RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Kirata -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 9:58:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tammystarm

R.I.P. treyvon!

And Trayvon, too.

K.




Powergamz1 -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 9:58:51 AM)

Thanks for clearly separating yourself *out* of the circle of people who have stuck to facts and reality. You might want to consider some tape since that hood keeps slipping so much.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

put up or shut up ...last time you ran away, you sure havent proven racism by me, or anynumber of people who have commented...
You on the other hand are full of it.
so yanno you can just go jerk yourself a nice piece of shit






tj444 -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 10:00:04 AM)

Why do you continually exagerate everything to the extreme? How does my understanding what she & Martin meant mean I am endorsing "the gay panic defense" or wearing some "hood" (are you talking hoodie? cuz I do have one).. its how Martin felt, just as Zimmy felt Martin was a "suspect".. right or wrong its what was going thru each others mind.. I know its hard for someone like you to understand.. Martin didnt know why he was being followed.. if a man follows me I could easily come to the conclusion he might just be a potential "rapist".. I just happen to use a different word than Martin did, same fear tho, of being sexually attacked by someone deliberately following you for no apparent other reason..
I think I will have to put you on block cuz I can not stand how you distort peoples words. bye..
quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

You just seriously endorsed the gay panic defense? You aren't even trying to keep the hood from slipping, are you??
quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


~ FR ~

For those who speculate on why Trayvon may have reacted the way he was alleged to have done, enter homophobia...

MORGAN: And he was freaked out by it?

JEANTEL: Yes. Definitely after I say may be a rapist, for every boy, for every man, every -- who's not that kind of way, seeing a grown man following them, would they be creep out?


Source

K.


she stated that during the trial to that horrible lawyer West.. that the "creepy ass" part of the comment meant "perv/pervert".. what other kinda pervert is there? seems to me few people grasped that..







thishereboi -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 10:01:41 AM)

quote:

To be honest, I would prefer to use a chemical spray on one myself-less chance of the irresponsible owners suing you for capping Fido later, and you wouldn't be putting innocents downrange at risk.


I had a huge black dog charge me when I walked out onto my back porch one morning. There was a can of raid wasp killer sitting there and I found it to be very effective.




Lucylastic -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 10:02:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

Thanks for clearly separating yourself *out* of the circle of people who have stuck to facts and reality. You might want to consider some tape since that hood keeps slipping so much.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

put up or shut up ...last time you ran away, you sure havent proven racism by me, or anynumber of people who have commented...
You on the other hand are full of it.
so yanno you can just go jerk yourself a nice piece of shit




ahum
you sure havent proven racism by me, or anynumber of people who have commented...
put up or shut up I said....but you cant, but you cant shut up either
pathetic ploy and clearly lying thru your ass
just prove it dumbass...go ahead...try
impotent arent ya




thishereboi -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 10:05:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

Do feel free to give a direct link to any valid legal resource that says that citizen's arrest is actually kidnapping.



You claim to have gone to law school but do not know what constitutes kidnap.
You claim to have gone to law school but do not seem to know what is required for a lawful "citizens arrest".
Perhaps next time you will go to real law school where they have a library,classrooms and teachers.




A link would have shown you knew what you were talking about. Just randomly implying he lied about going to law school makes you look like you don't and don't have the balls to admit it. Probably not what you were shooting for, but there it is [8|]




thishereboi -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 10:12:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

You see post history as you want... I see it differently....

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4322857


I fail to see how your example (which deals with sexism, not racism) disproves my point that Fargle, despite his outlandish rhetoric, is anti-racist (and anti-sexist for that matter).

I think that people who constantly make things about race, whether they are or not, are racists. I don't think I'm alone in that here.

This isn't a racial case.In never was.never should have been seen as such.
The jury sure didn't:
"While the George Zimmerman second-degree murder trial was viewed as racially charged, an anonymous juror told CNN's Anderson Cooper Monday night that the issue of race didn't come up during deliberations.

"I thought all of us did not think race played a role" in 17-year-old Trayvon Martin's death, a juror known as B37 told Cooper"

But a certain embedded element with the media and here seem to be obsessed with race (In fargles case,lynching) and have done everything within their power to make this a racial case.
Which is bizarre,because as has been beaten to death,Z is half latin,maybe has a black grandma-how white folk got dragged into this is beyond me...



Well according to his girlfriend not only was the only case about race, the jury was also racist. I think it is sad if she really believes that all whites are racist. But then again I also can't wrap my head around the idea of being on the phone with a friend, hearing everything that she did and not trying to find out what happened.

http://news.yahoo.com/key-witness-in-zimmerman-case-says-defense-attorney-is-%E2%80%98lucky-i%E2%80%99m-a-christian%E2%80%99--014754314.html

“It was racial. Let’s be honest,” she said. “If Trayvon was white and he had a hoodie on, would that have happened? It happened around 7 o’clock, that’s when people walk their dogs.”

And on the jury saying race played no role: “They’re white.”





thishereboi -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 10:16:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

~FR

Mom actually said she was Afro-Peruvian...

A nice little write up about that here....

http://www.latintimes.com/articles/6341/20130715/george-zimmerman-white-race-peruvian-black-gladys.htm

"In Peru we have a saying that goes, 'If you don't have the blood of the Incas, you've got the blood of the Mandingas," which means that if you don't have Indian blood, you've got black blood," Gladys Zimmerman said on Univision. "In my family we proudly come from the Afro-Peruvian race. My sons know their uncles, they know their aunts, they know their roots and my roots are not white, my roots are Afro-Peruvian. So they've been educated, not just at home as a family, at school. My sons don't look at color."

According to Tanya Golash-Boza, a sociologist at the University of California and the author of "Yo Soy Negro: Blackness in Peru," Gladys Zimmerman's description of herself as "Afro-Peruvian" is somewhat unusual.

"The word 'Afro-Peruvian' is kind of a new concept in Peru," she told the Latin Times. "The idea that some people are African-descendent, some people are indigenous-descendent, some people are Hispanic-descendent has some currency in Peru, but it hasn't really reached down to the level of popular sentiment. Instead, people tend to be identified as black if they have visible African ancestry. If people can look at them and make a guess that their ancestors probably came from Africa -- very curly hair, darker skin."




You find some of the most interesting links [:)]




thishereboi -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 10:23:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

When you see racism in people who aren't racists, where do you suppose the "racism" you're seeing is coming from?


This presumes there is such a thing as people who aren't racist. I don't believe that such a creature exists. It goes against human nature, it goes against human history, it goes against everything I have observed during forty-seven years of life.


Well then we have had vastly different experiences. It might go against your nature, but you don't speak for everyone else.
quote:



The difference between an anti- racist and those who are not is that the anti-racist uses reason and logic to overcome there own inherent racism in an act of will. An anti-racist sees a young black and walking down the street and - despite whatever initial reaction he or she felt - thinks to themselves there nothing wrong about walking down the street. The racist thinks he's up to no good. The racist thinks "these assholes always get away," and... well... we know what happened afterward.


Yup that sound racist to me as well. Which makes me wonder why you were so quick to back up farg's crack about lawyers. And then you can't understand why people think you feel the same way?




Kirata -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 10:27:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

I think it is sad if she really believes that all whites are racist...

Not much "if" about it, apparently.

K.




thishereboi -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 10:37:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

This isn't a racial case.In never was.never should have been seen as such.


Racism…damn that word is used so much that when I hear it I usually have a more negative reaction to the person directing it than to the person it is directed at. I don’t think I am alone and it is a shame that by its overuse true racism is often denied or overlooked.

What should be looked at is the reason African Americans commit 80 percent of violent crime. Here is where true racism comes in… I will not get into the these reasons here but it is not because blacks are more violent but because of the circumstances they find themselves in partly at least because of past and present racism.

I do understand that as a almost white man, lots of Cherokee mixed in, I look at racial views a different way than a person of color. I can only hope the day comes when this will not be true.

Butch




I agree. The race card has been played so often it has very little currency, except among african americans.
On the other hand, I think we will gradually breed ourselves out of our situation.

Why do blacks commit 80% of the crimes?
Well lets see - they drop ouf ot high school in fargreater numbers. They have a sub-culture that things pimping, whoring, and drug dealing is ok. Jobs are for stiffs.

Final story - I had a small business in an AA neighborhood. My neighbor was black, and had a laundry. He had clothes and cash on premises. He has no alarm. We never kept cash, or valueables and had good security. We were broken into by AAs once a month on average for 13 months. My neighbor - 0.
Do the math. Racism isn't just for white people.



Are you sure they were breaking in because you were white. Maybe they could tell you were a racist and wanted to fuck with you.





Phydeaux -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 10:39:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

quote:

Why do blacks commit 80% of the crimes?
Well lets see - they drop ouf ot high school in fargreater numbers. They have a sub-culture that things pimping, whoring, and drug dealing is ok. Jobs are for stiffs.


It's a bit more than that my man. The drug war is a huge part of this.Vast amounts of black fathers are in jail.It's led to an entire subculture based around an outlaw black market with resultant violence,incarceration, damage to social structures.
We have a long history of redlining and other laws designed to ghettoize blacks, there's a liquor store and a pawn shop(Which sell guns) on every corner in the hood,which ain't the case in the white burbs.Someone passes those laws, allows that zoning.
We have a criminal justice system that convicts/imprisons blacks in disproportionate numbers. Black schools are awful,especially in the urban centers. Infrastructure investment isn't expended. tax bases have crumbled.
The economic opportunities are nonexistent. The list goes on and on.


American society,history, and laws have contributed massively to this problem.

Pointing a blaming finger solves nothing, at any side. The real freaking question is, "OK, we have a problem,not a black problem or a white problem,but an American problem,one that affects and costs every citizen-what the fuck are we going to do about it?"



Agreed. I'm just terser than you.

Frankly I often wonder if it wouldn't be better to say - OK> anyone that wants to surrender US citizenship - we'll give you 20k and a ticket to anywhere. Better than the massive failure that is govt policy today.




thishereboi -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 10:39:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

It's pathetic that a states justice system and laws have gotten so perverted that they have literally upended one of the most basic tenets of American jurisprudence...

It would seem to me that the most basic tenet of American jurisprudence is that the accused is innocent until proven guilty.

Maybe you need to brush up on English. "one of the" does not equal "the"

Maybe you need to brush up on your English comprehension. I said exactly what I meant, and I meant it exactly the way I said it. So now that I've given you a clue, see if you can puzzle out what it means.

K.


I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you were simply too fucking stupid to read what I wrote. I see that instead you were just making a completely irrelevant comment that had no bearing on the point I was making to someone else.



It's not his fault you didn't understand what he was saying.[8|]




Kana -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 10:49:21 AM)

quote:

Well according to his girlfriend not only was the only case about race, the jury was also racist.

1-Not knocking her,but she's not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.I'm not sure she's the person we should be following about this.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tammystarm

~FR~
My thoughts,
If you want racism to stop ,
Then stop bringing it into it.

See-this is the debate I think we should be having.How did this case become about racism? Why did it?Why did it sit for two weeks and then explode? What forces pushed this and why? Where is the responsibility? Who fueled this false fire and what's their reasons/goals for doing so?
These are pertinent questions.

Further questions.
-Since Z is a minority and the state and feds have clearly singled him out for prosecution, overzealously so according to many lawyers,have his civil rights been violated?Does he have a legit federal case that The Man used all his power to railroad a potentially innocent Latin?
-Why are so many people dismissing the prosecutorial misconduct in this case? Is it now believed that it's acceptable for the govt to go to any lengths including violating its own laws to get someone to appease political agendas?
-Considering that neither Z nor his attorneys used any vestige of SYG (They relied solely on an old fashioned true blue American self defense strategy),why are Florida's SYG laws still in the discussion?
-Z has had multiple federal agencies,including 45(Count em,45!) freaking investigators, thoroughly vet his entire life under a federal microscope.Each and all found no racism in his background.This includes the FBI. Yet the Attorney General vowed to continue to investigate him. At what point does the government go into overkill and double jeopardy statutes start to kick in? Or do the feds just have the authority to keep throwing federal agencies at someone until they crumble? And why do people not have a problem with this?


What I'm suggesting,hell,saying, is that many external forces seized on this case,saw it as an opportunity advance their social/political/personal/financial agendas,whether the NAACP, Obama,The NRA, SYG advocates/deniers, racists on both sides of the political coin, whoever.
Why aren't we having a discussion about them. About the forces that intentionally separate us as a society, that fan the fires that divide, about how the fly false flags to advance disguised agendas, that shape and pervert our society.
Now that's a conversation worth having. At least in my mind
We could keep dicking round with the symptom or really start seeking the core issues.

quote:


No one won this battle
Sad at the state of the American people.

The truest words yet uttered on this thread




thishereboi -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 10:55:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


~ FR ~

For those who speculate on why Trayvon may have reacted the way he was alleged to have done, enter homophobia...

MORGAN: And he was freaked out by it?

JEANTEL: Yes. Definitely after I say may be a rapist, for every boy, for every man, every -- who's not that kind of way, seeing a grown man following them, would they be creep out?


Source

K.


she stated that during the trial to that horrible lawyer West.. that the "creepy ass" part of the comment meant "perv/pervert".. what other kinda pervert is there? seems to me few people grasped that..


And still she made no attempt to find out what happened to her friend that night.




Phydeaux -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 11:02:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

quote:

Well according to his girlfriend not only was the only case about race, the jury was also racist.

1-Not knocking her,but she's not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.I'm not sure she's the person we should be following about this.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tammystarm

~FR~
My thoughts,
If you want racism to stop ,
Then stop bringing it into it.

See-this is the debate I think we should be having.How did this case become about racism? Why did it?Why did it sit for two weeks and then explode? What forces pushed this and why? Where is the responsibility? Who fueled this false fire and what's their agenda?
These are pertinent questions.


I opened a thread with an article which pointed to the various federal, state, democrat agencies that conspired to make this about race. Go take a look.
quote:





Further questions.
-Since Z is a minority and the state and feds have clearly singled him out for prosecution, overzealously so according to many lawyers,have his civil rights been violated?Does he have a legit federal case that the man used all his power to railroad a potentially innocent Latin?


Personally, I think the prosecutor is going to get disbarred. It will matter only a little bit, as she will score a cush job with one of the agencies that set her up to it.

I think it is pretty clear Z's civil rights have been violated. I provided a link earlier where the FPI probe of 45 witnesses failed to turn up any evidence of racism. Personally, I think if Z is sued by the Martins he should countersue, and maybe even if they do not. They are responsible for the actions of their son.Who assaulted him, and caused him enormous personal loss (jail time, reputation etc). Plus they have a million dollar settlement to go after.

Unfortunately, it is very difficult to sue the US government. Sovereign immunity and all that.
quote:




-Why are so many people dismissing the prosecutorial misconduct in this case? Is it now believed that it's acceptable for the govt to go to any lengths including violating its own laws to get someone to appease political agendas?
-Considering that neither Z nor his attorneys used and vestige of SYG (They relied solely on an old fashioned true blue American self defense),why are Florida's SYG laws still in the discussion?


SYG is still relevent to the discussion, even though it wasn't required in the criminal trial. It is my understanding that Z could still request a SYG hearing in the event of a civil trial, and if so, a successful SYG hearing will preclude a civil trial, by florida statute.
quote:



-Z has had multiple federal agencies,including 45(Count em,45!) freaking investigators, thoroughly vet his entire federal microscope.Each and all found no racism in his background.This includes the FBI.Yet the Attorney General vowed to continue to investigate him. At what point does the government go into overkill and double jeopardy statutes start to kick in? Or do the feds just have the authority to keep throwing federal agencies at someone until they crumble? And why do people not have a problem with this?


What I'm suggesting,hell,saying, is that many external forces seized on this case,saw it as an opportunity advance their agenda,whether the NAACP, Obama,The NRA, SYG advocates/deniers, racists on both sides of the political coin, whoever.
Why aren't we having a discussion about them. About the forces that intentionally separate us as a society, that fan the fires that divide, about how the fly false flags to advance disguised agendas, that shape and pervert our society.
Now that's a conversation worth having. At least in my mind
We could keep dicking round with the symptom or really start seeking the core issues.

quote:


No one won this battle
Sad at the state of the American people.

The truest words yet uttered on this thread


Abuse of power by big government. And the government has the ability to do this to *anyone*.




thishereboi -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 11:03:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

Thanks for clearly separating yourself *out* of the circle of people who have stuck to facts and reality. You might want to consider some tape since that hood keeps slipping so much.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

put up or shut up ...last time you ran away, you sure havent proven racism by me, or anynumber of people who have commented...
You on the other hand are full of it.
so yanno you can just go jerk yourself a nice piece of shit





Weren't you on the thread earlier bitching about how calling everyone who disagrees a racist without any cause whatsoever really unproductive because then you stop taking the poster seriously? Now maybe I am thinking of some one else but I have to say this is a perfect example. Now while I am not sure her last sentence is anatomically possible there is nothing in her post to indicate that her opinion of you is based in any way on race.




thishereboi -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 11:06:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

I think it is sad if she really believes that all whites are racist...

Not much "if" about it, apparently.

K.



In that case she has a rough life ahead of her.




Kirata -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 11:08:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

Why aren't we having a discussion about them.

Because then we'd be ridiculed and insulted as lunatic conspiracy theorists?

(just taking a wild guess here)

K.







BamaD -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 11:08:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CHF73

I have just one question for the Jury: how can a grown up man with a gun feel in danger "of his life and/or great bodily harm" because of an unarmed kid?

To me something doesn't match.

Without the gun he expects do to the situation, to be beaten to death.
The gun is only a factor when he used it.




Page: <<   < prev  79 80 [81] 82 83   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.1098633