl. Free Woman is a specific term, and used in specific area. Apples and oranges there. I have referred to a group of females as "girls" when they have been mixed personality types. It is not meant as a slight, and none took it that way. quote:
It wasnt the OP I was responding to anyway, but rather Myos response to the other poster, that you responded to:) If that makes sense. Makes sense, my assessment still stands though. On a separate topic, you need to start a "nice ass" avatar group. I now enjoy seeing yours and Tazzy's avatars and think there should be many more ;)
_____________________________
When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."
|