Phydeaux -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/16/2013 11:02:15 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kana quote:
Well according to his girlfriend not only was the only case about race, the jury was also racist. 1-Not knocking her,but she's not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.I'm not sure she's the person we should be following about this. quote:
ORIGINAL: tammystarm ~FR~ My thoughts, If you want racism to stop , Then stop bringing it into it. See-this is the debate I think we should be having.How did this case become about racism? Why did it?Why did it sit for two weeks and then explode? What forces pushed this and why? Where is the responsibility? Who fueled this false fire and what's their agenda? These are pertinent questions. I opened a thread with an article which pointed to the various federal, state, democrat agencies that conspired to make this about race. Go take a look. quote:
Further questions. -Since Z is a minority and the state and feds have clearly singled him out for prosecution, overzealously so according to many lawyers,have his civil rights been violated?Does he have a legit federal case that the man used all his power to railroad a potentially innocent Latin? Personally, I think the prosecutor is going to get disbarred. It will matter only a little bit, as she will score a cush job with one of the agencies that set her up to it. I think it is pretty clear Z's civil rights have been violated. I provided a link earlier where the FPI probe of 45 witnesses failed to turn up any evidence of racism. Personally, I think if Z is sued by the Martins he should countersue, and maybe even if they do not. They are responsible for the actions of their son.Who assaulted him, and caused him enormous personal loss (jail time, reputation etc). Plus they have a million dollar settlement to go after. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to sue the US government. Sovereign immunity and all that.quote:
-Why are so many people dismissing the prosecutorial misconduct in this case? Is it now believed that it's acceptable for the govt to go to any lengths including violating its own laws to get someone to appease political agendas? -Considering that neither Z nor his attorneys used and vestige of SYG (They relied solely on an old fashioned true blue American self defense),why are Florida's SYG laws still in the discussion? SYG is still relevent to the discussion, even though it wasn't required in the criminal trial. It is my understanding that Z could still request a SYG hearing in the event of a civil trial, and if so, a successful SYG hearing will preclude a civil trial, by florida statute.quote:
-Z has had multiple federal agencies,including 45(Count em,45!) freaking investigators, thoroughly vet his entire federal microscope.Each and all found no racism in his background.This includes the FBI.Yet the Attorney General vowed to continue to investigate him. At what point does the government go into overkill and double jeopardy statutes start to kick in? Or do the feds just have the authority to keep throwing federal agencies at someone until they crumble? And why do people not have a problem with this? What I'm suggesting,hell,saying, is that many external forces seized on this case,saw it as an opportunity advance their agenda,whether the NAACP, Obama,The NRA, SYG advocates/deniers, racists on both sides of the political coin, whoever. Why aren't we having a discussion about them. About the forces that intentionally separate us as a society, that fan the fires that divide, about how the fly false flags to advance disguised agendas, that shape and pervert our society. Now that's a conversation worth having. At least in my mind We could keep dicking round with the symptom or really start seeking the core issues. quote:
No one won this battle Sad at the state of the American people. The truest words yet uttered on this thread Abuse of power by big government. And the government has the ability to do this to *anyone*.
|
|
|
|